Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review University Mission Objectives Top 10 Health Impediments to Academic Performance.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review University Mission Objectives Top 10 Health Impediments to Academic Performance."— Presentation transcript:

1 Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review University Mission Objectives Top 10 Health Impediments to Academic Performance

2 ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review2 Contents  Percent of Target Achieved Bar Chart for Objectives  Pair of Slides for the Objectives Healthy Campus 2010 Line chart for ethnicities  Data Set  Percent of Target Achieved Calculation

3 ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review3 University Learning Mission Objectives Health Impediments to Academic Performance Target Setting Method: Better than the best by ethnicity.

4 ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review4 University Learning Mission Objectives Health Impediments to Academic Performance NCHA data: N = ~17,000 to 46,000/yr, HIAP = Health Impediment to Academic Performance  9 away from target  1 toward target

5 ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review5 Percent of Targeted Change Achieved Low Grade on exam/project, course, took incomplete/dropped Top 10 Health Impediments to Academic Performance

6 ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review6 Percent of Targeted Change Achieved Took Incomplete or Dropped Course Top 10 Health Impediments to Academic Performance

7 ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review7 University Learning Mission Objectives Stress  2000 Baseline: 28.7%  2007: 34.1%  2010 Target: 25%

8 ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review8 University Learning Mission Objectives Cold/Flu/Sore Throat  2000 Baseline: 21.5%  2007: 27.1%  2010 Target: 12%

9 ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review9 University Learning Mission Objectives Sleep Difficulties  2000 Baseline: 20.7%  2007: 26.1%  2010 Target: 16%

10 ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review10 University Learning Mission Objectives Concern for Troubled Family Member/Friend  2000 Baseline: 16.4%  2007: 19%  2010 Target: 12%

11 ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review11 University Learning Mission Objectives Relationship Difficulties  2000 Baseline: 15.1%  2007: 16.4%  2010 Target: 12%

12 ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review12 University Learning Mission Objectives Depression  2000 Baseline: 11.3%  2007: 16.3%  2010 Target: 7.5%

13 ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review13 University Learning Mission Objectives Internet / Computer Games  2000 Baseline: 8.9%  2007: 16.3%  2010 Target: 6%

14 ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review14 University Learning Mission Objectives Death of Family Member / Friend  2000 Baseline: 7.9%  2007: 9.4%  2010 Target: 6%

15 ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review15 University Learning Mission Objectives Sinus Infection / Strep Throat  2000 Baseline: 7.8%  2007: 8.8%  2010 Target: 6%

16 ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review16 University Learning Mission Objectives Alcohol  2000 Baseline: 7.9%  2007: 7.7%  2010 Target: 2.5%

17 ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review17 ACHA-NCHA Data Sets FrequencyPercent Spring 2000160244.6 Spring 2001168134.8 Spring 2002282588.1 Spring 2003194975.6 Spring 20044720213.5 Spring 20055411115.5 Spring 20069480627.2 Spring 20077186020.6 Total348571100.0

18 ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review18 Percent of Targeted Change Achieved  Calculation (most recent value – baseline )/(2010 target - baseline)  Met or exceeded target 100% or greater (positive percent)  Movement toward target >0% to 99% of targeted change  Moved away from target Negative percent (i.e., -60%)

19 Contact Information  Jim Grizzell, MBA, MA, CHES, ACSM-HFS  jvgrizzell@csupomona.edu, grizzell@gwu.edu jvgrizzell@csupomona.edugrizzell@gwu.edu  (909) 856-3350 ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review19


Download ppt "Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review University Mission Objectives Top 10 Health Impediments to Academic Performance."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google