Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Multi-Scale modelling of atomic layer deposition Presented by: Mahdi Shirazi Supervised by: Dr. Simon Elliott.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Multi-Scale modelling of atomic layer deposition Presented by: Mahdi Shirazi Supervised by: Dr. Simon Elliott."— Presentation transcript:

1 Multi-Scale modelling of atomic layer deposition Presented by: Mahdi Shirazi Supervised by: Dr. Simon Elliott

2 Outline Atomic layer deposition (ALD) Description of ALD Goals Obstacles Findings from atomic-scale modelling Strategy for Kinetic Monte Carlo

3 ALD is based on self-limiting surface reactions of two chemicals. For an oxide, a metal precursor & an oxygen precursor. Process is cyclic : 1.Pulse of metal precursor - a monolayer of metal precursor molecules chemisorbs onto surface. 2.Purge - to remove unreacted precursor and by-products from chamber. 3.Pulse of oxygen precursor – to create a monolayer of chemisorbed oxygen precursor on surface 4.Purge – to remove unreacted precursor and by-products from chamber. www.isr.umd.edu/~hennlec/images/ALD/ALD_reaction_475.jpg The desired film thickness is reached by repeating the cycle. Typical growth per cycle is about 0.1 nm/cycle and cycle time is typically 1-4 s/cycle. What is ALD?

4 Goals Model interaction of precursors with surface and growth by ALD. Go beyond the atomic length scale and the time scale of individual reactions. Explain why amorphous or crystalline layers are deposited?

5 Obstacles Reaction mechanisms consist of rare events. Need to evaluate system beyond picosecond timescale. Using density functional theory (DFT) is time consuming. (e.g. Cl-NEB calculation takes 3 hours for 300 atoms by 120 Intel-Xeon CPU). To find reaction events: how efficient are Nudged Elastic Band (NEB), Conjugate Gradient (CG), quasi-Newton algorithms and ab initio Molecular Dynamics (MD)?  We should take advantage of Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) to describe ALD.

6 Outline Atomic layer deposition Findings from atomic-scale modelling ALD reactions Non-ALD reaction Evaluating barriers by NEB Importance of coordination number Strategy for Kinetic Monte Carlo

7 Slab modelling Growth of HfO 2 from Hf(N(CH 3 ) 2 ) 4 and H 2 O Monoclinic structure is stable phase in low temperature. Direction of growth (111) Four layers have been regarded as slab Extended surface 2  2 We used hydroxylated surface VASP code. VASP: http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/vasp/vasp.htmlhttp://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/vasp/vasp.html Slab=yellow, oxygen=red, hydrogen=white

8 Adsorption and dissociation of H 2 O at HfO 2 surface 1 H 2 O dissociates at active Lewis acid and base sites at surface Cover the surface with hydroxyl groups and water molecules Rate of proton diffusion depends on coverage of OH. 1-Charles B. Musgrave et al., Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 3397-3403. Hafnium =grey, oxygen=red, hydrogen=white

9 Sequence of ALD reactions We used DFT 2,3 to calculate activation energies to implement them into the  KMC 1.Graeme Henkelman, Hannes Jo´nsson et al J. Chem. Phys.113, 22, 9901 2000 2.VASP: http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/vasp/vasp.htmlhttp://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/vasp/vasp.html 3.Entropy calculated by TURBOMOLE http://www.turbomole.com/ T=500Khttp://www.turbomole.com/ HfX 4 +2H 2 O  4HX+HfO 2 X=N(CH 3 ) 2 Barriers were calculated by Cl-NEB 1 Hafnium =blue, oxygen=red, hydrogen=white, Nitrogen= darkblue, carbon=grey

10 Sequence of ALD reactions We used DFT 2,3 to calculate activation energies to implement them into the  KMC 1.Graeme Henkelman, Hannes Jo´nsson et al J. Chem. Phys.113, 22, 9901 2000 2.VASP: http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/vasp/vasp.htmlhttp://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/vasp/vasp.html 3.Entropy calculated by TURBOMOLE http://www.turbomole.com/ T=500Khttp://www.turbomole.com/ HfX 4 +2H 2 O  4HX+HfO 2 X=N(CH 3 ) 2 Barriers were calculated by Cl-NEB 1 Hafnium =blue, oxygen=red, hydrogen=white, Nitrogen= darkblue, carbon=grey

11 Sequence of ALD reactions We used DFT 2,3 to calculate activation energies to implement them into the  KMC 1.Graeme Henkelman, Hannes Jo´nsson et al J. Chem. Phys.113, 22, 9901 2000 2.VASP: http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/vasp/vasp.htmlhttp://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/vasp/vasp.html 3.Entropy calculated by TURBOMOLE http://www.turbomole.com/ T=500Khttp://www.turbomole.com/ HfX 4 +2H 2 O  4HX+HfO 2 X=N(CH 3 ) 2 Barriers were calculated by Cl-NEB 1 Hafnium =blue, oxygen=red, hydrogen=white, Nitrogen= darkblue, carbon=grey

12 Sequence of ALD reactions We used DFT 2,3 to calculate activation energies to implement them into the  KMC 1.Graeme Henkelman, Hannes Jo´nsson et al J. Chem. Phys.113, 22, 9901 2000 2.VASP: http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/vasp/vasp.htmlhttp://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/vasp/vasp.html 3.Entropy calculated by TURBOMOLE http://www.turbomole.com/ T=500Khttp://www.turbomole.com/ HfX 4 +2H 2 O  4HX+HfO 2 X=N(CH 3 ) 2 Barriers were calculated by Cl-NEB 1 Hafnium =blue, oxygen=red, hydrogen=white, Nitrogen= darkblue, carbon=grey

13 Sequence of ALD reactions We used DFT 2,3 to calculate activation energies to implement them into the  KMC 1.Graeme Henkelman, Hannes Jo´nsson et al J. Chem. Phys.113, 22, 9901 2000 2.VASP: http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/vasp/vasp.htmlhttp://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/vasp/vasp.html 3.Entropy calculated by TURBOMOLE http://www.turbomole.com/ T=500Khttp://www.turbomole.com/ HfX 4 +2H 2 O  4HX+HfO 2 X=N(CH 3 ) 2 Barriers were calculated by Cl-NEB 1 Hafnium =blue, oxygen=red, hydrogen=white, Nitrogen= darkblue, carbon=grey

14 Sequence of ALD reactions We used DFT 2,3 to calculate activation energies to implement them into the  KMC 1.Graeme Henkelman, Hannes Jo´nsson et al J. Chem. Phys.113, 22, 9901 2000 2.VASP: http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/vasp/vasp.htmlhttp://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/vasp/vasp.html 3.Entropy calculated by TURBOMOLE http://www.turbomole.com/ T=500Khttp://www.turbomole.com/ HfX 4 +2H 2 O  4HX+HfO 2 X=N(CH 3 ) 2 Barriers were calculated by Cl-NEB 1 Hafnium =blue, oxygen=red, hydrogen=white, Nitrogen= darkblue, carbon=grey

15 Barrier to H + diffusion to amide group Cl-NEB Our calculations showed that H + diffusion barrier varies between 0 to 2eV.

16 Test whether amide ligand can desorb without combining with H + ? No: barrier increases from 1.6 eV to 3.7 eV in absence of H +. 3.71eV Barrier to H + diffusion to amide group Cl-NEB

17 Discovery of reaction events (MD superior to optimisation) Densification 1 Ligand transfer 1.A. Este`ve, M. Djafari Rouhani et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4, 1915–1927 show role of coordination number

18 Non-ALD reaction (MD superior to optimization) Ligand decomposition We find that activation energies are tuned by coordination number

19 HfX diffusion by climbing NEB

20 Rate catalogue ReactionsBarrier (eV) HfX 4 (g)  HfX 4 (s)- HfX 4 (s)  HfX 3 (s)2.80 HfX 3 (s)  HfX 2 (s)2.96 Densification0<0.5 HfX 2 (s)  HfX 1 (s)1.29 HfX 1 (s)  HfX 0 (s)1.64 HfX 0 (s)  HfX 1 (s)0.69 HfX 1 (s)  HfX 2 (s)2.24 HfX 2 (s)  HfX 3 (s)5.26 HfX 3 (s)  HfX 4 (s)4.92 Ligand decomposition<0.5 Ligand transfer<0.5 H 2 O  OH - +H + Depends on coordination number of hafnium atoms at surface H + diffusion to amide group0-2eV

21 Outline Atomic layer deposition Findings from atomic-scale modelling Strategy for Kinetic Monte Carlo 1 Call reaction catalogue Stick to on-site KMC Tie rates to coordination number of atoms at surface Implementation of new application into the SPPARKS 2 code in progress 1.Arthur F. Voter, Introduction to the Kinetic Monte Carlo Method 2.SPPARKS http://www.sandia.gov/~sjplimp/spparks.html

22 1.A. Bortz, M. Kalos, and J. Lebowitz, J. Comput. Phys. 17, 10 1975 BKL algorithm 1

23 Conclusions New mechanisms of ALD reactions were found and quantified. Ab initio MD superior to optimisation methods in identifying global basins. Role of coordination number is important in growth of complex material. Introduce new application for KMC.

24 Acknowledgement We are grateful for funding by Science Foundation Ireland under the FORME project, http://www.tyndall.ie/forme/ and acknowledge a generous grant of computing time from the SFI and HEA-funded Irish Centre for High End Computing (ICHEC). We also thank A. Esteve & M. D. Rouhani in LAAS and Steve Plimpton & Corbett Battaile at Sandia National Laboratory for their collaboration. Thank you for your attention


Download ppt "Multi-Scale modelling of atomic layer deposition Presented by: Mahdi Shirazi Supervised by: Dr. Simon Elliott."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google