1. Introduction to Removable Partial Prosthodontics
Rola M. Shadid, BDS, MSc

2. Partial Denture
A prosthesis that replaces one or more, but not all of the natural teeth and supporting structures. It is supported by the teeth and/or the mucosa. It may be fixed (i.e. a bridge) or removable.

3. Removable Partial Denture (RPD)
A partial denture that can be removed and replaced in the mouth by the patient.
Can be interim RPD (all-resin) or definitive cast framework RPD

4. Interim Rmovable Partial Denture (Provisional; Temporary)
A denture used for a short interval of time to provide:
a. esthetics, mastication, occlusal support and convenience.
b. conditioning of the patient to accept the final prosthesis.

5. Retention:
Resistance to removal from the tissues or teeth
Stability:
Resistance to movement in a horizontal direction (anterior-posteriorly or medio-laterally
Support:
Resistance to movement towards the tissues or teeth

6. Abutment: A tooth that supports a partial denture.
Retainer: A component of a partial denture that provides both retention and support for the partial denture

7. Classification of Partially Edentulous Arches

8. Major Categories of Partial Tooth Loss
Tooth- and tissue-supported space Tooth-supported space

9. Requirements of an Acceptable Classification…..
should permit immediate visualization of the type of partially edentulous arch that is being considered.
should permit immediate differentiation between the tooth-supported and the tooth- and tissue-supported removable partial denture.
should be universally acceptable.

10. Classification of Partially Edentulous Arches
To assist our management of partially edentulous patients
Many classifications have been proposed but Kennedy classification is the most widely accepted
Class II RPD

11. Kennedy classification
Was proposed by Dr. Edward Kennedy in 1925
Like Bailyn & Skinner classification, it classifies the partial edentulous arches in a manner that suggests principles of design for a given situation

12. Kennedy classification
He classified the partial edentulous arches into four basic classes
The other edentulous areas that donot determine the class are considered as modification spaces

13. Kennedy classification
Class I: Bilateral edentulous areas located posterior to natural teeth Class II: A unilateral edentulous area located posterior to remaining natural teeth Class III: A unilateral edentulous area with natural teeth remaining anterior and posterior to it Class IV: A single, but bilateral (crossing the midline) edentulous area located anterior to remaining natural teeth

15. Applegate’s Rules for Applying the Kennedy Classification
Rule 1: the classification should follow, not precede extractions. Rule 2: if a 3rd molar is missing and not to be replaced, it’s not considered in the classification. Rule 3: if a 3rd molar is present and to be used as an abutment, it’s considered in the classification. Rule 4: if a 2nd molar is missing and not to be replaced, it’s not considered in the classification.

16. Rule 5: the most posterior area always determines the classification.
Rule 6: edentulous areas other then those determining the classification are referred to as modifications and are designated by their numbers.
Rule 7: the extent of the modification is not considered, only the number of additional edentulous areas.
Rule 8: there are no modification areas in a K Class IV.

19. What are the Available Options to Manage This?

20. What are the Available Options to Manage This?

21. What are the Available Options to Manage This?

22. Missing Teeth May Be Replaced By One of Three Prosthesis Types: *
An implant-supported fixed partial denture
A tooth-supported fixed partial denture (FPD)
A removable partial denture (RPD)
No replacement
Generally, any unilateral edentulous space bounded by teeth suitable for use as abutments should be
restored with a fixed partial denture cemented to one or more abutment teeth at either end. The length of the span and the periodontal support of the abutment teeth will determine the required number of abutments.
There are two specific contraindications for the use of unilateral fixed restorations. One is a long, edentulous span with abutment teeth that would not be able to withstand the trauma of nonaxial occlusal forces. The other is abutment teeth that exhibit reduced periodontal support because of periodontal disease that would benefit from cross-arch stabilization of RPD

23. Alternatives to RPD (Treatment Options)
1. Implant-supported prosthesis – most costly, closest replacement to natural dentition, less costly over long term 2. Fixed partial denture – requires abutments at opposite ends of edentulous space, more expensive than RPD, must grind down abutments, flexes and can fail if too long 3. No treatment

24. No Treatment
If a patient presents with a long-standing edentulous space into which there has been little or no drifting or elongation of the adjacent or opposing teeth, the question of replacement should be left to the patient's wishes.
If the patient perceives no functional, occlusal, or esthetic impairment, it would be a dubious service to place a prosthesis.*
This in no way contradicts the recommendation that a missing tooth routinely should be replaced.
The teeth adjoining an edentulous space usually move, but they do not always move.

25. No Treatment (Shortened Dental Arch)
Most patients can function with a shortened dental arch (SDA)
RPD doesn’t usually improve function in shortened dental arch cases

26. Shortened Dental Arch
Requires anterior teeth + 4 occlusal units (symmetric loss) or 6 occlusal units (asymmetric loss) for acceptable function-
Opposing PM =1 unit, opposing molars = 2 units

27. Indications of RPD
A removable partial denture should be considered only when a fixed restoration (either tooth-supported or implant-supported) is contraindicated

28. Indications of RPD * (Span Length)
Edentulous spaces greater than two posterior teeth, anterior spaces greater than four incisors, or spaces that include a canine and two other contiguous teeth; i.e, central incisor, lateral incisor, and canine; lateral incisor, canine, and first premolar; or the canine and both premolars.

29. Indications of RPD (Distal Extension Situations)
An edentulous space with no distal abutment will usually require an RPD, especially when implant treatment is not feasible for the patient. *
The exception to this includes situations in which the replacement of missing second (and third) molars is either inadvisable or unnecessary or in which unilateral replacement of a missing first molar can be accomplished by means of a multiple-abutment cantilevered fixed restoration.

30. Distal Extension Situations
To minimize the leverage effect, the pontic should be kept as small as possible, more nearly representing a premolar than a molar .
There should be light occlusal contact with absolutely no contact in any excursion.
The pontic should possess maximum occlusogingival height to ensure a rigid prosthesis.
Caniilever fixed partial dentures can also be used to replace molars when there is no distal abutment present.
When used judiciously, it is possible to avoid the insertion of a unilateral removable partial denture. Most commonly, this type of fixed partial denture is used to replace a first molar

31. Indications of RPD (After Recent Extractions)
Replacement of teeth after recent extractions often cannot be accomplished satisfactorily with a fixed restoration. When relining will be required later or when a fixed restoration using natural teeth or implants will be constructed later, a temporary RPD can be used.

32. Indications of RPD (Abutment Alignment)
Tipped teeth adjoining edentulous spaces and prospective abutments with divergent alignments may lend themselves more readily to utilization as RPD rather than FPD abutments, if implant therapy is not amenable.

34. Indications of RPD (Need for Effect of Bilateral Stabilization)
Periodontally weakened primary abutments may serve better in retaining a well designed removable partial denture than in bearing the load of a fixed partial denture. *
In a mouth weakened by periodontal disease, a fixed restoration may jeopardize the future of the involved
abutment teeth unless the multiple-abutment splinting effect is used. The removable partial denture, on
the other hand, may act as a periodontal splint through its effective cross-arch stabilizing of teeth
weakened by periodontal disease.
Cross arch stabilization: resistance against dislodging or rotational forces obtained by using a partial
removable dental prosthesis design that uses natural teeth on the opposite side of the dental arch from the edentulous space to assist in stabilization.

35. Avoid Unilateral RPD
This type of prosthesis does not benefit from cross-arch stabilization and places excessive
stress on abutment teeth.

36. Indications of RPD (Abutment condition)
Teeth with short clinical crowns or teeth that are just generally short usually will not be good FPD abutments.
Unusually sound abutment teeth

37. Indications of RPD (Abutment Condition)
An insufficient number of abutments may also be a reason for selecting a removable rather than FPD, if implant therapy is not amenable.

38. Indications of RPD (Excessive Loss of Residual Bone)
If there has been a severe loss of tissue in the edentulous ridge, an RPD can more easily be used to restore the space both functionally and esthetically.

39. Gingival Reconstruction with FPD

40. Indications of RPD ( Economic Considerations)
Economics should not be the sole criterion in arriving at a method of treatment.
When for economic reasons, complete treatment is out of the question and yet replacement of missing teeth is indicated, the restorative procedures dictated by these considerations must be described clearly to the patient as a compromise and not representative of the best that modern dentistry has to offer. *
A prosthesis that is made to satisfy economic considerations alone may provide only limited success and result in more costly treatment in the future.

41. Combination of RPD and FPD
Usually, any missing anterior teeth in a partially edentulous arch are best replaced by means of a fixed restoration. Then, the replacement of missing posterior teeth is made with an RPD .*
This is done to simplify the RPD design . There are exceptions. Sometimes a better esthetic result is obtainable when the anterior replacements are supplied by the removable partial denture when excessive tissue and bone resorption exists

42. Combination of RPD and FPD
When an edentulous space that is a modification of either a Class I or Class II arch exists anterior to a lone-standing abutment tooth, the splinting of this abutment to the nearest tooth by FPD is mandatory. *
Because this tooth is subjected to trauma by the movements of a distal extension RPD far in excess of its ability to withstand such stresses.

43. Combination of RPD and FPD
Eliminate all but one posterior edentulous space per quadrant by using an FPD to simplify the RPD design.
Eliminate the technical difficulties of restoring multiple edentulous spaces in one quadrant.
Multiple edentulous spaces, each of which may be restorable with a fixed partial denture, nonetheless may
call for the use of a removable partial denture because of the expense and technical complexity. Bilateral edentulous spaces with more than two teeth missing on one side also may call for the use of a removable prosthesis instead of two fixed prostheses.

44. Removable Partial Denture
Dry mouth poor RPD risk
Limited patient finances
Acceptable oral hygiene
Reliable recall candidate
Treatment simplification
Advanced age
Systemic health problems
More adaptable to dentition in transition to edentulous state

45. Conventional Tooth-Supported FPD
Unfavorable attitude toward RPD
Patient can't cope with aging, tooth loss
Favorable opposing occlusion
Periodontally weakened natural dentition may permit FPD in less than optimal situations
Dry mouth high caries risk
Muscular discoordination
Mandibular tori
Palatal soft tissue lesions
Large tongue
Exaggerated gag reflex

46. Components of a Typical RPD
Major connectors
Minor connectors
Direct retainers
Indirect retainers (if the prosthesis has distal extension bases)
One or more bases, each supporting one to several replacement teeth

47. (a) Major Connector: The unit of an RPD that connects the parts of one side of the dental arch to those of the other side.
Its principal functions are to provide unification and rigidity to the denture.

48. (b) Minor Connector:
A unit of a partial denture that connects other components (i.e. direct retainer, indirect retainer, denture base, etc.) to the major connector.
The principle functions of minor connectors are to provide unification and rigidity to the denture.

49. (c) Direct Retainer:
A unit of a partial denture that provides retention against dislodging forces.
A direct retainer is commonly called a 'clasp' or 'clasp unit' and is composed of
four elements, a rest, a retentive arm, a reciprocal arm and a minor connector.

50. (d) Indirect Retainer:
A unit of a Class I or II partial denture that prevents or resists movement or rotation of the base(s) away from the residual ridge.
The indirect retainer
is usually composed of one component, a rest.

51. (e) Denture Base:
The unit of a partial denture that covers the residual ridges and supports the denture teeth.

52. References
McCracken’s Removable Prosthodontics, 11th Edition 2005 by McGivney GP, Carr AB. Chapter 2 and 3
McCracken’s Removable Prosthodontics, 11th Edition 2005 by McGivney GP, Carr AB. Chapter 12 Diagnosis and Treatment Planning P