1. Linac 6575 Modulator PFN Charging Power Supply Upgrade Minh Nguyen December 5, 2012

2. Present L1S (21-1) modulator Several modifications have been made since May 2011 to stabilize beam voltage – Added a tail clipper – Added negative bias on thyratron control grid – Modified grid drive circuit – Tuned de-Q’ing feedback signal Pulse-to-pulse stability not including 120Hz hump is ~ 80 ppm (rms) MNNModulator HVPS Upgrade AIP2

3. AIP Goal To stabilize beam voltage amplitude and time as much as we possibly can on existing Linac modulators that include – Improving PFN voltage regulation to minimize amplitude jitter – Improving Thyratron grid drive circuit to minimize time jitter Upgrades one modulator (24-8) to demonstrate the stability improvement and reliability of the upgraded components MNN3Modulator HVPS Upgrade AIP

4. Motivation Existing 6575 L-C resonant charging system cannot meet stability requirements of < 100 ppm (rms) for critical LCLS stations – The system relies on a single-shot voltage regulation for each main pulse. There is no control feedback to develop fine corrections of PFN voltage – De-Q’ing regulation performance is dependent on several factors, such as AC line voltage fluctuations, PFN charging slopes, accuracy of the de-Q’ing phase- advanced signal compensation, and thyratron operating conditions Direct PFN charging systems using multiple HV inverter- type power supplies for voltage regulation much better than 100 ppm have been successfully utilized at SACLA. However, they are designed for low power and PRF (35kW, 60Hz). This charging system would be fairly complex and really expensive to be adopted by SLAC LCLS (91kW, 120Hz) MNN4Modulator HVPS Upgrade AIP

5. Upgrade approach A hybrid scheme in which a low power, high voltage, inverter power supply is added in parallel to the existing high power, resonant charger to provide fine PFN voltage regulation. The coarse, resonant-charging level will be at about 99.5% of the target level Implementation is low cost and relatively simple Changes to the existing modulator will be minimal and oblivious to the MKSU control system. No additional modulator LOTO is required for the new 50kV power supply Installs other components to improve the overall beam voltage stability – Tail clipper: to minimize PFN voltage variations due to random Thyratron recovery and to protect the klystron from high PIV – Negative grid bias PS: to minimize time jitter on the control grid MNN5Modulator HVPS Upgrade AIP

6. Modulator upgrade circuit (in red lines) Modulator Output: 360 kV, 420 A, 151 MW peak, 91 kW Ave. @ 120 Hz MNN 6 Modulator HVPS Upgrade AIP

7. Preliminary tests with TDK 40kV, 500W power supply at low PRF MNNModulator HVPS Upgrade AIP7 Resonant charging voltage (40kV) TDK PS charging voltage Pulse-to-pulse stability: ~ 40 ppm (rms) Target PFN voltage before Thyratron firing

8. Semi-custom TDK-Lambda HVPS Peak output power2.5 kJ/sec Output voltage50 kV Output current 100 mA (to charge 700nF from 49.5 to 50kV in < 4ms) Current rate of rise (0-100%)500 A/sec Switching frequency40 kHz AC input voltage 208 Vac, 3-phase Efficiency85% Rack-mount chassis19”x 17”x 7” The power supply is protected against open circuits, short circuits, overloads and arcs. MNNModulator HVPS Upgrade AIP8

9. Theoretical PFN voltage stability and regulation range Power supply rated: 50kV, 2.5kJ/sec peak, 40kHz switching freq. Peak charge current: – Ipk = 2 (Ppk /Vrated) = 2(2.5kJ/50kV) = 100mA Voltage variations: – ∆V = Ipk x 0.5Tsw /Cload = 100mA x 12.5µs/0.7µF = 1.78V Pulse to pulse repeatability: – 1.78V / 50kV = 36 ppm Charging voltage-time ratio: – Vchg/Tchg = Ipk /Cload = 100mA /0.7µF = 143 V/ms For 4ms charge time (120Hz operation)  Vchg = 572V PFN voltage regulation range = 572V / 50kV = 1.1% MNN9Modulator HVPS Upgrade AIP

10. Open modulator cabinet MNNModulator HVPS Upgrade AIP10 De-Qing Chassis #2 Capacitor Discharge Switch De-spiking Coil Charging Diode Pulse Forming Network Anode Reactor Thyratron Keep Alive Power Supply Charging Transformer Step Start Resistors 600VAC Circuit Breaker Filter Capacitors Contactors Full Wave Bridge Rectifier De-Qing Chassis #1 Power Supply AC Line Filter Networks Power Transformer (T20) Cabinet 1Cabinet 2Cabinet 3 Modulator Front

11. Schedule Update MNNModulator HVPS Upgrade AIP11

12. Comments and Suggestions Comments and suggestions ? MNNModulator HVPS Upgrade AIP12

13. Tail clipper MNNModulator HVPS Upgrade AIP13 The thyratron normally latched on at the end of the main pulse and does not recover for > 200µs later. However, due to changes in gas pressure, sometimes it recovers much sooner which results in higher inverse voltage than normal A tail clipper (HV diodes and thyrite connected in parallel with the pulse transformer primary) clamps the peak inverse voltage to a normal level, which reduces PFN voltage variations when the thyratron recovers early Clipper Current 100kV PIV

14. Negative bias on thyratron grid MNNModulator HVPS Upgrade AIP14 Thyratron grid voltage waveform Negative biased control grid improved BV time jitter Pulse-to-pulse jitter: ~ 2 ns

15. Grid drive circuit MNNModulator HVPS Upgrade AIP15 Existing grid drive circuit was designed to be used in conjunction with the thyratron that had pre- trigger electrode, which required it to be triggered in advance of the control grid. However, it was no longer used Removing the filter for the time delay and using non-inductive series resistor reduced grid trigger rise- time from ~ 160 to 40 ns Existing grid trigger risetime Risetime after modification

16. de-Q’ing divider signal compensation MNNModulator HVPS Upgrade AIP16 PFN voltage is regulated by de-Q the charging transformer. Tight regulation requires high accuracy of the de-Q’ing divider signal Due to regulation system delay, amplitude variations in resonant charging voltage produce PFN voltage error (∆Vpfn) The error is minimized if the sensing signal to regulate is accurately compensated - advanced in phase an equal amount to the system delay