Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Battle of the Forms Contracts – Prof Merges Feb. 17, 2011
2
Mirror Image Rule What do you call a purported acceptance that varies the terms of the offer?
3
Mirror Image Rule What do you call a purported acceptance that varies the terms of the offer? A counter-offer
4
Mirror Image Rule What do you call a purported acceptance that varies the terms of the offer? A counter-offer What then is the acceptance?
5
K Formation PO Sales Acknowledgement Shipment of goods; payment Shipment/pmt = Acceptance; “last shot” rule
6
Typical Purchase Order Form
7
Finding the Terms of the Contracts Purchase Order (Buyer)
8
Finding the Terms of the Contract Purchase Order (Buyer) 1.Goods 2.Price 3.Quantity 4.Shipment Date
10
Finding the Terms of the Contracts Purchase Order (Buyer) 1.Goods 2.Price 3.Quantity 4.Shipment Date “Major Terms”
11
Sales Confirmation (Seller) 1.Goods 2.Price 3.Quantity 4.Shipment Date
12
Sales Confirmation (Seller) 1.Goods 2.Price 3.Quantity 4.Shipment Date Purchase Order (Buyer) 1.Goods 2.Price 3.Quantity 4.Shipment Date
13
Sales Confirmation (Seller) 1.Goods 2.Price 3.Quantity 4.Shipment Date Purchase Order (Buyer) 1.Goods 2.Price 3.Quantity 4.Shipment Date Overlap on Major Terms = Contract
14
“Dickered Terms” “Deal points”; negotiated terms The essence of the business transaction –Separate from “legalese” –P. 188
15
Backs of the Forms Confirmation 1.Limit on Warranty 2.Arbitration 3.Timely Delivery 4.Shipment: Risk of Loss 5.Etc. 6.Etc. 7.Etc.
16
Backs of the Forms Confirmation 1.Limit on Warranty 2.Arbitration 3.Timely Delivery 4.Shipment: Risk of Loss 5.Etc. 6.Etc. 7.Etc. 1.Extensive Warranty 2.Choice of Law 3.“Time is of the essence” – delivery clause 4.Indemnification 5.Etc. 6.Etc. 7.Etc. Purchase Order
17
“Degree of Overlap” – Fine Print
18
Sales Confirmation (Seller) 1.Goods 2.Price 3.Quantity 4.Shipment Date Purchase Order (Buyer) 1.Goods 2.Price 3.Quantity 4.Shipment Date Overlap on Major Terms = Contract
19
Stewart Macauley, Non- contractual Relations in Business The fine print is rarely consulted Disputes often worked out informally Norms of fairness, reciprocity, etc., often control
23
How to Handle this? UCC 2-207 to the rescue!
24
2-207: Major Innovations No “mirror image rule” Separate “K” from “terms” -Overall K formation -K Terms K even though writings do not match up
25
2-207(1) (1) A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time [*A*] operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon, [*B*] unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms.
26
[*A*] “operates as an acceptance” Here is where the “mirror image rule” dies
27
[*B*] “The proviso” Operates as an acceptance... unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms. Proviso case: No acceptance; no K is formed
28
2-207(3): K by conduct; no K “on the writings” (3) Conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of a contract is sufficient to establish a contract for sale although the writings of the parties do not otherwise establish a contract. In such case the terms of the particular contract consist of those terms on which the writings of the parties agree, together with any supplementary terms incorporated under any other provisions of this code.
29
2-207(3): K by conduct; no K “on the writings” (3) Conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of a contract is sufficient to establish a contract for sale although the writings of the parties do not otherwise establish a contract.
30
2-207(3): Takes effect in 2 cases 1. Failure of agreement on “major terms” 2. Offer includes “proviso” under 2- 207(1) which is not “assented to” –“Failed proviso” case
31
207(1) 207(2) 207(3) 1.No agreement on major terms 2.Failed proviso case
32
207(1) 207(2) 207(3) 1.Agreement on major terms; not a “failed proviso” case 2. Then: Go to 2-207(2)
33
Jordan Int’l [Steel] Co. C. Itoh Co. P. 199
34
2-207(3): K by conduct; no K “on the writings” (3)... In such case the terms of the particular contract consist of [*a*] those terms on which the writings of the parties agree, [*b*] together with any supplementary terms incorporated under any other provisions of this code.
35
Sources of law: 2-207(3) Contracts Terms on which parties agree UCC Itself
36
1.Price 2.Quantity Terms on which parties agree
37
1.Price 2.Quantity “Gaps” in the K
38
1.Price 2.Quantity Terms supplied by the UCC 2-309: Reasonable Delivery time 2-310: Payment: Cash at Delivery
39
1.Price 2.Quantity UCC: “Gap- fillers” UCC
40
Consider only acceptances varying offers Avoid the disputes over “confirmations” Dorton v. Collins & Aikman may involve either confirmation or acceptance varying offer
41
The confirmation quagmire (1)A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance... (2) [Speaks only of offers...]
42
Applying 2-207: Dorton v. Collins & Aikman Facts History
45
Does 2-207 apply? Is this a “Proviso” case?
46
[*B*] “The proviso” Operates as an acceptance... unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms. Proviso case: No acceptance; no K is formed
47
Holding: not a proviso case “expressly made conditional on assent” p. 195-96: “Acceptance subject to all the terms and conditions on the face and reverse side hereof...” NOT ENOUGH
48
Then what? On to 2-207(2)
49
207(1) 207(2) 207(3) 1.Agreement on major terms; not a “failed proviso” case 2.Go to 2-207(2)
50
What if there is a K on the writings? By definition, acceptance “states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon.”
51
Different vs. additional terms Dorton involves “additional” term –Offer is silent re: arbitration
52
Confirmation 1.Limit on Warranty 1.Extensive Warranty Purchase Order Different Term in Acceptance
53
Confirmation 1.Limit on Warranty Purchase Order Additional Term in Acceptance
54
Confirmation 1.Arbitration Purchase Order Additional Term in Acceptance
55
(2) The additional terms are to be construed as proposals for addition to the contract. Between merchants such terms become part of the contract unless: (a) The offer expressly limits acceptance to the terms of the offer; (b) They materially alter it; or (c) Notification of objection to them has already been given or is given within a reasonable time after notice of them is received.
56
207(2): The Merchant’s Rule “Between merchants” – Takes 2 merchants! “[S]uch terms become part of the contract unless...” –Additional terms IN UNLESS --
57
207(2): Exceptions to “Merchant’s Rule” (a) The offer expressly limits acceptance to the terms of the offer; (b) They materially alter it; or (c) Notification of objection to them has already been given or is given within a reasonable time after notice of them is received.
58
207(2)(a): Offer says “my terms only” Exception to 2-207 merchant’s rule; additional term not in the K
59
2-207(2)(b): Material alteration rule Non-material (“big’) alteration: additional term is in K Material K: it is not in the K
60
2-207(2)(b): Material alteration rule Non-material (“small’) alteration: additional term is in K Material (big) term: it is NOT in the K –Remand in Dorton to figure this out...
61
Don’t get lost – Additional terms Merchants rule Material/non-material alteration
62
Confirmation 1.Limit on Warranty 1.Extensive Warranty Purchase Order Different Term in Acceptance
63
Northrop Corp. v. Litronic 3 Positions on “different terms” –Knockout rule –Fall out rule –“Treat like additional terms” rule - California
64
Minoriry rule Fallout rule: different term in acceptance FALLS OUT of K So offeror’s term stays in, and prevails
65
Confirmation 1.Limit on Warranty 1.Extensive Warranty Purchase Order Different Term in Acceptance
66
Knockout Rule Different terms “knock each other out,” both are removed from the K What is left? UCC gap-fillers
67
ConfirmationPurchase Order Different Term in Acceptance
68
1.Price 2.Quantity UCC: “Gap- fillers” on warranties UCC
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.