Presentation on theme: "Employee Benefit Plans Joseph Applebaum, FSA October 4, 2002 Views expressed are those of the speaker and do not represent the views of the U.S. General."— Presentation transcript:
Employee Benefit Plans Joseph Applebaum, FSA October 4, 2002 Views expressed are those of the speaker and do not represent the views of the U.S. General Accounting Office. email@example.com
Employee Benefit Plans What is the Big Picture Issue? Ageing of the U.S. Population U.S. is not alone – G-7 countries have similar, if not worse trends. Key Drivers Increased Life Expectancy Decreased Fertility
Employee Benefit Plans Demographic trends have implications for Size and composition of work force, Pension costs, Healthcare costs Structure of U.S. pension programs Mixed system – part voluntary, part governmental program Three ( four ?) legged stool – Social Security, employment based pensions, personal savings ( post-retirement earnings)
Social Security Financed on a modified pay-as-you-go basis Combined employer/employee tax rate for 2002 of 12.4% on earnings up to $84,900 Maximum amount subject to tax is updated each year for change in average wage in covered employment Benefits are paid to retired and disabled workers, their eligible spouses, children, and their survivors (esp. aged widows)
Social Security Big Issue for Social Security is cost rising relative to payroll. Because current system is pay-as-you-go (more or less) cost of system is related to number of workers supporting each beneficiary. Let’s look at costs over next 75 years or so. The costs go sharply upward, a few years from now, when Baby Boomers start retiring. Under current program benefit rules, costs keep growing well after the Boomers retire. Principal drivers are demographic – life expectancy, particularly life expectancy at retirement age, and fertility which determines, with a lag, number of workers.
Social Security Costs and Income Rates Cost as % of taxable payroll Income as % of taxable payroll
Social Security Two sets of measures of demographic trends: dependency ratios – the ratio of those over 65 ( or those under 20 plus those over 65) to those between ages 20 and 64, and; ratio of beneficiaries to workers. Some observations Around 1950, only a portion of the elderly were eligible for social security benefits The percentage of workers covered by social security has grown The labor force participation rates of women have increased Labor force participation rates of older (greater than 55) men declined. Disability benefits were introduced in 1950’s, but didn’t expanded rules later.
Aged and Total Dependency Ratios Total Dependency Aged Dependency
Social Security Problems are well understood Last major reform culminated in 1983 Amendments Incremental changes in benefits and taxes Put program in balance for 75 years – Program is now out of actuarial balance Valuation period change Experience & assumption changes What are criteria for solution? Continue to provide layer of protection against insured events Program should be sustainable Cost levels should be near current levels
Demographic Impacts on Private Plans Demographic forces also impact private sector employee benefit plans. Phased retirement Most defined benefit pension plans allow early retirement ( i.e. before 65) Some plans require a reduction in monthly payments to make up for longer payout period – others don’t; virtually none do not subsidize early retirement – that is, the value of the early retirement benefit is greater than the value of deferring starting receipt of those benefits until 65.
Phased Retirement Let’s consider a hypothetical employee who is now, say age 60 and is entitled, based on her service with the company, to a monthly pension benefit of 50% of final pay. If she retires, she can go to work elsewhere and get her pension benefit and increase her current compensation. (She might even go on to collect a pension from the second employer!). Under current law before she attains NRA, there are significant impediments for the employee to collect her pension benefits while continuing to work for her current employer. This economic conundrum has existed since the wide spread introduction of pension plans – however, the relatively slow growth in the labor force supply has increased the importance of addressing this problem.
Changes in Pension Plan Design Around 1975, the dominant pension benefit design was the final average pay defined benefit plan – a typical formula is the product of Years of service Final pay A number around 1.5% The trend over the last 25 years or so has been towards other designs – defined contribution plans, and hybrid defined benefit plans like cash balance plans.
Changes in Pension Plan Design Regulatory Environment Introduction of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Greater rigidity of defined benefit funding Current designs are more attractive to mobile,typically younger, workers. Changes in employment patterns Service economy Greater job mobility Less attachment to firm Employer Views Risk aversion Changing demographics – the relative scarcity of younger workers
Trends in Pension Plan Coverage (millions) Source: U.S. Dept. of Labor