Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Modeling of protein turns and derivation of NMR parameters related to turn structure Megan Chawner BRITE REU Program Advisor: Dr. Dimitrios Morikis Department.

Published by Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Modeling of protein turns and derivation of NMR parameters related to turn structure Megan Chawner BRITE REU Program Advisor: Dr. Dimitrios Morikis Department."— Presentation transcript:

1 Modeling of protein turns and derivation of NMR parameters related to turn structure Megan Chawner BRITE REU Program Advisor: Dr. Dimitrios Morikis Department of Bioengineering University of California, Riverside

2 Outline Background My Project Results Conclusions Acknowledgements

3 Protein Structure: All proteins are made up of twenty amino acid building blocks into a sequence = primary structure

4 Protein structure: sequence folds into  -sheet,  -helix, random coil loops and various types of turns stabilized by atomic interactions (e.g., H-bonds) = secondary structure Anti-parallel  -sheet  -helix Primary structure: GPLLNKFLTT Primary structure: EKQKPDGVFQE Strand 1 Strand 2 Inter-strand H-bonds C=O(i)…H-N(i+4) H-bonds 1 helix turn = 3.6 a.a.

5 Protein Structure: three-dimensional protein folds are stabilized by long range interactions = tertiary structure Turns introduce reversibility in the direction of other elements of secondary structure, such as  -helices or  -sheets 3 amino acids =  -turn 4 amino acids =  -turn  -turn  -turn

6 i-1 i i+1 ii ii ii  -sheet Ramachandran plot (  ) plot defines secondary structure Backbone torsion angles:  Turns  -helix

7 Protein Structure Determination: uses Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to get NMR observables, which are converted to NMR-derived structural parameters Nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs)  inter-proton distances 3 J(H N -H  )-coupling constants   -torsion angles Karplus Equation (Karplus, 1959, J Chem Phys) NOE equation (Wuthrich, 1986) r i,j  inter-proton distance  c  rotational correlation time A=6.98, B=-1.38, C=1.72 (Wang and Bax, 1996, JACS) NOE < 5 Å  through-space interactions  inter-proton distances 3 J(H N -H  ) = 3-chemical bond coupling  through-bond interactions   -torsions

8 Amino Acid iAmino Acid i+1 NCC C OR H NCC C O H R ii ii 3 J(H N -H  )  i+1  i+1 HH ii H N (i)-H  (i) H N (i)-H N (i+1) H N (i)-H  (i+1) 3 J(H N -H  ) = 3-bond   -torsion NOE < 5 Å  distance in space H  (i)-H  (i+1) H  (i)-H N (i+1) Relations of experimental observables and structural parameters d  N (i,i+1) d NN (i,i+1) d N  (i,i) d  (i,i+1)

9 3 J(H N -H  ) (Hz)  ( o ) Cis  =0 o  =60 o  =90 o  =150 o Newman Projections N C=O C=O H H C  N C=O C=O H H C  N C=O C=O H H C  N C=O C=O H H C   =-90 o  =-30 o Trans  =180 o  =-120 o Solution of Karplus equation using MatLab  -helix  -sheet NC  H  H Cis NC  H  H Trans NC HH Cis NC  H  H Trans C NC  C  Cis C NC  C  Trans C NC  C  Cis C NC  C  C NC  C  C NC  C  Trans C NC  C  C NC  C  Chawner & Morikis, in preparation

10 My Project Goals: To use NMR-derived parameters (inter-proton distances and  -torsion angles) to create databases of expected NMR observables (NOEs and 3 J(H N -H  )- coupling constants) for ideal  - and  - turns with statistical deviations. Bottom line: we are back-calculating NMR observables. Remember, during structure determination, NMR-derived parameters are obtained from NMR spectroscopic observables, NOEs and 3 J(H N -H  )-coupling constants. Use: Rapid protein turn structure identification by examination of raw NMR observables, without a complete structure calculation.

11 Color code: Blue: N Light blue: H Gray: C Red: O Color code: Blue: N Light blue: H Gray: C Red: O VIII I I’ II’ II 1 3 2 4         H-bond C  -C  I I’ II’ II 1 3 2 4         H-bond C  -C   -turns Computational modeling of ideal  -and  -turns according to torsion angles using DeepView Classic  -turn criteria Distance: C  (1)-C  (4) < 7 Å C=O(1)…H-N(4) H-bonded Distance: O(1)-N(4) < 3.3 Å Distance: O(1)-HN(4) < 2.4 Å Angle: O(1)-H(4)-N(4) almost linear ± 35 o Torsion angles ( o ) Type 22 22 33 33 I-60-30-900 II-60120800 I'6030900 II'60-120-800 VIII-60-30-120120 Chawner & Morikis, in preparation

12 Torsion angles ( o ) Type 22 22 Direct70-60 70-70 85-60 85-70 Inverse-7060 -7070 -8560 -8570 directinverse  -turns Computational modeling of ideal  -and  -turns according to torsion angles Classic  -turn criteria Chawner & Morikis, in preparation

13 Nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs)  inter-proton distances Characteristic  -turn distances H  (2)-H N (4): (i, i+2) H  (2)-H N (3): (i, i+1) H  (3)-H N (4): (i, i+1) H N (2)-H N (3): (i, i+1) H N (3)-H N (4): (i, i+1) Characteristic  -turn distances H  (1)-H N (3): (i, i+2) H  (1)-H N (2): (i, i+1) H  (2)-H N (3): (i, i+1) H N (1)-H N (2): (i, i+1) H N (2)-H N (3): (i, i+1)  -turn  -turn

14 Torsion angles ( o )D < 7 ÅH-bond distance (Å)H-bond angle (°) Type 22 22 33 33 C  (1)-C  (4)O(1)-N(4)O(1)-H N (4)O(1)-H(4)-N(4) I-60-30-9004.72.61.6153.2 II-601208004.72.61.7152.2 I'60309004.73.02.1151.1 II'60-120-8004.72.92.0153.4 VIII-60-30-1201206.24.34.569.5 Torsion angles ( o )D < 7 ÅH-bond distance (Å)H-bond angle (°) Type 22 22 C  (1)-C  (3)O(1)-N(3)O(1)-H N (3)O(1)-H(3)-N(3) Direct70-605.42.71.8142.2 70-705.52.71.9135.5 85-605.53.12.2137.4 85-705.63.12.3134.6 Inverse-70605.42.41.5143.6 -70705.52.51.7131.3 -85605.52.81.9141.9 -85705.62.82.0136.0 Marginal H-bonds present because of larger deviations from linearity Test of compliance of molecular models with ideal turn criteria Not present H-bond present Chawner & Morikis, in preparation

15 Inter-proton distance (Å) Type H N (2)- H N (3) H N (3)- H N (4) H  (2)- H N (3) H  (3)- H N (4) H  (2)- H N (4) H  (2)- H  (3) H  (3)- H  (4) H N (2)- H  (3) H N (3)- H  (4) I2.62.43.53.33.74.74.85.34.7 II4.52.52.13.3 4.44.86.45.2 I'2.62.43.03.34.24.8 5.0 II'4.52.53.3 4.24.54.85.74.9 VIII2.64.33.52.15.84.64.45.34.9 Torsion angles (°) Inter-proton distance (Å) Type 22 22 H N (1)- H N (2) H N (2)- H N (3) H  (1)- H N (2) H  (2)- H N (3) H  (1)- H N (3) H  (1)- H  (2) H  (2)- H  (3) H N (1)- H  (2) H N (2)- H  (3) Direct70-602.03.73.6 4.05.34.83.95.7 70-702.03.83.6 4.25.34.73.95.7 85-602.03.6 4.25.34.83.85.5 85-702.03.83.6 4.45.34.73.85.6 Inverse-70602.03.73.62.63.84.84.64.55.1 -70702.03.83.62.54.14.84.64.55.1 -85602.03.6 2.63.94.74.64.44.9 -85702.03.83.62.54.24.74.64.44.9 Ideal  -turns Ideal  -turns Molecular models: measured distances corresponding to characteristic NOEs

16 We classified the inter-proton distances as corresponding to strong, medium, weak and very weak NOE intensities: 1.8-2.6 Å = strong 2.7-3.5 Å = medium 3.6-4.4 Å = weak 4.5-5.0 Å = very weak Relative NOE intensities Type H N (2)- H N (3) H N (3)- H N (4) H  (2)- H N (3) H  (3)- H N (4) H  (2)- H N (4) H  (2)- H  (3) H  (3)- H  (4) H N (2)- H  (3) H N (3)- H  (4) ISSMMWVW N/OVW IIVWSSMMW N/O I'SSMMWVW II'VWSMMW N/OVW VIIISWMSN/OVWWN/OVW  -turns Relative classification of NOE intensities Chawner & Morikis, in preparation 1.8 Å: sum of van der Waals radii with some overlap

17 Torsion angles (°) Relative NOE intensities Type 22 22 H N (1)- H N (2) H N (2) - H N (3) H  (1) - H N (2) H  (2) - H N (3) H  (1) - H N (3) H  (1) - H  (2) H  (2) - H  (3) H N (1) - H  (2) H N (2) - H  (3) Direct70-60SWWWWN/OVWWN/O 70-70SWWWWN/OVWWN/O 85-60SWWWWN/OVWWN/O 85-70SWWWWN/OVWWN/O Inverse-7060SWWSWVW N/O -7070SWWSWVW N/O -8560SWWSWVW W -8570SWWSWVW W  -turns We classified the inter-proton distances: 1.8-2.6 Å = strong 2.7-3.5 Å = medium 3.6-4.4 Å = weak 4.5-5.0 Å = very weak Relative classification of NOE intensities

18  2 (°) J 2 (Hz)  3 (°) J 3 (Hz) Type I-604.2-908.2 Type I’607.3905.8 Type II-604.2806.6 Type II’607.3-806.9 Type VIII-604.2-12010.1 Type  2 (°) J 2 (Hz) Direct707.1 Direct856.2 Inverse-705.5 Inverse-857.5 Solution of Karplus equation: calculations of characteristic 3 J(H N -H  )-coupling constants  -turns  -turns Chawner & Morikis, in preparation

19  2 (°) J 2 (Hz)  3 (°) J 3 (Hz) Type I-60Weaker-90Stronger Type I’60Stronger90Weaker Type II-60Weaker80Stronger Type II’60Stronger-80Weaker Type VIII-60Weaker-120Stronger Type  2 (°) J 2 (Hz) Direct70S Direct85W Inverse-70W Inverse-85S We classified the turn’s 3 J(H N -H  )-coupling constants as stronger or weaker relative to itself, so that the different types can be differentiated comparatively  -turns  -turns Caution: small variations in  -torsion angles result to very large variations in j-coupling constants. In general, the use of j-coupling constants is not as helpful as NOE intensity patterns and connectivities.  -helix  -sheet Chawner & Morikis, in preparation

20 Conclusions NOE intensity patterns and connectivities can be used to distinguish turn type without a complete structure determination. We have created small NOE intensity databases that discriminate Type I, I’, II, II’, and VIII  -turns, and direct and inverse  -turns.  Caution: Classification of strong, medium, weak, and very weak NOEs is relative. Small variations of the characteristic  -torsion angles introduce very large variations in the 3 J(H N -H  )-coupling constant values, sometimes spanning the whole range of possible solutions for the Karplus equation and the whole allowed region of the Ramachandran plot.  Why? the small variations in  -torsion angles are owed to the dynamic character of turns in proteins and peptides and to conformational averaging. Overall, NOEs are more useful than J-coupling constants.

21 Acknowledgements Dr. Dimitrios Morikis Li Zhang Coordinators of BRITE Program Fellow BRITE students

22 3 J(H N -H  )  Cis  =0 o  =60 o  =90 o  =150 o Newman Projection N C=O C=O H H C  N C=O C=O H H C  N C=O C=O H H C  N C=O C=O H H C   =-90 o  =-30 o Trans  =180 o  =-120 o Solution of Karplus equation

Download ppt "Modeling of protein turns and derivation of NMR parameters related to turn structure Megan Chawner BRITE REU Program Advisor: Dr. Dimitrios Morikis Department."

Similar presentations

Protein NMR terminology COSY-Correlation spectroscopy Gives experimental details of interaction between hydrogens connected via a covalent bond NOESY-Nuclear.

Protein NMR terminology COSY-Correlation spectroscopy Gives experimental details of interaction between hydrogens connected via a covalent bond NOESY-Nuclear.
Areas of Spectrum.

Areas of Spectrum.
A brief refresher on protein structure Topic 3. Perhaps the most important structural bioinformatics result ever published… Chothia, C. & Lesk, A. M.

A brief refresher on protein structure Topic 3. Perhaps the most important structural bioinformatics result ever published… Chothia, C. & Lesk, A. M.
Protein Structure Prediction

Protein Structure Prediction
Protein Secondary Structure II Lecture 2/24/2003.

Protein Secondary Structure II Lecture 2/24/2003.
S ASC Answer to Practice Problem

S ASC Answer to Practice Problem
Protein structure and folding Some facts and fundamental conepts Cherri Hsu 02-2789-8658 Institute of Chemistry B307

Protein structure and folding Some facts and fundamental conepts Cherri Hsu Institute of Chemistry B307
One-dimensional Spectra Provides 1. Chemical shifts & Relative Intensities 2. J-couplings.

One-dimensional Spectra Provides 1. Chemical shifts & Relative Intensities 2. J-couplings.
1 Protein Structure, Structure Classification and Prediction Bioinformatics X3 January 2005 P. Johansson, D. Madsen Dept.of Cell & Molecular Biology, Uppsala.

1 Protein Structure, Structure Classification and Prediction Bioinformatics X3 January 2005 P. Johansson, D. Madsen Dept.of Cell & Molecular Biology, Uppsala.
The Structure and Functions of Proteins BIO271/CS399 – Bioinformatics.

The Structure and Functions of Proteins BIO271/CS399 – Bioinformatics.
Structure Determination by NMR CHY 431 Biological Chemistry Karl D. Bishop, Ph.D. Lecture 1 - Introduction to NMR Lecture 2 - 2D NMR, resonance assignments.

Structure Determination by NMR CHY 431 Biological Chemistry Karl D. Bishop, Ph.D. Lecture 1 - Introduction to NMR Lecture 2 - 2D NMR, resonance assignments.
Solving NMR structures I --deriving distance restraints from crosspeak intensities in NOESY spectra --deriving dihedral angle restraints from J couplings;

Solving NMR structures I --deriving distance restraints from crosspeak intensities in NOESY spectra --deriving dihedral angle restraints from J couplings;
Protein Primer. Outline n Protein representations n Structure of Proteins Structure of Proteins –Primary: amino acid sequence –Secondary:  -helices &

Protein Primer. Outline n Protein representations n Structure of Proteins Structure of Proteins –Primary: amino acid sequence –Secondary:  -helices &
3J Scalar Couplings 3 J HN-H  The 3 J coupling constants are related to the dihedral angles by the Karplus equation, which is an empirical relationship.

3J Scalar Couplings 3 J HN-H  The 3 J coupling constants are related to the dihedral angles by the Karplus equation, which is an empirical relationship.
CISC667, F05, Lec20, Liao1 CISC 467/667 Intro to Bioinformatics (Fall 2005) Protein Structure Prediction Protein Secondary Structure.

CISC667, F05, Lec20, Liao1 CISC 467/667 Intro to Bioinformatics (Fall 2005) Protein Structure Prediction Protein Secondary Structure.
Resonance Assignment for Proteins Classical homonuclear ( 1 H- 1 H) assignment methods: 1. Spin system assignments 2. Sequence-specific assignments 3.

Resonance Assignment for Proteins Classical homonuclear ( 1 H- 1 H) assignment methods: 1. Spin system assignments 2. Sequence-specific assignments 3.
Protein Basics Protein function Protein structure –Primary Amino acids Linkage Protein conformation framework –Dihedral angles –Ramachandran plots Sequence.

Protein Basics Protein function Protein structure –Primary Amino acids Linkage Protein conformation framework –Dihedral angles –Ramachandran plots Sequence.
A PEPTIDE BOND PEPTIDE BOND Polypeptides are polymers of amino acid residues linked by peptide group Peptide group is planar in nature which limits.

A PEPTIDE BOND PEPTIDE BOND Polypeptides are polymers of amino acid residues linked by peptide group Peptide group is planar in nature which limits.
Protein Structure Prediction Dr. G.P.S. Raghava Protein Sequence + Structure.

Protein Structure Prediction Dr. G.P.S. Raghava Protein Sequence + Structure.
Chapter 12 Protein Structure Basics. 20 naturally occurring amino acids Free amino group (-NH2) Free carboxyl group (-COOH) Both groups linked to a central.

Chapter 12 Protein Structure Basics. 20 naturally occurring amino acids Free amino group (-NH2) Free carboxyl group (-COOH) Both groups linked to a central.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google