1. MPARWG Deborah K Smith DISCOVER MEaSUREs Project Remote Sensing Systems

2.  Dr Frouin’s Criteria Table  Strawman tables in Greg Hunolt’s background notes  Telecon in August with suggestion of answering a series of questions as a means to determine quality. Do the answers to questions lead to a metric of overall quality?  Peter’s presentation this morning on quality feedback from survey and his opinions. Oct 20-22 2010 ESDSWG Mtg, New Orleans

3.  A "straw-man proposal", a brainstormed simple proposal intended to generate discussion of its disadvantages and to provoke the generation of new and better proposals. Often, a straw man document will be prepared by one or two people prior to kicking off a larger project. In this way, the team can jump start their discussions with a document that is likely to contain many, but not all the key aspects to be discussed. -Wikipediastraw-manbrainstormed Oct 20-22 2010 ESDSWG Mtg, New Orleans

4.  A project with heritage. We’ve been producing microwave ocean data products and making them available since 1996 under NASA Pathfinder funding.  We have produced, and continue to produce and distribute many ocean products. Each product is assessed for quality before release to the public.  We are currently releasing F16 and F17 SSMIS ocean products. I will use these as an example in this talk. Oct 20-22 2010 ESDSWG Mtg, New Orleans

5. 1. Is the data set complete? 2. Are any gaps confirmed and documented? 3. Are the data acceptably intercalibrated to previous data? 4. Do the data products look as expected? (has a human eye checked the data set?) 5. Are overall statistics within expected range? 6. Are statistics for sub-regions or sub-time frames consistent with expectations and previous data?

6. 7. Are comparison statistics with “truth” or other data (such as buoy, ship or model winds) within expected range? 8. Is the data format consistent with previous data and what users expect? 9. Are files read correctly by read routines, and if not, have changes been made? 10. Have we completed or updated product documentation?

7. 11. Have we informed the users of file format, processing steps, algorithm changes/specifics? 12. Is a data validation file produced? 13. Has all web and ftp text been updated? 14. Have images been made and do the web tools to display them work correctly? 15. Have we described to users the differences to expect? 16. Is the data product like any other available, and if so, how does it compare?

8. 17. Who have we created this data set for and will it meet those user needs? 18. Do our tools work on the new data products? 19. Are any new tools needed? 20. What advances have occurred since we last asked these questions and should we change?

9.  Have we checked the data within the extended time series?  Are there any spurious trends in the data?

10.  But what do the answers to these questions mean?  What does the program want to know?  Is an external body needed to determine the quality? If so, who? (program? DAAC? Other scientists? General public?) Oct 20-22 2010 ESDSWG Mtg, New Orleans

11. Oct 20-22 2010 ESDSWG Mtg, New Orleans Science Quality Level To what degree have the data been validated? To what degree do the data fit within already existing products? To what degree is the data set complete and consistently processed? To what degree is the data set used in the community? To what degree are the data accurate and precise? 4Comparison by both project and other scientists find similar results Time series analysis demonstrate the quality of intercalibration Data set complete, with documentation of known gaps, and consistently processed, extends previous values Some are redistributing the data / Power users Measurements are both accurate and precise and derived values show expected and accepted ranges 3Comparison s to known references Extensive intercalibration performed Data set complete and consistently processed Many routine users Accuracy and precision have been demonstrated by many 2Comparison s to other data products Preliminary intercalibration performed Data set consistently processed but has gaps Many usersPreliminary point comparisons show data are accurate and precise 1No comparisons made by the project No intercalibration, but biases are known Data set has gaps and is not consistently processed Few usersNo assessment has been made

12. Oct 20-22 2010 ESDSWG Mtg, New Orleans Document Quality Level To what degree is the data format described and usable? To what degree are the algorithm and processing steps described? To what degree can a new user begin using the data? 4Data format is a commonly used standard accessible by 3 rd party software Peer-reviewed publication describes algorithm and data production Can be using the data within 15 minutes and can confirm the data are accurate 3Data format is described and read routines provided to users ATBD provided by data producer Can use the data accurately within a reasonable amount of time 2Data format is described Informal description provided with data Time required to understand how to use the data 1No data format information is provided No description provided Many hours and support emails needed to make sense of the data

13. Oct 20-22 2010 ESDSWG Mtg, New Orleans Accessibility/ Support Services Quality How easy is it for users to read the data ? How easy is it for users to obtain the data? To what degree can the user get help? 4Widely used standard file format User can access data with clients such as OpenDAP Full support services available 3Limited use file format, some common tools can be used User can view and obtain the data using common tools User can email the data producer 2Simple binary format with read routines User can view the data on the web Online FAQ 1Format described but no read routines available User must download and write own program to access data No help

14. Oct 20-22 2010 ESDSWG Mtg, New Orleans Overall Quality Level To what degree are users satisfied with data product? What is score from sub- tables? To what degree is the targeted community using the data** To what degree is the broader community using the data? 4Few questions to support services 10-12Significant useRoutinely used by journalists, students, applications 3Some questions about data 7-10Routine useUsed by journalists 2Questions about data and format 4-7Some useSome use by universities and researchers etc 1Many questions0-3No useNo use is evident ** this can be obtained from user metrics already being collected and from citation metrics

15.  Agreed-upon definitions of all terms  Understanding of how questions carry meaning across projects (if any)  An understanding of what Martha wants  An understanding of the value of this information and how to communicate it  Agreement on what the questions will be Oct 20-22 2010 ESDSWG Mtg, New Orleans