Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Diffractive and total pp cross sections at the LHC and beyond Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Diffractive and total pp cross sections at the LHC and beyond Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University"— Presentation transcript:

1 Diffractive and total pp cross sections at the LHC and beyond Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University http://physics.rockefeller.edu/dino/myhtml/conference.html Otranto (Lecce), Italy Hotel Baia dei Turchi September 10 - 15, 2010 DIFFRACTION 2010 International Workshop on Diffraction in High-Energy Physics

2 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 2 CONTENTS  Introduction  Diffractive cross sections  The total cross section  Ratio of pomeron intercept to slope  Conclusions

3 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 3 Diffractive pp/pp Processes   Elastic scatteringTotal cross section SD DDDPESDD=SD+DD  T =Im f el (t=0) OPTICAL THEOREM   GAP

4 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 4 Basic and combined (“nested”) diffractive processes multi-gap “nested” process

5 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 5 The problem: the Regge theory description violates unitarity at high s  d  /dt  sd grows faster than  t as s increases  unitarity violation at high s (similarly for partial x-sections in impact parameter space)  the unitarity limit is already reached at √s~ 2 TeV

6 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 6 Standard Regge Theory Parameters:  s 0, s 0 ' and g(t)  set s 0 ‘ = s 0 (universal IP)  g(t)  g(0) ≡ g PPP  KG-1995  determine s 0 and g PPP – how? KG-1995: PLB 358, 379 (1995 )

7 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 7 Global fit to p ± p,  ±, K ± p x-sections  INPUT  RESULTS CMG-1996 PLB 389, 176 (1996) Regge theory eikonalized negligible

8 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 8 Renormalization  the key to diffraction in QCD

9 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 9 Diffractive gaps definition: gaps not exponentially suppressed p p X p Particle productionRapidity gap   -ln  ln M X 2 ln s X No radiation

10 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 10  T SD (pp & pp) - data Factor of ~8 (~5) suppression at √s = 1800 (540) GeV  suppressed relative to Regge for √s>22 GeV KG, PLB 358, 379 (1995) 1800 GeV 540 GeV M ,t,t p p p’  T SD mb √s=22 GeV  RENORMALIZATION MODEL CDF Run I results

11 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 11 M 2 distribution: data KG&JM, PRD 59 (1999) 114017  factorization breaks down to ensure M 2 scaling Regge 1 Independent of s over 6 orders of magnitude in M 2  M 2 scaling  d  dM 2 | t=-0.05 ~ independent of s over 6 orders of magnitude ! data

12 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 12 Gap probability  (re)normalize to unity Single diffraction renormalized – (1) 2 independent variables: t color factor gap probability sub-energy x-section EDS 2009: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1002/1002.3527v1.pdf CORFU-2001: hep-ph/0203141

13 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 13 Single diffraction renormalized – (2) color factor Experimentally: KG&JM, PRD 59 (114017) 1999 QCD:

14 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 14 Single diffraction renormalized - (3) set to unity  determine s o

15 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 15 Single diffraction renormalized – (4)  Pumplin bound obeyed at all impact parameters Grows slower than s 

16 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 16 Scale s o and triple-pom coupling  Two free parameters: s 0 and g PPP  Obtain product g PPP s 0  from  SD  Renormalized Pomeron flux determines s 0  Get unique solution for g PPP Pomeron-proton x-section Pomeron flux: interpret as gap probability  set to unity: determines g PPP and s 0 KG, PLB 358 (1995) 379 S o =3.7±1.5 GeV 2 g PPP =0.69 mb -1/2 =1.1 GeV -1

17 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 17 Multigap diffraction KG, hep-ph/0203141  y

18 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 18 Multigap cross sections Same suppression as for single gap! Gap probabilitySub-energy cross section (for regions with particles) 5 independent variables color factor

19 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 19 Gap survival probability S =

20 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 20 The total x-section √s F =22 GeV SUPERBALL MODEL 98 ± 8 mb at 7 TeV 109 ±12 mb at 14 TeV

21 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 21 Born Eikonal  T at LHC from CMG global fit    @ LHC √s=14 TeV: 122 ± 5 mb Born, 114 ± 5 mb eikonal  error estimated from the error in  given in CMG-96 caveat: s o =1 GeV 2 was used in global fit! Compare with SUPERBALL  (14 TeV) = 109 ± 6 mb

22 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 22  SD and ratio of  ' 

23 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 23 Monte Carlo Strategy for the LHC   T  from SUPERBALL model  optical theorem  Im f el ( t=0 )  dispersion relations  Re f el ( t=0 )  differential  SD  from RENORM  use nested pp final states for pp collisions at the IP ­ p sub-energy √s‘ Strategy similar to that employed in the MBR (Minimum Bias Rockefeller) MC used in CDF based on multiplicities from: K. Goulianos, Phys. Lett. B 193 (1987) 151 pp “A new statistical description of hardonic and e + e − multiplicity distributions “  T optical theorem Im f el (t=0) dispersion relations Re f el (t=0) MONTE CARLO STRATEGY

24 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 24 Dijets in  p at HERA from RENORM Factor of ~3 suppression expected at W~200 GeV (just as in pp collisions) for both direct and resolved components K. Goulianos, POS (DIFF2006) 055 (p. 8)

25 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 25 SUMMARY  Froissart bound  Valid above the “knee” at √s = 22 GeV in  T SD vs. √s and therefore valid at √s = 1.8 TeV of the CDF measurement  Use superball scale s 0 (saturated exchange) in the Froissart formula, where s 0 = 3.7±1.5 GeV 2 as determined from setting the integral of the Pomeron flux to unity at the “kneee” of s√s = 22 GeV  m 2 = s 0 = (3.7±1.5 GeV 2  At √s 1.8 TeV Reggeon contributions are negligible (see global fit)   compatible with CGM-96 global fit result of 114 ± 5 mb   t = (98 ± 8) mb at 7 TeV – wait and see!

26 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 26 BACKUP

27 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 27 Diffractive dijets @ Tevatron p jet reorganize jet

28 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 28 F D JJ ( , Q 2 ) @ Tevatron

29 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 29 SD/ND dijet ratio vs. x Bj @ CDF 0.035 <  < 0.095 Flat  dependence for  < 0.5 CDF Run I

30 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 30 Diffractive DIS @ HERA e Q2Q2 ** p jet  reorganize J. Collins: factorization holds (but under what conditions?) e **  t p IP Pomeron exchangeColor reorganization Results favor color reorganization

31 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 31 Vector meson production (Pierre Marage, HERA-LHC 2008)  left - why different  vs. W slopes?  more room for particles  right - why smaller b-slope in  *p?  same reason

32 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 32 Dijets in  p at HERA - 2008 DIS 2008 talk by W. Slomiński, ZEUS  20-50 % apparent rise when E T jet 5  10 GeV  due to suppression at low E T jet !!!

33 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 33 Unexpected, not understood QCD factorisation not OK Dijets in  p at HERA – 2007 Hadron-like  e Q2Q2 ** p jet  reorganize Direct vs. resolved  the reorganization diagram predicts:  suppression at low Z | P jets, since larger  is available for particles  same suppression for direct and resolved processes

34 K. Goulianos DIFF. 2010, 09/10-15 Otranto, ITALY Diffractive and total x-sections at LHC and beyond 34 The end


Download ppt "Diffractive and total pp cross sections at the LHC and beyond Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google