1. http://d0.epe.phys.washington.edu/~gwatts/research/d0/Higgs/wenu_trigger_studies/

2. 2 Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) Higgs Meeting 8/30/2002 Samples Data –Trigger list 8.0 Data –Trigger bit 9: CEM(1,5) At 10E30 this trigger bit was running 80 Hz At 30E30 about 240 Hz. –Reprocessed with p11 –Data extracted (not trig-simmed) MC –HW, W->e –Simulated and recoed with p11.08

3. 3 Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) Higgs Meeting 8/30/2002 Summary At Level 1 –CEM(1,10) –CJT(2,5) –CJT(3,3) Not useful until calorimeter is fixed L1 MET –Would have been fantastic –Almost doubles rejection at L1, eff goes down 6%. At Level 2 –1 Jet above 20 GeV –2 Jets above 10 GeV –Was not able to get electrons to work The EMF in data was peaked strongly at one Still investigating this issue

4. 4 Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) Higgs Meeting 8/30/2002 Pass % as a function of cut No Cuts CJT(2,5) CJT(3,3)CEM(1,10)L2J(1,20) L2J(2,10) Data MC

5. 5 Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) Higgs Meeting 8/30/2002 Rates L2@10E30L2@30E30 CEM(1,5)Rejection: 1 Rate: 80 Hz Rejection: 1 Rate: 240 Hz CEM(1,10) CJT(3,3) CJT(2,5) Rejection: 2.8 Rate: 30 Hz Rejection: 2.8 Rate: 85 Hz +l2j(1,20) l2j(2,20) Rejection: 5.5 Rate: 15 Hz Rejection: 5.5 Rate: 43 Hz If we don’t join other groups this will get prescaled at lumi Within Reason (but requires L3!) w/MET: Rejection 8.8

6. 6 Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) Higgs Meeting 8/30/2002 The Top Trigger CEM(1,10)CJT(2,5)This is great L2j(1,10)L2em(1,10)This should work (baring L2 em problems) L3ele(1,15,shwr)l3jet(2,15)This needs to be checked; top is more jetty than WH…