Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Chapter 6 System Design: Decomposing the System

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Chapter 6 System Design: Decomposing the System"— Presentation transcript:

1 Chapter 6 System Design: Decomposing the System

2 Design “There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies.” - C.A.R. Hoare Compared with Requirements Analysis System design is messy. One of the reasons is that the analysis depends on the application domain. When entering design, we add the implementation domain. We worry about how to map the application domain expressed in the system model (object model, dynamic model, functional model) into the existing hardware. Unfortunately this is not a well known science. Again only heuristics are known. Unfortunately even these heuristics have a half-life of 2-5 years. One of the problems is that we are still making incredible progress in computer science which is driven by technology 20 years ago we every analysis was mapped on a main frame. It was too expensive to waste cycles. With the advence of minis and LAN networks, people started talking about client/server architectures and mapped their analysis onto distributed networks of computers One of the questions a designer faces is performance vs reliability. If a certain design needs to be optimized because the response time is too slow, what should the designer do? Pick a Cray or a network of Sun workstations? Which would be more difficult?

3 Why is Design so Difficult?
Analysis: Focuses on the application domain Design: Focuses on the solution domain Design knowledge is a moving target The reasons for design decisions are changing very rapidly Halftime knowledge in software engineering: About 3-5 years What I teach today will be out of date in 3 years Cost of hardware rapidly sinking “Design window”: Time in which design decisions have to be made Technique Time-boxed prototyping The “evolutionary rapid development” process focuses on the use of small artisan-based teams integrating software and systems engineering disciplines working multiple, often parallel short-duration timeboxes with frequent customer interaction. …reuse of architectural components …

4 Overview System Design I (Today)
0. Overview of System Design 1. Design Goals 2. Subsystem Decomposition System Design II: Addressing Design Goals (next lecture) 3. Concurrency 4. Hardware/Software Mapping 5. Persistent Data Management 6. Global Resource Handling and Access Control 7. Software Control 8. Boundary Conditions Rumbaugh distinguishes two kinds of design: System design and Object design. System design, the topic of this and the next lecture is concerned with the overall aspects of the system. What are the goals it tries to achieve. The main goals are: Low cost, good response time, high reliability. Types (Often listed under Global requirements in Problem Statement). Trade-off priorities System design is also concerned about the overall structure of the system. How is it broken into pieces? How do these pieces fit together? Must they know about each other? The best system design is one where the interaction between the subsystems is minimal. Concurrency is another important design issue. The more concurrency we can identify in a system, the better it can perform. Mapping the subsystem to processors is the moment of truth, and the hardest. While decomposotion and concurrency identification are still independent of technology, subsystem allocation is not. Shall we map them to hardware or can we get by with software (Example: Floating point package). The management of data is also a design issue. The FRIEN database group is an example: Most of its problems are design specific. Access methods specify the security of the design. Can a random user or a program gone hay-wire create havoc to the rest of the system? Control is another important design issue. Who is in control? A main program or a set of harmoniously cooperating processes? Boundary conditions specify the non-steady state behavior of the system. Usually the designer worries about the steady state (average number of transactions/sec). However, initialization and termination behavior, in particular failure conditions are important design issues. How does the system behave when an error occurs? Does it simply type "Illegal address at PC 0. Abort!" (Famous last words on a screen cockpit filmed by a video camera before the plane, an F-15 fighter, crashed). For the FRIEND system, database design issues are very important. We will discuss several design goals that are very important for the design of distributed databases More Self reading

5 System Design System Design 1. Design Goals 8. Boundary Conditions
nition T rade-of fs 8. Boundary Conditions Initialization T ermination 2. System Failure Decomposition Layers/Partitions Cohesion/Coupling 7. Software Control 1. Design goals 2. System decomposition Breaking the system into subsystems, Layers and partitions, System information flow (topology) 3. Identification of concurrency Threads of control 4. Hardware/software allocation Estimate hardware requirements, Hardware/software trade-offs, Describe processor allocation, Physical connectivity (existing hardware) 5. Data management Data structures implemented in memory or secondary storage 6. Global resource handling Choose access control 7. Software control implementation Procedure-based, event-based, concurrent systems 8. Boundary conditions Describe behavior at initialization, termination and failure 9. Feasibility Discuss design alternatives, Technological constraints that drive the design, What if the constraints change? Monolithic Event-Driven Threads Conc. Processes 3. Concurrency 6. Global Identification of Threads 4. Hardware/ 5. Data Softwar e Resource Handling Management Mapping Access control Security Persistent Objects Special purpose Files Buy or Build Trade-off Databases Allocation Data structure Connectivity

6 How to use the results from the Requirements Analysis for System Design
Nonfunctional requirements => Activity 1: Design Goals Definition Functional model => Activity 2: System decomposition (Selection of subsystems based on functional requirements, cohesion, and coupling) Object model => Activity 4: Hardware/software mapping Activity 5: Persistent data management Dynamic model => Activity 3: Concurrency Activity 6: Global resource handling Activity 7: Software control Subsystem Decomposition Activity 8: Boundary conditions In Requirements analysis we have beautifully built 3 descriptions of the problem, the models. Where do the models go in system design? If you read Rumbaugh, the above list of system design issues looks a little bit random. But there is a reason behind it:

7 List of Design Goals Are these exhaustive? Anything else?
Reliability Modifiability Maintainability Understandability Adaptability Reusability Efficiency Portability Traceability of requirements Fault tolerance Backward-compatibility Cost-effectiveness Robustness High-performance Good documentation Well-defined interfaces User-friendliness Reuse of components Rapid development Minimum # of errors Readability Ease of learning Ease of remembering Ease of use Increased productivity Low-cost Flexibility Are these exhaustive? Anything else? What do we do with all these?

8 How do we get the Design Goals?
Let’s look at a small example Current Situation: Computers must be used in the office What we want: A computer that can be used in mobile situations. Why? Problem What are the technical terms describing the two?

9 Identify Current Technology Constraints
Direction where the user looks is irrelevant Single Output Device Fixed Network Connection Location of user does not matter Precise Input

10 Generalize Constraints using Technology Enablers
Single Output Device Precise Input Direction where the user looks is irrelevant Fixed Network Connection Location of user does not matter Direction where the user looks is relevant Multiple Output Devices Dynamic Network Connection Location-based Vague Input Any concrete scenarios?

11 Establish New Design Goals
Mobile Network Connection Multiple Output Devices Location-Based Multimodal Input (Users Gaze, Users Location, …) Vague input Are these Requirements or Design?

12 Sharpen the Design Goals
Location-based input Input depends on user location Input depends on the direction where the user looks (“egocentric systems”) Multi-modal input The input comes from more than one input device Dynamic connection Contracts are only valid for a limited time Is there a possibility of further generalizations? Example: location can be seen as a special case of context User preference is part of the context Interpretation of commands depends on context

13 Relationship Between Design Goals
End User Low cost Increased Productivity Backward-Compatibility Traceability of requirements Rapid development Flexibility Functionality User-friendliness Ease of Use Ease of learning Fault tolerant Robustness Runtime Efficiency Reliability Portability Good Documentation Client (Customer, Sponsor) Minimum # of errors Modifiability, Readability Reusability, Adaptability Well-defined interfaces Nielson Usability Engineering MMK, HCI Rubin Task Analysis Developer/ Maintainer What does “Reliability” mean?

14 Typical Design Trade-offs
Functionality vs. Usability Cost vs. Robustness Efficiency vs. Portability Rapid development vs. Functionality Cost vs. Reusability Backward Compatibility vs. Readability

15 Section 2. System Decomposition
Subsystem (UML: Package) Collection of classes, associations, operations, events and constraints that are interrelated Seed for subsystems: UML Objects and Classes. (Subsystem) Service: Group of operations provided by the subsystem Seed for services: Subsystem use cases Service is specified by Subsystem interface: Specifies interaction and information flow from/to subsystem boundaries, but not inside the subsystem. Should be well-defined and small. Often called API: Application programmer’s interface, but this term should used during implementation, not during System Design From what spec.? Relation of subsystems to each other is similar to object model System topology is similar functional model!

16 Coupling and Cohesion Goal: Reduction of complexity while change occurs Cohesion measures the dependence among classes High cohesion: The classes in the subsystem perform similar tasks and are related to each other (via associations) Low cohesion: Lots of miscellaneous and auxiliary classes, no associations Coupling measures dependencies between subsystems High coupling: Changes to one subsystem will have high impact on the other subsystem (change of model, massive recompilation, etc.) Low coupling: A change in one subsystem does not affect any other subsystem Subsystems should have as maximum cohesion and minimum coupling as possible: Can you illustrate these using UML conventions?

17 Partitions and Layers … and ???
Partitioning and layering are techniques to achieve low coupling. A large system is usually decomposed into subsystems using both, layers and partitions. Partitions vertically divide a system into several independent (or weakly-coupled) subsystems that provide services on the same level of abstraction. A layer is a subsystem that provides subsystem services to a higher layers (level of abstraction) A layer can only depend on lower layers A layer has no knowledge of higher layers In an object-oriented design such as JEWEL, each subsystem makes its layer a subclass of the generic layer class provided by the UI subsystem. Each individual subsystem must provide for its own zoom and refresh methods. Ideally the refresh method will be called for every draw operation. The UI subsystem is responsible for knowing when to call for a refresh (but the UI group will not have to implement it itself: it is a callback method implemented by the visualization and GIS group). All the interfaces with UI (such as how UI will provide the other groups with selection information) should be well documented and agreed on by all groups. What are other architectural styles?

18 Subsystem Decomposition into Layers
Ideally use one package for each subsystem Subsystem Decomposition Heuristics: No more than 7+/-2 subsystems More subsystems increase cohesion but also complexity (more services) No more than 4+/-2 layers, use 3 layers (good) Why? Why?

19 Relationships between Subsystems
Layer relationship Layer A “Calls” Layer B (runtime) Layer A “Depends on” Layer B (“make” dependency, compile time) Partition relationship The subsystem have mutual but not deep knowledge about each other Partition A “Calls” partition B and partition B “Calls” partition A Actually, this will depend on the directionality?

20 Virtual Machine Dijkstra: T.H.E. operating system (1965) Problem VM1
A system should be developed by an ordered set of virtual machines, each built in terms of the ones below it. Problem VM1 C1 C1 C1 attr attr attr opr opr opr C1 C1 VM2 attr attr opr opr C1 VM3 C1 attr attr opr opr C1 VM4 attr opr Existing System

21 Virtual Machine A virtual machine is an abstraction
It provides a set of attributes and operations. A virtual machine is a subsystem It is connected to higher and lower level virtual machines by "provides services for" associations. Virtual machines can implement two types of software architecture Open and closed architectures. How do we represent this in UML? A virtual machine can be seen a collection of classes instead of a single class. This module uses services provided by lower level virtual machines and provides a service to higher level machines Key concept in structuring and providing abstraction, but slightly out of out of date, cannot deal with distributed architectures. Works still well for single processor architectures (tasks)

22 Closed Architecture (Opaque Layering)
VM4 VM3 VM2 VM1 C1 attr op Any layer can only invoke operations from the immediate layer below Design goal: High maintainability, flexibility Only vertical communications?

23 Open Architecture (Transparent Layering)
Any layer can invoke operations from any layers below Design goal: Runtime efficiency C1 attr op C1 attr op C1 attr op VM1 C1 attr op C1 attr op VM2 C1 attr op C1 attr op VM3 C1 attr op C1 attr op VM4

24 Properties of Layered Systems
Layered systems are hierarchical. They are desirable because hierarchy reduces complexity (by low coupling). Closed architectures are more portable. Open architectures are more efficient. If a subsystem is a layer, it is often called a virtual machine. Why? and what else? So, which is better? What are examples of systems using a layered architectural style?

25 Software Architectural Styles
Subsystem decomposition Identification of subsystems, services, and their relationship to each other. Specification of the system decomposition is critical. Patterns for software architecture Client/Server Peer-To-Peer Repository Model/View/Controller Pipes and Filters Patterns = styles? Is this a J2EE pattern? What are other architectural styles?

26 Core J2EE Patterns: Patterns index page

27 Client/Server Architectural Style
One or many servers provides services to instances of subsystems, called clients. Client calls on the server, which performs some service and returns the result Client knows the interface of the server (its service) Server does not need to know the interface of the client Response in general immediately Users interact only with the client Is “interface” the same as “interface of the server” in UML?

28 Client/Server Architectural Style
Often used in database systems: Front-end: User application (client) Back end: Database access and manipulation (server) Functions performed by client: Customized user interface Front-end processing of data Initiation of server remote procedure calls Access to database server across the network Functions performed by the database server: Centralized data management Data integrity and database consistency Database security Concurrent operations (multiple user access) Centralized processing (for example archiving) ? Cf. J2EE and its evolution: motivation behind J2EE? architecture? Does a system use a single style or multiple styles?

29 Design Goals for Client/Server Systems
glance through Design Goals for Client/Server Systems Service Portability Server can be installed on a variety of machines and operating systems and functions in a variety of networking environments Transparency, Location-Transparency The server might itself be distributed (why?), but should provide a single "logical" service to the user Performance Client should be customized for interactive display-intensive tasks Server should provide CPU-intensive operations Scalability Server should have spare capacity to handle larger number of clients Flexibility The system should be usable for a variety of user interfaces and end devices (eg. WAP Handy, wearable computer, desktop) Reliability System should survive node or communication link problems Is this what performance means to you? Is this what realiability means to you?

30 Problems with Client/Server Architectural Styles
do not provide peer-to-peer communication Peer-to-peer communication is often needed Example: Database receives queries from application but also sends notifications to application when data have changed What does this mean?

31 Peer-to-Peer communication [Wikipedia]
Peer-to-peer (P2P) networking is a method of delivering computer network services in which the participants share a portion of their own resources, such as processing power, disk storage, network bandwidth, printing facilities. Such resources are provided directly to other participants without intermediary network hosts or servers.[1] Peer-to-peer network participants are providers and consumers of network services simultaneously, which contrasts with other service models, such as traditional client-server computing. A server based network (i.e: not peer-to-peer). A peer-to-peer based network

32 Peer-to-Peer Architectural Style
Client Server Generalization of Client/Server Architecture Clients can be servers and servers can be clients This is where the chicken-and-egg problem exists!

33 Example of a Peer-to-Peer Architectural Style
? Layer ISO’s OSI Reference Model ISO = International Standard Organization OSI = Open System Interconnection Reference model defines 7 layers of network protocols and strict methods of communication between the layers. Closed software architecture Application Presentation Session Level of abstraction Transport Network DataLink Physical

34 OSI model Packages and their Responsibility
glance through OSI model Packages and their Responsibility The Physical layer represents the hardware interface to the net-work. It allows to send() and receive bits over a channel. The Datalink layer allows to send and receive frames without error using the services from the Physical layer. The Network layer is responsible for that the data are reliably transmitted and routed within a network. The Transport layer is responsible for reliably transmitting from end to end. (This is the interface seen by Unix programmers when transmitting over TCP/IP sockets) The Session layer is responsible for initializing a connection, including authentication. The Presentation layer performs data transformation services, such as byte swapping and encryption The Application layer is the system you are designing (unless you build a protocol stack). The application layer is often layered itself.

35 Another View at the ISO Model
A closed software architecture Each layer is a UML package containing a set of objects An example of a closed architecture is the Reference Model of Open Systems Interconnection (in short, the OSI model) is composed of seven layers [Tanenbaum, 1996]. Each layer is responsible for performing a well defined function. In addition, each layer provides its services by using services by the layer below. The Physical layer represents the hardware interface to the network. It is responsible for transmitting bits over a communication channels. The DataLink layer is responsible for transmitting data frames without error using the services of the Physical layer. The Network layer is responsible for transmitting and routing packets within a network. The Transport layer is responsible for ensuring that the data is reliably transmitted from end to end. The Transport layer is the interface Unix programmers see when transmitting information over TCP/IP sockets between two processes. The Session layer is responsible for the initialization of a connection, including authentication. The Presentation layer performs data transformation services, such as byte swapping or encryption. The Application layer is the system you are designing (unless you are building an operating system or protocol stack). The application layer can and should, of course, also consist of layered subsystems. An example of closed architecture: the OSI model (UML class diagram). The OSI model decomposes network services into seven layers, each responsible for a different level of abstraction.

36 Middleware Allows Focus On The Application Layer
Presentation Session Transport Network DataLink Physical Socket CORBA TCP/IP Object Ethernet Wire What does this mean, and where is the middleware?

37 Model/View/Controller
Cf. boundary/control/entity Subsystems are classified into 3 different types Model subsystem: Responsible for application domain knowledge View subsystem: Responsible for displaying application domain objects to the user Controller subsystem: Responsible for sequence of interactions with the user and notifying views of changes in the model. MVC is a special case of a repository architecture: Model subsystem implements the central datastructure, the Controller subsystem explicitly dictate the control flow What is this? Controller Model subscriber notifier initiator * repository 1 View Which interacts with the user? What creates boundary objects?

38 Sequence of Events (Collaborations)
:Controller :InfoView :Model 2.User types new filename 1. Views subscribe to event 3. Request name change in model 4. Notify subscribers 5. Updated views :FolderView Which interacts with the user? What creates boundary objects?

39 Repository Architectural Style (Blackboard Architecture, Hearsay II Speech Recognition System)
What’s blackboard? Are all repository architectural styles mean blackboard? Subsystems access and modify data from a single data structure Subsystems are loosely coupled (interact only through the repository) Control flow is dictated by central repository (triggers) or by the subsystems (locks, synchronization primitives) Two kinds Subsystem Repository createData() setData() getData() searchData() Wreck the nice beach

40 Examples of Repository Architectural Style
Compiler SemanticAnalyzer SyntacticAnalyzer Optimizer CodeGenerator LexicalAnalyzer Repository Hearsay II speech understanding system (“Blackboard architecture”) Database Management Systems Modern Compilers ParseTree SymbolTable SourceLevelDebugger SyntacticEditor

41 Subsystem Decomposition Example
Authoring Is this the right decomposition or is this too much ravioli? Augmented Reality Modeling Workflow Inspection Repair Workorder

42 System as a set of subsystems communicating via a software bus
Authoring Modeling Workflow Augmented Reality Inspection Repair Workorder A Subsystem Interface Object publishes the service (= Set of public methods) provided by the subsystem What is this architectural style called?

43 A 3-layered Architecture
Repair Inspection Authoring Augmented Reality Workflow Modeling What is the relationship between Modeling and Authoring? Are other subsystems needed?

44 Summary System Design Design Goals Definition Subsystem Decomposition
Reduces the gap between requirements and the (virtual) machine Decomposes the overall system into manageable parts Design Goals Definition Describes and prioritizes the qualities that are important for the system Defines the value system against which options are evaluated Subsystem Decomposition Results into a set of loosely dependent parts which make up the system

45 Additional Slides

46 Nonfunctional Requirements may give a clue for the use of Design Patterns
Read the problem statement again Use textual clues (similar to Abbot’s technique in Analysis) to identify design patterns Text: “manufacturer independent”, “device independent”, “must support a family of products” Abstract Factory Pattern Text: “must interface with an existing object” Adapter Pattern Text: “must deal with the interface to several systems, some of them to be developed in the future”, “ an early prototype must be demonstrated” Bridge Pattern

47 Textual Clues in Nonfunctional Requirements
Text: “complex structure”, “must have variable depth and width” Composite Pattern Text: “must interface to an set of existing objects” Façade Pattern Text: “must be location transparent” Proxy Pattern Text: “must be extensible”, “must be scalable” Observer Pattern Text: “must provide a policy independent from the mechanism” Strategy Pattern

48 Definition: Subsystem Interface Object
A Subsystem Interface Object provides a service This is the set of public methods provided by the subsystem The Subsystem interface describes all the methods of the subsystem interface object Use a Facade pattern for the subsystem interface object

49 Choosing Subsystems Criteria for subsystem selection: Most of the interaction should be within subsystems, rather than across subsystem boundaries (High cohesion). Does one subsystem always call the other for the service? Which of the subsystems call each other for service? Primary Question: What kind of service is provided by the subsystems (subsystem interface)? Secondary Question: Can the subsystems be hierarchically ordered (layers)? What kind of model is good for describing layers and partitions?

50 The Purpose of System Design
Problem Bridging the gap between desired and existing system in a manageable way Use Divide and Conquer We model the new system to be developed as a set of subsystems New System Existing System

51 Tournament Statistics
Another Example: ARENA Subsystem decomposition User Interface Tournament Advertisement User Management Component Management User Directory Tournament Statistics Session Management

52 Tournament Statistics
Services provided by ARENA Subsystems User Interface Manages advertisement banners and sponsorships. Administers user accounts Manages tournaments, applications, promotions. Tournament Advertisement User Management For adding games, styles, and expert rating formulas Component Management User Directory Tournament Statistics Session Management Stores user profiles (contact & subscriptions) Stores results of archived tournaments Maintains state during matches.

53 Services and Subsystem Interfaces
Service: A set of related operations that share a common purpose Notification subsystem service: LookupChannel() SubscribeToChannel() SendNotice() UnscubscribeFromChannel() Services are defined in System Design Subsystem Interface: Set of fully typed related operations. Subsystem Interfaces are defined in Object Design Also called application programmer interface (API)


Download ppt "Chapter 6 System Design: Decomposing the System"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google