Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Why on earth are physicists working in ‘economics’? Trinity Finance Workshop September 26 2000 Summary Introduction A brief look at some data, stylised.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Why on earth are physicists working in ‘economics’? Trinity Finance Workshop September 26 2000 Summary Introduction A brief look at some data, stylised."— Presentation transcript:

1 Why on earth are physicists working in ‘economics’? Trinity Finance Workshop September 26 2000 Summary Introduction A brief look at some data, stylised facts Rationale for interest of physicists Agent models Minority game and simulations Lotka Volterra Peer pressure models Crashes Peter Richmond Department of Physics Trinity College Dublin

2 Systems

3 Fluctuations: S(t, ) = ln[P(t+ )/P(t)] Price P(t) Time t

4

5 ~8% pa ~15% pa

6 FT All share index 1800-2001

7 Ln FTA: 1800-1950;1950-2001

8 Dow Jones 1896-2001

9

10 Z,R,S If P(t+Δ)~P(t) or Δ« t then S(t) = Ln[P(t+Δ)/ P(t)] ~R(t)

11 Average 0.024

12

13

14 Brownian or random walks (see TCD schools web site) Time Distance

15 Bachelier (1900) (pre-dated Einstein’s application of Brownian motion to motion of large particles in ‘colloids’) Theorie de la Speculation Gauthiers-Villars, Paris 0 Gaussian tails

16 Example: D 1/2 = 0.178 r = 0.087

17 FTSE100 Daily data

18 Led to…  Efficient market hypothesis, capital asset pricing model Markowitz 1965  Black-Scholes equation for option pricing 1973  Nobel Prize for Economics 1992  But did it work?

19 …the ultimate in mega- disasters! Caveat emptor… even with Nobel Prize winners!!

20 Overthrow of economic dogma Martingale =x t Independent, identical differences - iid Valid only for t >> * BUT * is comparable with timescales of importance ….where tails in pdf are important From observation tails are NOT Gaussian Tails are much fatter!

21 PDF is not Gaussian Discontinuity..(cusp in pdf)..?

22 ‘Near’ tails and ‘far’ tails stable Levy may not even be valid for near tails

23 Volatility persistence and anomalous decay of kurtosis Volatility is positively correlated Over weeks or months

24 Anomalous decay of kurtosis

25 Bounded Rationality and Minority Games – the ‘El Farol’ problem

26 Agents and forces

27 Forces in people -agents buy Sell Hold

28 The Ising model of a magnet a Prototype model of Statistical physics Focus on spin I. This sees: a)local force field from other spins b)external field, h I h

29 Cooperative phenomena Theory of Social Imitation Callen & Shapiro Physics Today July 1974 Profiting from Chaos Tonis Vaga McGraw Hill 1994

30 Time series and clustered volatility T. Lux and M. Marchesi, Nature 397 1999, 498-500 G Iori, Applications of Physics in Financial Analysis, EPS Abs, 23E A Ponzi,

31 Auto Correlation Functions and Probability Density

32 Langevin Models Tonis Vaga Profiting from Chaos McGraw Hill 1994 J-P Bouchaud and R Cont, Langevin Approach to Stock Market Fluctuations and Crashes Euro Phys J B6 (1998) 543

33 A Differential Equation for stock movements? Risk Neutral,(β=0); Liquid market, (λ-)>0) Two relaxation times  1 = (λ-)~ minutes  2 =  1 / ~ year =kλ/ (λ-) 2

34 Risk aversion induced crashes ?

35 Speculative Bubbles

36

37 Over-optimistic; over-pessimistic; R Gilbrat, Les Inegalities Economiques, Sirey, Paris 1931 O Biham, O Malcai, M Levy and S Solomon, Generic emergence of power law distributions and Levy-stable fluctuations in discrete logistic systems Phys Rev E 58 (1998) 1352 P Richmond Eur J Phys B In 2001 P Richmond and S Solomon cond-mat, Int J Phys

38 Generalised Langevin Equations

39 PDF fit to HIS

40 Generalised Lotka-Volterra wealth dynamics Solomon et al a – tax rate a/NΣw – minimum wage w – total wealth in economy at t c – measure of competition

41 GLV solution Mean field Relative wealth And Ito

42 Lower bound on poverty drives wealth distribution!

43 Why is ~1.5? 1+2 or 2+4 dependents 1+3 dependents …. 1+9

44

45

46 Generalised Langevin models Choose simple exponential: f(x 1 +x 2 ) ~ f(x 1 )f(x 2 )

47 Link to Marsili and Solomon (almost) Autocatalytic term of GLV Leads to Marsili within mean field approximation: P(x 1,x 2 |t)=P(x 1 |t)P(x 2 |t) Scale time t/ζ -> t

48 Discrete time & Maps Logistic map f is analytic

49 Lorentz Cauchy Singular term Corresponds to autocatalytic term in GLV

50 Levy like map

51 Stock Exchange Crashes

52 Analogy with earthquakes and failure of materials

53 Scale invariance Allegre Continuous Power law Discrete Log periodic solutions

54 Include Log periodic corrections

55 Log periodic Oscillations DJ 1921-1930

56 How much longer and deeper? We predict: Bearish phase with rallies rising near end 2002 / early 2003 followed by new strong descent and a bottom ~20 Jan 2004 after which recovery..we think! Sornette and Zhou cond-mat/0209065 3 Sep 2002

57 After a crash…beyond Coppock? Interest Rate Correlation with stock price –0.72 Interest Rate Spread Correlation with stock Price –0.86

58 And finally.. Chance to dream (by courtesy of Doyne Farmer, 1999) $1 invested from 1926 to 1996 in US bonds  $14  $2,296,183,456 !! $1 invested in S&P index  $1370 $1 switched between the two routes to get the best return…….


Download ppt "Why on earth are physicists working in ‘economics’? Trinity Finance Workshop September 26 2000 Summary Introduction A brief look at some data, stylised."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google