1. Recuperação de Informação

2. IR: representation, storage, organization of, and access to information items Emphasis is on the retrieval of information (not data) Focus is on the user information need Introduction to IR

3. Data retrieval  Well defined semantics  a single erroneous object implies failure! Information retrieval  information about a subject or topic  semantics is frequently loose  small errors are tolerated IR system:  interpret contents of information items  generate a ranking which reflects relevance  notion of relevance is most important

4. IR at the center of the stage  IR in the last 20 years: classification and categorization systems and languages user interfaces and visualization  Still, area was seen as of narrow interest  Advent of the Web changed this perception once and for all universal repository of knowledge free (low cost) universal access no central editorial board many problems though: IR seen as key to finding the solutions!

5. Logical view of the documents structure Accents spacing stopwords Noun groups stemming Manual indexing Docs structureFull textIndex terms

6. User Interface Text Operations Query Operations Indexing Searching Ranking Index Text query user need user feedback ranked docs retrieved docs logical view inverted file DB Manager Module 5 2 8 Text Database Text The Retrieval Process

7. Basic Concepts IR systems usually adopt index terms to process queries Index term:  a keyword or group of selected words  any word (more general) Stemming might be used:  connect: connecting, connection, connections An inverted file is built for the chosen index terms

8. Matching at index term level is quite imprecise No surprise that users get frequently unsatisfied Since most users have no training in query formation, problem is even worst Frequent dissatisfaction of Web users Issue of deciding relevance is critical for IR systems: ranking Basic Concepts

9. A ranking is an ordering of the documents retrieved that (hopefully) reflects the relevance of the documents to the user query A ranking is based on fundamental premisses regarding the notion of relevance, such as:  common sets of index terms  sharing of weighted terms  likelihood of relevance Each set of premisses leads to a distinct IR model Basic Concepts

10. Each document represented by a set of representative keywords or index terms An index term is a document word useful for remembering the document main themes Usually, index terms are nouns because nouns have meaning by themselves However, some search engines assume that all words are index terms (full text representation) Basic Concepts

11. Not all terms are equally useful for representing the document contents: less frequent terms allow identifying a narrower set of documents The importance of the index terms is represented by weights associated to them Let  ki be an index term  dj be a document  wij is a weight associated with (ki,dj) The weight wij quantifies the importance of the index term for describing the document contents Basic Concepts

12.  ki is an index term  dj is a document  t is the total number of docs  K = (k1, k2, …, kt) is the set of all index terms  wij >= 0 is a weight associated with (ki,dj)  wij = 0 indicates that term does not belong to doc  vec(dj) = (w1j, w2j, …, wtj) is a weighted vector associated with the document dj Basic Concepts

13. The Vector Model Use of binary weights is too limiting Non-binary weights provide consideration for partial matches These term weights are used to compute a degree of similarity between a query and each document Ranked set of documents provides for better matching

14. The Vector Model Define:  wij > 0 whenever ki  dj  wiq >= 0 associated with the pair (ki,q)  vec(dj) = (w1j, w2j,..., wtj) vec(q) = (w1q, w2q,..., wtq)  To each term ki is associated a unitary vector vec(i)  The unitary vectors vec(i) and vec(j) are assumed to be orthonormal (i.e., index terms are assumed to occur independently within the documents) The t unitary vectors vec(i) form an orthonormal basis for a t-dimensional space In this space, queries and documents are represented as weighted vectors

15. The Vector Model Sim(q,dj) = cos(  ) = [vec(dj)  vec(q)] / |dj| * |q| = [  wij * wiq] / |dj| * |q| Since wij > 0 and wiq > 0, 0 <= sim(q,dj) <=1 A document is retrieved even if it matches the query terms only partially i j dj q 

16. The Vector Model Sim(q,dj) = [  wij * wiq] / |dj| * |q| How to compute the weights wij and wiq ? A good weight must take into account two effects:  quantification of intra-document contents (similarity) tf factor, the term frequency within a document  quantification of inter-documents separation (dissi- milarity) idf factor, the inverse document frequency  wij = tf(i,j) * idf(i)

17. The Vector Model Let,  N be the total number of docs in the collection  ni be the number of docs which contain ki  freq(i,j) raw frequency of ki within dj A normalized tf factor is given by  f(i,j) = freq(i,j) / max(freq(l,j))  where the maximum is computed over all terms which occur within the document dj The idf factor is computed as  idf(i) = log (N/ni)  the log is used to make the values of tf and idf comparable. It can also be interpreted as the amount of information associated with the term ki.

18. The Vector Model The best term-weighting schemes use weights which are give by  wij = f(i,j) * log(N/ni)  the strategy is called a tf-idf weighting scheme For the query term weights, a suggestion is  wiq = (0.5 + [0.5 * freq(i,q) / max(freq(l,q)]) * log(N/ni) The vector model with tf-idf weights is a good ranking strategy with general collections The vector model is usually as good as the known ranking alternatives. It is also simple and fast to compute.

19. The Vector Model Advantages:  term-weighting improves quality of the answer set  partial matching allows retrieval of docs that approximate the query conditions  cosine ranking formula sorts documents according to degree of similarity to the query Disadvantages:  assumes independence of index terms (??); not clear that this is bad though

20. The Vector Model: Example I d1 d2 d3 d4d5 d6 d7 k1 k2 k3

21. The Vector Model: Example II d1 d2 d3 d4d5 d6 d7 k1 k2 k3

22. The Vector Model: Example III d1 d2 d3 d4d5 d6 d7 k1 k2 k3

23. Evaluation Precision: from the returned docs, how many are relevant Recall: from all relevant docs, how many were returned

24. Evaluation Collection Relevant Docs |R| Answer Set |A| Relevant Docs in Answer Set |Ra| Recall= |Ra|/|R| Precision = |Ra|/|A|