Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Progress on single crystal diamond beam position monitors for

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Progress on single crystal diamond beam position monitors for"— Presentation transcript:

1 Progress on single crystal diamond beam position monitors for
Progress on single crystal diamond beam position monitors for synchrotron X-ray beams J Morse1, M Salomé1, K Detlefs1 H Graafsma2 K Desjardins3 M Pomorski4 B Solar5 E Berdermann6 J Smedley7 1European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, 38043, France 2Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Hamburg, 22607, Germany 3Synchrotron Soleil, L'Orme des Merisiers -Saint Aubin, 91192, France 4Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique …, Gif s/Yvette, 91191, France 5Dromedar d.o.o., Žabnica, 4209, Slovenia 6GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, 64220, Germany 7Instrumentation Division, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA

2 1. Synchrotrons and X-ray beam monitoring needs:
Outline 1. Synchrotrons and X-ray beam monitoring needs: why diamond? why single crystal? CVD single crystal diamond bulk- and surface- challenges quadrant- and resistive-electrode devices: principle of operation; fabrication; ‘near dc ’ (electrometer) and RF readout methods 5. 'superthinning’ project 6. Conclusions / status 2

3 synchrotron sources: Now (2012) about 50 major X-ray synchrotrons in the world… sources of infra-red to MeV photon beams, but main interest 1 ~ 100keV the big three, commissioned early 1990's… ESRF-Grenoble, France APS-Argonne nr. Chicago SPring8, Harima nr. Osaka 3

4 synchrotron sources: situation in 2012
J-L Revol, ESRF (ASD)

5 3rd generation synchrotron beamlines
~ 45 beamline stations ESRF Ø300m energy tunability undulator source ΔE/E ~10-2 ‘white’ X-ray beam 50~100m source to end station pink/white beam monochromatic X-ray beam out Bragg diffraction from silicon crystals ΔE/E ~10 -4 flux on sample ~1013 ph/sec beam position - intensity monitors white/pink beam 0.1~1kWmm-2 monochromatic beam ~mW

6 X-ray beamline monitoring goals
required beam stability ~10% of 0.1 ~ 50μm beam size NINA upgrade beamline, nanofocusing → 10nm beam on sample measurements ~dc (thermal drifts) to ~ 1kHz (acoustic vibrations) Position accuracy & linearity requirement typically ≤ 1% (sometimes <0.01% ratiometric) Intensity: (sub) millisec sampling; pump probe synchronization <100psec Timing: continuous signal readout with negligible beam interference: absorption, coherence loss, scattering beamline compatibility: package size, operation in air, dirty-vacuum, clean-UHV lifetime >months under ionizing radiation loads to >104 Gray/sec device… crystal monochromatized beams : device absorbed X-ray power ≤ few mW but beam powers to 100Wmm-2 (C-W) in undulator ‘white’ beams: heat load → ONLY possible with diamond 6

7 …at energies >20keV, short range of Compton-electrons
why diamond ? Z = 6 → low X-ray absorption by photoelectric effect … ~8-fold less than silicon for 10keV X-rays …at energies >20keV, short range of Compton-electrons 5.5eV bandgap → ‘zero’ leakage current at room temperature and at high E-fields → nanosec pulse response times → insensitive to ambient light, (λc ~ 215nm ) ‘all diamond’ devices are (X-ray) radiation hard --no atomic displacement damage extreme thermal conductivity: diamond ~2000 Wm-1 °K-1 at 273°K , cf. silicon ~150 7

8 quadrant diamond X-ray beam monitor: principle
photocurrent readout of beam position and intensity → simple, compact devices high purity diamond plate ~10…100µm thick metal surface electrical contacts ~100nm thick ( e.g. Al, Pt, W) externally applied bias field 0.5 ~5 Vµm-1 surface contact beam DIAMOND directly intercepting beam, diamond bulk acts as solid state ‘ionization chamber’ electron thermalization range a few µm for <20keV X-rays photocharge drifts for ~ nanosecond in applied E field to electrodes charge cloud lateral thermal diffusion ~10µm → induced signals can be measured with 'integrating' electrometer (charge), or drift current pulses observed directly (wideband) …beam 'center of gravity' determined by interpolation

9 why not polycrystalline diamond?
attractive: 6" wafers available → easier, cheaper device processing XBIC: signal current map made from x, y raster scan of sample with a ~7keV micron-focused X-ray beam LIST-CEA Saclay data (ESRF ID21) but crystallite grain-boundaries of size ~ 10% of film growth thickness → random crystallite orientations 'powder ring' X-ray scattering… → local field distortions and charge trapping & signal response lag → random crystallite orientations 'powder ring' X-ray scattering… → local field distortions and charge trapping & signal response lag 9

10 polycrystalline diamond: trapping and signal lag
signal decay after beam cut off Charge collection efficiency ~1…10%, variable (prompt + detrapped components) with applied E field 1…5 V/µm, 10 sec SLS MX beam 15 x 100µm2, x 1012 ph/sec at 12keV data Ralf Menk, 2006: polycrystalline ~10µm thick, grown on Si substrate by Diamond Materials GmbH, Freiburg, contacts fabricated at PSI Nanofab (?)

11 electrical responsivity with X-ray energy
Carbon K edge feature is field dependent, caused by incomplete carrier collection for near surface absorption Platinum electrodes M edge feature: photons absorbed by incident contact (no field dependence observed) J. Keister and J. Smedley, NIM A 606, (2009), 7

12 signal linearity with beam flux
Linearity at high currents, single crystal diamond with Pt electrodes (measurements at BNL NSLS-X28C white beam, absorbed power density up to 20 Wmm-2) at ESRF, signal linearity observed over range ~10pA to >10µA (monochromatic beams, keV data) → operation in linear mode shown over total >10 orders magnitude ESRF ID21 microbeam, 7keV 20nm+20nm - GSI Cr-Au contacts 10pA 1.E - 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 1.E+00 1.E+01 power Absorbed by Diamond (W) Gas ion chamber calibration Calorimetric calibration Fit, w = / 0.2 eV diamond signal (Amps) J. Bohon, E. Muller, J. Smedley, J. Synch. Rad 17, (2010) 12

13 position measurement: multiple electrodes:
Y X A B C D exploits diffusion splitting (~10µm) of charge between A, B, C, D contacts of quadrant motif → difference/sum of currents A, B, C, D gives beam 'centre of gravity’ * → sum of currents gives beam intensity *requires high signal/noise ! Packaged device, ESRF ID09B, ID11, Desy tests

14 position measurement: resistive contacts
signal current is shared between edge strip electrodes as ratio of resistances through resistive contact → linear position response possible over several millimeters → true beam center of gravity, so position sensitivity independent of beam size variation signal/noise may be limited by contact resistance, slower response (RC ~µsec) first device used in ESRF & Soleil beam tests ~2009

15 quadrant designs: contact fabrication
~100nm Al contacts on 30 and 100µm diamonds OSU-Kagan ~100nm Al contacts on 100µm plates INEX, UK Inex - ESRF - DESY RF readout design DIC microscopy white light microscopy Lift-off lithography: cf. shadow mask deposition: -allows complex geometric designs for metal contacts; -multiple designs on single mask; -electrode features to < 1µm …but difficult work on small samples -surface preparation, hot acid cleaning and post-clean handling - edge ‘beading’ of spin deposited resist ESRF-DESY-OSU XBPM and microdosimetry mask set , 2010

16 single crystal I-V response in X-ray beam
ESRF ID21 beam ~0.6x1.5µm2, ~4x109ph/sec at 7.2keV, cross polarizer-selected e6 plates, two-side ion beam etched to final 100µm thickness, 100nm Al sputtered contacts using lift off lithogaphy (OSU-Kagan, 2010) full charge collection for >10V bias (0.1Vµm-1) dark leakage current <0.1pA (measurement sensitivity limit) at 200V bias no hotspot defects found over 7mm2 contact areas for 3/3 preselected samples tested calibration relative to silicon diode → εDiamond = /-0.2 eV/e-h pair

17 position response of diamond quadrant devices
signal slope ~0.5% /micron beam collimated 200µm 1 2 Line 7.2keV For large beamsize (> 50µm), device ‘crossover response’ is simply the line integral across the beam intensity profile 1 2 ESRF ID21 electrometer ‘charge integral’ measurements, i.e. signal integration time >> charge carrier drift time signal slope ~5% /micron …beam focused <1µm isolation gap ~120µm For a small beam (< 5µm), crossover response is ~independent of beam size: convolution of photoelectron thermalization range and lateral charge diffusion occurring during carrier drift

18 beamline tests : position timescan and ‘vibrations’,
4.4 hours synchrotron orbit shifts, or something upstream on beamline… ESRF ID09B, single bunch mode (355kHz) charge generated in diamond ~ 0.1pC/pulse currents measured by Keithley 485 electrometers (10Hz BW, mean current measured ~10µA/contact) 390um thick diamond sample ‘S361-1’ with TiW quadrant contacts inserted before final slitbox, pink undulator beam peaking at 20keV

19 compact diamond mounting
ESRF-ID21 Fluorescence Microscopy beamline: limited space, operation in dirty vacuum and in air IBM-etched e6 single crystals 4.2 x 4.2mm2, thicknesses 30 & 100µm guard-ringed direct PCB mounting with … … Al electrode contacts and wire bonding (Kagan – OSU 2010) Rogers multilayer PCB, microcoax wire leadouts homogeneous response map for 3/3 samples tested, no signal ‘hot spot’ defects <0.1pA leakage current at 2Vµm-1 vertical streaks are from beam Io normalization errors during scan ID21 beam line installation o scan stage sample x,y piezo stage f ocused beam diamond quad r a n t B P M 10mm

20 quadrant device, electrometer readout: time scans
σ =13.3nm 1sec V-F σ= 20.4nm sec V-F ESRF ID21 FZP microfocus beam tracking 1sec/point: vertical beam jumps on synchrotron e-beam refills 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 position* ( µm ) time (sec) vertical horizontal *scaling 'calibration' error possibly ~10% ~40% synchrotron refill 2010 data, 4x109ph/sec at 7.2keV (FZP → K-B mirror) 14(18)nm vertical(horizontal), 1sec integration 33(48)nm, 0,1 sec integration X-ray flux ~108 ph/sec at 7keV (FZP optic): ~ 20fC in diamond per X ray bunch ~ 10nA ‘dc equivalent’ signal current 20

21 ID22 nanofocus beamline: stability measurements
5-6 Sept 2012: 25µm x 17keV beam nnx 1010 ph/sec 23:00, successive time scans: blue data: beam focused (~50nm) on diamond 'sample' red data: diamond axially displaced 5mm 17keV, flux 2.5x 109 ph/sec 17keV, flux 2.5x 109 ph/sec

22 ID22 nanofocus beamline: stability measurements
17keV, flux 2.5x 109 ph/sec 2.5nm rms 3.9nm rms short term vertical and horizontal stabilities 17keV, flux 5.0 x 109 ph/sec (16 bunch mode) Keithley 485 electrometers, 100msec integrations at ~1.6sec intervals diamond piezo stage step-displaced vertically: 10nm steps clearly visible quasi-linear crossover response over ~8µm beam absorption in diamond 1.8% (~70% via photoelectric effect) measured quadrant currents sum <i > 13nA (ESRF 16 bunch mode, peak pulse currents ~2µA) for photoelectric absorption, i = ɸ x Exray / ε (Amps) ɸ = absorbed X-ray flux; EX-ray = photon energy (eV) ε = diamond e-h pair production energy = 13 eV

23 ‘resistive contact’ BPMs
40µm e6 plate, with sputtered diamond-like carbon (DLC) contacts (CEA-LIST, M. Pomorski), ESRF-ID06 beam test: I-V response in 10.5keV beam, ~1011 ph/sec (~0.5µA measured photocurrents) metal electrodes Al, TiPtAu complete charge collection for bias >5V non-injecting contact (measured to +/-100V) DLC resistive layer intrinsic diamond slab DLC resistive layer metal collecting electrodes DLC resistive layer resistivity of contacts ~`20kΩ/square, physically hard and scratch resistant layers 0.2µm thickness long term radiation, temperature stability…?

24 resistive contact BPM: device #2 at ESRF-ID06
Position noise of first device tested at ESRF measured was limited by the 20kΩ resistance of the DLC contacts (electrometer input voltage noise driven currents) new device installed at ID06 June 2012, 265µm thick, kΩ resistance contacts shadow-mask Au electrodes over full-surface DLC PCB mounted over hole and electrodes connected by Ag loaded thermoplastic signal current reaches a well defined plateau corresponding to complete photo-charge collection. excess signal current and noise seen with >100V 'negative' bias -->local diamond bulk defect(s) device works perfectly with positive bias…

25 performance, device #2 at ESRF-ID06
beam 12keV, 1.3x 1013ph/sec, ~25x25µm2 device linearity across entire 2mm spacing between the gold line contacts ~zero horizontal-vertical crosstalk (orientation alignment errors?) x,y mesh plot shows uniform response over most of the 2x2 mm2 active area: no local defects. differences between red and blue data points are from beam vertical position drift occurring during two x,y mesh scans of the BPM.

26 duo-lateral Resistive Electrode, position resolutions
device #1, 20 kΩ contacts, 40 µm thick diamond, S/N ~104 (electrometer offset induced noise limit) active area 2 x 2 mm2, 100msec integrations [µm] ID06 σ = 258nm Proxima2 1 MΩ contacts, 300µm thick diamond, S/N ~105, active area 2.5 x 2.5 mm2, 100msec integrations σ = 27nm

27 narrowband RF readout: Libera Brilliance
1 2 3 4 beam X, Y, Σ out over fast network pulse signals in ~500 systems installed at ESRF + DESY for electron orbit stabilization using capacitive pick-up buttons analog stage: SAW narrowband tuned filter (352MHz ESRF, 500MHz DESY) digital sampling at 110MHz, FPGA digital filtering → output data stream ~130ksample/sec 'rotating' crossbar RF switch removes electronic drift between A,B,C,D input channels 27

28 narrowband RF readout, first tests
Quadrant electrode device first test at DESY-DORIS F1 (white bending magnet, Al filtered beam May 2012 monochromatic beam tests at DESY P11 with 100µm thick plate higher field, thinner plate → shorter transit times ( <2ns ) signal vs. detector bias (390µm thick sample, 50µm isolation gap 550V 217V 138V electrode ground bounce crosstalk !! with Libera brilliance system, measure 'narrowband' (~5MHz BW ) power at 500MHz center frequency → only measure ‘ fast drift’ signal components

29 Libera dynamic position response
first test at DESY Doris synchrotron white beam (filtered bending magnet F4) stability timescan (Libera ADC buffer data, 130KHz readout digital sampling-averages) rms position noise* vs. bandwidth µm in ground shock position noise includes real beam-sensor movements J. Morse, B. Solar and H. Graafsma, J. Synchrotron Rad. 17, 456‐464 (2010)

30 RF readout tests DESY Petra P11 (May 2012)
Tests of series of 8 quadrant BPMs (OSU- and INEX-fabricated Al electrodes) beam vibrations measured 30m from monochromator with bad LN cooling turbulence quadrant BPM on PCB with 500MHz LC resonators and transformer cable impedance matching beam ~ 50x100µm2 ~1013 ph/sec, 10.0keV Si diode diamond BPM-1 diamond BPM-2 time (secs) 130 ksamples/sec (digital averages) (A+B-C-D)/(A+B+C+D) BPM 1 BPM2 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 20mV, 5ns /div DSO traces, 'wideband' after 500MHz LC filter x, y raster scan of electrode responses, Libera data (sum map)

31 Superthinned diamond membrane beam monitors
DDK scaife-polished optical grade CVD single crystal (optical grade material!) selected for low wedge error cental area thickness ~3µm after ArO etching membrane survived boiling acid clean and Al electrodes deposition ceramic mounting/wire bonding (Systrel, Paris) tested at Soleil Synchrotron October 2012 see talk of Michal Pomorski, this workshop 40µm thick plate shows significant trapping – I-V plot with X-ray beam shows no plateau region … …but 7µm membrane area has a good I-V plateau , i.e. bulk trapping in membrane is at ‘acceptable’ level fast response and no polarization effects seen can we use material with ~ppm N impurity ??

32 conclusions / status / future:
for intensity and position measurements, ‘proof of principle’ now well established by several groups using quadrant devices, with electrometer or RF signal readout approaches quality of CVD single crystal material --threading dislocation clusters-- remains a serious limit on device yield (bad samples shows high dark signal currents and local signal ‘gain’ effects…) Element Six ‘electronic grade’ samples have not improved over past ~7 years → selection of material still necessary to avoid local 'hotspots' ongoing work: - testing / deployment of devices: electrometer readout at ESRF; Soleil… RF readout at Petra; NSLS-BNL - investigating commerical fabrication (INEX; Micron; …) for series production of 'standard' device(s) and sourcing of superthin plates <10µm by deep dry etching - robust contacts and devices: - DLC variants for resistive contacts - boron doped CVD overgrowth - passivation (Al3N4; SiOx …?) 32

33 Thank-you for your attention


Download ppt "Progress on single crystal diamond beam position monitors for"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google