1. Construction and Performance of a Double-Sided Silicon Detector Module using the Origami Concept C. Irmler, M. Friedl, M. Pernicka HEPHY Vienna

2. 2TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Contents Motivation “Origami” Chip-on-Sensor Concept Prototype Assembly Beam Test Performance Summary & Outlook

3. 3TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Motivation “Origami” Chip-on-Sensor Concept Prototype Assembly Beam Test Performance Summary & Outlook

4. 4TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 ~1 km in diameter Mt. Tsukuba KEKB Belle KEKB and Belle @ KEK (Tsukuba, Japan) Asymmetric machine: 8 GeV e - on 3.5 GeV e + e + /e - linear accelerator + storage ring Center of mass energy: Y(4S) (10.58 GeV) High intensity beams (1.6 A & 1.3 A) Linac Belle KEKB

5. 5TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Belle-II KEKB factory upgrade until 2013 Target luminosity of 8 x 10 35 cm -2 s -1 40 times the present value Accordingly increase of background Limitations of current silicon vertex detector (SVD2): –Occupancy  need faster shaping –Trigger rate (dead time)  need faster readout and pipeline Replacement of the SVD and its readout is necessary APV25 readout chip would fit the needs

6. 6TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Comparison VA1TA – APV25 VA1TA (SVD2) Commercial product (IDEAS) Tp = 800 ns (300 ns – 1000 ns) no pipeline 5 MHz readout 20 Mrad radiation tolerance noise: ENC = 180 e + 7.5 e/pF time over threshold: ~2000 ns single sample per trigger APV25 (Belle-II SVD) Developed for CMS by IC London and RAL Tp = 50 ns (30 ns – 200 ns) 192 cells analog pipeline 40 MHz readout >100 Mrad radiation tolerance noise: ENC = 250 e + 36 e/pF time over threshold: ~160 ns multiple samples per trigger possible (Multi-Peak-Mode) Must minimize capacitive load !!!

7. 7TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Shaping Time and Occupancy With hit time finding, we can cope with 40-fold increase in luminosity For details see poster by Markus Friedl

8. 8TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Consequences for SVD Ladder Design SVD2 ladders: Up to 3 ganged (concatenated) sensors are read out from the side Minimization of material budget, as hybrids are outside of acceptance SNR > 15 with VA1TA, but would be < 10 with APV25 Ganging of sensors does not work with APV25! up to 3 ganged sensors up to 3 ganged sensors

9. 9TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Motivation “Origami” Chip-on-Sensor Concept Prototype Assembly Beam Test Performance Summary & Outlook

10. 10TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Origami – Chip-on-Sensor Concept (readout connections not shown) Chip-on-sensor concept for double-sided readout Flex fan-out pieces wrapped to opposite side (hence “Origami“) All chips aligned on one side  single cooling pipe Prototype for 4” DSSD (later with 6” sensors)

11. 11TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Origami – Details side view Thinned readout chips (APV25) on sensor Strips of bottom side are connected by flex fanouts wrapped around the edge All readout chips are aligned  single cooling pipe Shortest possible connections  high signal-to-noise ratio Total material budget: 0.72% X 0 (cf. 0.48% for conventional readout)

12. 12TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Belle-II SVD Layout Tentative geometry New central pixel double-layer using DEPFET 4 strip layers of 6” DSSDs Every sensor is read out individually to maintain high SNR –red:Origami chip-on-sensor concept –green:read out by conventional hybrid (from side) Double-layer of DEPFET pixels 4 layers of double- sided strip sensors

13. 13TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Sketch of the Outermost Ladder (Layer 6) Composed of 5 x 6” double-sided sensors Center sensors have Origami structure Edge sensors are conventionally read out from sides Cooling block (end ring) Connector (Nanonics) Structural element (Zylon) Cooling pipe Flex circuits Electronics for border sensor ca. 60cm

14. 14TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Motivation “Origami” Chip-on-Sensor Concept Prototype Assembly Beam Test Performance Summary & Outlook

15. 15TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 APV25 Thinning One wafer (319 good dies) thinned down from 300 µm to 106 µm and diced by French company EDGETEK / WSI Received 314 good dies (5 lost = 98.4% yield) 16 thinned APVs mounted onto 4 hybrids Compared to 1 hybrid with 4 standard APVs Measurement Results: All APVs show similar signal and noise figure Proper calibration curve No measurable differences between normal and thinned chips  Thinning has no effects on APV functionality and signal quality! APV25 Calibration Curve Thinned APV25 Standard APV25

16. 16TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Origami Hybrid – Final Layout 4 n-side APV chips 2 p-side APV chips Connectors (on both sides) Flex fanouts to be Wrapped around the sensor edge 3-layer flex hybrid design p- and n-sides are separated by 80V bias n-side pitch adapter is integrated in hybrid 3 pcs. of each type produced at CERN PCB workshop Animal farm (mascots of creators)

17. 17TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Module Assembly 1 Hamamatsu 4” DSSD: top side: 152 µm pitch (z) bottom side: 50 µm pitch (rφ) Gluing fanouts onto bottom side: –Custom jig (porous stone inlay) for gluing and wire bonding –Two component epoxy paste adhesive Araldite® 2011 –Aligning fanouts against sensor and hybrid –Distance between flexes is important Wire bonding: –Fully automated bonder F&K Delvotec 6400 Processing of bottom side is finished

18. 18TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 bottom APV25 top APV25 APV25 calibration curves of Origami hybrid Module Assembly 2 Attaching APV25 chips onto hybrid –Two component conductive adhesive –Alignment under microscope Gluing hybrid onto Rohacell foam –There must be sufficient glue underneath the bond pads! Wire bonding of APV25 power and control lines Electrical test of hybrid –some bad vias  mostly repaired with thin wires –Hybrid PCB design is okay –7 of 8 APV chips are working well –Excellent internal calibration results

19. 19TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Module Assembly 3 Flip sensor and fanouts –Using another jig  jig2 –Jigs are stuck together with 3 alignment pins –Turning over –Remove jig1 –Further assembling has to be done on jig2 Gluing hybrid onto top side of sensor –Aligning pitch adapter to strips on sensor and fanouts Wire bonding between sensor and integrated pitch adaptor 2 openings to protect bottom side bond wires

20. 20TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Module Assembly 4 Bending & Gluing of fanouts –Using positioner equipped with a custom tool –Easier than expected –Allows precise positioning w/o damaging underlying wire bonds Wire bonding between APVs and pitch adaptors Attaching cooling pipe –Thermal conductive paste –Electrically isolating pad between APV and pipe

21. 21TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Final Origami Module Origami concept already presented at TWEPP 2008 Prototype completed beginning of August 2009

22. 22TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Motivation “Origami” Chip-on-Sensor Concept Prototype Assembly Beam Test Performance Summary & Outlook

23. 23TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Beam Test Setup CERN SPS beam line Aug. 09 120 GeV π + / p / K + Cooling: 13 °C water cooling system beam Origami Module Together with different types of Belle DSSD prototype modules

24. 24TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Beam Test Results Origami Module has been tested for several hours Good performance w and w/o cooling (13 °C water) About 80 GB data recorded Analysis is in an early stage  results preliminary Benefit of cooling: ~ 10% higher SNR 120 GeV/c π + /p/K + w/o coolingcooling (13° water) p-siden-sidep-siden-side Average cluster width2.21.82.21.8 Cluster SNR11.516.712.818.5 Preliminary Cluster SNR =  strip_signal / ( sqrt(cluster_width) * noise_avg) ~10% higher noise compared to 2008 beam test for all modules (ground loop in the front-end and / or HV supply?) Hence SNR of all modules is slightly worse than expected

25. 25TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Time resolution achieved in beam tests with several different types of Belle DSSD prototype modules (covering a broad range of SNR) Beam Test Results 2 (TDC error subtracted) Origami Module SPS 2009 data matches previous beam test. 2...3 ns RMS accuracy at typical cluster SNR (15...25) Origami shows similar precision like other modules

26. 26TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Motivation “Origami” Chip-on-Sensor Concept Prototype Assembly Beam Test Performance Summary & Outlook

27. 27TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Motivated by KEKB upgrade and Belle II Concept for low-mass double-sided readout with cooling Thinning of APV25 chips does not affect its functionality Successfully built the first prototype of an Origami module Module showed excellent performance at beam test Beam test analysis is still ongoing Next goal: We want to build a prototype of the outermost layer of Belle-II SVD Summary & Outlook

28. 28TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Thank you for your attention

29. 29TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 BACKUP SLIDES

30. 30TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Origami Material Budget X 0 comparison between conventional and chip-on-sensor: +50% increase in material, but also huge improvement in SNR Trade-off between material budget and SNR According to simulation, additional material is prohibitive in innermost layer, but no problem for layers 4-6  OK with layout

31. 31TWEPP 2009, Christian Irmler (HEPHY Vienna)23 September 2009 Origami Hybrid – Flexes