Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Team II Josh Pavlik, Jennifer Rogas, Logan Reynolds, Corbin Ray, Marlee Armstrong, Amy Drake.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Team II Josh Pavlik, Jennifer Rogas, Logan Reynolds, Corbin Ray, Marlee Armstrong, Amy Drake."— Presentation transcript:

1 Team II Josh Pavlik, Jennifer Rogas, Logan Reynolds, Corbin Ray, Marlee Armstrong, Amy Drake

2  Good to Great ◦ Prequel to “Built to Last”  Good is the Enemy of Great  4 Phases  Level 5 Leadership  Timeless Physics

3  Good-to-great pattern: ◦ 15-year returns at or below market ◦ Transition point ◦ 15-year returns at least three times market  Other criteria: ◦ Pattern independent of company’s industry  Should additional criteria be used with stock returns?

4  Cut 1- 1,435 companies ◦ Fortune 500, 1965-1995  Cut 2- 126 companies ◦ Used data from University of Chicago Center for Research in Security Prices ◦ Selected companies that had above-average returns preceded by average or below-average returns  Cut 3- 19 companies ◦ Eliminated companies that did not follow exact good-to-great pattern

5  Cut 4- 11 companies ◦ Eliminated companies that did not show transition relative to industry

6 Abbott Circuit City Fannie Mae Gillette Kimberly-Clark Kroger Nucor Philip Morris Pitney Bowles Walgreens Wells Fargo

7  Good-to-Great VS Comparison Companies ◦ Distinguishing Factors  Direct Comparison Companies ◦ Same Industry/Opportunities ◦ Similar Resources at Transition ◦ No Leap from Good to Great  Unsustained Comparison Companies ◦ Short Term shift Good-to-Great ◦ Failed to Sustain

8 Good-To-Great CompaniesDirect Comparison Companies Abbott Circuit City Fannie Mae Gillette Kimberly-Clark Kroger Nucor Philip Morris Pitney Bowes Walgreens Wells Fargo Upjohn Silo Great Western Warner-Lambert Scott Paper A&P Bethlehem Steel R.J. Reynolds Addressograph Eckerd Bank of America Unsustained Comparison Companies Burroughs Chrysler Harris Hasbro Rubbermaid Teledyne

9  The research compared good companies to great companies  Research was gathered through evidence of key data  Material was coded into categories  Research included interviews of executives during transformation  Extensive analysis

10  The research included extensive analysis of ◦ Acquisitions and mergers ◦ Executive compensation ◦ Business strategy ◦ Corporate culture ◦ Layoffs ◦ Leadership and management styles ◦ Financial ratios

11  10 to 11 great companies, CEO’s came from within the company  Executive compensation is a key component of transformation  Long range strategic planning has no direct correlation  Focus on what not to do and what to stop doing

12  Technology advances transformation, it does not create it  Two mediocre companies cannot equal one great one  Commitment, leadership, and motivation flourish under the right circumstances  Most great transformations are made unaware  Greatness is a matter of choice, not circumstance

13  Interactive Process of looping back and forth ◦ Developing Ideas ◦ Testing them against the data ◦ Revising the ideas ◦ Building framework ◦ Watching it break under the weight of evidence ◦ Rebuilding it yet again

14  Process is repeated continually  Reach coherent framework of concepts  Every primary concept showed up as a change variable in 100% of the good to great companies.  Transformation Process: Disciplined People, Disciplined Thoughts, Disciplined Action

15  Transformation Process Stages: ◦ Disciplined People  Leadership, First Who…Then What ◦ Disciplined Thoughts  Confront Brutal Facts, Hedgehog Concept ◦ Disciplined Action  Culture of Discipline, Technology Accelerators

16  What type of leaders take a good company to great?  Do not share the characteristics of high profile leaders  They are self-effacing, quiet, reserved, and even shy  A blend of personal humility and professional will

17  How do good-to-great leaders begin the process to greatness?  Got the right people on the bus  Took the wrong people off the bus  Got the right people in the right seats  Then figured out where to drive the bus

18  Good-to-great companies embrace the Stockdale Paradox ◦ 1. Maintain faith you will prevail ◦ 2. Confront the brutal facts of reality

19  Good-to-great companies rise above the curse of competence  Because something is your core business, does not mean you can be the best at it  If you can’t be the best at it, then it cannot be the basis of a great company

20  Good-to-great companies create a culture of discipline  If you have disciplined people, hierarchy is not needed  If you have disciplined thought, bureaucracy is not needed  If you have disciplined action, excessive controls are not needed

21  Good-to-great companies think differently about the role of technology  Use technology to ignite transformation  Technology is not used as a primary cause of greatness  Pioneers in “carefully selected technologies”

22  Jim Collins states that we should continually search for timeless principles that will remain true and relevant no matter how the world changes around us  Example: Wells Fargo

23  It does not matter what kind of economy we are in to apply these timeless principles  Example: Apple and Steve Jobs

24  Good being the enemy great is a human problem  Any type of organization can be transformed using timeless principles


Download ppt "Team II Josh Pavlik, Jennifer Rogas, Logan Reynolds, Corbin Ray, Marlee Armstrong, Amy Drake."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google