# Statistical techniques in NLP Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou University of Texas at Dallas.

## Presentation on theme: "Statistical techniques in NLP Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou University of Texas at Dallas."— Presentation transcript:

Statistical techniques in NLP Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou University of Texas at Dallas

Learning Central to statistical NLP In most cases, supervised methods are used, with a separate training set Unsupervised methods (clustering) recalculate the entire model on new data

Parameterized models Assume that the observed (training) data D is described by a given distribution This distribution, possibly with some parameters , is our model . We want to maximize the likelihood function, P(D|  ) or P(D|  ).

Find the  that maximizes P(D|  ), i.e., Example: Binomial distribution P(D|m) = Therefore, m=D/N Maximum likelihood estimation

Smoothing MLE assigns zero probability to unseen events Example: trigrams in part of speech tagging (23% unseen) Solution: smoothing (small probabilities for unseen data)

Bayesian learning It is often impossible to solve Bayes decision rule: choose  that maximizes P(  |D) (minimum error rate) But it may be hard to calculate P(  |D) Use Bayes’ rule: Naïve Bayes:

Examples Gale et al 1992, 90% sense disambiguation accuracy (choose between “bank/money” and “bank/river”) Hanks and Rooth 1990, prepositional phrase attachment –He ate pasta with cheese –He ate pasta with a fork Both rely on observable features (nearby words, the verb)

Markov models A stochastic process follows a sequence of states over time with some transition probabilities If the process is stationary and with limited memory, we have a Markov chain The model can be visible, or with hidden states (HMM)

Example: N-gram language models Result for a word depends only on the word and a limited number of neighbors Part-of-speech tagging: maximize With Bayes rule, chain rule, and independence assumptions Use HMM for automatically adjusting back- off smoothing

Example: Speech recognition Need to find correct sequence of words given aural signal Language model (N-gram) accounts for dependencies between words Acoustic model maps from visible (phonemes) to hidden (words) level HMM combines both Viterbi algorithm will find optimal solution

Estimation-Maximization In general, we can iteratively estimate complex models with hidden parameters Define a quality function Q as the conditional likelihood of the model on all parameters Estimate Q from an initial choice for  Choose new  that maximizes Q

Example: PCFG parsing Probabilistic context-free grammars Likelihood of each rule (e.g., VP  V or VP  V NP) is a basic parameter Combined probability of the entire tree gives the quality function Forward-backward algorithm gives the solution Lexicalization (Collins, 1996, 1997)

Example: Machine Translation The noisy channel model (Brown et al., 1991) –Input in one language (e.g., English) is garbled into another (e.g., French) –Estimate probabilities of each word or phrase generating words or phrases in the other language and how many of them (fertility) A similar approach: Transliteration (Knight, 1998)

Linear regression Predict output as a linear combination of input variables Choose weights that minimize the sum of residual square error (least squares) Can be computed efficiently via a matrix decomposition and inversion

Log-linear regression Ideal output is 0 or 1 Because the distribution changes from normal to binomial, a transformed LS fit is not accurate Solution: Use an intermediate predictor , Can be approximated with iterative reweighted least squares

Examples Text categorization for information retrieval (Yang, 1998) Many types of sentence/word classification –cue words (Passonneau and Litman, 1993) –prosodic features (Pan and McKeown, 1999)

A technique for reducing dimensionality; data points are projected Given matrix A (n  m), find matrices T (n  k), S (k  k), and D (k  m) so that their product is A S is the top k singular values of A Projection is achieved by multiplying and A Application: Latent Semantic Indexing Singular-value decomposition

Methods without an explicit probability model Use empirical techniques to directly provide output without calculating a model Decision trees: Each node is associated with a decision on one of the input features The tree is built incrementally by choosing features with the most discriminatory power

Variations on decision trees Shrinking to prevent over-training Decision lists (Yarowsky 1997) use only the top feature for accent restoration

Rule induction Similar to decision trees, but the rules are allowed to vary and contain different operators Examples: RIPPER (Cohen 1996), transformation-based learning (Brill 1996), genetic algorithms (Siegel 1998)

Methods without explicit model k-Nearest Neighbor classification Neural networks Genetic algorithms

Support vector machines Find hyperplane that maximizes distance from support vectors Non-linear transformation: From original space to separable space via kernel function Text categorization (Joachims, 1997), OCR (Burges and Vapnik, 1996), Speech recognition (Schmidt, 1996)

Classification issues Two or many classes Classifier confidence, probability of membership in each class Training / test set distributions Balance of training data across classes

When to use each method? Probabilistic models depend on distributional assumptions Linear models (and SVD) assume a normal data distribution, and generalized linear models a Poisson, binomial, or negative binomial Markov models capture limited dependencies Rule-based models allow for multi-way classification easier than linear/log-linear ones For many applications, it is important to get a confidence estimate

Download ppt "Statistical techniques in NLP Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou University of Texas at Dallas."

Similar presentations