Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging1 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging1 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006."— Presentation transcript:

1 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging1 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006

2 Paging2 A different approach Addresses all of the issues of previous topic Introduces new issues of its own

3 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging3 Memory Management – Review Virtual (or logical) address vs. Physical addresses Memory Management Unit (MMU) –Set of registers and mechanisms to translate virtual addresses to physical addresses Processes (and CPU) see virtual addresses –Virtual address space is same for all processes, usually 0 based –Virtual spaces are protected from other processes MMU and devices see physical addresses CPU MMU MemoryI/O Devices Logical Addresses Physical Addresses

4 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging4 Solve fragmentation problems, internal and external Use fixed size units in both physical and virtual memory Provide sufficient MMU hardware to allow units to be scattered across memory Make it possible to leave infrequently used parts of virtual address space out of physical memory page X frame 0 frame 1 frame 2 frame Y physical memory … page 0 page 1 page 2 Logical Address Space (virtual memory) … page 3 MMU

5 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging5 Processes see a contiguous virtual address space Memory Manager divides the virtual address space into equal sized pieces called pages Memory Manager divides the physical address space into equal sized pieces called frames –Frame size usually a power of 2 between 512 and 8192 bytes –Frame table One entry per frame of physical memory State –Free –Allocated – process(es) sizeof(page) = sizeof(frame)

6 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging6 Paging – Address Translation Translating virtual addresses –a virtual address has two parts: virtual page number & offset –virtual page number (VPN) is index into a page table –page table entry contains page frame number (PFN) –physical address is: startof(PFN) + offset Page tables –Supported by MMU hardware –Managed by the Memory Manager –Map virtual page numbers to page frame numbers one page table entry (PTE) per page in virtual address space i.e., one PTE per VPN

7 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging7 Paging Translation page frame 0 page frame 1 page frame 2 page frame Y … page frame 3 physical memory offset physical address F(PFN)page frame # page table offset logical address virtual page #

8 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging8 Page Translation Example Assume a 32-bit address space –Assume page size 4KB (log 2 (4096) = 12 bits) –For a process to address the full logical address space Need 2 20 PTEs – VPN is 20 bits Offset is 12 bits Translation of virtual address 0x12345678 –Offset is 0x678 –Assume PTE(12345) contains 0x01000 –Physical address is 0x01000678

9 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging9 PTE Structure Valid bit gives state of this PTE –says whether or not a virtual address is valid – in memory and VA range –If not set, page might not be in memory or may not even exist! Reference bit says whether the page has been accessed –it is set by hardware when a page has been read or written to Modify bit says whether or not the page is dirty –it is set by hardware during every write to the page Protection bits control which operations are allowed –read, write, etc. Page frame number (PFN) determines the physical page –physical page start address Other bits dependent upon machine architecture page frame numberprotMRV 202111

10 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging10 Paging – Advantages Easy to allocate physical memory pick any free frame No external fragmentation All frames are equal Limited internal fragmentation Bounded by page/frame size Easy to swap out pages (called pageout) Size is usually a multiple of disk blocks PTE contains info that helps reduce disk traffic Processes can run with not all pages swapped in

11 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging11 Definition — Page Fault A trap when a process attempts to reference a virtual address of a page not in physical memory Valid bit in PTE is set to false If page exists on disk:– Suspend process If necessary, throw out some other page (update its PTE) Swap in desired page, resume execution If page does not exist on disk:– Return program error or Conjure up a new page and resume execution –E.g., for growing the stack!

12 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging12 Paging Observations Recurring themes in paging –Temporal Locality – locations referenced recently tend to be referenced again soon –Spatial Locality – locations near recent references tend to be referenced soon Definitions –Working set: The set of pages that a process needs to run without frequent page faults –Thrashing: Excessive page faulting due to insufficient frames to support working set

13 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging13 Paging Issues #1 — Page Tables can consume large amounts of space –If PTE is 4 bytes, and use 4KB pages, and have 32 bit VA space - > 4MB for each process’s page table –What happens for 64-bit logical address spaces? #2 — Performance Impact –Converting virtual to physical address requires multiple operations to access memory Read Page Table Entry from memory! Get page frame number Construct physical address Assorted protection and valid checks –Without fast hardware support, requires multiple memory accesses and a lot of work per logical address

14 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging14 Issue #1: Page Table Size Process Virtual Address spaces –Not usually full – don’t need every PTE –Processes do exhibit locality – only need a subset of the PTEs Two-level page tables Virtual Addresses have 3 parts –Master page number – points to secondary page table –Secondary page number – points to PTE containing page frame # –Offset Physical Address = offset + startof (PFN) Note: Master page number can be used as Segment # –previous topic n-level page tables are possible, but rare in 32-bit systems

15 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging15 Two-level page tables page frame 0 page frame 1 page frame 2 page frame Y … page frame 3 physical memory offset physical address page frame # master page table secondary page# virtual address master page #offset secondary page table # secondary page table # addr page frame number

16 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging16 Two-level page tables page frame 0 page frame 1 page frame 2 page frame Y … page frame 3 physical memory offset physical address page frame # master page table secondary page# virtual address master page #offset secondary page table # secondary page table # addr page frame number 12 bits 8 bits

17 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging17 Multilevel Page Tables Sparse Virtual Address space – very few secondary PTs ever needed Process Locality – only a few secondary PTs needed at one time Can page out secondary PTs that are not needed now –Don’t page Master Page Table –Save physical memory However Performance is worse –Now have 3 memory access per virtual memory reference or instruction fetch How do we get back to about 1 memory access per VA reference? –Problem #2 of “Paging Issues” slide

18 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging18 Paging Issues Minor issue – internal fragmentation –Memory allocation in units of pages (also file allocation!) #1 — Page Tables can consume large amounts of space –If PTE is 4 bytes, and use 4KB pages, and have 32 bit VA space - > 4MB for each process’s page table –What happens for 64-bit logical address spaces? #2 — Performance Impact –Converting virtual to physical address requires multiple operations to access memory Read Page Table Entry from memory! Get page frame number Construct physical address Assorted protection and valid checks –Without fast hardware, requires multiple memory accesses and a lot of work per logical address

19 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging19 Associative Memory (aka Dynamic Address Translation) Do fast hardware search of all entries in parallel for VPN If present, use page frame number (PFN) directly If not, a)Look up in page table (multiple accesses) b)Load VPN and PFN into Associative Memory (throwing out another entry as needed) VPN #Frame #

20 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging20 Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB) Associative memory implementation in hardware –Translates VPN to PTE (containing PFN) –Done in single machine cycle TLB is hardware assist –Fully associative – all entries searched in parallel with VPN as index –Returns PFN –MMU use PFN and offset to get Physical Address Locality makes TLBs work –Usually have 8–1024 TLB entries –Sufficient to deliver 99%+ hit rate (in most cases) Works well with multi-level page tables

21 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging21 MMU with TLB

22 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging22 Typical Machine Architecture CPU Bridge Memory Graphics I/O device MMU and TLB live here

23 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging23 TLB-related Policies OS must ensure that TLB and page tables are consistent –When OS changes bits (e.g. protection) in PTE, it must invalidate TLB copy –If dirty bit is set in TLB, write back to page table entry TLB replacement policies –Random –Least Recently Used (LRU) – with hardware help What happens on context switch? –Each process has own page tables (multi-level) –Must invalidate all TLB entries –Then TLB fills as new process executes –Expensive context switches just got more expensive! Note benefit of Threads

24 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging24 Alternative Page Table format – Hashed Common in address spaces > 32 bits. The virtual page number is hashed into a page table. This page table contains a chain of VPNs hashing to the same value. Virtual page numbers are compared in this chain searching for a match. If a match is found, the corresponding physical frame is extracted Still uses TLB for execution

25 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging25 Hashed Page Tables

26 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging26 Alternative Page Table format – Inverted One entry for each real page of memory. Entry consists of virtual address of page stored at that real memory location, with information about the process that owns that page. Decreases memory needed to store each page table, but increases time needed to search the table when a page reference occurs. Use hash table to limit the search to one or a few page-table entries. Still uses TLB to speed up execution

27 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging27 Inverted Page Table Architecture

28 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging28 Paging – Some Tricks Shared Memory –Part of virtual memory of two or more processes map to same frames Finer grained sharing than segments Data sharing with Read/Write Shared libraries with eXecute –Each process has own PTEs – different privileges Copy-on-write (COW) – e.g. on fork() –Don’t copy all pages – create shared mapping of parent pages in child Make shared pages read-only in child When child does write, a protection fault occurs OS copies the page and resumes client

29 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging29 Paging – More Tricks Memory-mapped files –Instead of standard system calls ( read(), write(), etc.) map file starting at virtual address X I.e., use the file for swap space for that part of VM –Access to “X + n” refers to file at offset n –All mapped file PTEs marked at start as invalid –OS reads from file on first access –OS writes to file when page is dirty and page is evicted

30 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging30 Paging – Summary Partition virtual memory into equal size units called pages Any page can fit into any frame in physical memory No relocation needed by loader Only active pages in memory at any time Supports very large virtual memories and segmentation Hardware assistance is essential An instance of the fundamental principle of caching

31 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging31 Caching The act of keeping a small subset of active items in fast storage while most of the items are in much larger, slower storage –Virtual Memory Very large, mostly stored on (slow) disk Small working set in (fast) RAM during execution –Page tables Very large, mostly stored in (slow) RAM Small working set stored in (fast) TLB registers

32 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging32 Caching is Ubiquitous in Computing Transaction processing Keep records of today’s departures in RAM while records of future flights are on disk Program execution Keep the bytes near the current program counter in on-chip memory while rest of program is in RAM File management Keep disk maps of open files in RAM while retaining maps of all files on disk …

33 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging33 Caching issues When to put something in the cache What to throw out to create cache space for new items How to keep cached item and stored item in sync after one or the other is updated How to keep multiple caches in sync across processors or machines Size of cache needed to be effective Size of cache items for efficiency …

34 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging34 Summary OS Organization Linking and Loading Memory Management issues Paging

35 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging35 Homework Assignment Read (for next week) –Dijkstra, E. W., “The Structure of the ‘THE’- Multiprogramming System,” Communications of ACM, vol.11, pp. 341-346, May 1968. (.pdf).pdf –Tanenbaum, §§4.1 – 4.3 Programming Project #2 (two weeks)


Download ppt "CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006 Paging1 CS-3013 & CS-502 Summer 2006."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google