Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Grading Practices EDU 300 | Newberry College | Jennifer Morrison.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Grading Practices EDU 300 | Newberry College | Jennifer Morrison."— Presentation transcript:

1 Grading Practices EDU 300 | Newberry College | Jennifer Morrison

2 Grading Practices What do grades mean? What are your experiences with grades? What are the problems with traditional grading practices? What are four different grading practices/systems? What are the pros and cons of each?

3 What does this grade mean? 5 95 C

4 Lines of Opinion When you were a student, how did/do grades make you feel? (horrible  excellent) How important are grades to learning? (not important  vital) What would happen if we stopped using grades? (peace  chaos)

5 Grades only makes sense… when you know the scale. in comparison to others. Traditionally, grades… are about control. are about comparisons. create competition.

6 What’s the problem? Student makes an A in Math and “fails” the end of course standardized test Student behaves badly all year long and fails the course Student does absolutely no work but aces the tests and makes a C for the year In a class, students generally attend and do class work, then 75% of them fail the course

7 Show learning (standards and objectives) Show effort Motivate students to learn more Encourage students to enjoy learning Encourage high expectations Reward and encourage hard work Create commitment to life-long learning Set a standard for comparison What do we want grades to do?

8 We are going to look at 4 grading systems. What are the pros and cons of each? Grading by Standards (Marzano, Wiggins) Median Grading “Not Yet” Grading (Power of I by SREB) No Grades

9 Grading by Standards Robert Marzano Classroom Assessment & Grading That Work Traditional grades give poor feedback and are high variable Recommends focusing measurement on standards (+ life skill topics like participation, work completion, behavior, and working in groups)

10 Grading by Standards Recommends targeted assessments of many types evaluated with 4-point scoring scale 4.0 Advanced – In addition to Score 3.0 performance, in- depth inferences and applications that go beyond what was taught 3.0 Proficient – No major errors or omissions regarding any of the information and/or processes (simple or complex) that were explicitly taught 2.0 Basic – No major errors or missions regarding the simpler details and processes, but major errors or omissions regarding the more complex ideas and processes 1.0 Below Basic – With help, a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes and some of the more complex ideas and processes

11 What does standards-based grading look like?

12 “Not Yet” Grading Southern Regional Education Board, www.sreb.org (Power of the I)www.sreb.org Giving zeroes and accepting poor work creates a culture of low expectations. Students learn that they have the option of not turning work in. Failure to turn in work is #1 reason for middle school and ninth grade failure. Instead of a zero, give incomplete and follow up with consequences and extra help.

13 Median Grading 0 75 90 85 70

14 Median Grading Russell Wright, “Success for All: The Median Is the Key” Phi Delta Kappan, May 1994 In work world we focus on using our strengths; students must show proficiency on a wide range of tasks “The median is actually the statistically correct measure of central tendency for ordinal data.” C students work harder

15 No Grades Alfie Kohn, “From Degrading to De-Grading” High School Magazine, March 1999

16 What’s Due?


Download ppt "Grading Practices EDU 300 | Newberry College | Jennifer Morrison."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google