Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Hearing problems in school – causes and solutions

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Hearing problems in school – causes and solutions"— Presentation transcript:

1 Hearing problems in school – causes and solutions
Harvey Dillon With thanks to: Sharon Cameron Robyn Massie Helen Glyde

2 Presentation Overview
Causes of not hearing clearly in class Solutions Sound field amplification Auditory training for Spatial Processing Disorder (SPD)

3 Why don’t some children seem to hear and understand easily in class?

4 Children may not understand speech easily in the classroom because of:
Hearing loss Sensorineural hearing loss – permanent Conductive hearing loss Language impairment (including ESL) Cognitive deficit Attention Verbal working memory IQ Auditory processing disorder Spatial processing disorder Other types Poor classroom acoustics

5 Differentiating these problems based on symptoms
Acts (inappropriately) based on what was heard Asks for repetition of instruction Does nothing Misbehaves Response by child Interpretation by observer Daydreams Badly behaved Can’t follow instructions Is not very smart Poor concentration Child fails to understand an instruction Event Cognition Language Auditory processing Hearing loss

6 What solutions exist?

7 Solutions to help hear more clearly:
Language intervention Hearing aids Wireless remote microphones Sound field amplification Auditory training Memory training

8 Matching treatment to condition
Language intervention Hearing aids Wireless remote microphone Sound-field amplification Auditory training Memory training Attention disorder Language impairment Sensorineural hearing loss Conductive hearing loss (√ ) CAPD - general CAPD – spatial processing disorder Working memory deficit

9 THE IMPACT OF SOUND-FIELD AMPLIFICATION IN MAINSTREAM CLASSROOMs
Robyn Massie Harvey Dillon

10 FACTORS AFFECTING CLASSROOM COMMUNICATION

11 Direct and reverberant fields in a room
Total Noise Reverberant Direct

12 SOUND-FIELD AMPLIFICATION

13 PREVIOUS STUDY FINDINGS
INCREASED: verbal communication children’s response to teacher verbal instruction child proactiveness in classroom discussion children’s confidence DECREASED: disruptive behaviours teacher voice fatigue

14 Aim of our study To investigate the effects of sound field amplification intervention on specific educational goals

15 METHOD Eight Grade 2 classes, in Queensland
242 children 43% Vietnamese, Samoan, Spanish, Aboriginal Dual-channel sound-field amplification Four classes started with amplification, four without. Change-over at mid year. Educational attainment rated by teacher at year start, mid-year, and start of next year (Diagnostic Net)

16 PROCEDURE Teacher in-service training Audiological assessment
Classroom acoustic measurements

17 Hearing and acoustic results
Mean Hearing level Overall effect Mean noise Mean Reverberation Mean Signal-to-noise 15 dB + 7 dB Actual Recommended 50 dB dB 1.5 secs secs - 3 dB dB

18 Overall “ON” / “OFF” Bars show 95% confidence intervals

19 Results by skill area and language at home
On Off

20 SUMMARY Positive effect on literacy and numeracy
Urgent need to improve classroom and acoustic environment

21 Spatial Processing Disorder: Overview
Diagnosis, cause, remediation

22 The Australian Broadcasting Commission
Catalyst The Australian Broadcasting Commission

23 Link between SPD and Chronic Otitis Media (middle ear infections)

24 SPD and chronic otitis media (COM)
50% of children (24/49) diagnosed with SPD at NAL reported a history of COM. (Dillon et al., 2012). 30% of children (15/50) previously diagnosed with COM at University of Melbourne were diagnosed with SPD. (Graydon & Rance, ongoing). Spatial processing deficit worse for early onset age and longer duration of COM (n=35; Tomlin & Rance, under review). 6 yo children with history of COM have below average spatial advantage (n=17; z= -1.0) (Kapadia et al, 2012). 13-17 yo adolescents with history of COM have below average spatial advantage (n=20; z= -0.75) (Kapadia et al, 2014). 10% of a population sample (9/90) of Aboriginal children from remote Australia diagnosed with SPD. (Unpublished data). 7% of a population sample (10/144) of Aboriginal children from regional Australia diagnosed with SPD. (Cameron et al., in review). Indigenous Australian children experience, on average, 2.6 years of conductive hearing loss (vs. 3 months for non-Indigenous children).

25 Interpretation Based on These and Other Studies
Chronic otitis media Fluctuating access to binaural cues reduced effectiveness in better-ear glimpsing

26 Remediation of SPD: The LiSN & Learn Auditory Training Software

27 Target: The horse kicked six wet shoes

28 LiSN-S Results - Pre- vs. Post-Training
LC SRT p = 0.158 Talker Advantage p = 0.981 HC SRT p = Spatial Advantage p = Total Advantage p = 0.001 Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals F(8, 64)=5.3847, p=.00003 Cameron & Dillon (2011)

29 LiSN & Learn – Preliminary Study
9 children with SPD (6 to 11 years) LiSN & Learn – 2 games/day, 5 days/week, 12 weeks 10 dB Better Average SRT First vs Last 30 Days p = LiSN & Learn SRT (dB) Game Number Cameron & Dillon (2011)

30 Self-Report Questionnaire - Pre- vs. Post-Training
Very Hard Hard OK Easy Very Easy SSQ – Listening in Noise: Pre vs Post - p = * Post vs 3MP - p = 0.397 SSQ – Listening in Quiet: Pre vs Post - p = 0.103 Post vs 3MP - p = 0.529 Cameron & Dillon (2011)

31 Blinded Randomized Control Study
10 children (aged 6 yrs 0 mths to 9 yrs, 9 mths) diagnosed with LiSN-S as having SPD: 5 x LiSN & Learn (experimental group) 5 x Earobics (control group) Questionnaires Participant (LIFE) Parent (Fishers) Teacher (LIFE) LiSN & Learn or Earobics training – 15 minutes daily x 60 sessions Re-evaluate LiSN-S and questionnaires post-training SSQ = Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale LISN-S one-sided critical difference was calculated as (Mean Test-Retest Difference) - (1.64 x SD of Mean Test-Retest Difference). This represents the decrease in dB needed to infer that there has been a genuine improvement in auditory performance on retest, taking into account mean practice effects and day-to-day fluctuations in performance. Mean difference between test and retest was 0.5 dB for Low-cue SRT, 1.1 dB for High-cue SRT, 0.9 dB for talker advantage, 0.1 dB for spatial advantage, and 0.7 for total advantage. A critical difference on the spatial advantage measure is 2.8 dB, and on the Low-cue SRT it is 2.5 dB 31 31

32 LiSN-S Results – Pre vs. Post Training
Earobics (n = 5) Lisn & Learn (n = 5) p = 0.03 to p = 0.5 to 0.7 Cameron, Glyde & Dillon (2012)

33 Questionnaires – Post Training Improvements
L&L = 16 pts; Earobics = 7 pts; where 0 pts = “no improvement” Teachers Parents Children p = 0.028 L&L = 31%; Earobics = 9% L&L = 22%; Earobics = 9%

34 Spatial Processing Disorder: Prevalence in a clinical population

35 Australian Hearing’s CAPD Service
Operating in 42 Australian Hearing centers around Australia since May 2012. Diagnosis, assessment and management of specific aspects of CAPD. Recruitment targets children experiencing difficulty hearing in background noise. Tests are chosen which: Have been shown to be associated with difficulties in real life. Are reliable, repeatable and relatively quick to administer. Lead to remediation that is backed by research evidence.

36 Test structure LiSN-S Auditory memory (digits forward and reverse)
Remediate (L&L) LiSN-S Auditory memory (digits forward and reverse) Remediate (Memory booster) Remediate (wireless remote microphone) Dichotic digits

37 Age Distribution N=618

38 Minimal Sensorineural
Passes and Fails 666 23 4 Mild Conductive Hearing screening Minimal Sensorineural 3 Pass 636 Unknown Z < Fail 120 LiSN - HC LiSN SPD 19% Z ≥ -1 307 Auditory memory Fail 167 Pass (not SPD) 209 Memory 26% Pass 349 < 7 years 76 Age Testing discontinued ≥ 7 yrs 273 Dichotic deficit DDT Fail 100 20% Pass 173 27%

39 National CAPD service results: LiSN & Learn effects

40 LiSN & Learn training: COSI results

41 Effect of Memory Booster training

42 COSI scores for Memory Booster training

43 Take-home messages Children need to hear their teacher easily
Many deficits in children prevent this Many classroom prevent this Acoustics can be improved Classroom amplification helps everyone Spatial Processing Disorder (SPD) is common but can be diagnosed and cured

44 Disclosure The National Acoustic Laboratories, is an Australian government laboratory NAL licences the LiSN-S test to Phonak, and is paid a royalty on sales. NAL directly sells the LiSN & Learn training package through its web site.

45 CAPD.NAL.gov.au - TV news story
Thanks for listening The support of the Commonwealth Department of Health is greatly appreciated CAPD.NAL.gov.au - TV news story - science TV show 45


Download ppt "Hearing problems in school – causes and solutions"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google