Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Group 1 Capp Facine Licata Pascoe Pius Poniatowski Group 2 Bercel Luthe Miller Ott Patchak Vaughn Group 3 Freeman Phillips Stege Wahl Wasmund Group 4 Fassero.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Group 1 Capp Facine Licata Pascoe Pius Poniatowski Group 2 Bercel Luthe Miller Ott Patchak Vaughn Group 3 Freeman Phillips Stege Wahl Wasmund Group 4 Fassero."— Presentation transcript:

1 Group 1 Capp Facine Licata Pascoe Pius Poniatowski Group 2 Bercel Luthe Miller Ott Patchak Vaughn Group 3 Freeman Phillips Stege Wahl Wasmund Group 4 Fassero Hauser Hoyt Kammerer Lane Group 5 Buszke Fowler Hard Riddock Zmudczynski Group 6 Mazer Beaulac Brech Lisiecki Riley Group 7 Cooper Haezebrouck Randolph Sherman Vargo Exam 2 Review Group Assignments

2 Exam 2 Score Distribution (46311)

3 Item 12345678910 Difficulty 0.890.951.00 0.860.891.000.890.650.92 Power 0.220.00 0.11 0.000.110.390.17 Item11121314151617181920 Difficulty 0.76 0.840.920.780.701.000.650.841.00 Power -.060.280.110.170.220.390.000.390.110.00 Item21222324252627282930 Difficulty 0.570.95 0.540.97 0.760.950.32 Power 0.170.11 0.06 0.11 0.44 Item Analysis for Examination 2 (46311): Scores adjusted by +2 Average item difficulty =.84 (.72) Average Item Power =.14 (.25) Easier items (blue):.85-.99 Medium items (white):.60-.84 Harder items (pink):.45-.60 Problematic Items (yellow): <.45


Download ppt "Group 1 Capp Facine Licata Pascoe Pius Poniatowski Group 2 Bercel Luthe Miller Ott Patchak Vaughn Group 3 Freeman Phillips Stege Wahl Wasmund Group 4 Fassero."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google