1. Technical University of Denmark Danish Institute for Fisheries Research Danish marine stocking experiments applying the Responsible Approach

2. Technical University of Denmark Danish Institute for Fisheries Research The Responsible approach Prioritise and select target species for enhancement Community survey Local experts In Denmark, fishermen (commercial and recreational) make suggestions for specific species in specific areas. OR, aquaculture enterprise make suggestions for releases Expert group then looks at the potential for restocking or stock enhancement of the specific species in the specific area Source: Blankenship & Leber, 1995

3. Technical University of Denmark Danish Institute for Fisheries Research The Responsible approach Develop a species management plan that identifies harvest opportunity, stock rebuilding goals and genetic objectives Goals and objectives for restocking or stock enhancement Clearly identified genetic structure and geographic distribution of the stock Production and management objectives need to be outlined Source: Blankenship & Leber, 1995

4. Technical University of Denmark Danish Institute for Fisheries Research Economic analysis Running costs: 2 million DKr Expected return: 13-20 million DKr The Responsible approach

5. Technical University of Denmark Danish Institute for Fisheries Research The Responsible approach Define quantitative measure of success Set quantitative goals Use simple indicators Source: Blankenship & Leber, 1995 The Danish Baltic Sea Case Study: Goal of 10% increase in average year class recruits. Increase the Spawning Stock Biomass by min. 10% while < 140.000 tons.

6. Technical University of Denmark Danish Institute for Fisheries Research Number of 2-year-old recruits Good environmental conditions Poor environmental conditions SSB ca. 65 000 t in 2005

7. Technical University of Denmark Danish Institute for Fisheries Research The Responsible approach Use genetic resource management to avoid deleterious genetic effects Identify genetic risks and consequences of enhancement and how to mitigate Implement genetic controls in the hatchery and a monitoring and evaluation program for wild stocks Implement a sufficiently large broodstock Implement spawning protocols that ensure genetic biodiversity. Source: Blankenship & Leber, 1995

8. Technical University of Denmark Danish Institute for Fisheries Research The Responsible approach Use disease and health management Establish maximum acceptable levels of infections and parasites in the hatchery established on the basis of wild stock health screening results. Source: Blankenship & Leber, 1995 BVP monitoring program established for Danish Baltic Sea broodstock

9. Technical University of Denmark Danish Institute for Fisheries Research The Responsible approach Use an empirical process for defining optimum release strategies Source: Blankenship & Leber, 1995 Trial at 1% increase target.

10. Technical University of Denmark Danish Institute for Fisheries Research The Responsible approach Use adaptive management. Continuous process to improve stocking results by reviewing all components, some degree of monitoring and adapting. New ideas for refining stock enhancement/ restocking constantly considered and integrated in the management process. Source: Blankenship & Leber, 1995

11. Technical University of Denmark Danish Institute for Fisheries Research Conclusion Dynamic new science where progress is being made Broad-based, multi-disciplinary, or “ecosystem approach” integrating biotechnical with a range of other considerations, esp. stakeholder involvement and local choices Look at the field critically with risk assessment and cost- benefit analysis, with a view to improve it through integration, monitoring, evaluation, adaptation and dissemination of information