1. Many-body theory of electric and thermal transport in single-molecule junctions INT Program “From Femtoscience to Nanoscience: Nuclei, Quantum Dots and Nanostructures,” July 31, 2009 Charles Stafford

2. 1. Fundamental challenges of nanoelectronics (a physicist’s perspective) Fabrication: Lithography → self-assembly? For ultrasmall devices, even single-atom variations from device to device (or in device packaging) could lead to unacceptable variations in device characteristics → environmental sensitivity. Contacts/interconnects to ultrasmall devices. Switching mechanism: Raising/lowering energy barrier necessitates dissipation of minimum energy k B T per cycle → extreme power dissipation at ultrahigh device densities. Tunneling & barrier fluctuations in nanoscale devices.

3. Molecular electronics Fabrication: large numbers of identical “devices” can be readily synthesized with atomic precision. (Making the contacts is the hard part!) But does not (necessarilly) solve fundamental problem of switching mechanism.

4. Single-molecule junction ≈ ultrasmall quantum dot Similarities and differences: Typically, π-orbitals of the carbon atoms are the itinerant degrees of freedom. Charging energy of a single π-orbital: U ~ 9eV. Charging energy of a benzene molecule: ‹U› ~ 5eV. Nearest-neighbor π-π hopping integral: t ~ 2 – 3eV. Lead-molecule coupling: Γ ~ 0.5eV (small parameter?). Electronic structure unique for each molecule---not universal!

5. Alternative switching mechanism: Quantum interference David M. Cardamone, CAS & S. Mazumdar, Nano Letters 6, 2422 (2006); CAS, D. M. Cardamone & S. Mazumdar, Nanotechnology 18, 424014 (2007); U.S. Patent Application, Serial No. 60/784,503 (2007) (a)Phase difference of paths 1 and 2: k F 2d = π → destructive interference blocks flow of current from E to C. All possible Feynman paths cancel exactly in pairs. (b) Increasing coupling to third terminal introduces new paths that do not cancel, allowing current to flow from E to C.

7. Self-consistent Hartree-Fock calculation for a benzene heterojunction

8. Proposed structure for a QuIET: 1 2 3 Tunable Fano anti-resonance due to vinyl linkage Real  (not decoherence) 3

9. I-V Characteristic of a QuIET based on sulfonated vinylbenzene Despite the unique quantum mechanical switching mechanism, the QuIET mimics the functionality of a macroscopic transistor on the scale of a single molecule! Increasing gate voltage causes electronic states of vinyl linkage to couple more strongly to benzene, introducing symmetry-breaking scattering.

10. General schematic of a QuIET Source, drain, and gate nodes of QuIET can be functionalized with “alligator clips” e.g., thiol groups, for self-assembly onto pre-patterned metal/semiconducting electrodes (cf. Aviram, US Patent No. 6,989,290).

11. Example of a class of QuIETs based on benzene Conducting polymers (e.g., polythiophene, polyaniline) connect to source and drain; semiconducting polymer (e.g., alkene chain) connects to gate electrode. Lengths of polymeric sidegroups can be tailored to facilitate fabrication and fine-tune electrical properties.

12. Example of a class of QuIETs based on [18]-annulene Interference due to aromatic ring; Polymeric sidegroups for interconnects/control element(s).

13. 2. The nonequilibrium many-body problem Mean-field calculations based on density-functional theory are the dominant paradigm in quantum chemistry, including molecular junction transport. They are unable to account for charge quantization effects (Coulomb blockade) in single-molecule junctions! HOMO-LUMO gap not accurately described; no distinction of transport vs. optical gap. Many-body effects beyond the mean-field level must be included for a quantitative theory of transport in molecular heterojunctions. To date, only a few special solutions in certain limiting cases (e.g., Anderson model; Kondo effect) have been obtained to the nonequilibrium many-body problem. There is a need for a general approach that includes the electronic structure of the molecule.

14. Nonequilibrium Green’s functions

15. Real-time Green’s functions

16. Dyson-Keldysh equations

17. Molecular Junction Hamiltonian Coulomb interaction (localized orthonormal basis): Leads modeled as noninteracting Fermi gases: Lead-molecule coupling (electrostatic coupling included in H mol (1) ):

18. Molecular Junction Green’s Functions All (steady-state) physical observables of the molecular junction can be expressed in terms of G and G <. Dyson equation: Coulomb self-energy must be calculated approximately. G obeys the equation of motion: Once G is known, G < can be determined by analytic continuation on the Keldysh contour. Tunneling self-energy:

19. Electric and Thermal Currents Tunneling width matrix:

20. Elastic and inelastic contributions to the current

21. Elastic transport: linear response

22. 3. Application to specific molecules: Effective π-electron molecular Hamiltonian For the purpose of this talk we consider conjugated organic molecules. Transport due primarily to itinerant  electrons. Sigma band is filled and doesn’t contribute appreciably to transport. Effective charge operator, including polarization charges induced by lead voltages: Parameters from fitting electronic spectra of benzene, biphenyl, and trans- stilbene up to 8-10eV: Accurate to ~1% U=8.9eV,t=2.64eV, ε=1.28 Castleton C.W.M., Barford W., J. Chem. Phys. Vol 17 No. 8 (2002)

23. Enhanced thermoelectric effects near transmission nodes

24. Effect of a finite minimum transmission

25. Formal solution of the equations of motion → tunneling self-energy → Coulomb self-energy Eliminating lead-molecule GF Eliminating 2-body GF

26. 4. The Coulomb self-energy

27. Sequential-tunneling limit: Σ C (0) Nonequilibrium steady-state probabilities determined by detailed balance: Tunneling width matrix:

28. Correction to the Coulomb self-energy

29. Self-consistent Hartree-Fock correction to the Coulomb self-energy of a diatomic molecule Narrowing of transmission resonances; No shift of transmission peak or node positions; No qualitative effect on transmission phase; Correction small in (experimentally relevant) cotunneling regime.

30. Coulomb blockade in a diatomic molecule

31. Higher-order corrections to the Coulomb self-energy: RPA

32. 5. Results for 1,4-benzenedithiol-Au junctions

33. Determining the lead-molecule coupling: thermopower Experimentally the BDT junction’s Seebeck coefficient is found to be 7.0 .2  V/K Baheti et al, Nano Letters Vol 8 No 2 (2008) Find that  Au -  0 =-3.22 ±.04eV, about 1.5eV above the HOMO level (hole dominated) Experimentally the linear-conductance of BDT is reported to be 0.011G 0 (2e 2 /h) Xiaoyin Xiao, Bingqian Xu, and N.J Tao. Nano-letters Vol 4, No. 2 (2004) Comparison with calculated linear-response gives  =.63 ±.02eV We can express the thermopower in terms of the transmission probability

34. Differential conductance spectrum of a benzene(1,4)dithiol-Au junction Junction charge quantized within ‘molecular diamonds.’ Transmission nodes due to quantum interference. Resonant tunneling through molecular excited states at finite bias. Justin P. Bergfield & CAS, Physical Review B 79, 245125 (2009)

35. Resonant tunneling through molecular excitons Justin P. Bergfield & CAS, Physical Review B 79, 245125 (2009)

36. Conclusions Electron transport in single-molecule junctions is a key example of a nanosystem far from equilibrium, and poses a challenging nonequilibrium quantum many-body problem. Transport through single molecules can be controlled by exploiting quantum interference due to molecular symmetry. Large enhancement of thermoelectric effects predicted at transmission nodes arising due to destructive quantum interference. Open questions: Corrections to Coulomb self-energy beyond RPA Fabrication, fabrication, fabrication…

37. Self-consistent Hartree-Fock correction to the Coulomb self-energy of ‘isolated’ molecule Narrowing of transmission resonances; No shift of transmission peak or node positions; No qualitative effect on transmission phase; Correction small in (experimentally relevant) cotunneling regime.

38. Molecular ‘Coulomb Diamond’ Intra-molecular correlation effects Excited state transport Fano-like lineshapes Energy N N+1 N+2 Energy  lead

39. Alternative switching mechanism: Quantum interference (a)Phase difference of paths 1 and 2: k F 2d = π → destructive interference blocks flow of current from E to C. All possible Feynman paths cancel exactly in pairs. (b) Increasing coupling to third terminal introduces new paths that do not cancel, allowing current to flow from E to C.

40. Elastic and inelastic contributions to the current

41. Molecular Junction Green’s Functions All (steady-state) physical observables of the molecular junction can be expressed in terms of G and G <. Example: elastic transmission function G obeys the equation of motion: Once G is known, G < can be determined by analytic continuation on the Keldysh contour. Tunneling width matrix: