Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Physics Results from RHIC Gunther Roland XLIII Cracow School of Theoretical Physics Zakopane 5/30-6/7 2003.

Published by Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Physics Results from RHIC Gunther Roland XLIII Cracow School of Theoretical Physics Zakopane 5/30-6/7 2003."— Presentation transcript:

1 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Physics Results from RHIC Gunther Roland XLIII Cracow School of Theoretical Physics Zakopane 5/30-6/7 2003

2 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Exploring QCD with Heavy Ions Matter Density  B (GeV) Temperature (MeV) Quark-Gluon Plasma Hadron Gas Phase Boundary Early Universe 0 200 0 Atomic Nuclei 1 Critical Point I II III IV oStructure of Relativistic Nuclei oMechanism of Entropy Production oQCD phase diagram oProperties of QGP IIIIIIIV

3 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Two Lectures I. Bulk Production II. Hard Scattering Charged Hadron p T -Spectrum in Au+Au at RHIC (PHOBOS)

4 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Bulk Production Hard Scattering

5 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Initial State ‘Final State’ Interactions

6 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Control Parameters: sqrt(s) Different sqrt(s) dependence of ‘soft’ vs ‘hard’ processes Drees, QM’01

7 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Control Parameters: Centrality b 2R ~ 15fm Spectators Participant Region Smaller Impact Parameter b Bigger Collision System More Participants (N part ) = Wounded Nucleons

8 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Control Parameters: Centrality  inel =42 mb (RHIC) Glauber Monte Carlo  inel =33 mb (SPS)  inel =21 mb (AGS) Centrality controls –Volume (N part ) –No. of binary collisions (N coll ) –Shape of interaction region N part vs N coll –soft vs hard processes –coherent vs incoherent production

9 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider First Physics in ‘00 Versatile machine –Au+Au (‘00-’02) 19.6 GeV 56 GeV 130 GeV 200 GeV –p+p (‘02,’03) 200 GeV polarized –d+Au (‘03) 200 GeV 4 Experiments –2 big –2 small Complementary capabilities

10 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 STAR Large acceptance tracking detector Mass, charge and momentum for >1000 hadrons per event

11 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 PHENIX High Rate, Particle ID, Triggering Rare particles: Leptons, High p T

12 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 PHOBOS Full Acceptance Multiplicity Detector High precision spectrometer near y=0 (low p T )

13 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 BRAHMS Particle Production at small angles High resolution spectrometer & good particle ID

14 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Part I: Bulk Particle Production

15 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Rapidity Density 600 1200 Central Au+Au (200 GeV) Predicted Multiplicity for RHIC Extrapolate –A+A at 20 GeV –p+p at 200 GeV Compilation by K. Eskola

16 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 4-  Multiplicity at RHIC dN/d  Pseudo-rapidity 19.6 GeV130 GeV 200 GeV PHOBOS BRAHMS 130 GeV BRAHMS 200 GeV dN/d  PHOBOS nucl-ex/0210015 BRAHMS PLB 523 (2001) 227, PRL 88 (2002) 202301

17 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Result vs Predictions Multiplicity at low end of range Most models didn’t do so well Rapidity Density 6001200 Central Au+Au (200 GeV) Color Glass Parton Saturation Kharzeev, Levin

18 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Limiting Fragmentation BRAHMS PHOBOS Study shape in rest-frame of one nucleus Distributions fall on limiting curve at large  Limiting curve is unique for each centrality bin PHOBOS nucl-ex/0210015 BRAHMS PRL 88 (2002) 202301

19 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Au+Au (preliminary)  N ch  scaling vs N part N ch proportional to N part

20 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Au+Au (preliminary)  N ch  scaling vs N part N ch proportional to N part Constant of proportionality = N ch in e + e - at same sqrt(s)

21 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 (Mueller 1983) Total Multiplicity vs. Beam Energy PHOBOS QM’02, Steinberg pp/pp A+A e+e-e+e- Central A+A /e + e - Fit

22 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Rapidity Distributions at 200 GeV yTyT  Surprising agreement in shape between AA/e + e - /pp e + e - measures dN/dy T (rapidity relative to “thrust” axis) AA/pp ~ 1.4-1.5 200 GeV Central Au+Au q q PHOBOS QM’02, Steinberg

23 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Particle density near midrapidity RHIC combined e + e - scales like AA near midrapidity (dN/dy T ) RHIC combined PHOBOS QM’02

24 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Centrality Dependence at |  < 1 _ pp Au+Au 19.6 GeV preliminary 130 GeV 200 GeV Saturation model works from 20 to 200 GeV

25 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 What is the Energy Density?  = 650 * 1GeV/(  R 2 *1 fm/c) = 4 GeV/fm 3 Much bigger than  crit … …if we have fast thermalization! Rapidity Density 6001200 Central Au+Au (200 GeV)

26 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Azimuthal Anisotropy “Head on” view of colliding nuclei Peripheral Central Initial State Anisotropy Coordinate Space Final State Anisotropy Momentum Space Interaction! 2*v 2 Azimuthal Angle (rad)

27 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Anisotropy v 2 vs Centrality STAR |  | < 1.3 0.1 < p t < 2.0 PHOBOS PHENIX Up to mid-central collisions, v 2 reaches hydro limit

28 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Hydrodynamics and v 2 Teaney, Lauret, Shuryak, nucl-th/0110037Kolb, Heinz, nucl-ex/0204061 Data consistent with hydro calculations Sensitivity to EoS

29 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Hydro Equation of State Kolb, Heinz, nucl-ex/0305084

30 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Parameters:  0 = 0.6 fm/c s 0 = 110 fm -3 s 0 /n 0 = 250 T crit =T chem =165 MeV T dec =100 MeV Hydrodynamics and Spectra Kolb, Rapp, Phys. Rev. C 67 (03) 044903

31 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Blast wave fit p K   Blast wave: –“Hydro-inspired” Fit –Parametrize Final State Local thermal equilibrium (T) Linear radial flow profile  x,y (r) =  0,x,y * r Geometrical size r x and r y Freeze-out time  o and duration  o Even better than the real thing…

32 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Blast wave Fits to Spectra Simultaneous Fit to ,k,p gives Kinetic Freeze-Out Temperature, Transverse Expansion velocity

33 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Blast wave Fit to Correlation Data Fabrice Retiere SQM ‘03, Mike Lisa Consistent Data from STAR, PHENIX, PHOBOS Also HBT vs reaction plane Unlike particles Balance Functions Short-lived Resonances Consistent Results Lifetime ~ 10 fm/c Particle emission over few fm/c

34 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Hydro and Correlation Data Kolb, Heinz nuclt-th/0305084 Hydro calculation underestimates size, overestimates time

35 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Statistical Model Fit Relative Abundances: Two Parameters (or three or four) ! Caveat: Resonances, Phase-space over/under population

36 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 T chem vs T kin Florkowski, Broniowski, nucl-th/0212052 Addition of resonances may allow freezeout with T chem = T kin c.f. Torrieri, Rafelski, nucl-th/030507

37 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Physics Results from RHIC: Lecture II Gunther Roland XLIII Cracow School of Theoretical Physics Zakopane 5/30-6/7 2003

38 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Memento: Bulk Particle Production @ RHIC – Saturation consistent w/ multiplicity systematics – Final state anisotropy indicates “Thermalization” Energy Density: > 5 GeV/fm 3 – Momentum distributions and correlations are hydro- like, with a large radial flow field – Hydrodynamic calculations show sensitivity of results to EoS; many qualitative features – Timescales are very short: Thermalization, Expansion, Freeze-out

39 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 2nd Lecture I. Bulk Production II. Hard Scattering Charged Hadron p T -Spectrum in Au+Au at RHIC

40 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Dense Matter Diagnostics Leading Particle Hadrons q q Leading Particle Jet cross-section calculable in QCD

41 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Dense Matter Diagnostics Leading Particle Hadrons q q Leading Particle Hadrons q q Leading Particle Jet cross-section calculable in QCD Study fate of jets in dense matter in Au+Au Leading Particle

42 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 STAR Au+AuOpal e + e -

43 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Dense Matter Diagnostics Leading Particle Hadrons q q Leading Particle Hadrons q q Leading Particle Jet cross-section calculable in QCD Study fate of jets in dense matter in Au+Au Poor man’s jet: Leading Particles Leading Particle

44 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Charged Hadron Spectra Preliminary  s NN = 200 GeV Results from all RHIC experiments!

45 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Control Parameters: Centrality  inel =42 mb (RHIC) Glauber Monte Carlo  inel =33 mb (SPS)  inel =21 mb (AGS) Total yield scales with N part –Volume-scaling Coherence Expect N coll scaling for hard (point-like) processes –Incoherent production

46 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 “Jet Quenching” at High p T Yield at high p T in AA is 6 times smaller than expected expected observed proton+proton Au+Au

47 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Jets in Dense Matter Are we really looking at jets? Look for jet structure by measuring –small angle correlations –back-to-back correlations relative to high p T leading particle Hadrons q q Leading Particle

48 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Peripheral Au+Au data Jets seen in peripheral Au+Au and p+p Azimuthal correlations –Small angle (  ~ 0) –Back-to-Back (  ~ p) D. Hardtke QM ‘02

49 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Central Au+Au data Disappearance of back-to-back correlations in central Au+Au Away-side particles absorbed or scattered in medium D. Hardtke QM ‘02

50 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Jet suppression via Energy Loss Vitev, Gyulassy, PRL 89 (2002) Suppression due to the energy loss of fast partons in plasma via induced gluon radiation

51 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Centrality Dependence of Suppression STAR Preliminary Central Peripheral

52 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Another Look at Centrality Dependence approximate N part -scaling at “intermediate” p T !? PHOBOS, nucl-ex/0302015

53 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 N part Scaling in Saturation Model High p T suppression as an initial state effect: Parton saturation breaks incoherence Kharzeev, Levin, McLerran, hep-ph/021332

54 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Experimental Test: d+Au Vitev, nucl-th/0302002, Phys.Lett.B in press Vitev and M.Gyulassy, Phys.Rev.Lett. 89 (2002) Central Peripheral Fixed target p+A data Prediction for RHIC

55 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Experimental Test: d+Au Central Kharzeev, Levin, McLerran, hep-ph/021332

56 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Preliminary Results for d+Au PHENIX Preliminary 1  errors STAR Preliminary Min-bias d+Au data from PHENIX/STAR, relative to p+p –Similar to low-energy data (Cronin effect) –No suppression

57 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Centrality dependence of R dAu PHOBOS preliminary PHOBOS preliminary PHOBOS preliminary PHOBOS preliminary R dAu Yield/ /p+p fit

58 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Back-to-back ‘Jets’ in d+Au d+Au Au+Au

59 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Preliminary Lesson from d+Au Back-to-Back Jets are observed Data compatible with extrapolation of Cronin-effect to RHIC No suppression effects seen If data holds: “Jet quenching” indicative of light parton energy loss (2-3 GeV) in a dense medium Some high-p T “puzzles” remain ->

60 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 “Instant” Thermalization E. Shuryak, nucl-th/0112042 STAR Central Peripheral Limit ( mfp = 0) v2v2 S. Voloshin, QM’02

61 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 “Proton puzzle” dN/dp T (p) ~ dN/dp T (  )

62 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 “Suppression” for light/heavy hadrons High-p T hadrons from fragmentation of fast partons: –Suppression/energy loss should effect all hadrons –But: No suppression for baryons at 2 < p T < 4 GeV/c

63 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Baryon v 2 At high-p T –Baryon anisotropy exceeds that for mesons –Also seen for p vs 

64 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 New (old) Idea: Recombination Fries, Mueller, Nonaka, Bass, nucl-th/0301087 Greco, Ko, Levai, nucl-th/0301093 Molnar, Voloshin, nucl-th/0302014] Lopez, Parikh, Siemens, PRL 53 (1984) 1216 Dense partonic medium –Hadron production by quark recombination (coalescence) –Fries et al: Favorable relative to fragmentation for thermal parton momentum distribution Fragmentation Recombination

65 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Recombination/Fragmentation T eff = 350 MeV blue-shifted temperature pQCD spectrum shifted by 2.2 GeV Fries, Mueller, Nonaka,Bass nucl-th/0301087

66 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Recombination and v 2 Looking “per quark”: –Common behavior for Baryons/Mesons –Do we see partonic flow? –Gluons? Entropy?

67 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Recombination/Fragmentation and v 2 Bass, CIPANP ‘03

68 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Recombination/Fragmentation and Spectra Bass, CIPANP ‘03

69 Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Summary Lecture II Extensive data sets for intermediate/high p T Observation of several unique effects –Violation of collision scaling –Large elliptic flow (Baryons vs Mesons) –Proton puzzle New data (d+Au) and new ideas (recombination) –Suggest we’re looking at: Energy loss of fast partons in dense partonic matter Collective flow of partonic matter

Download ppt "Gunther Roland/MITZakopane 6/2/2003 Physics Results from RHIC Gunther Roland XLIII Cracow School of Theoretical Physics Zakopane 5/30-6/7 2003."

Similar presentations

Mass, Quark-number, Energy Dependence of v 2 and v 4 in Relativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions Yan Lu University of Science and Technology of China Many.

Mass, Quark-number, Energy Dependence of v 2 and v 4 in Relativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions Yan Lu University of Science and Technology of China Many.
1 Jet Structure of Baryons and Mesons in Nuclear Collisions l Why jets in nuclear collisions? l Initial state l What happens in the nuclear medium? l.

1 Jet Structure of Baryons and Mesons in Nuclear Collisions l Why jets in nuclear collisions? l Initial state l What happens in the nuclear medium? l.
TJH: ISMD 2005, 8/9-15 Kromeriz, Czech Republic TJH: 1 Experimental Results at RHIC T. Hallman Brookhaven National Laboratory ISMD Kromeriz, Czech Republic.

TJH: ISMD 2005, 8/9-15 Kromeriz, Czech Republic TJH: 1 Experimental Results at RHIC T. Hallman Brookhaven National Laboratory ISMD Kromeriz, Czech Republic.
Jet probes of nuclear collisions: From RHIC to LHC Dan Magestro, The Ohio State University Midwest Critical Mass October 21-22, 2005.

Jet probes of nuclear collisions: From RHIC to LHC Dan Magestro, The Ohio State University Midwest Critical Mass October 21-22, 2005.
RHIC & AGS Annual User’s Meeting, May 2003 Nu Xu 1 Recent Results from STAR Nu Xu Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory For the STAR Collaboration.

RHIC & AGS Annual User’s Meeting, May 2003 Nu Xu 1 Recent Results from STAR Nu Xu Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory For the STAR Collaboration.
Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions: Recent Results from RHIC David Hardtke LBNL.

Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions: Recent Results from RHIC David Hardtke LBNL.
DNP03, Tucson, Oct 29, 2003 1 Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Hadron Yields, Hadrochemistry, and Hadronization.

DNP03, Tucson, Oct 29, Kai Schweda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the STAR collaboration Hadron Yields, Hadrochemistry, and Hadronization.
Peter SteinbergISMD2003 Experimental Status of Parton Saturation at RHIC Peter Steinberg Brookhaven National Laboratory ISMD2003, Krakow, Poland 5-11 September.

Peter SteinbergISMD2003 Experimental Status of Parton Saturation at RHIC Peter Steinberg Brookhaven National Laboratory ISMD2003, Krakow, Poland 5-11 September.
Nu XuInternational Conference on Strangeness in Quark Matter, UCLA, March 26 - 31, 20061/20 Search for Partonic EoS in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions Nu.

Nu XuInternational Conference on Strangeness in Quark Matter, UCLA, March , 20061/20 Search for Partonic EoS in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions Nu.
5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.

5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.
XXXIII International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics, September 7, 2003 Kraków, Poland Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez STAR Collaboration Review.

XXXIII International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics, September 7, 2003 Kraków, Poland Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez STAR Collaboration Review.
Identified and Inclusive Charged Hadron Spectra from PHENIX Carla M Vale Iowa State University for the PHENIX Collaboration WWND, March 14 2006.

Identified and Inclusive Charged Hadron Spectra from PHENIX Carla M Vale Iowa State University for the PHENIX Collaboration WWND, March
Production and Flow of Identified Hadrons at RHIC Julia Velkovska XXXIV International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics Sonoma State University, 2004.

Production and Flow of Identified Hadrons at RHIC Julia Velkovska XXXIV International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics Sonoma State University, 2004.
Heavy-Ion Physics XXIII Physics in Collision Raimond Snellings

Heavy-Ion Physics XXIII Physics in Collision Raimond Snellings
Tatsuya Chujo (BNL) for the PHENIX Collaboration

Tatsuya Chujo (BNL) for the PHENIX Collaboration
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. First results from STAR experiment at RHIC - Soft hadron.

Masashi Kaneta, LBNL Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. First results from STAR experiment at RHIC - Soft hadron.
High p T  0 Production in p+p, Au+Au, and d+Au Stefan Bathe UC Riverside for the Collaboration Topics in Heavy Ion Collisions McGill University, Montreal,

High p T  0 Production in p+p, Au+Au, and d+Au Stefan Bathe UC Riverside for the Collaboration Topics in Heavy Ion Collisions McGill University, Montreal,
Identified Particle Ratios at large p T in Au+Au collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV Matthew A. C. Lamont for the STAR Collaboration - Talk Outline - Physics.

Identified Particle Ratios at large p T in Au+Au collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV Matthew A. C. Lamont for the STAR Collaboration - Talk Outline - Physics.
May, 20, 2010Exotics from Heavy Ion Collisions KE T and Quark Number Scaling of v 2 Maya Shimomura University of Tsukuba Collaborated with Yoshimasa Ikeda,

May, 20, 2010Exotics from Heavy Ion Collisions KE T and Quark Number Scaling of v 2 Maya Shimomura University of Tsukuba Collaborated with Yoshimasa Ikeda,
Steffen A. RHIC #1 Steffen A. Bass Duke University & RIKEN-BNL Research Center The Protons Puzzle at RHIC - the demise of pQCD? Recombination.

Steffen A. RHIC #1 Steffen A. Bass Duke University & RIKEN-BNL Research Center The Protons Puzzle at RHIC - the demise of pQCD? Recombination.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google