1. Council of European National Top level domain Registries Internet Governance and the CENTR Organisation TERENA Networking Conference 2000 “Pioneering Tomorrows Internet” Lisbon 22-25 May 2000

2. Council of European National Top level domain Registries Dennis Jennings, Chairman, CENTR Dennis.Jennings@ucd.ie

3. About CENTR An Association of ccTLD Registry Managers Started as a project of RIPE NCC in 3/98 Members decided to establish CENTR separately as a company in the UK. European focus but no geographical limits 30 members – registering over 3m domain names (+ associate members, JAPAN, NSI) Representatives of member Registry Managers make up the CENTR General Assembly

4. MEMBERS ANDORRA.adITALY.it ASCENSION ISLAND.ac LITHUANIA.lt AUSTRIA.at LUXEMBURG.lu BELGIUM.be MALTA.mt CANADA.ca NETHERLANDS.nl CROATIA.hrNORWAY.no DENMARK.dk POLAND.pl FINLAND.fi PORTUGAL.pt FRANCE.fr ROMANIA.ro GERMANY.de RUSSIA.ru GREECE.gr SLOVENIA.si GUERNSEY.ggSPAIN.es HUNGARY.huSWEDEN.se IRELAND.ieSWITZERLAND.ch ISRAEL.ilUNITED KINGDOM.uk Associate members: JAPAN.jp NSI Registry

5. Functions: Policy and Political Provides a forum to discuss matters of policy affecting ccTLD Registry Managers Acts as a channel of communication to Internet governing bodies and other organisations. Promotes the interests of not-for-profit ccTLD Registry Managers and lobbies on their behalf. Does not speak or act for individual Registry Managers

6. Functions: Exchange of Information Provides a focal point for enquiries on ccTLD Registry Manager practices to the wider community Collects information on, and document the practices of, ccTLD registries Encourages the harmonisation of practices and provision of better service for users

7. Differences in ccTLD Practices Automation of registration Contracts with registrants or registrars Domain Name dispute policy Fees for registration (one-off, annual etc.) Naming Rules (open to all -v- restricted to national businesses; any name -v- prohibited words and categories) Registration forms/information collected on name holder

8. Activities: Technical Technical Working Group for member Registry Managers (Mailing lists and web pages) Technical Work plan for collaborative projects –Secondary servers, Whois, security etc Workshops for technical staff to review work plan and share ideas.

9. Activities: Legal Legal Working Group for legal advisers of member Registry Managers. Physical meetings to work on legal issues such as data protection, trademark issues and contracts. Work plan agreed for 2000 including: –Contracts with registrants/registrars –Data Protection implications –Domain Name dispute resolution Advice on Relationship with ICANN and Governments

10. Activities:.eu.EU Working Group on CEC proposal for creation of.eu. European Commission published a working paper on the creation of.EU TLD http://www.ispo.cec.be/eif/InternetPoliciesSite/DotEU/Work DocEN.html http://www.ispo.cec.be/eif/InternetPoliciesSite/DotEU/Work DocEN.html CENTR Issues press release 15/2/2000: –Welcomes e-Europe Initiative –Specific proposal for.EU requires detailed analysis

11. Activities:.eu CENTR.eu Working Group meeting in Brussels - Issues report - 28/3/2000: –Welcomes e-Europe Initiative –Proposal for.EU requires detailed analysis:  Merits of.EU to end users  Legal implications  Appropriate policies for a TLD which is neither national nor global generic  Role of national internet communities in the process CENTR WG represented on CEC Consultation Group on.eu

12. ICANN DNSO PSO ASO Activities: ICANN Names council gTLDs Trade Mark Non commercial ccTLDs Commercial Registrars ISP/connectivity GACRSAC

13. ccTLD Constituency Regional AFRICA: AFTLD Asia/Pacific: APTLD Europe+: CENTR Latin America: LACTLD North America: NATLD Other groups IATLD:

14. Government Advisory Committee (GAC) An Advisory Body to ICANN Several Governments Represented (+CEC) Lead by Australia, US, France Focuses on ccTLDs and National Sovereignty Laying down rules for ccTLDs (Best Practice) Laying down rules for designation of ccTLD Managers Wishes to interject Governments between ccTLD Managers and ICANN

15. CENTR - ICANN ISSUES Relationship between ccTLDs and ICANN Currently under discussion in CENTR Some CENTR Members dissatisfied with the DNSO / Names Council / ccTLD Constituency structures and activities Some CENTR Members dissatisfied with ICANN - the budget, the focus on gTLDs, the authoritarian approach, the apparent reliance on the GAC in relation to ccTLDs, etc.

16. CENTR - ICANN ISSUES CENTR Members Seeking Recognition of existing Registry Managers Contract for Services by ICANN (IANA Functions and Root) Agreement on Best Practice Agreement on Designations and Re- Designations Agreement on ICANN Budget and Funding Agreement on Representation in ICANN

17. CENTR - ICANN ISSUES CENTR Members Offering Recognition of ICANN Industry self-regulation Best Practice Procedures for Designation and Re- Designation Funding NOT offering authority over ccTLDs

18. CENTR - ICANN ISSUES CENTR Key Concepts Industry self-regulation Local Internet Community (inc. Government) is the source of authority Operation of a ccTLD Registry is a “monopoly” and Manager must behave appropriately

19. CENTR - ICANN ISSUES Recognition of Registry Managers Nothing agreed GAC wants Government Licensing and Control of ccTLD Registry Managers

20. CENTR - ICANN ISSUES Contract for Services by ICANN (IANA Functions and Root) ICANN CEO declares that it is a “Policy Formation” not a “Services” Organisation Contract with ICANN (or through ICANN) does not seem possible How to proceed ? Need to protect authoritative root server system

21. CENTR - ICANN ISSUES Agreement on Best Practice CENTR has drafted Best Practice Guidelines CENTR Members likely to sign up to these Best Practice Guidelines at the General Assembly meeting in Trondheim in June Process for amending and updating CENTR Best Practice Guidelines to be agreed in Trondheim CENTR then ready to participate in other ccTLD Best Practice discussions

22. CENTR - ICANN ISSUES Agreement Designations/Re-Designations CENTR Chairman has drafted a “Principles” document for discussion in Trondheim Document envisages the “Local Internet Community” as the authority Document outlines a Designations dispute resolution procedure based on “Expert Determination” Document envisages industry self regulation ICANN appears to see itself as the Re-Designation authority ?

23. CENTR - ICANN ISSUES Agreement on ICANN Budget and Funding Most CENTR Members do not accept the ICANN approach to setting the ICANN budget or allocating funding responsibilities to ccTLDs. ICANN envisages a domain name tax which most CENTR Members reject CENTR Members envisage a system based on a number of contribution bands CENTR ExCom offered donations for 1999/2000 in response to ICANN invoices ICANN 2000/2001 budget / funding NOT agreed

24. CENTR - ICANN ISSUES Agreement on Representation in ICANN Not under discussion Possibility that CENTR Members will want to be independent of ICANN Possibility that CENTR Members will want to replace the DNSO with a TLD Support Organisation with 3+ Bard members Note that that the full recognition of ICANN by the US DoC requires that ICANN establish its relationship with ccTLD Registry Managers

25. CENTR - ICANN ISSUES Many issues to be resolved…..

26. Council of European National Top level domain Registries Thank You