1. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 20061 ILC Detector R&D Motivated by Outstanding Physics Opportunity & Advanced Technical Challenges Global Collaboration on Detector R&D Coordination with Accelerator R&D of GDE Detector Concepts Report Planning for Detector Concepts Beyond the DCR (post 2006)

2. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 20062 ILC Physics Goals EWSB –Higgs Mass (~50 MeV at 120 GeV) Width BRs (at the few% level) Quantum Numbers (spin/parity) Self-coupling –Strong coupling (virtual sensitivity to several TeV) SUSY particles –Strong on sleptons and neutralinos/charginos Extra dimensions –Sensitivity through virtual graviton Top –Mass measured to ~ 100 MeV (threshold scan) –Yukawa coupling W pairs –W mass

3. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 20063 ILC Experimental Advantages Detector performance translates directly into effective luminosity Elementary interactions at known E cm * eg. e + e -  Z H * beamstrahlung manageable Democratic Cross sections eg.  (e + e -  ZH) ~ 1/2  (e + e -  d d) Inclusive Trigger total cross-section Highly Polarized Electron Beam ~ 80% (+ positron polarization – R&D) Exquisite vertex detection eg. R beampipe ~ 1 cm and  hit ~ 3  m Calorimetry with Particle Flow Precision  E /E ~ 30-40%/  E Advantage over hadron collider on precision meas. eg. H  c c

4. 4 ILC Detector Challenges  ILC physics places premium on jet measurements and tagging, in an environment where event reconstruction is possible  tth  8 jets  hZ  2l + 2 jets, 4 jets  hhZ  2l + 4 jets, 6jets Aim to fully reconstruct final state  + SUSY, quark, τ tagging, lepton/hadron id  Vertex precision complements calorimetry  Precision tracking needed for decay-mode independent Higgs detection e e  Z H Z  l  l  Z  l  l  H  anything H  anything M j3-j4 vs. M j1-j2

5. 5 ILC Flavor Tagging Challenge  ~billion pixel vertex detectors with ~3  m pt. res., and 0.1 % X 0 ladders, being developed  SLD comprised 307 Mpixels with < 4  m point resolution over entire system SUSY (2 Higgs Doublet Model) S. Yamashita

6. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 20066 Performance requirements for ILC Detector exceed state-of-the-art –Calorimeters with ~100 million cells Jet resolution goal ~ 30%/  –Pixel Vertex Detector with ~10 9  20  m pixels Impact parameter resolution 5 µ m  10 µ m/(p sin 3/2  ) –Tracking resolution –High Field Solenoid ~ 5 Tesla –High quality forward tracking systems –Beamline Instrumentation R&D Essential in order to realize these capabilities in a timely way Detector R&D Required

7. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 20067 The GDE Plan and Schedule 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Global Design EffortProject Baseline configuration Reference Design ILC R&D Program Technical Design Bids to Host; Site Selection; International Mgmt LHC Physics TODAY

8. 8 J. Brau ALCPG Workshop – Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 Possible Experiments are being Studied as Concepts Current set of concepts formed beginning in 2004 4th Concept GLD LDC http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/wwstudy/concepts

9. 9 J. Brau ALCPG Workshop – Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 The GDE Plan and Schedule 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Global Design EffortProject Baseline configuration Reference Design ILC R&D Program Technical Design Bids to Host; Site Selection; International Mgmt LHC Physics TODAY Detector Outline Documents Detector Concept Report (issued w/ RDR) http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/wwstudy/concepts

10. 10 J. Brau ALCPG Workshop – Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 ILC Plan for Two Detectors ILCSC Scope Document –Scope under review GDE IR Design –2  20 mr recently changed to 14  14 mr WWS Arguments for 2 IRs/Detectors –Snowmass Proceedings http://www.fnal.gov/directorate/icfa/LC_parameters.pdf Active full detectors being developed: GLD LDC SiD 4th Referred to as “concepts”

11. 11 J. Brau ALCPG Workshop – Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 Case for Two Complementary Detectors Confirmation and Scientific Redundancy Complementarity, Collider Options Competition Efficiency, Reliability, Insurance Sociology, Scientific Opportunity Historical lessons This will be expressed in the DCR http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0508141/proc/papers/PLEN0059.PDF

12. 12 J. Brau ALCPG Workshop – Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 Beyond the DCR GDE plans TDR at end of 2009 Experiments must remain on same timeline as machine  Detector TDRs ~2010 ? “synchronize” detectors with the machine TDRs require significant resources over time –2 years? or more? How do we get there? –Downselect of detectors? –Authority to do this? –Intermediate step? CDR? –Discussions in WWS, with GDE and ILCSC Possibly CDRs in 2007/8

13. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 200613 University Detector R&D in US FY06 was the fourth year of support for detector R&D from the agencies since it was first organized by the LCSGA (formerly USLCSG) and the ALCPG FY05 LCDRD fundsFY06 LCDRD funds $700,000 – DOE $1,048,000 - DOE $117,000 – NSF $ 300,000 - NSF 25 projects 25 universities 33 projects 26 universities/labs http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/lcdrd/fy05-awards.html http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/lcdrd/fy06-awards.html

14. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 200614 U.S. LCDRD Program FY05 FY06 Topic Projects Funding Projects Funding $0.817M $1.348M DOE $0.700M DOE $1.048M NSF $0.117M NSF $.300M LEP5 15.7% 6 12.4% VXD 1 9.0% 4 12.5% TRK 8 32.6% 8 36.7% CAL 9 39.0% 13 42.3% PID(mu)2 3.8% 2 5.4% no. of projects 25 33 WWS R&D Panel reviewed the scope of the global program, and noted there was effort on most topics, particle ID other than muon, and forward tracking being noteable weaknesses (we are planning to support some particle ID, and forward tracking) In general, all areas active.

15. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 200615 LCDRD – FY06 – Projects LEP,VXD, Tracking

16. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 200616 LCDRD – FY06 – Projects Calorimetry, PID/Muons

17. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 200617 Global Organization World wide Study (of the Phy. & Det. for Future Lin. e + e  Colliders) http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/wwstudy/ –Co-chairs: H.Yamamoto, F. Richard, J. Brau –Workshops2004 Paris 2005 Stanford 397 participants 2006 Bangalore 326 participants 2007 DESY –Coordinates ILC Detector R&D world-wide ALCPG (American Linear Collider Physics Group) http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/alcpg/ –Regional workshops (2005 Snowmass (650), 2006 Vancouver) –Detector and Physics R&D in the Americas –Co-chairs: M. Oreglia, J. Brau GDE –WWS co-chairs are members –R&D Board – C. Damerell ( WWS R&D Panel Chair ) member

18. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 200618 WWS R&D Panel Created by WWS, Spring 2005 J-C.Brient, IN3P3 C.Damerell, RAL (chair) R. Frey, OREGON H.J.Kim, KYUNGPOOK W. Lohmann, DESY D.Peterson, CORNELL Y. Sugimoto, KEK T.Takeshita, SHINSHU H.Weerts, ARGONNE Input from all R&D groups and “Concepts” Compiled global data, analyzed for gaps ILC Detector Research and Development Status Report and Urgent Requirements for Funding http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/wwstudy/R&D Report-final.pdf

19. J. Brau ALCPG Workshop – Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 19 Detector R&D - WWS R&D Panel Report –http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/wwstudy/R&D Report- final.pdfhttp://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/wwstudy/R&D Report- final.pdf –Urgent needs require $32M and 1870 man-years over next 3-5 years - globally –Established support over 3-5 years $15M and 1160 man-years - globally –Translating man-years to dollars ($100k/man-year) $33M/yr established over 4 years, $22M/yr more required –Support notably behind in North America and Japan Planning global review of R&D –With GDE R&D Board and WWS-OC

20. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 200620 FY07 University Detector R&D in US We are organizing ourselves in anticipation for increased funding in FY07 – discussed $3M with agencies (5 year R&D plan being developed by ALCPG) Encourgement led to developing a proposal early for a few (9) high priority, urgent efforts (~$1M) followed by annual round for another $2M Supplemental proposal prepared this summer 1 – call for abstracts (received 22) 2 – selection of highest priorities/urgent needs (9) http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/lcdrd/supplement-06a.html

21. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 200621 FY07 U.S. LCDRD Proposal FY07 proposals will be accepted for continuing and new projects from DOE/NSF funding One year proposals (third year of 3 year cycle) Anticipated timeline December 15, 2006 – status reports and new project descriptions due May – awards announced - revised budgets/descriptions September, 2007 – funded year begins details will be posted on ALCPG web page

22. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 200622 Test Beams The detector R&D program will need high quality test beams over the next few years. –WWS Test Beam Panel –Surveyed community on needs and facilties –Fermilab test beam – good for hadrons IMPORTANT Possible Special Role for SLAC –High energy electron beams –Note – requirements for detector tests different from machine ~ 1 particle per pulse –Several projects are interested in this possibility EM cal, tracking, vertex detectors Could be complemented by other interests (eg. Super B)

23. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 200623 Silicon Detector (SiD) Workshop SLAC October 26-28, 2006 http://www-sid.slac.stanford.edu/SLAC-06-workshop/Workshop06.asp subsystem status and performance studies, SiD R&D plans, SiD contributions for the Detector Concept Report, SiD Conceptual Design Report, recent progress on the machine design and on ILC physics DRAFT PROGRAM http://www-sid.slac.stanford.edu/SLAC-06-workshop/Draft%20Agenda%20for%20SiD%20Workshop%20October%2026.doc October 26 –1:30-4:00 subgroup parallel meetings –4:30-6:00 plenary October 27 –8:30-6:00 plenary/discussion – dinner October 28 –9:00-12:30 plenary/discussion REGISTRATION: http://www-sid.slac.stanford.edu/SLAC-06-workshop/register.asp http://www-sid.slac.stanford.edu/SLAC-06-workshop/register.asp

24. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 200624 New weekly R&D Tele-meetings Replaces bi-weekly LCD study group organized by SLAC –http://www-sldnt.slac.stanford.edu/nld/meetings/index.htmhttp://www-sldnt.slac.stanford.edu/nld/meetings/index.htm and Fermilab weekly ILC R&D meeting ALCPG Physics and Detector R&D Meeting –http://ilcagenda.cern.ch/categoryDisplay.py?categId=87http://ilcagenda.cern.ch/categoryDisplay.py?categId=87 –Weekly meeting to exchange results and information about ILC physics studies and detector R&D –open to everybody –organized jointly by Fermilab & SLAC –Thursdays, 11 AM PDT, 1 PM CDT

25. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 200625 Future Meetings SLACOctober 26-28, 2006 –SiD Workshop ValenciaNovember, 2006 –ECFA/GDE BeijingFebruary, 2007 –ACFA/GDE HamburgJune, 2007 –LCWS 2007 (joint with GDE) Fermilab Next summer/fall –Joint GDE / ALCPG meeting

26. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 200626 Conclusions ILC Detector R&D urgently needed –global effort Many opportunities to participate New groups invited to join effort

27. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 200627 backup

28. J. Brau ALCPG Workshop – Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 28 Detector Outline Documents ■ 4 Outline Documents were prepared in Spring 2006 leading up to the Bangalore LCWS ■ Contents Description of the detector concept Performance estimates w.r.t. physics benchmarks Required R&D and its status Rough costing estimate See http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/wwstudy/concepts

29. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 200629 FY06 review 36 projects for FY06 from univ. and “small” labs $2.828 M – limited by realization of limited availability of funds 24 continuations of efforts supported in FY05 12 requests for new projects. Review teams of two or three experts looking at each of the specific topics Executive committee of six independently reviewing all of the proposals. –Conflict of interest was considered carefully, and dealt with to avoid inappropriate influence in the review process. Evaluation of each proposal for the following factors: RATING: overall quality of the research plan and goals, and the strength of the team to carry out the objectives (excellent, good, satisfactory, poor) RELEVANCE: the relevance of the project to the linear collider detectors (critical, important, useful, irrelevant) CONCEPTS: the importance of the work (except for the LEP - luminosity, energy, polarization proposals) to an active linear collider detector concept (critical, important, useful, irrelevant) critical that project contributes to advancing detector technology for specific sub-detector capabilities of priority for the ILC physics program

30. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 200630 Grannis, HEPAP. July 2006

31. J. Brau ILC Detector R&D SLUO Annual Meeting Sep 11, 200631 Global Perspective (WWS R&D Panel) US Detector R&D effort lags behind Europe Fig 1. Urgent R&D support levels over the next 3-5 years, by funding country or region. 'Established' levels are what people think they will be able to get under current conditions, and 'total required' are what they would need to establish proof-of-principle for their project.

32. 32 J. Brau ALCPG Workshop – Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 Detector Concept Report Physics Concepts –Based on four detector concept DOD's The goal: –We can do the ILC physics –We have different and complementary solutions –We have a clear vision on how to reach the goals (R&D) –We have some understanding on the cost for these detectors Integrated presentation of Concepts Case for Two Detectors/IRs

33. 33 J. Brau ALCPG Workshop – Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 Detector Concept Report WWS has established teams of editors for the companion volume, the DCR –Physics editors - K. Moenig, A. Djouadi, M. Yamaguchi, Y. Okada, M. Oreglia, J. Lykken –Detector editors – T. Behnke, C. Damerell, J. Jaros, A. Miyamoto –Cost analysis of the concepts – M. Breidenbach, H. Maki, H. Videau – interacting with GDE Cost Board Active during VLCWS06 http://www.linearcollider.org/wiki/doku.php