1. About this presentation Digestible overview of GAP 2 Freely available to use / modify as you wish Has accompanying notes (in the ‘normal view’) to explain things in more detail

3. Bridging the gap between science, stakeholders and policy makers

5. InfluenceDemonstration

6. Orthongel Anabac FTCPG S TEERING O PERATIONAL SCIENCE - STAKEHOLDER PARTNERSHIPS C OORDINATION

7. European National Regional Influence Advisory Councils (RACs)

8. 13 Case studies

9. Publication of reform package - Adoption of proposals 201020122011201320142015 CFP Reform timeline Commission meetings with stakeholders in Member States Passage of draft proposals through legislative process (co-decision EU Parliament & Council) Enter into force, reformed CFP Implementation by member states GAP 2 timeline 6 RACs workshops - Strengthening scientific and multi-stakeholder engagement in regional CFP decision making and implementation Regional case studies – participatory research actions and evaluation of participatory processes Applied research in context of integration of the MSFD & CFP

10. Duration: 4 years EU Contribution: €5,916,775 Start date: 1 st April 2011 End date: 31 st March 2015 Reporting dates: No. 1, Month 6 (Light): 30th Sept 2011 No. 2, Month 18: 30th Sept 2012 No. 3, Month 36: 31st March 2014 No, 4 (Final), Month 48: 31st Mar 2015 EU Seventh Framework programme, Science in Society Action Line – A more dynamic governance of the science and society relationship SiS-2010-1.0-1 Mobilisation and Mutual Learning Actions Grant type: Co-ordination and support action (Supporting)

12. Source: Mackinson et al. Marine Policy 2010 Source: NSRAC draft Record DWG 011209.doc

13. It’s not only what you do, it’s how you go about it

14. GAP aims & objectives delivered through WPs Objective 3 (WP3) – Develop and demonstrate methods that bridge the research knowledge to policy making gap at the EU level Objective 4 (WP4) – Evaluate the sociological conditions that influence whether, when and how participatory approaches make a difference Demonstrate the role & value of participatory research to evidence-based policy O BJECTIVES AND ASSOCIATED SUPPORT ACTIONS Objective 1 (WP1) – Promote & enhance stakeholder involvement at regional & EU level Objective 2 (WP2) – Enable & demonstrate two-way interaction and mutual learning among scientists, stakeholders and policy makers on defined local and regional issues Promote & enable participation of stakeholders in systems of research and governance Objective 5 (WP5) – Engage society with science and vice versa A IMS

15. How the work flows WP3. Making a difference: enabling participatory research knowledge and stakeholder know-how WP4. Knowledge, social processes and the success of participatory research WP1. Stakeholders role in research and governance WP2. Involving stakeholders in research WP6. Project co-ordination: Design, Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation of GAP 2 Support Actions Management Action WP5. Effective outreach: connecting with society

16. Steven Mackinson WP1 – Stakeholders role in research and governance. Sasa Raicevich & Juan Freire, WP2 – Involving stakeholders in research Martin Pastoors WP3 – Making a difference: enabling participatory research knowledge and stakeholder know-how. Doug Wilson & Petter Holm, WP4 – Knowledge, social processes and the success of participatory research Kristian Teleki WP5 – Effective outreach: connecting with society. Suzanna Neville WP6 – Design, Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation of GAP2 Sue Bramford, Michael Clarke & Jane Medler, Financial and contract management and advice

17. Roles - who’s responsible for what? Management Group (WP Leaders & Coord) Operational Partners (Science & Stakeholders) GAP 2 Coordinator (Cefas) Contracts & Finance Team (Cefas) Steering Group Reference User and Civil Society Groups Group and Users Group EC Project Manager

19. Description of Work –Concepts and approaches –Methods –Roles and responsibilities –Deadlines (see spreadsheet) Suzanna!

20. I NTERNAL (managed via WP6) WP 1 – Impact on dialogue WP 2 – Scientific credibility – research outcomes WP 3 – Delivering useful and useable research WP 4 – Participatory processes (in depth) WP 5 – Outreach effectiveness WP 6 – Steering Committee evaluation E XTERNAL EU Reporting dates: No. 1, Month 6 (Light): 30th Sept 2011 No. 2, Month 18: 30th Sept 2012 No. 3, Month 36: 31st March 2014 No, 4 (Final), Month 48: 31st Mar 2015

21. Stakeholder engagement Stakeholders Participation Scientists ‘Expert’ Knowledge Dialogue Transparency, openness, quality, credibility Policy and Governance