Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Pharmaceutical Case Competition 2007

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Pharmaceutical Case Competition 2007"— Presentation transcript:

1 Pharmaceutical Case Competition 2007
HLM Biotech Consulting Paul Di Capua, MD, MBA candidate Robert Stavert, MD, MBA candidate Adrian Garcia, MBA candidate November 30, 2007

2 WHY BIOTECH ? WHY NOW? Cash reserves Slim pipeline
Pharmaceutical pipeline is drying up Diversification of drug portfolio into biologics Potential synergies WHY BIOTECH ? WHY NOW? Cash reserves Slim pipeline Blockbusters are going off-patent WHY NOW Old pharmaceutical business model not holding up Looking at drug market, fraction that is traditional pharmaceuticals is decreasing and fraction that is small molecules is increasing Analysts estimate Pfizer may lose over 41% of revenues to generic competitors between 2010 and 2012 Lipitor (which accounts for 29% of Pfizer’s revenue) sales have been declining much faster than expected under face of generic competition for statins 2nd quarter sales of lipitor fell more than $400 M (13%) from 2006 to 2007 Other key drugs facing increased generic competition- Norvasc, Zyrtec Inhalable insulin (Exubera) has been major disappointment At the start of 2007, Pfizer has eight compounds in phase 3 development; four of them were new indications for already-approved drugs. The remaining four are mostly cancer0targeting drugs that face a very competitive oncology market. They won’t even come close to replacing the billions of dollars Pfizer will soon lose to generic competition. WHY BIOTECH Synergies: R&D development Marketing Corporate structure and culture more aligned with current and future of biologics industry WHY BIOGEN: MS market Race for oral MS Tx Growth of market Increased control of interferon β 1 market with AVONEX and REBIF Patent extension through combination drugs Economies of scale in combining drugs Marketing and distribution channels already exist for IFN β Sucessful biotech with proven track record Growth of MS market Potential synergies So competition doesn’t acquire Biogen

3 “When we look back, this will seem a very expensive time.”
– Tony Robinson, Head of Business Development and Licensing at Novartis Not a favorable market Seller’s market Icahn’s bid serves as anchor Desparate buyers Press coverage inflates price ‘08 elections will emphasize health care and drug prices MS research has unpredictable future Robust pipeline with a lot of competition Future of MS therapy unknown Vaccines or cures may dry up MS market for chronic disease Biotech firms difficult to value Revenue generators expire with patents Difficult to valuate pipeline, which represent future value of firm Buyers beware! ***RISKS*** Overvalued Icahn’s bid Anchor Increased press Bidding war Desparate buyer Overhyped buyee Seller’s market Pipeline drugs won’t get approved Other biotech beats biogen in MS development in targeted mechanisms  mechanism overlap in pipeline Biotech’s are hard to value If vaccine approved and effective  will dry up MS market  MS no longer chronic disease Field of MS may go in other directions Vaccine Genes Stem cells Reversible effects via other mechanisms ‘08 elections  attention to increased $$ spent on drugs US health care reform with attention to drug spending, biotech model makes specialized drugs and charges a lot (big pharma has more lobby!) Biogen is a big biotech  has many other relationships, can complicate deal, increase cost $$ “Pharma companies are desperate for new products, they are prepared to pay huge amounts of money for early-stage compounds and give away geographical rights that would previously have been unthinkable.” – Simon Maroney, CEO of MorphoSys, German Biotech firm

4 Multiple Sclerosis: Pathogenesis and mechanisms of therapy
Figure from: Compston A, Coles, A. Multiple Sclerosis. Lancet 2002; 359:

5 cost for 1 month of treatment
Current MS therapies Drug name molecule & mechanism firm patent expiration route Notable features cost for 1 month of treatment interferon β 1a 2011 IM Most used of DMT's $1,395.00 Natalizumab (monoclonal antibody) 2015 IV • Touch process --> PML • reduces frequency of exacerbations for relapsing forms of MS $2,225.00 Betaseron inteferon β 1b Bayer - Berlex off patent SC contraindicated in pregnancy $1,489.00 glatrimer acetate (mimics myelin sheath) Teva 2014 safest of main disease modifying drugs (ABCR's) $1,370.00 Pfizer-Serono risk of neutropenia and pancytopenia $1,470.00 mitoxantrone (intercalates DNA, causing DNA damage) Emd Serono / OSI Pharma 2010 • Unique mechanism of intercalating DNA • risk of cardiotoxicity $1,453.00 Major risks: Copaxone safest Tysabri: touch process; PML Novatrone: cumulative cardiotoxicity AVONEX is most used DMT b/c both decrease in relapses and slows accumulation of physical disability TYSABRI is notable because: BENEFITS: it delays accumulation of physical disability and reduces frequency of exacerbations for relapsing forms of MS RISKS: touch process  PML, immunosuppression

6 Prospective MS therapies
Drug name Firm Phase Mechanism Route Strategic competitive advantage Fingolimod Novartis III sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1P-R) modulators oral • Oral administration • Novel mechanism of action • May reverse effects of MS NeuroVax Immune Response II T Cell Receptor (TCR) peptide vaccine monthly injections Vaccine, complete remission after 1 year BG-12 fumeric acid ester (FAE) immunomodulator with a combination of cytoprotective and anti-inflammatory properties oral administration, novel mechanism of immunomodulation Fampridine-SR Acorda Therapeutics Blocks channels from damaged neurons facilitating electrical signal transfer Oral, offers improvement of symptoms Rituxan Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody IV Already approved for other indications Zenapax (daclizumab) Biogen with PDL BioPharma Monoclonal antibody that targets IL-2 receptor antibodies Possible synergistic activity with interferons Major risks: Copaxone safest Tysabri: touch process; PML Novatrone: cumulative cardiotoxicity AVONEX is most used DMT b/c both decrease in relapses and slows accumulation of physical disability TYSABRI is notable because: BENEFITS: it delays accumulation of physical disability and reduces frequency of exacerbations for relapsing forms of MS RISKS: touch process  PML, immunosuppression

7 Traditional DCF Method:
Biogen Idec Valuation Traditional DCF Method: Discount Rate (3) 13.0% Assumed EBITDA Exit Multiple 10.0x 20.0x 30.0x PV of Terminal Value $ ,235.2 $ ,470.5 $ ,705.7 PV of Free Cash Flows 1,612.7 Implied Enterprise Value $ ,847.9 $ ,083.1 $ ,318.4 Discount Rate (3) 13.0% Assumed Perpetual Growth Rate 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% Terminal Year + 1 Free Cash Flow $ $ $ Terminal Value 21,653.2 32,775.0 66,140.6 PV of Terminal Value $ ,752.5 $ ,789.0 $ ,898.4 PV of Free Cash Flows 1,612.7 Implied Enterprise Value $ ,365.2 $ ,401.7 $ ,511.1

8 Valuation by industry multiples and recent acquisitions:
Current Market Value ($mn) LTM Multiples Price Enterprise Value Market Cap. Sales EBITDA EBIT P / E Bio Gen 69.75 18,195.39 19,098.07 6.78 6.53 7.55 42.27 Amgen 54.02 57,333.94 61,476.94 4.x 4.6x 4.7x 12.7x Genentech 76.01 81,868.48 82,157.48 8.8x 9.6x 10.1x 29.8x Genzyme 73.53 4.9x 5.6x 6.4x 167.1x Gilead 44.49 12.2x 14.x 14.3x -80.9x Mean 7.5 8.47 8.87 32.18 Median 6.87 7.63 8.25 21.24  Industry Multiples Sales EBITDA EBIT Income FY 2007E 3,354 911 671 438 Multiples 7.5 8.47 8.87 32.18 Ent. Value $25,149 $7,711 $5,952 $14,081 Acquisition Multiples  Sales EBITDA EBIT Income FY 2007E 3,354 911 671 438 Multiples 11.7 149 NM Ent. Value $39,240 $135,733

9 Value of BIOGEN’s MS line of drugs:
DCF Valuation by drug 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Market Size 175,000 195,000 215,000 235,000 257,000 281,000 Pentetration Rate 37% 38% 39% 40% 41% 42% Patients on AVONEX 64,750 74,100 83,850 94,000 105,370 118,020 Sales Price per patient 1,395 1,430 Annual Revenue per patient 16,740 17,159 Total Annual Revnue 1,084 1,271 1,439 1,613 1,808 2,025 Costs 759 890 1,007 1,129 1,266 1,418 Gross Profit 325 381 432 484 542 608 Present Value $1,769 Value of BIOGEN’s MS line of drugs: Avonex $1,769 M Rituxan $551 M Tysabri $339 M BG12 $5,908 M Total value (U.S) $8,566 M Total (Worldwide): $14,277 M

10 Multiple valuations of BIOGEN-IDEC:
Maximum Bid Price: $22b Industry multiples: $5.9b - $25.1b Traditional DCF valuation: $11.8b - $37.5b DCF valuation by drug: $21.4b Acquisition multiples: $39.2b - $135.7b

11 Make bid of $22b Propose strategic alliance, valued at: $14.3b
Icahn has bid $23b, which is slightly above our valuation Historical acquisition multiples and current market environment suggest that market is overvalued Propose strategic alliance, valued at: $14.3b An alliance for MS line allows both companies to benefit from the synergies Allows BIOGEN to keep autonomy: Retains corporate culture and structure of biologics leader Still benefiting from Pfizer’s economies of scale Pfizer fills pipeline without overpaying, gets virtual monopoly on IFN-β market Pass on BIOGEN, acquire smaller biotechs Current market is overvalued, any big purchase is unwise investment Seek smaller firms with interesting pipelines in line with current marketing strategy

12 APPENDICES

13

14 The MS Pipeline: Phase III drugs
Drug name Firm Mechanism Route strategic competitive advantage BG-12 Biogen IDEC fumeric acid ester (FAE) immunomodulator with a novel mechanism of action with a combination of cytoprotective and anti-inflammatory properties oral Qday oral administration, novel mechanism of immunomodulation Campath Genzyme and Bayer Schering anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody Interim results compared Campath very favorably with Rebif Fampridine-SR Acorda Therapeutics Blocks channels from damaged neurons facilitating electrical signal transfer Oral, offers improvement of symptoms Revimmune Accentia Biopharmaceuticals Using a ultra-high intensity cyclophosphamide, Revimmune is intended to "reboot" a patient's immune system, thereby eliminating autoimmunity IV infusion for 4hours over for 4 days improvement of symptoms and possibly complete remission via high-intesity IV cyclophosphamide-mediated "reboot" of immune system FTY720 (Fingolimod) Novartis sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1P-R) modulators - may repair damage oral New mechanism of action with potential reversible effects; impact on CNS in addition to well established action on immune cells. laquinimod Teva immunomodulatory effects would be first oral therapy for MS MBP8298 BioMS Medical Re-introduce a state of "tolerance" to a critical portion of the nerve's Myelin Basic Protein IV 1/6 mos novel mechanism of action: restores "tolerance" to myelin basic protein; would be one of few therapies targetted at secondary MS;

15 The MS Pipeline: Phase I & II drugs
Drug name Firm mechanism strategic competitive advantage RTL-1000 Artielle ImmunoTherapeutics Inactivates pathogenic T cells through binding to them Novel mechanism, damage reversal ATX-MS-1467 Apitope (UK) Vaccination with myelin basic protein (MBP) peptides to sensitize T cells Novel Mechanism, vaccination CHR-1103 Chromos Molecular Systems monoclonal antibody directed against VLA-2 reduce the severity of a relapse; stem the residual neurological damage that often accompanies relapse RPI-78M Nutra Pharma Corp Induces gamma-interferon and IL-27 to suppress auto-inflammatory processes Novel mechanism Cyclophosphamide Generic intercalating agent Already approved for other indications Ibidulast (MN-166) MediciNova Inhibits leukotrienes, phosphodiesterases, nitric oxide Novel mechanism, neuroprotection, oral administration NeuroVax Immune response, Corp an investigational T Cell Receptor (TCR) peptide vaccine for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). vaccine via T cell receptor mechanism Rituxan Biogen Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody Zenapax (daclizumab) Biogen with PDL BioPharma Monoclonal antibody that targets IL-2 receptor antibodies Possible synergistic activity with interferons Cladribine Merck Serono Nucleoside analogue that disrupts production of WBCs oral medication, novel mechanism of action, potential to be first first-line oral approved drug for MS BHT-3009 Bayhill Therapeutics Inc. Autoimmune DNA vaccine that encodes MBP. It is designed to reprogram the immune system vaccine encoding human myelin basic protein Tovaxin Opexa Therapeutics The induction of anti-idiotypic cytotoxic CD8+ effector T-cells and anti-ergotypic CD4+CD25+FoxP3 positive Tregs.

16 Important features of licensing agreement:
Scope of license: Exclusive/non-exclusive Transferable/non-transferable Territory distribution rights Licensor’s assets Maintaining of patents Possible enhancements of licensor’s IP Fee structure Paid up-front (unlikely) Royalties: fixed/volume Indemnity: IP infringement confidentiality breach Insurance Assignment rights - scope of license: exclusive/non-exclusive, transferable/non-transferable, territory - distribution rights ? - licensor's maintaining of patents etc. - possible enhancements of licensor's IP/technology and related property - fee structure: fully paid-up licence (unlikely), royalties (basis ? fixed/volume/$) - reps & warranties of licensor: usual r&w + ownership of its licensed IP/technology, GMP compliance, privacy - indemnity (hold harmless): IP infringement, confidentiality breach, injury/death (due to use of IP/technology) - need of trademark license ? - licensor's assistance in case of recall of products based on licensor's IP/technology - withholding taxes (if licensor is non-Canadian, assuming that licensee is Canadian) - insurance - assignment rights

17 2006 MS market share by firm Post acquisition MS market share by firm
Post acquisition MS market share with synergies Post acquisition MS market share by firm 2006 MS market share by firm

18 The following slides describe the details of the DCF valuation

19 Projected Fiscal Years Ending Dec. 31,
- DRAFT - Bio Gen Income Statement ($ in millions, except per share amounts) Historical FYE Dec. 31, Projected Fiscal Years Ending Dec. 31, 2005A 2006A 2007E 2008E 2009E 2010E 2011E Product $1,617.0 $1,781.3 $2,226.6 $2,783.3 $3,479.1 $4,348.9 $5,436.1 Unconsolidated Joint Business $708.9 $810.9 $1,013.6 $1,267.0 $1,583.7 $1,979.6 $2,474.6 Other Revenue $96.6 $90.9 $113.6 $142.0 $177.5 $221.9 $277.3 Net Sales $2,422.5 $2,683.0 $3,353.8 $4,192.3 $5,240.3 $6,550.4 $8,188.0 Cost of Goods Sales (373.6) (274.4) (335.4) (419.2) (524.0) (655.0) (818.8) Gross Profit 2,048.9 2,408.7 3,018.4 3,773.0 4,716.3 5,895.4 7,369.2 Margin 84.6% 89.8% 90.0% SG&A and Other (1,812.8) (1,968.6) (2,347.7) (2,934.6) (3,668.2) (4,585.3) (5,731.6) Total Costs and Expenses Depreciation 402.2 375.9 240.2 # 234.1 232.8 237.1 248.2 EBITDA 638.2 815.9 911.0 1,072.6 1,280.9 1,547.1 1,885.8 EBITDA Margin 26.3% 30.4% 27.2% 25.6% 24.4% 23.6% 23.0% Operating Income 236.0 440.0 670.8 838.5 1,048.1 1,310.1 1,637.6 Operating Income Margin 9.7% 16.4% 20.0% Interest (Expense) 0.0 (3.4) (0.7) Interest Income 20.2 52.1 Other Income (Expenses) EBT 256.2 492.2 667.4 837.8 Income Tax Expense (95.5) (278.4) (233.6) (293.2) (366.8) (458.5) (573.2) Income from Continued Operations 160.7 213.7 433.8 544.5 681.2 851.6 1,064.4 Effect on Acct Change (net of taxes) 3.8 Net Income $160.7 $217.5 $437.6 $548.3 $685.0 $855.3 $1,068.2 Diluted Shares Outstanding 344.1 342.4 Diluted EPS (1) $0.47 $0.62 $1.27 $1.59 $1.99 $2.49 $3.11 First Call $3.36 $3.38 $3.66 $3.93 Dividends Per Share $0.00 Payout Ratio 0.0% - Assumed P/E 42.0x 107.3x Implied Share Price for Repurchase $26.21 $135.99 $170.70 $213.55 $266.94 $333.68 Shares to Repurchase 0MM Shares One-Year Average Share Price $67.00 Implied '03 P/E (1) Based on Income from Continued Operations.

20 Projected Fiscal Years Ending Dec. 31,
- DRAFT - Bio Gen Balance Sheet ($ in millions) Historical FYE Dec. 31, Projected Fiscal Years Ending Dec. 31, 2005A 2006A 2007E 2008E 2009E 2010E 2011E Cash and Cash Equivalents $850.8 $902.7 $1,128.4 $1,508.1 $1,957.5 $1,820.0 $2,754.8 Accounts Receivable (net) 280.5 317.4 387.5 472.9 576.8 703.0 856.3 Inventories 182.8 169.1 205.8 256.1 318.7 396.5 493.4 Due from unconsolidated business 141.1 168.7 210.9 263.6 329.5 411.9 514.9 Other current assets 177.7 154.7 193.4 241.7 302.2 377.7 472.1 Total Current Assets 1,632.9 1,712.6 2,125.9 2,742.4 3,484.6 3,709.1 5,091.5 Gross PP&E 1,389.6 1,589.0 Accumulated Depreciation (214.8) (308.6) Net PP&E 1,174.8 1,280.4 1,173.8 1,467.3 1,834.1 2,292.6 2,865.8 Marketable securities 1,204.4 1,412.2 1,765.3 2,206.6 2,758.3 3,447.8 4,309.8 Intangibles 2,975.6 2,747.2 Goodwill 1,130.4 1,154.8 Investments and other assets 264.1 245.6 307.0 383.8 479.7 599.7 749.6 Total Assets $8,382.1 $8,552.8 $7,508.8 $8,495.5 $9,700.5 $10,503.4 $12,608.9 Accounts Payable $99.8 $100.5 $122.8 $153.5 $191.9 $239.8 $299.8 Taxes Payable 200.2 145.5 181.9 227.4 284.2 355.3 444.1 Accrued Expenses 297.8 336.9 Total Current Liabilities 597.8 582.9 611.7 764.7 955.8 1,194.8 1,493.5 Notes Payable 43.4 96.7 25.4 0.0 340.5 Long Term deferred tax liablility 762.3 643.6 618.3 958.7 Other Long Term Liabilities 72.3 79.8 Total Long Term Liabilities 878.0 820.2 Common Stock 0.2 Additional Paid-in Capital 8,206.9 8,308.2 Other SE Items, incl. Treasury Stock (222.8) (319.7) Deferred Stock Compensation (42.9) Accum. Other Comprehensive Income (13.9) 21.9 Retained Earnings (1,021.6) (860.8) (423.2) 125.1 810.1 1,665.4 2,733.7 Total Equity 6,905.9 7,149.8 7,587.4 8,135.7 8,820.7 9,676.0 10,744.3 Total Liabilities & SE $8,381.7 $8,842.7 $9,518.6 $10,394.8 $11,489.1 $13,196.5 Assets-(Liabilities + SE) 0.395 0.000 (1, ) (1, ) ( ) ( ) ( )

21 Projected Fiscal Years Ending Dec. 31,
- DRAFT - Bio Gen Cash Flow Statement ($ in millions) Projected Fiscal Years Ending Dec. 31, 2007E 2008E 2009E 2010E 2011E Net Income $437.6 $548.3 $685.0 $855.3 $1,068.2 Depreciation 240.2 234.1 232.8 237.1 248.2 Amortization 0.0 (Increase)/Decrease in Intangibles (Increase)/Decrease in Investments and other assets (61.4) (76.8) (95.9) (119.9) (149.9) Changes in Working Capital Accounts: (Increase)/Decrease in Accounts Receivable (net) (36.8) (70.1) (85.4) (103.9) (126.2) (153.3) (Increase)/Decrease in Inventories 13.7 (36.7) (50.3) (62.6) (77.9) (96.9) (Increase)/Decrease in Due from unconsolidated business (27.6) (42.2) (52.7) (65.9) (82.4) (103.0) (Increase)/Decrease in Other current assets 23.0 (38.7) (48.3) (60.4) (75.5) (94.4) Increase/(Decrease) in Accounts Payable 0.7 22.3 30.7 38.4 48.0 60.0 Increase/(Decrease) in Taxes Payable (54.7) 36.4 45.5 56.8 71.1 88.8 Increase/(Decrease) in Accrued Expenses 39.0 (29.8) 76.8 95.9 119.9 149.9 Total Changes in Working Capital (42.7) (158.8) (83.8) (101.6) (123.1) (148.9) Change in NWC as % of Sales 1.6% 2.0% Cash Provided / (Used) by Operating Activities 519.0 698.6 816.2 969.3 1,167.5 Net Capital Spending (222.0) (293.5) (366.8) (458.5) (573.2) Other Cash (Used) / Provided by Investing Activities Increase/(Decrease) in Common Equity Dividends $0.0 Preferred Dividends Cash (Used) / Provided by Financing Activities Net Increase / (Decrease) in Cash Balance 297.0 405.1 449.4 510.8 594.3 Plus: Cash at Beginning of Period 902.7 1,128.4 1,508.1 1,957.5 1,820.0 Cash Available / (Deficit) to Reduce Revolver 1,199.7 1,533.5 2,468.3 2,414.3 Minimum Cash Balance 1,410.5 1,763.1 2,203.8 2,754.8 Cash (Used) / Drawn to Reduce Revolver (71.3) (25.4) 340.5 Cash at End of Period $1,128.4 $1,508.1 $1,957.5 $2,468.3 $2,754.8

22 Projected Fiscal Years Ending Dec. 31,
- DRAFT - Bio Gen Projections Assumptions ($ in millions) Historical FYE Dec. 31, Projected Fiscal Years Ending Dec. 31, 2005A 2006A 2007E 2008E 2009E 2010E 2011E Income Statement Net Sales Growth 10.8% 25.0% Cost of Goods Sales % of Net Sales 15.4% 10.2% 10.0% SG&A and Other % of Net Sales 74.8% 73.4% 70.0% Interest on Cash Balance 6.1% 5.9% 4.0% Effective Interest on Total Debt 0.0% 5.5% Effective Tax Rate 37.3% 56.6% 35.0% Balance Sheet Minimum Cash Balance $850.8 $902.7 $1,128.4 $1,410.5 $1,763.1 $2,203.8 $2,754.8 Min Cash Balance as % of Sales 35.1% 33.6% Accounts Receivable Days 42.3 43.2 42.2 41.2 40.2 39.2 38.2 Inventory Days 178.6 224.9 223.9 222.9 221.9 220.9 219.9 Inventory Turns 2.0 1.6 1.7 Accounts Payable Days 97.5 133.6 Due from unconsolidated business % of Net Sales 5.8% 6.3% Other current assets % of Net Sales 7.3% Total Current Assets % of Net Sales 67.4% 63.8% Net PP&E % of Net Sales 48.5% 47.7% Marketable securities % of Net Sales 49.7% 52.6% Intangibles % of Net Sales 122.8% 102.4% Goodwill % of Net Sales 46.7% 43.0% Investments and other assets % of Net Sales 10.9% 9.2% Taxes Payable % of Net Sales 8.3% 5.4% Accrued Expenses % of Net Sales Total Current Liabilities % of Net Sales Notes Payable % of Net Sales # Long Term deferred tax liablility % of Net Sales 4.1% 3.7% Other Long Term Liabilities % of Net Sales Total Long Term Liabilities % of Net Sales 12.3% 12.6% Cash Flow Statement Capital Spending (1) ($318.4) ($198.3) ($222.0) ($293.5) ($366.8) ($458.5) ($573.2) Sale of PP&E 408.1 74.2 0.0 Net Capital Spending $89.8 ($124.1) % of Sales 13.1% 7.4% 6.6% 7.0% PPE 1,174.8 1,280.4 1,173.8 1,467.3 1,834.1 2,292.6 2,865.8

23 Projected Fiscal Years Ending Dec. 31,
Depreciation/Tax/Interest Rate Schedules ($ in millions) GAAP Depreciation Average Remaining Life of Existing PP&E 10.0 Existing Net PP&E $1,280 Annual 1st Year Projected Fiscal Years Ending Dec. 31, Year $ CapEx Life Depreciation Convention 2007E 2008E 2009E 2010E 2011E 1 2 3 4 5 CapEx Schedule $222.0 15 $14.8 0.5 $7.40 $293.5 $19.6 $9.8 $366.8 $24.5 $12.2 $458.5 $30.6 $15.3 $573.2 $38.2 $19.1 Depreciation of New PP&E 7.4 24.6 46.6 74.1 108.5 Plus: Depreciation of Existing PP&E 232.8 209.5 186.2 163.0 139.7 Total Book Depreciation $240.2 $234.1 $232.8 $237.1 $248.2 Calculation of Interest on Debt 2006A Weighted Average Interest Rate Rate Amount Weight 5.5% #DIV/0! (1) Effective tax rate based on published research. - 1 -

24 Projected Fiscal Years Ending Dec. 31,
Summary Financials ($ in millions, except per share amounts) Historical FYE Dec. 31, Projected Fiscal Years Ending Dec. 31, CAGR 2005A 2006A 2007E 2008E 2009E 2010E 2011E E Operating Statistics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Net Sales $2,422.5 $2,683.0 $3,353.8 $4,192.3 $5,240.3 $6,550.4 $8,188.0 25.0% Gross Profit 2,048.9 2,408.7 3,018.4 3,773.0 4,716.3 5,895.4 7,369.2 25.1% Operating Income 236.0 440.0 670.8 838.5 1,048.1 1,310.1 1,637.6 30.1% Income from Continued Operations 160.7 213.7 433.8 544.5 681.2 851.6 1,064.4 37.9% Diluted EPS (1) 0.47 0.62 1.27 1.59 1.99 2.49 3.11 EBITDA 638.2 815.9 911.0 1,072.6 1,280.9 1,547.1 1,885.8 18.2% Capital Spending 318.4 198.3 222.0 293.5 366.8 458.5 573.2 23.6% Free Cash Flow (EBITDA - Capital Spending) 319.9 617.6 689.0 779.1 914.1 1,088.6 1,312.6 16.3% Growth Rates 10.8% 17.6% 25.3% 86.4% 52.4% 27.8% 11.7% 17.7% 19.4% 20.8% 21.9% 93.1% 11.6% 13.1% 17.3% 19.1% 20.6% Margins 89.8% 90.0% 16.4% 20.0% 8.0% 12.9% 13.0% 30.4% 27.2% 25.6% 24.4% 23.0% 20.5% 18.6% 17.4% 16.6% 16.0% Leverage / Credit Statistics EBITDA / Total Interest Expense #DIV/0! 271.3x 1,536.4x FCF / Total Interest Expense 205.2x 1,116.0x Average Total Debt / EBITDA -- 1.0x 0.8x 0.6x 0.5x 0.4x Debt / Total Capital (Book) 10.5% 9.6% 8.6% 7.3% 6.4% 5.9% 7.6% Net Debt / Total Capital (Book) 0.3% -1.0% -6.5% -10.5% -13.8% -11.4% -14.2% Operating Returns Net Sales / Assets (Average) 31.7% 41.8% 57.6% 64.8% 70.9% Operating Income Return on Assets (Average) 5.2% 8.4% 11.5% 14.2% Return on Equity (Average) (1) 3.0% 6.9% 9.2% 10.4% (1) Based on Income from Continued Operations - 1 -


Download ppt "Pharmaceutical Case Competition 2007"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google