Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Preliminary Test Track Experiments April 16, 2004 Motohide Hatanaka, Emily Ma Stanford University.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Preliminary Test Track Experiments April 16, 2004 Motohide Hatanaka, Emily Ma Stanford University."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Preliminary Test Track Experiments April 16, 2004 Motohide Hatanaka, Emily Ma Stanford University

2 2 Preliminary Test Track Experiments Goal: Validate simulations and to generate insights to improve on first generation foot design. Focus on three phases of leg trajectory. AttachmentGenerate strong contact between claws and surface. Timing of attachment Impact velocity Orientation angle (compensate for motion in thru-stroke?) Through-strokeAnkle compliance – how much and for which axes? DetachmentDetachment with least resistance and without breaking claws. Orientation angle Timing of detachment Preliminary tests focused on timing of attachment and detachment.

3 3 Test Track Coordinates force plate foot

4 4 Timing of attach/detachment

5 5 Observations [all cases] The robot is always pushing itself away from the wall. (-Z) [early attachment] high lateral pull in (+X) robot pushes itself down at initial contact (-Y) robot pushes itself away from surface at initial contact (-Z) [late attachment] small lateral pull in (+X) [late detachment] lateral push out at detachment (-X) significant pull down or drag (-Y) large kick off away from surface (-Z) [early attachment, late detachment] largest pull down (drag) at detachment (-Y)

6 6 Detachment Early Nominal Late Attachment Very Early Early Nominal Late Lateral Force: X-direction (+X = pull in) High pull-in force (+X) after early attachment Low pull-in force (+X) after late attachment Lateral push out (-X) at late detachment 6 optimal

7 7 Detachment Early Nominal Late Attachment Very Early Early Nominal Late Vertical Force: Y-direction (+Y = pull body up) Robot pushes itself down (-Y) at early attachment Significant pull down = drag (-Y) at late detachment 7 optimal

8 8 Detachment Early Nominal Late Attachment Very Early Early Nominal Late Normal Force: Z-direction (+Z = pull body into wall) Large kick off away from wall (-Z) at late detachment Robot pushes itself away from wall (-Z) especially at early attachment 8 optimal

9 9 Summary of findings Assuming we want lateral pull in, vertical self push/pull up, and pull into wall, (i.e. +X,+Y,+Z): Early attachment is to be avoided for -Y and -Z but useful for +X. Late detachment is to be avoided for all parameters.

10 10 Next Steps (1) Further analyses with current setup Measure or calculate forces and torques at contact point (current contact point is offset from center of the force plate) Study the torques Find out the reasons for the results obtained (e.g. by closer observation at slower operation rate) Look at work generated in a cycle and quantify performance of each setup

11 11 Next Steps (2) Experiment modification Modify the trajectory to have +Z values to measure claw attachment strength on wall Include amplitude as an additional parameter for optimization Use pull-up motor to emulate the five legs that are not there Identify control parameters to match ideal force & torque profiles derived from biology.


Download ppt "1 Preliminary Test Track Experiments April 16, 2004 Motohide Hatanaka, Emily Ma Stanford University."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google