Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Pain Management in the Hospital
Rog Kyle, MD Medical University of South Carolina 2/7/12
2
Objectives Differentiate acute, chronic, somatic, neuropathic, referred, and visceral pain syndromes. Differentiate tolerance, dependence, addiction, and pseudo-addiction. Explain the indications and limitations of non-pharmacological, pharmacological, and adjuvant methods of pain control in the hospitalized patient. Explain the indications and limitations of opioid pharmacotherapy. Determine equianalgesic dosing for pharmacologic therapy as needed.
3
Key Messages Chronic pain is a significant problem in the elderly
There are many different mechanisms involved in generation and perception of pain Both non-opioid and opioid options are available for managing pain. Different classes of medication and non-pharmacotherapies are available for the management of pain syndromes Opioids have a narrow therapeutic window and their use must be weighed carefully in the management of chronic, non-cancer pain
4
Types of pain Tolerance, dependence and addiction Medications
5
Types of Pain
6
Nociceptive Pain Nociceptors = pain fiber sensitive to noxious stimuli
Somatic – injury to tissues, well localized Visceral – injury to organs (stretch receptors), poorly localized Referred – afferent visceral fibers + somatic to same spinothalamic pathway
7
Neuropathic pain Abnormal neural activity secondary to disease, injury, or dysfunction Persists without ongoing injury (trigeminal neuralgia, DM neuropathy) Types: Sympathetic – from peripheral nerve injury with autonomic changes “New” term – Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Type I = RSD Type II = causalgia Peripheral autonomic pain – Same but without autonomic change (PHN) Central Pain (spinal cord injury)
8
Tolerance, Dependence, Addiction
9
Tolerance Tolerance - increase the dose to maintain equipotent analgesic effects Associative - linked to environmental clues and involves psychological factors Adaptive - involves down-regulation or desensitization of opioid receptors, or both
10
Tolerance Repeated administration of opioids
Desensitization or down-regulation Sensitization – similar to neuropathic pain with increased sensitivity to pain
11
Can’t distinguish the hyperalgesia due to opioid treatment from the hyperalgesia due to worsening neuropathic pain It is often impossible to distinguish between pharmacologic tolerance and abnormal pain sensitivity Both lead to escalation of opioid therapy that ultimately fails
12
Dependence Rapid discontinuation of opioid following prolonged administration produces symptoms Dysphoria Anxiety Mood volatility Hypertension Tachycardia Sweating
13
Dependence Psychological dependence Physical dependence
Extreme behavior (craving) associated with procuring/consuming drug High vs. withdrawal Physical dependence class-specific withdrawal syndrome that can be produced by abrupt cessation or rapid dose reduction of a drug (or administration of an antagonist)
14
Addiction Physical and psychological dependence
Chronic relapsing disorder characterized by persistent drug-seeking and drug-taking behaviors Impaired control over use, compulsive use, continued use despite harm and craving
15
Medications
16
NSAIDS
17
Wide variety 60 million Rx’s/yr
Clinical efficacy of equipotent doses is similar Individual responses highly variable – especially toxicity cox-1 vs. cox-2 naprosyn may have greatest relative cardiovascular safety profile diclofenac - available as a topical patch for pain due to trauma and as a gel for treatment of painful joints sulindac – increased hepatotoxicity indomethacin - GI and central nervous system adverse effects may be more frequent or severe than with other NSAIDs ketorolac - risk of gastropathy is increased when use exceeds five days piroxicam – high GI toxicity celecoxib – no antiplatelet function. Increased CV risk above 200mg/day
18
Utility of NSAIDS Variations in patient response
Generally indicated in mild to moderate pain Mostly for pain of somatic origin although has a CNS effect as well Each trial should last a couple weeks May have an opioid sparing effect as adjunct Use at the maximum anti-inflammatory dose Protein bound – may interfere with other protein bound drugs (dilantin. coumadin)
19
Utility of NSAIDS Noted variability in the response to NSAIDS between patients Does not appear related to serum concentrations Degree of Cox inhibition doesn’t correlate with effect Non-prostaglandin effects may predominate in some patients Switching between classes of NSAIDS may be beneficial
20
Tricyclic Antidepressants
21
Utility in pain management
Most useful in neuropathic pain None of the TCA’s carries an indication for pain management Used frequently in variety of settings Amitriptyline most widely studied Anti-depressant effects may alleviate depression associated with chronic pain May have synergy with opioids Switching TCA’s based on effect and/or side effects can be tried…but often frustrating
22
Mechanism of action Generally unknown
Theories involve action on serotonin, norepinephrine receptors (TCAs with the greatest effect upon serotonin seem to have the greatest analgesic effect) May potentiate endogenous opioid system However, potent serotonin RI’s have no analgesic effect of their own Can take weeks to work
23
Side effects Anticholinergic (amitriptyline > nortriptyline)
Also GI, CV, neurologic (esp. sedation – maybe a +’ve) Anticholinergic and CNS effects may diminish in days to weeks – “ride it out”
24
Anticonvulsants
25
Utility in pain management
Can be very effective, particularly in neuropathic pain Wide variation in use among pain specialists, except with carbamazepine for trigeminal neuralgia Gabapentin is frequently a first choice as levels do not need monitoring
26
Mechanism of action Theories include membrane stabilization (phenytoin), inhibition of repeated neuronal discharges (carbamazepine), GABA inhibition enhancement (valproic acid, clonazepam), GABA mimetics (gabapentin, pregabalin).
27
Adjuvant medications
28
Benzodiazepines Good choice when anxiety complicates pain management (esp’ly cancer patients) Clonazepam particularly useful in neuropathic pain (GABA potentiation) Drawbacks well known Addictive potential is significant Potentiates sedation and respiratory depression
29
Antispasmodics Painful muscle spasm, myoclonic jerks can accompany a variety of pain conditions (and opioids) toxicity of morphine Mechanism of action may reflect their sedative effects more than direct muscle effect Commonly used – cyclopenzaprine, carisoprodol, baclofen, methcarbamol
30
SSRI/SNRI Often tried when TCA side effects limit utility
May be treating depression – not an uncommon consequence of life with chronic pain Venlafaxine has been shown to be similar to imipramine in one study of painful neuropathy Duloxetine approved for diabetic peripheral neuropathy Depression is probably undertreated in chronic pain patients in general (cancer and non-cancer pts)
31
Opioids
32
Opioids Role in treatment of pain is well established for acute pain, malignant pain and care of the terminally ill Role in chronic non-cancer pain is more controversial WHO Ladder
34
Opioids WHO Ladder Moderate to severe - fixed dose schedule and not on a “prn” basis Stepwise approach Adjuvants useful in enhancing analgesia and controlling side effects
35
Opioids Equi-analgesic dosing
37
Opioids Equianalgesic dosing Equianalgesic conversion
MUSC pharmacy recommends 50% dose reduction for cross tolerance (others recommend 25-50%) except for methadone and fentanyl (see below)
39
Opioids Equianalgesic dosing Equianalgesic conversion
Methadone conversion ratio
41
Opioids Equianalgesic dosing Equianalgesic conversion
Methadone conversion ratio Fentanyl conversion
43
Therapeutic failures and adverse outcomes
One of the fundamental principles of pain management is that the dose of an opioid should be increased until maximal analgesia is achieved with minimal side effects What to do when this doesn’t work? Identifying causes of treatment failure Progression of underlying illness Pharmacologic tolerance Increased pain sensitivity
44
PCA Efficacy established in post-op pain
Morphine, hydromorphone, fentanyl Higher pt satisfaction, better pain control, higher amount of opioid overall
45
PCA Morphine Metabolites (morphine-6-glucuronide) accumulate in renal failure = sedation, respiratory depression Fentanyl Less histamine release = better in hypotension, bronchospasm Inactive metabolites (hepatic), Safe in ESRD Hydromorphone Safe in ESRD High concentration/low volume
47
PCA Conversion When converting from a PCA to an oral regimen in patients requiring long term pain control Give approximately 50% of 24 hr total opioid use as a long acting oral formulation and 50% as breakthrough oral formulation Reduce dose 25-50% to account for cross tolerance if switching opioid
48
Side Effects Depressed respiratory drive
Depressed consciousness, hallucinations Hypotension Nausea, vomiting Ileus, constipation Urinary retention
49
Examples – Equianalgesic Dosing
Convert a patient requiring 120 mg of p.o. morphine and 20 mg i.v. morphine to p.o. oxycodone 20 mg i.v. morphine = 60 mg p.o. morphine 120 mg + 60 mg = 180 mg morphine/24 hr Ratio 3:2 for morphine:oxycodone (po) = 120 mg oxycodone Reduce by 25-50% = mg oxycodone po Q4H
50
Examples – Methadone Conversion
Convert a patient taking 300 mg MS Contin BID and 60 mg MSIR Q4H to methadone Total oral morphine/24 hrs = 960mg Conversion ratio is 16 for 960 mg = 960/16 = 60 Reduce by 50% for cross tolerance = 30 Given Q8H = 30/3 = 10 mg Q8H methadone
51
Examples – PCA to Oral Opioid
Convert a patient with hydromorphone PCA set at basal rate of 1 mg/hr and breakthrough of 0.2mg Q10 min that utilized a total of 6 mg of breakthrough in previous 12 hours to oral oxycodone 24 hr iv hydromorphone use = 24 mg basal (1 mg/hr x 24 hrs) + 12 mg breakthrough (6 mg/12 hrs x 2) = 36 mg hydromorphone IV oxycodone:hydromorphone iv = 20:1.5 = 480 mg oxycodone Reduce 50% for cross tolerance = 240 mg oxycodone Giving 50% of total as long acting = OxyContin 60 mg BID + 20 mg oxycodone Q4H
52
References Ballantyne JC, Mao J. Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain. N Engl J Med 2003;349: Hudcova J, McNicol ED, Quah CS, Lau J, Carr DB. Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus conventional opioid analgesia for postoperative pain (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003348 Roelofs PD, Deyo RA, Koes BW, Scholten RJ, van Tulder MW. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: an updated Cochrane review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(16):1766 Von Korff M, Kolodny A, Deyo RA, Chou R. Long-term opioid therapy reconsidered. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(5):325 Joranson DE, Ryan KM, Gilson AM, Dahl JL. Trends in medical use and abuse of opioid analgesics. JAMA. 2000;283(13):1710 Dobecki DA, Schocket SM, Wallace MS. Update on pharmacotherapy guidelines for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2006;10(3):185 Saarto T, Wiffen PJ. Antidepressants for neuropathic pain: a Cochrane review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(12):1372
53
References Ballantyne JC, Mao J. Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain. N Engl J Med 2003;349: Hudcova J, McNicol ED, Quah CS, Lau J, Carr DB. Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus conventional opioid analgesia for postoperative pain (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003348 Roelofs PD, Deyo RA, Koes BW, Scholten RJ, van Tulder MW. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: an updated Cochrane review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(16):1766 Von Korff M, Kolodny A, Deyo RA, Chou R. Long-term opioid therapy reconsidered. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(5):325 Joranson DE, Ryan KM, Gilson AM, Dahl JL. Trends in medical use and abuse of opioid analgesics. JAMA. 2000;283(13):1710 Dobecki DA, Schocket SM, Wallace MS. Update on pharmacotherapy guidelines for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2006;10(3):185 Saarto T, Wiffen PJ. Antidepressants for neuropathic pain: a Cochrane review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(12):1372
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.