1. Pieter Paap NL Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment 3 rd Annual ACCSEAS Conference 17-19 February 2015 e-Navigation Framework - Development and Status -

2. Increasing demands for alternative utilization of the seas Increase of Maritime Transport Increase diversity of ships Larger / faster ships Decrease navigable space Increase of safety risks Accessibility areas and ports under pressure Increasing risks marine environment Increasing public awareness after accidents with major impact Increasing demands for enhanced o traffic management and monitoring o Interaction shore/ship

3. Globelization of shipping industry Increase demands optimizing connection to the logistic chain Enhance efficiency, need for:  planning tools,  more reliable, timely data and information  standardized reporting  decrease administrative burden Increasing user needs  new services/applications,  decision-making tools,  software and hardware Rapid developments of (new) technology and its potential use 25 years

4. An increase of international, regional and national legislation Sometimes  contradictive  lacking coherency Many legislative organizations Running behind developments Need for:  review  less  more transparancy  more coherency Maritime Security  ISPS Code  Anti-Piracy measurements  Anti-Terrorism measurements Need for:  Timely reliable data  Data protection  Secure networks Knowledge and expertise fading away Restricted career perspectives Gaps in training (theory <> practice) Need for:  Encouragement maritime professions aboard and ashore  Theory in line with practice  New training methodologies  MMI (ergonomics)  Reduction workload

5. Safety, efficiency, accessibility, environment Proliferation of non-supported or non-approved services, applications and procedures Diversity of equipment aboard/ashore Maritime security and security of data Increasing non-transparency or incoherency of legislation Increasing workload aboard/ashore Further deviation between real practice and training Image loss for maritime industry due to lack of harmonization due to absence of standardization Mismatch of equipment and infrastructure (non- interoperability)

6.  Legislation & regulations  Services  Definitions Harmonization  Reliable and in time data / information  Enhanced data management  Standardised data-formats Enhanced interaction ship/ship, ship/shore, shore/shore  Old and New into one Concept  Common integral Architecture Make use of modern technologies  Equipment on ships  Shore based infrastructure  Interfacing  Procedures Standardization  Sustainable (future proof)  Plug-and-Play (new features) Scalable  Man/Machine interface  Decrease workload  Training Eye for human factor Ongoing process 2006 Decision IMO Let’s develop a worldwide harmonization programme

7. Promote WORLDWIDE STANDARDISATION UNIFORMITY AND INTEROPERABILITY Systems Services Portrayal Equipment Procedures SYSTEM INTEGRATION Functional MMI User Driven Support SAFE / SECURE NAVIGATION VESSEL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AND - MONITORING COMMUNICATION AND DATA EXCHANGE Contribute EFFICIENCY MARITIME TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS EFFECTIVE SEARCH-AND-RESCUE (SAR), DISASTER and INCIDENTS RESPONSE Develop REQUIREMENTS for TRAINING AND EDUCATION FAMILIARISATION with EQUIPMENT, PROCEDURES, SERVICE PROVISION, APPLICATIONS, SYSTEMS

8. The harmonized collection, integration, exchange, presentation and analysis of marine information onboard and ashore by electronic means to enhance berth to berth navigation and related services for safety and security at sea and protection of the marine environment Definition e-Navigation

9. ARCHI- TECTURE HUMAN FACTOR COMMS and INFORMATION UNIFORMITY FORMATS GNSS and PNT ELECTRONIC NAUTICAL CHARTS Direct link to modernization GMDSS APPLICATIONS & SERVICES EQUIPMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE SHIPSHORE FUNCTIONAL TECHNICAL STANDAR- DISATION HARMO- NISATION MARITIME SERVICE PORTFOLIO CSMD IHO S-100 GI Register Product Specs Interfacing Important decisions

10. 2006 Proposal Development Strategy Development Strategy by IMO Subcommittees supported by International Organizations (IGOs/NGOs) 2008 Approval Strategy IMO/MSC 85 2014 Approval SIP IMO/MSC94 Nov 2014 Development Strategic Implementation Plan (SIP) Input national member states and IGOs/NGOs Prominent role for IALA, IHO, CIRM, ICS 2015 Proposal actions SIP for inclusion in HLAP to IMO/MSC95 May 2015 Development Submission > MSC95 2015 Decision IMO Assembly on HLAP 2016-2017 and 2018-2019 … and others In the mean time development of services, technologies and standards continues Development Milestones

11. Completed: Identification of the Users SOLAS vessels Government vessels Offshore supply Non-SOLAS vessels Fishery Pleasure craft Etcetera VTS Coastguard / MRCCs Ship Reporting Services Pilot services Ports Hydrophrafic Survey National Single Window Data stream from/to abroad Investigation services Port State Control Enforcement services Shipping Inspection Relief / Response services Fairway authorities Third parties In logistic chain Third parties In logistic chain Etcetera

12. Completed: Identification of the Users Identification User requirements IMO Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) Risk Control Options 1: Integration of navigation information/equipment including improved software quality assurance 2: Bridge alert management 3: Standardized mode(s) for navigation equipment 4: Automated and standardized ship-shore reporting 5: Improved reliability and resilience of onboard PNT systems 6: Improved shore-based services 7: Bridge and workstation layout standardization Assesment 28 Potential (Sub)Solutions : 5 Prioritized Solutions to start with S1: Improved, harmonized and user-friendly bridge design; S2: Means for standardized and automated reporting; S3: Improved reliability, resilience and integrity of bridge equipment and navigation information; S4: Integration and presentation of available information in graphical displays received via communication equipment; and S9: Improved Communication of VTS Service Portfolio (not limited to VTS stations).

13. Completed: Identification of the Users Identification User requirements IMO Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) Regulatory framework /technical requirements for solutions

14. Completed: Identification of the Users Identification User requirements IMO Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) Regulatory framework/technical requirements for solutions Identified 5 areas for the delivery of Maritime Service Portfolio’s (MSPs) Harbour operations Operations in coastal and confined or restricted waters Transocean voyages Offshore operations Operations in Arctic, Antarctic and remote areas.

15. Completed: Identification of the Users Identification User requirements IMO Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) Regulatory framework/technical requirements for solutions Identified 6 areas for the delivery of Maritime Service Portfolio’s (MSPs) A preliminary list of 17 Maritime Service Portfolio’s (MSP 1) VTS Information Service (INS); (MSP 2) VTS Navigation Assistance Service (NAS); (MSP 3) VTS Traffic Organization Service (TOS); (MSP 4) Local Port Service (LPS); (MSP 5) Maritime Safety Information (MSI) service; (MSP 6) Pilotage service; (MSP 7) Tugs service; (MSP 8) Vessel shore reporting; (MSP 9) Remote monitoring of ships systems; (MSP 10) Telemedical Maritime Assistance Service (TMAS); (MSP 11) Maritime Assistance Service (MAS); (MSP 12) Nautical chart service; (MSP 13) Nautical publications service; (MSP 14) Ice navigation service; (MSP 15) Meteorological information service; (MSP 16) Real-time hydrographic and environmental information services (MSP 17) Search and Rescue (SAR) Service.

16. Completed: Identification of the Users Identification User requirements IMO Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) Regulatory framework/technical requirements for solutions Identified 6 areas for the delivery of Maritime Service Portfolio’s (MSPs) A preliminary list of 17 Maritime Service Portfolio’s Identification of 18 tasks proposed to be executed in the periode 2015-2019 SIP approved, request and tasked by MSC94: Review each of the tasks listed in the SIP > reduce the numbers of outputs; Prepare a full justification for each reviewed output in accordance with Annex 3 to resolution A.1062(28); Prepare a comprehensive prioritized plan of work > include the time required for completion of each output; Submit the information to MSC 95 for consideration > for inclusion in the post-biennial agenda of MSC Work currently ongoing

17. Completed: Identification of the Users Identification User requirements IMO Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) Regulatory framework/technical requirements for solutions Identified 6 areas for the delivery of Maritime Service Portfolio’s (MSPs) A preliminary list of 17 Maritime Service Portfolio’s Identification of 18 tasks proposed to be executed in the periode 2015-2019 Guidelines:  Guideline on Human Centred Design (HCD) for e-navigation  Guideline on Usability Testing, Evaluation and Assessment (U-TEA) (systems)  Guideline for Software Quality Assurance (SQA) in e-navigation Note: Unified into 1 Guideline as proposed by NCSR-1, ready for approval  Guidelines on Harmonization of test beds reporting (MSC.1/Circ.1494).

18. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974 and amendments Resolutions Recommendations, Guidelines, Standards Regulations, Legislaton, Directives, Guidelines, relevant Programmes and Projects (e.g. e-Maritime, TEN-T )

19. e-Navigation is not just a bundle of services and technologies…. but also an adventure …… our common journey into the future ! contributes to that, for the North Sea Region and as an example to the international maritime community!