Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Low-level Motion Activity Features for Semantic Characterization of Video Kadir A. Peker, A. Aydin Alatan, Ali N. Akansu International Conference on Multimedia.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Low-level Motion Activity Features for Semantic Characterization of Video Kadir A. Peker, A. Aydin Alatan, Ali N. Akansu International Conference on Multimedia."— Presentation transcript:

1 Low-level Motion Activity Features for Semantic Characterization of Video Kadir A. Peker, A. Aydin Alatan, Ali N. Akansu International Conference on Multimedia and Expo 2000

2 Introduction We want to establish connections between low-level motion activity feature of video segments and the semantic meaningful characterization of them. Two computationally simple descriptors for motion activity of a video content is used.

3 Motion Activity Descriptors act 0 : monotonous (steady) motion activity descriptor act 1 : non-monotonous (unsteady) motion activity descriptor

4

5 j

6 act 0 is sensitive to global motion such as camera pan and to objects moving very close to camera. act 1 filters out the component of motion activity that does not change from frame to frame. In contrast to act 0, act 1 is more sensitive to unsteady motion such as fickle motion of a non-rigid object in close up.

7 Results from Application Examples We use the two descriptors in two different application contexts. Browsing through a sports video. Retrieval from a database of shots.

8 Detecting Close-ups in Sports Video We observe that the difference act 1 (n)- act 0 (n) is highest for close-up shots where the irregular motion of players in view is dominant over the regular global motion. Basketball from MPEG-7 data set (10 minutes, 18000 frames,4800 P frames) A ground truth data is prepared manually, segmenting the video into wide angle and close- up shots.(59 segments, 30 being close-ups)

9 We expect m1 (act 0 (n)) to be high for close-up frames because zoom or when the action is close to the camera the motion vector is larger. We expect if non-monotonous activity act 1 (n) is significantly higher than act 0 (n) in a frame, then with a high probability, the frame is a close-up on a highly active object.

10 Frame-based detection Two threshold for m1 and m2 to select 250 P-frames. Bounding boxes are close-up segments. Positive impulses are where m2 suggest a close-up. Negative impulses are where m1 suggest a close-up.

11 Segment-based Detection

12 We find the close-up segments by sorting the segments with respect to sm1 and sm2 and choosing the top K. The retrieval using sm1 (average of act 0 over the segment) is misled by camera motion.The first retrieved segment is a fast pan segment. We find sm2 to be a more reliable detector for close-ups.

13

14 Retrieval of High Activity Shots A database of 600 shots from MPEG-7 test set, include various programs such as news, sports,entertainment, education, etc. 5 highest activity shots are retrieved using act 0, act 1 and (act 1 - act 0 ). act 0 and act 1 retrieve shots that contain fast camera motions or an objects that passes too close to the camera, which are not commonly considered high activity. (act 1 - act 0 ) get 5 shots of dancing people.

15

16 Conclusion We described two descriptors to infer whether the activity content is dominantly a monotonous, steady motion or an unsteady, inconstant motion. This kind of a characterization of the activity content can be used to detect close-up segment in a sports video or in an activity based query from a database of video shots.


Download ppt "Low-level Motion Activity Features for Semantic Characterization of Video Kadir A. Peker, A. Aydin Alatan, Ali N. Akansu International Conference on Multimedia."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google