Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Freeway Segment Traffic State Estimation

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Freeway Segment Traffic State Estimation"— Presentation transcript:

1 Freeway Segment Traffic State Estimation
Heterogeneous Data Sources and Uncertainty Quantification: A Stochastic Three-Detector Approach Wen Deng Xuesong Zhou University of Utah Prepared for INFORMS 2011

2 Needs for Traffic State Estimation
Sensor Data Traffic State Estimation Traffic Flow/Control Optimization

3 Motivating Questions How to estimate freeway segment traffic states from heterogeneous measurements? Point mean speed Bluetooth travel time records Semi-continuous GPS data Semi-continuous path trajectory Continuous path trajectory Point Point-to-point Loop Detector Automatic Vehicle Identification Automatic Vehicle Location Video Image Processing

4 Motivating Questions How much information is sufficient?
How to locate point sensors on a traffic segment? How to locate Bluetooth reader locations? How much AVI/GPS market penetration rate is sufficient?

5 Existing Method 1: Kalman Filtering
Eulerian sensing framework Muñoz et al., 2003; Sun et al., 2003; Sumalee et al., 2011 Linear measurement equations to incorporate flow and speed data from point detectors Extended Kalman filter framework second-order traffic flow model Wang and Papageorgiou (2005)

6 Existing Method 2: Cell Transmission Model
Cell inflow inequality qi,j(t) = Min { vfree  ki,j(t) , qmax i,j(t) , w  (kjam - ki,j(t))  Δ x } Switching-mode model (SMM) set of piecewise linear equations qi,j(t) =  [vfree  ki,j(t) ] +  [vfree  ki,j(t) ]

7 Existing Method 3: Lagrangian sensing
Nanthawichit et al., 2003; Work et al., 2010; Herrera and Bayen, 2010 Establish linear measurement equations Utilize semi-continuous samples from moving observers or probes

8 Existing Method 4: Interpolation method
Treiber and Helbing, 2002 “kernel function” that builds the state equation for forward and backward waves Linear state equation through a speed measurement-based weighting scheme Figure Source: Treiber and Helbing, 2002

9 Challenge No.1 1. Unified measurement equations to incorporate
Point, point-to-point and semi-continuous data

10 Our New Perspective Dr. Newell’s three-detector model provides a unified framework N(t,x)=Min {Nupstream(t-BWTT)+Kjam*distance, Ndownstream(t-FFTT)}

11 1: From Point Sensor Data to Boundary N-curves
Cell density and flow are all functions of cumulative flow counts

12 2: From Bluetooth Travel Time to Boundary N-curves
Downstream and upstream N-Curves between two time stamps are connected

13 3: From to GPS Trajectory Data to Boundary N-curves
Under FIFO conditions, GPS probe vehicle keeps the same N-Curve number (say m) m m m m m

14 4: From Boundary N-curves to Everything inside

15 Challenge No. 2 All sensors have errors error propagation
Surveillance Type Data Quality Point Detectors High accuracy and relatively low reliability Automatic Vehicle Identification Accuracy depends on market penetration level of tagged vehicles Mobile GPS location sensors Accuracy depends on market penetration level of probe vehicles Trajectory data from video image processing Accuracy depends on machine vision algorithms

16 The Question We have to Answer
Under error-free conditions, Newell’s model provides a good traffic state description tool N(t,x) =Min {Nupstream(*), Ndownstream(*)} With measurement errors What are the mean and variance of Min {Nupstream(*)+eu, Ndownstream(*) +ed}

17 Quick Review: Probit Model and Clark’s Approximation
Probit model (discrete choice model for min of two alternatives’ random utilities ) U = min (U1+e1, U2+e2) Route choice application Clark’s approximation minimization of two random variables can be approximated by a third random variables

18 Proposed Stochastic 3-Detector Model

19 Discussion 1: Consistency Checking
When Uncertainties of boundary values are 0, the stochastic 3-detector model reduces to deterministic 3-detertor model

20 Discussion 2: Weights under Different Traffic Conditions

21 Discussion 3: Quantify Uncertainty of Inside-Traffic-State Estimates
Variance or trace of estimates determine the value of information

22

23 Numerical Example

24 Input: Queue Spillback

25 Ground truth Arrive-departure Curves

26 Estimated Density Profile

27 Estimated Uncertainty profile
Before After

28 Impact of Additional Sensors

29 Possible (Un-captured) Modeling Errors
Stochastic free-flow speed, Stochastic backward wave speed; Heterogeneous driving behavior Upper plot: original NGSIM vehicle trajectory data Lower plot: reconstructed vehicle trajectory based on flow count measurements

30 Conclusions Proposed stochastic 3-detertor Model
Estimate freeway segment traffic states from heterogeneous measurements Quantify the degree of estimation uncertainty and value of information, under different sensor deployment plans


Download ppt "Freeway Segment Traffic State Estimation"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google