Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

MILAN| 23 June 2011 Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions - Sönke Albers Professor of Marketing and Innovation.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "MILAN| 23 June 2011 Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions - Sönke Albers Professor of Marketing and Innovation."— Presentation transcript:

1 MILAN| 23 June 2011 Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions - Sönke Albers Professor of Marketing and Innovation Kühne Logistics University, Hamburg

2 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions AGENDA 2  Success factors for empirical estimation of aggregate sales response function  Success factors for optimizing allocation of sales effort  Conclusion

3 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions Success Factors for Empirical estimation of Aggregate Sales Response Function 3 1.Functional form must be appropriate and matters! 2.Functional form should exhibit decreasing elasticity 3.Long-term effects should be modeled with the help of stock models (not Koyck) 4.Separation of effects of first contact and repeated contacts 5.Heterogeneity across customers should be taken into account 6.Trends and seasonality should be taken into account I data are from a panel

4 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions Functional Form of The Aggregate Response Function 4 Observation: Marketing & sales instruments (except for price) exhibit diminishing marginal returns at some point, otherwise marketing & sales expenditures would not be optimizable! Proposition 1: Linear relationships are therefore inappropriate for aggregate sales response models.

5 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions Functional Form of the Aggregate Response Function 5 Example for an assumed linear relationship from a top journal: Source: Natalie Mizik and Robert Jacobson: Are Physicians "Easy Marks"? Quantifying the Effects of Detailing and Sampling on New Prescriptions Management Science Vol. 50 (2004), No. 12, 1704-1715 We employ the following dynamic fixed-effects distributed lag regression model to assess the effect of detailing and sampling on new prescriptions:

6 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions Functional Form of the Aggregate Response Function 6 Proposition 2a: The functional form is very important when diminishing marginal returns exist! NameFunctionElasticity Constant Elasticity Semi-logarithmic Diminishing Elasticity Modified Exponential Log-Reciprocal

7 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions Functional Form of the Aggregate Response Function 7

8 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions Functional Form of the Aggregate Response Function 8 Proposition 2b: The functional form for a relationship with diminishing marginal returns is important because it leads to quite different optimal solutions! Functional FormOptimal No. Calls Quadratic17.7 Constant Elasticity77.8 Diminishing Elasticity18.6 Modified Exponential14.1 Log-reciprocal24.3

9 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions Functional Form of the Aggregate Response Function 9 Observation: Very often, researchers prefer to work with nonlinear functions that are linearizable. Proposition 3a: Adding quadratic terms does not help unless the interval with the maximal or minimal outcome is supported by a sufficient number of observations. Proposition 3b: Estimation of linearized models (e.g., taking logs) comes at the cost of creating a bias in the error terms (implicitly weighting lower versus higher values).

10 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions Taking Logs in linear estimation is different from nonlinear estimation (Proposition 3b) 10

11 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions Functional Form of the Aggregate Response Function 11 Proposition 3b: Estimating constant elasticity response functions with a linearized log-log function can lead to dramatically different results for the optimal call level compared to a nonlinear estimation Functional FormOptimal No. Calls Log-Log265.8 Constant Elasticity77.8

12 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions AGENDA 12  Success factors for empirical estimation of aggregate sales response function  Success factors for optimizing allocation of sales effort  Conclusion

13 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions Success Factors for optimal allocation of sales effort 13 1.Estimation method should have maximized information value rather than goodness-of-fit 2.Results should have face validity but also some surprising aspects 3.Any model should be offered in EXCEL 4.Rather than providing numerical optimization understandable heuristics are better accepted

14 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions Informational value versus goodness-of-fit 14 Proposition 4: Response models may be good for reproducing sales utilizing the response function, but may nevertheless be problematic if they lead to optimization errors (e.g., in the paper by Proppe and Albers (2009) where one wrong estimate affects the entire allocation task, or in case of uncertainty when non-significant variables are set to be zero)

15 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions 15 Research questions RESEARCH QUESTION CAN BEST BE SOLVED BY SIMULATION STUDY Simulation Dennis Proppe and Sönke Albers: Choosing Response Models for Budget Allocation in Heterogeneous and Dynamic Markets: Why Simple Sometimes Does Better, Marketing Science Institute Special Report 09-202, April 2009  Key question: Which econometric methods deliver the most reliable estimation results that can be used for a successful budget allocation task?  Which data properties are especially influential for good estimation when it comes to optimal budget allocation?  Under what circumstances may simple allocation heuristics perform better than the allocation based on econometric estimation?  When analyzing real data, the true model remains unknown.  Results of econometric estimation procedures can only be evaluated by goodness-of-fit-statistics and not by their closeness to the true relationship.  In a simulation study the data is generated by a true model which is specified by the researcher.  Thus, the real model parameters are known and the estimation result can be compared to the true relationship.

16 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions 16 DATA QUALITY HAS A SUBSTANTIAL INFLUENCE ON THE OPTIMALITY OF THE BUDGET ALLOCATION Dennis Proppe and Sönke Albers: Choosing Response Models for Budget Allocation in Heterogeneous and Dynamic Markets: Why Simple Sometimes Does Better, Marketing Science Institute Special Report 09-202, April 2009 Best case: Small error, many observations, many response units Worst case: Large error, few observations, few response units

17 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions 17 GOOD ECONOMETRIC TECHNIQUES BENEFIT FROM HETEROGENEITY AND a LARGE No. of OBSERVATIONS Dennis Proppe and Sönke Albers: Choosing Response Models for Budget Allocation in Heterogeneous and Dynamic Markets: Why Simple Sometimes Does Better, Marketing Science Institute Special Report 09-202, April 2009 Heterogeneous parameters, large number of observations Homogeneous parameters, small number of observations

18 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions Implementation success depends on ease-of-use 18 Proposition 5: Managers like to make use of instruments that they can master. EXCEL is such an instrument, and thus decision support should be made available in EXCEL tools.

19 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions Implementation success depends on ease-of-use 19 “As Albers (IJRM 2000) notes, the use of marketing models in actual practice is becoming less of an exception and more of a rule because of spreadsheet software. It is our hope that the ease with which the BG/NBD model can be implemented in a familiar modeling environment will encourage more firms to take better advantage of the information already contained in their customer transaction databases. Furthermore, as key personnel become comfortable with this type of model, we can expect to see growing demand for more complete (and complex) models—and more willingness to commit resources to them.” Peter S. Fader, Bruce G. S. Hardie, and Ka Lok Lee: “Counting Your Customers” the Easy Way: An Alternative to the Pareto/NBD Model, Marketing Science, Vol. 24, No. 2, Spring 2005, pp. 275–284

20 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions Implementation success depends on ease-of-use 20 Proposition 6: Managers want to understand why certain decisions are recommended. Optimization models for determining key marketing budgets will only be applied if the solution is provided in terms of understandable heuristics.

21 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions Example for easy-to-understand Heuristic 21 Sales effort should allocated proportionally to Past sales Contribution margin Elasticity of Sales with respect to changes of sales effort

22 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions AGENDA 22  Success factors for empirical estimation of aggregate sales response function  Success factors for optimizing allocation of sales effort  Conclusion

23 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions Conclusion 23 1. The functional form matters: Aggregate response functions should exhibit diminishing marginal returns and decreasing elasticities 2. Goodness-of-fit is not everything. Sometimes it is better to know whether an estimation provides values that lead to correct optimization, as is the case with allocation. 3. Instead of very complicated optimization approaches, we need heuristics that are understandable and easy to implement in Excel for managers.

24 Sönke Albers: Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions 24 Thank you very much for your attention!


Download ppt "MILAN| 23 June 2011 Success factors of models used for supporting sales ‐ related allocation decisions - Sönke Albers Professor of Marketing and Innovation."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google