Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Assessing Mechanisms Responsible for Non-Homogenous Emitter Electrospray from Large Arrays of FEEP and Colloid Thrusters.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Assessing Mechanisms Responsible for Non-Homogenous Emitter Electrospray from Large Arrays of FEEP and Colloid Thrusters."— Presentation transcript:

1 Assessing Mechanisms Responsible for Non-Homogenous Emitter Electrospray from Large Arrays of FEEP and Colloid Thrusters

2 capillary feed concept ionic liquid ion – Colloid Thruster charged droplets alternate droplet charge liquid metal ion – FEEP Thruster atomic ions relatively large electric field high efficiency liquid metals do not wet Si Emitter Operation  N range for thrust – requires cluster of emitters geometry not optimized  single emitter geometry (capillary, slit, ring, needle, …)  array spacing unstable emitter operation non-homogenous ion emission from arrays of emitters Lozano and Martinez-Sanchez (2005)

3 Mechanisms investigated: internal and external liquid feed structures charge depletion with ionic liquids (AC potential) wetting characteristics extrusion electrode geometry Mechanisms not yet investigated: thin film stability surface tension flows (Marangoni) body & surface forces via charge film rupture (dispersion forces) capillary-driven flow (curvature) Non-Homogenous Emitter Electrospray single emitter considerations dependent upon: single emitter geometry single emitter operation array geometry array operation Goal is stable liquid feed with homogenous electrospray over emitter array.

4 P liq,needle =  /R(z) P liq,base =  /r – 1/R base ) P liq,film = 0 curvature-induced flow neglecting gas pressure: - liquid pressure decreases towards base of cone - liquid pressure increase at base due to 1/r - liquid pressure lowest in film Requires external force to stabilize liquid film. thin film stability surface temperature variations drive Marangoni flow body forces drive convective flows (gravitational, ion drag, …) charge accumulation on surface may perturb film evaporation changes surface temperature vapor (ion) recoil may perturb film dispersion forces drive film rupture Film stabilizing/destabilizing mechanisms not understood.

5 Technical Approach – Film Stability One-sided linear stability film evolution: Surface Tension - Disjoining PressureSurface Tension - Gravitational begin with 1D formulation to determine primary film destabilization mechanisms conduct simple validation experiments develop 3D formulation for assessing film stability for specific emitter geometries

6 Technical Approach – Minimum Energy Film Morphology Use Surface Evolver to: determine low energy liquid morphology for emitter array determine linear stability limits of each morphology optimize array geometry for stable liquid feed to emitter tips Minimum energy morphology for fixed liquid volume in a flattened tube for various contact angles. Braun (2008) Surface Evolver – Energy Minimization Code Minimum energy and linear stability map for liquid in a cylindrical tube. Allen, Son & Collicott (2009)

7 Anticipated Results Establish stable liquid film: define the coupling of mechanisms of which stabilize or destabilize thin liquid films – both metal and ionic liquids validate stability model with planar film experiments predict film destabilization modes for emitter geometries optimize emitter geometry and array pattern for stable film morphology Establish stable, homogenous elecrospray: stable, uniform liquid feed to array of electrodes define envelope for operating conditions


Download ppt "Assessing Mechanisms Responsible for Non-Homogenous Emitter Electrospray from Large Arrays of FEEP and Colloid Thrusters."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google