• 0:00
    /
    0:00
    Loaded: 0%
    0:00
    Progress: 0%
    Stream TypeLIVE
    0:00
     
    1x
    Advertisement

New York State Electricity Markets

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "New York State Electricity Markets"— Presentation transcript:

1 New York State Electricity Markets
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Market Design Technical Conference January 22, 2002 Charles A. King - Vice President, Market Services

2 Outline of Today’s Presentation
Overview of New York’s Market Structure Day-Ahead Market Real-Time Market Transmission Service Markets Financial Transmission Rights Ancillary Services Markets Long-Term Capacity Markets Market Monitoring and Mitigation Appendix – Statistics and Examples

3 I. NYISO Overview New York ISO "Hub of the Northeast"
Hydro Quebec 19,410 MW* ISO - New England 25,158 MW* IMO 23,857 MW* New York ISO 30,983 MW* PJM 54,176 MW* * = Peak Load in Megawatts

4 NYISO Overview New York Electric Industry Restructuring
New York Transmission Owners entered into settlement agreements with New York Public Service Commission in mid 1990s which required divesture of generating units Established phased schedule for retail access Wholesale markets launched and NYISO began operation on December 1, 1999

5 NYISO Overview NYISO Governance

6 NYISO Overview Unique System Characteristics
Transmission prone to thermal, voltage and stability limitations which can bifurcate NYISO system (east vs. west) Much higher degree of transmission congestion FERC 12/19/01 Electric Transmission Constraint Study High degree of generation divestiture Investor-owned utility divesture currently at 91 percent

7 I. NYISO Overview New York Independent System Operator
High Voltage Transmission System - 230 kV and above Transmission

8 NYISO Overview Markets
Bid-Based Markets Energy Regulation Spinning and Non-Spinning Reserves Three-part bids Self-scheduling Other Markets Installed Capacity Transmission Congestion Contracts Two Settlement System Day-Ahead Market Real-Time Market

9 NYISO Overview Markets (continued)
Locational Based Marginal Pricing Nodal congestion management pricing system Marginal losses Financial Hedging Instruments Transmission Congestion Contracts Contract For Differences Virtual Trading Demand Response Program Day-Ahead Emergency

10 NYISO Overview Markets (continued)
Flexible market structure accommodates: Bilateral Transactions Existing Transmission Agreements Scheduling of Energy Limited Resources Municipal Customers Power Marketers Price responsive load customers

11 NYISO Overview New York's Two-Settlement Process
Bids by 5 a.m. Day before Forward Contracts DAM = Day-Ahead Market SCUC = Security Constrained Unit Commitment BME = Balancing Market Evaluation RT = Real-Time Market SCD = Security Constrained Dispatch Day-Ahead Market SCUC (Hourly Process) Schedules Bids by 90 min before hour BME Basepoints Supplemental Resource Evaluation Real-Time Market Real Conditions Gen SCD

12 Day-Ahead Market Highlights
Bids submitted by 5:00 am previous day Suppliers submit MW quantity and price bids for each hour including any ancillary services bids Loads submit MW requirement bids for each hour including any price cap load bids Includes bids for virtual supply and virtual load Security Constrained Unit Commitment (SCUC) scheduling software simultaneously cooptimizes energy and ancillary services for least cost solution

13 Day-Ahead Market Highlights (continued)
Locational Based Marginal Prices (LBMP) posted by 11:00 am previous day Accommodates bilateral transaction scheduling concurrently with supply and load bids Any deviations in supply or demand settled in Real-Time Market

14 Day-Ahead Market Benefits
Provides price certainty while avoiding volatility of Real-Time Market Simultaneous co-optimization process maximizes the use of the existing transmission system and provides for appropriate cost allocation Highly automated system manages complex operating processes

15 Day-Ahead Market Benefits (continued)
Multi-pass Security Constrained Unit Commitment (SCUC) process accommodates Reliability requirements Market mitigation Cost assignment of uplift

16 Day-Ahead Market Unique Characteristics
Day-Ahead prices include effect of reliability commitments and all scheduled external transactions Incorporates automated mitigation (in-city and automated mitigation procedures (AMP)) Ancillary Services secured and priced Fully unbundled Simultaneous co-optimization of individual availability bids

17 Real-Time Market Highlights
Balances system supply and demand every five minutes Bids may be adjusted to address in-day operating conditions Accommodates additional bilateral transactions and changes to fixed output generator schedules Security Constrained Dispatch (SCD) software re-optimizes energy and ancillary service markets on system-wide basis Provides for commitment of “quick start” resources Locational Based Marginal Prices (LBMP) posted every five minutes

18 Real-Time Market Benefits
Simultaneous co-optimization process maximizes the use of the existing transmission system while maintaining reliability Provides for least cost dispatch of Real-Time resources Provides Real-Time price transparency

19 Real-Time Market Unique Characteristics
Ex-ante pricing based upon “scheduled” generator basepoint vs. ex-post pricing based upon generator actual output NYISO uses unit-specific MW signal instead of dollar zonal price signal Minimum energy bid is -$1000 vs. $0 in PJM. NYISO practice allows market to resolve min-gen scenarios instead of dumping energy

20 Real-Time Market Unique Characteristics (continued)
Variations on criteria used to determine which units are eligible to set Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) PJM only allows units that respond to $ zonal price signal to set LMP NYISO used hybrid pricing method to allow inflexible units to set LMP. PJM does not allow inflexible units to set price

21 Transmission Service Markets Highlights
Firm transmission service available to users willing to pay congestion costs Continuous redispatch to support firm transactions Transmission Congestion Contracts (TCCs) provide financial hedge against congestion costs Non-firm transmission service curtailed when congestion exists Cost of transmission marginal losses included in clearing price

22 Transmission Service Markets Highlights
Long-term prescheduling and ramp management will enhance ability to acquire explicit long-term transmission service across control area boundaries Facilitation of “counter-flow” transactions in hourly scheduling process avoids need to curtail day-ahead transactions for transmission system security Implementation of Open Scheduling System (OSS) for “One Stop Shopping”

23 Transmission Service Markets Benefits
Loads pay non-pancaked license plate Transmission Service Charge All parties pay the same rate at the same location All parties have equal access to the transmission system, no physical reservations / rights to hoard Day-Ahead transaction certainty enhanced through presence and utilization of counter-flow transactions

24 Transmission Service Markets Unique Characteristics
NYISO utilizes an implicit bid-based transmission reservation scheduling process NYISO planned implementation of explicit transmission pre-scheduling process provides physical long-term reservation and schedule at NYISO boundaries Utilization of “counter-flow” transaction avoids curtailment of Day-ahead schedules Open Scheduling System (OSS) facilitates transaction scheduling

25 Transmission Service Markets Unique Characteristics
Blended (flow-based) export transmission service charge rate Generation minimum interconnection criteria is “access-based” with no deliverability requirement Special protection schemes fully addressed

26 Financial Transmission Rights Highlights
Transmission Congestion Contracts (TCCs) sold through auction - serves as a congestion hedge, or as financial instrument available to the market Auctions held on a semi-annual basis for TCCs for variable time periods (half-year to 5 years) Monthly “Re-configuration Auctions” conducted Auction results posted TCCs settled in Day-Ahead market May be specified between generators, zones, external proxy buses, NYISO reference bus

27 Financial Transmission Rights Benefits
All Transmission Congestion Contracts (TCCs) auctioned except those associated with Grandfathered Transmission Wheeling Agreements Fully funded TCCs provide hedging certainty Multiple round auction enhances price discovery

28 Financial Transmission Rights Benefits (continued)
“Alternating Current (AC) Power flow” solution provides for improved accuracy Simultaneous feasibility is assured to avoid “over selling” of Transmission Congestion Contracts (TCCs) TCCs are “unbundled” - for more liquid market Moving towards a simultaneous, multi-period TCC auction process by Summer 2003

29 Financial Transmission Rights Unique Characteristics
NYISO fully funds TCCs and balances over/under collection with Transmission Owners PJM passes revenue shortfalls to FTR holder and over-collection is refunded to loads High degree of capability offered for sale in the auction TCCs may be purchased up to 5 years vs. monthly in PJM

30 Ancillary Services Market Highlights
Market-Based Services Regulation Spinning Reserve 10-Minute Non-Spinning Reserve 30-Minute Non-Spinning Reserve Simultaneously co-optimized with energy markets both Day-Ahead and Real-Time Incorporates locational reserve requirements Cost-Based Services Scheduling, Control and Dispatch Voltage Support Black Start

31 Ancillary Services Market Benefits
Separate but simultaneously co-optimized markets provide an efficient mechanism for obtaining the least-cost solution Lost opportunity cost payments ensure availability of sufficient resources Markets can satisfy locational needs Allows for a more precise ability to control and dispatch resources to maximize use of the transmission system

32 Ancillary Services Market Unique Characteristics
Fully unbundled regulation and reserve services Four markets vs. single regulation market in PJM Explicit availability bids for each Ancillary Service Market Specific locational requirements met Ancillary services are fully scheduled in the Day-Ahead Market, with in-day adjustments made through hourly and supplemental processes Energy and ancillary services simultaneously co-optimized

33 Long Term Capacity Markets Highlights
Installed Capacity (ICAP) requirements for Load Serving Entities (LSE’s) based on annual peak load Long-term ICAP requirement Monthly ICAP auctions accommodate load-shifting and latest generator performance Supply can be via Bilateral Transaction, self supply, or auction

34 Long Term Capacity Markets Highlights (continued)
Locational requirements apply (in-city and Long Island) Deficiency charges applied to Load Serving Entities (LSEs), if requirements are not met Market power mitigation measures apply in New York City

35 Long Term Capacity Markets Benefits
NYISO market similar to neighbors for product consistency Ensures resource adequacy to meet reliability requirements Installed Capacity (ICAP) reflects experienced availability: Unforced Capacity (UCAP) Intermittent resources (windmills, etc…) eligible Demand-side resources allowed to participate

36 Long Term Capacity Markets Unique Characteristics
4 hour qualification test vs. 2 hour test in PJM Full credit for ICAP / UCAP for interruptible loads and intermittent generators Monthly certification Deficiency penalty applied monthly

37 Market Monitoring & Mitigation Highlights
NYISO market monitoring procedures … foster transition to a fully competitive market seek to maintain a competitive supply demand relationship under all conditions minimize unnecessary market intervention insure delivery of market based products from suppliers Mitigation based upon Conduct and Impact standard Multiple mitigation needs addressed through variable thresholds, margins, and reference offers/bids

38 Market Monitoring & Mitigation Highlights
Market Monitoring accountable to NYISO Board of Directors Independent Market Advisor provides oversight NYISO applying comprehensive mitigation approach to address all mitigation needs based upon conduct / impact standard Day-Ahead Market (DAM) In-City with structural component Real-Time (RT) In-City with structural component Statewide Automated DAM

39 Market Monitoring & Mitigation Highlights
Market monitoring of: Physical Withholding / physical audits Economic Withholding Uneconomic production Submission of false information Failure to follow dispatch instruction Under-scheduling load Transmission congestion contracts Transmission service / transactions Installed Capacity Markets Market participant financial positions against collateral

40 Market Monitoring & Mitigation Benefits
Mitigation parameters (triggers, thresholds, reference prices, etc) may be tailored to address specific needs Reference prices reflect historical accepted competitive offers whenever possible Process provides for consultation with market participants prior to mitigation Procedures automated to prevent “lost day” Mitigation parameters can be reviewed and adjusted over time, allows Market Participants to “build out “ of a congested pocket

41 Market Monitoring & Mitigation Unique Characteristics
NYISO relies on a conduct / impact standard to determine exercise of market power (except for New York City pocket mitigation; plan under development to add conduct / impact plus structural component) PJM assumes market is un-competitive when transmission congestion exists (except for East/Central/West voltage constraints) NYISO mitigates to a competitively set reference bid PJM mitigates via cost-capping (cost + 10 percent)

42 Market Monitoring & Mitigation
Universal Market Mitigation Framework CONDUCT TEST T R I G E S T H R E S O L D M A R G I N S C O N S U L T A I MARKET IMPACT TEST Generator Reference Prices Historical 90 day Competitive Negotiated Default Mitigation Occurs Only During Non-competitive Times

43 APPENDIX Statistics and Examples

44 Day-Ahead Market Performance Statistics
High degree of price certainty Load zones A, G, and J used as trading indices by power marketers 95% of New York’s energy transactions settled Day-Ahead Includes both Day-Ahead Market and Bilateral Transactions All Transmission Congestion Contracts (TCCs) settled Day-Ahead

45 Day-Ahead Market New York Market Share
Bilaterals 50% NYISO Day-Ahead Market 45 – 50% Real Time <5% Bilateral Contracts outside the NYISO % NYISO Day-Ahead Market % NYISO Real-Time Market <5% 100%

46 Real-Time Market Performance Statistics
Represents less than 5 percent of New York energy market transactions Less than .05 percent of price intervals corrected in 2001 Improved NERC control performance

47 Real-Time Market Performance Statistics

48 Transmission Service Markets Open Scheduling System (OSS)
What is OSS? OSS is comprised of an industry leading set of tools for Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators to interact, trade and communicate within and across control areas Initially, OSS will provide the ability to: Enter bilateral transaction bids across Scheduling Coordinator borders with a single data entry interface View status from each Scheduling Coordinator View schedules from each Scheduling Coordinator Request transmission and ramp reservations

49 Transmission Service Markets Open Scheduling System (OSS)
What is OSS? OSS is comprised of an industry leading set of tools for Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators to interact, trade and communicate within and across control areas Initially, OSS will provide the ability to: Enter bilateral transaction bids across Scheduling Coordinator borders with a single data entry interface View status from each Scheduling Coordinator View schedules from each Scheduling Coordinator Request transmission and ramp reservations

50 Transmission Service Markets Open Scheduling System (OSS)

51 Transmission Service Markets Open Scheduling System (OSS)

52 Transmission Service Markets Open Scheduling System (OSS)
OSS Project Timeline 6/05/01 8/27/01 2/11/02 3/11/02 Design/Development Kickoff Phase 1 Test Start Phase 1 Live Phase 2 and beyond Agreement on OSS end-vision Validation of pilot concepts Open nodal architecture Internal and external bilateral transactions (hourly) Pre-scheduling Integration with PJM Ability to review and manage schedule status Ability to edit NERC tags Bid entry up to 18 months in future Support EST only Integration with e-Tag agents Integration w/ WebCoordinate Consistent with ESC and OASIS II Automated Checkout Inter-regional congestion commitments Integration with more scheduling coordinators Support of sub-hourly transactions User defined time zone

53 Transmission Service Markets Open Scheduling System (OSS)
OSS Summary Open, platform independent design that is consistent with Order 2000 OSS is an application that can be easily adopted by other Scheduling Coordinators with minimal change to existing systems Addresses critical Inter-Control Area transaction seams issues with minimal impact on current MP processes

54 Transmission Service Markets Open Scheduling System (OSS)
OSS Summary Based on requirements gathered from MPs with input from Scheduling Coordinators Defines a communication protocol between Scheduling Coordinators The OSS application will be deployed in phases with the first scheduled for Q1 2002

55 Financial Transmission Rights Performance Statistics
Net Revenues to Transmission Owners - Year 2000: ~ $260 million - Year 2001: ~ $65 million Outstanding Transmission Congestion Contracts (TCCs) - Grandfathered: ~ 40 percent (~ 11,800 MW) - NYISO Auction: ~ 60 percent (~ 18,800 MW)

56 Financial Transmission Rights Performance Statistics
Alleviating Contract Path Confusion Parties do not need to optimally pair their supply and load up as bilateral transactions to minimize transmission charges TUC paid by aggregator does not depend on how it bids its supply and load TUC is point-to-point Does not depend on contract path An Example Source Sink

57 Financial Transmission Rights Example – Configuration A
Source Sink Chat East Fraser Niagara 345 Leeds Ramapo Sprainbrook Goethals

58 Financial Transmission Rights Example – Configuration A
Configuration A - Billing

59 Financial Transmission Rights Example – Configuration B
Source Sink Chat East Fraser Niagara 345 Leeds Ramapo Sprainbrook Goethals Config A Config B

60 Financial Transmission Rights Example – Configuration B
Configuration B - Billing

61 Financial Transmission Rights Example
The Aggregator Net Charge

62 Ancillary Services Market Example: Summer 2001

63 Ancillary Services Market Example: Summer 2001
Overview of Northeast Peak Load Situation on Aug. 9 - New NYISO Peak Load - 30,983 MW (Hour Beginning:14:00, August 9) New Peaks in Neighboring Control Areas IMO ,269 MW ISO-NE - 25,158 MW PJM ,176 MW

64 Ancillary Services Market Example: Summer 2001
Situations Observed – NYISO Operating at Reserve Requirements Neighboring Control Areas Operating at Margins NYISO Able to Maintain Energy Exports Depressed Voltage Levels Observed in PJM and New York

65 Ancillary Services Market Example: Summer 2001
Load Relief Measures Total ,580 MW EDRP & SCR MW Voltage Reduction MW Public Appeals MW NYS Government MW TO Programs MW

66 Ancillary Services Market Example: Summer 2001
System Performance Equipment Performance Market Information System was reliable The Transmission System was secure and reliable Generation performed consistently Load was served throughout the period

67 Ancillary Services Market Example: Summer 2001
System Performance Impact of Transactions on Voltages NYISO exports and wheels to PJM PJM experienced severe voltage problems in the East NYISO experienced depressed SENY voltages Some transactions cut by NYISO to increase voltages PJM requested NYISO voltage reduction to avoid system voltage collapse NYISO implemented 5 percent voltage reduction to assist PJM

68 Ancillary Services Market Example: Summer 2001
Level of Exports Maintained during Peak Day NYISO Reserve Requirement Operating Reserve August 9, 2001

69 Ancillary Services Market Example: Summer 2001
Benefits of NYISO “Best Practices” August 9, 2001 Best Practice: Simultaneous co-optimization of energy and ancillary service markets; Best Practice: Hourly evaluation (Balancing Market Evaluation – BME) which optimizes in-day resource adjustments; Best Practice: Emergency Demand Response Program

70 Ancillary Services Market Example: Summer 2001
Benefits of NYISO “Best Practices” August 9, 2001 (continued) NYISO Best Practices provided the ability to track and augment system energy and reserves in real time despite adverse conditions. NYISO Best Practices provided the ability to make full utilization of limited transmission capability in real-time to maintain reliability in NY and support neighboring control areas. NYISO able to maintain exports critical to neighboring areas during peak load periods due to flexibility afforded by NYISO Best Practices.

71 Ancillary Services Market Performance Statistics

72 Ancillary Services Market Performance Statistics
*10 minute reserves includes only capability in Eastern New York due to locational reserve requirements.

73 Long Term Capacity Markets Performance Statistics
Installed Capacity (ICAP) Requirements Statewide: 36,132 MW Locational: New York City: 8,428 MW Long Island: 4,639 MW Procurement 75 percent Bilateral Transactions 25 percent NYISO Auctions

74 Long Term Capacity Markets Performance Statistics
Statistics on ICAP prices Winter - UCAP Strip Auction $9.40/kW/month NYC (3970 MW) $2.00/kW/month Rest of State (ROS) (2290 MW) Monthly – thorough 1/2002 $7.30/kW/month NYC (550 MW) $0.20/kW/month ROS (550 MW)

75 Market Monitoring & Mitigation Fundamentals of Operation
Market Power Mitigation: Two Criteria Conduct inconsistent with workable competition Actions have a substantial impact on LBMPs or other revenues

76 Market Monitoring & Mitigation Fundamentals of Operation
Conduct inconsistent with workable competition Economic Withholding of an Electric Facility Physical Withholding by an Electric Facility Uneconomic Over-production from an Electric Facility

77 Market Monitoring & Mitigation Fundamentals of Operation
Actions have a substantial impact on LBMPs or other Revenues Criterion The lower of a tripling of prices or $100 in an energy or ancillary services market A tripling of guarantee payments to a market participant

78 Market Monitoring & Mitigation Fundamentals of Operation
Does Conduct Exceed Thresholds? Thresholds for Economic Withholding The lower of a quadrupling of prices or $100 / MW in the energy markets and for most reserves. The lower of a quadrupling of prices or $50 / MW for real-time 10-minute spinning reserves. A tripling of startup cost offer prices Reference concept Accepted, unmitigated offers during periods of workable competition

79 Market Monitoring & Mitigation Fundamentals of Operation
Does Conduct Exceed Thresholds? Thresholds for Physical Withholding: Day-Ahead The lower of 10% or 100 MW of a unit’s capability. The lower of 5% or 200 MW of an organization’s capability Thresholds for Physical Withholding: Real-Time Operation of a unit at less than 90% of the NYISO’s dispatch rate

80 Market Monitoring & Mitigation Fundamentals of Operation
Does Conduct Exceed Thresholds? Thresholds for Uneconomic Over-production Schedule and production of energy at an LBMP less than 20% of a unit’s reference price. Real-time output exceeding 110% of the NYISO’s dispatch level. The conduct must cause or contribute to congestion

81 Market Monitoring & Mitigation Fundamentals of Operation
Screening Reports “5 AM” Generator, Startup, and Zone Reports “11AM” Generator and Energy Exception Reports Identify DAM conduct through reports and data screens Identify impact through SCUC and offer-curve analysis Conduct and impact together trigger prospective mitigation


Download ppt "New York State Electricity Markets"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google