Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

IMD World Competitiveness Index VS Unemployment Lam Ka Man 06015360 Sung Yuk Ling 06007260 Chow Cheuk Yin 06007201 Wan Tai Ho 06009077 Au Chun Lung 06015840.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "IMD World Competitiveness Index VS Unemployment Lam Ka Man 06015360 Sung Yuk Ling 06007260 Chow Cheuk Yin 06007201 Wan Tai Ho 06009077 Au Chun Lung 06015840."— Presentation transcript:

1 IMD World Competitiveness Index VS Unemployment Lam Ka Man 06015360 Sung Yuk Ling 06007260 Chow Cheuk Yin 06007201 Wan Tai Ho 06009077 Au Chun Lung 06015840

2 Academic definition of competitiveness A field of Economic knowledge Analyzes the facts and policies that shape the ability of a nation Create and maintain an environment that sustains more value creation for its enterprises and more prosperity for its people

3 More precisely Competitiveness analyzes how nations and enterprises manage the totality of their competencies to achieve prosperity and profit

4 About WCI The ranking represent a success, economic performance, wealth of a nation The ability of nations create and maintain a competitive environment Investigate the global economic situation WCI and its ranking provide a frame of reference to asses how nations mange their economic future

5 WCI – World Competitiveness Index Computed by IMD - International Institute for Management Development A leading provider of Executive Education located in Swiss

6 WCI – World Competitiveness Index Published in WCY - World Competitiveness Yearbook  World’s most renowned and comprehensive annual report on the competitiveness of nations Ranking and analyzing how a nation’s environment creates and sustains the competitiveness of enterprises

7 WCY - World Competitiveness Yearbook The yearbook benchmarks the performance of 55 countries Based on 323 criteria measuring different facets of competitiveness Analyzes and ranks the ability of nations Create and maintain an environment that sustains the competitiveness of enterprises

8 Why are these economies are chosen? All key players in world markets Impact on the global economy In 2007, added two new countries (Lithuania and Ukraine)

9 Methodology The criteria used to compute the rankings are grouped into 4 main factors divided into 20 sub-factors

10 Methodology Economic Performance Government Efficiency Business Efficiency Infrastructure

11 Economic Performance Domestic economy International trade International investment Employment Prices

12 Government Efficiency Public finance Fiscal policy Institutional framework Business legislation Societal framework

13 Business Efficiency Productivity Labor market Finance Management practices Attitudes and values

14 Infrastructure Basic infrastructure Technological infrastructure Scientific infrastructure Health and environment Education

15 The Golden Rules of Competitiveness Rule 1  Create a stable and predictable legislative environment Rule 2  Work on a flexible and resilient economic structure Rule 3  Invest in traditional and technological infrastructure

16 The Golden Rules of Competitiveness Rule 4  Promote private savings and domestic investment Rule 5  Develop aggressiveness on the international markets as well as attractiveness for foreign direct investment

17 The Golden Rules of Competitiveness Rule 6  Focus on quality, speed and transparency in government and administration Rule 7  Maintain a relationship between wage levels, productivity and taxation Rule 8  Preserve the social fabric by reducing wage disparity and strengthening the middle class

18 The Golden Rules of Competitiveness Rule 9  Invest heavily in education, especially at the secondary level, and in the life-long training of the labor force Rule 10  Balance the economies of proximity and globality to ensure substantial wealth creation, while preserving the value systems that citizens desire

19

20 How to use the World Competitiveness Index ?

21

22

23 World Competitiveness Scoreboard Presents the 2007 overall rankings for the 55 economies covered by the WCY The rankings are calculated on the basis of the 246 ranked criteria included in the Yearbook  127 Hard and 119 Survey data The countries are ranked from the most to the least competitive

24

25

26

27

28 The relationship between WCI and unemployment

29 WCI points and unemployment rate WCI points Unemployment rate (%) USA1004.6 SINGAPORE99.1211.6 HK93.5414.3 LUXEMBERG92.2074.2 DENMARK91.9264.1 SWITZERLAND90.4322.8 ICELAND88.6892 NETHERLAND85.8643.2 SWEDEN84.1194.5 CANADA83.8246 AUSTRIA83.1844.6 AUSTRALIA82.3874.4 NORWAY81.9922.5 IRELAND81.8564.7 CHINA79.4844 GERMANY78.0228.3 FINLAND77.3376.2 TAIWAN76.053.9 NEW ZEALAND75.5063.6 UK75.4475.3 ISRAEL74.3217.6 ESTONIA74.3034.2 MALASYIA74.0913.1 JAPAN72.4053.9 BELGIUM71.5437.2 CHILE68.5677 INDIA63.387.2 FRANCE62.5617.7 KOREA61.5643.2 SPAIN61.2088 LITHUAUIA61.0713.9 CREZH59.6245.1 THAILAND57.7581.6

30 WCI points and unemployment rate SLOVAK57.72211.3 HUNGARY57.6277.2 GREECE57.4317.9 JORDAN57.13213.5 COLOMBIA56.89911.2 PORTUGAL55.9847.9 SOLVENIA55.1724.4 BULGARIA48.7376.6 ITALY48.2685.6 RUSSIA47.3155.9 ROMANIA47.2866 PHILLIPINES47.1637.3 UKRAINE45.4792.5 MEXICO45.3053.9 TURKEY45.2219.2 BRAZIL44.7069.3 SOUTH AFRICA44.47925.5 ARGENTINA43.358.9 POLAND42.7349 CROATIA38.52311.8 INDONESIA37.419.7 VENEZUELA30.9548.3

31 France VS Korea France: rank:29 (62.561) unemployment rate: 7.7% Korea: rank:30 (61.564) unemployment rate: 3.2%

32 France VS Korea France(7.7)Korea(3.2) GDP - real growth rate1.8% (2007 est.)4.9% (2007 est.) GDP - per capita (PPP):$33,800 (2007 est.)$24,600 (2007 est.) Inflation rate (consumer prices): 1.5% (2007 est.)2.5% (2007) Investment (gross fixed):20.7% of GDP (2007 est.)27.8% of GDP (2007 est.) Budget:revenues: $1,311 billion expenditures: $1,372 billion Deficit: 61billion (2007 est.) revenues: $269.7 billion expenditures: $256.6 billion Deficit: 13.1billion (2007 est.) Current account balance:-$35.94 billion (2007 est.)$5.95 billion (2007)

33

34 WCI & Unemployment rate 2007

35 The relation between WCI and unemployment rate (2007 calculation) H0: β1=0 HA: β1≠0 Rejection rule: reject H0 if |t| > tc Let α=0.05 degree of freedom =55-1-1 tc: t0.025, 53≈ 2.0003 From Eview, |t|=4.37584 As |t| > tc, we reject H0. Therefore we conclude that β1 is significantly different form 0.

36 The relation between WCI and unemployment rate After the calculation, we can conclude that WCI has a weak negative relationship with UNEMPLOYMENT RATE.

37 Why the relationship between WCI and unemployment rate are so weak? Only a few components of WCI are directly reflected the Employment/Labor Market.

38 Why the relationship between WCI and unemployment rate are so weak? (con ’ t) The goals of WCI is not measuring the labor market. It ignored many factors which affecting the employment. - The law of protesting labor. - The market power of union. - The welfare of no job workers. - The tradition of the country

39 The law of protesting labor Example: minimum wages. Theoretically, By raising the wage of unskilled and inexperienced workers above the equilibrium level, minimum wage laws raise the quantity of labor supplied and reduce the quantity demanded. The resulting excess supply of labor represents unemployment.

40 The market power of union When the unions are having enough market power. When unions push the wages in unionized industries above the equilibrium level, they create an excess supply of labor. On the other hand, unions can bargain with the company and government. It result the firm can not fire the labor easily. (France)

41 The welfare for unemployed workers the Frictional unemployment. Unemployment insurance is a government policy that, while protesting workers’ incomes  the amount of search unemployment.

42 The tradition of the country For example, Japan’s tradition is lifetime employment Most large firms offer guaranteed lifetime employment. Retirement age is 55.  Therefore, the Japan unemployment rate keeps in low level.

43 WCI has a negative relationship with UNEMPLOYMENT RATE The WCI ranking represent a success, economic performance, wealth of a nation. It can Implied that the higher WCI rank  the higher output (GDP)  lower unemployment rate

44 WCI has a negative relationship with UNEMPLOYMENT RATE Those factors are affecting the output level and GDP level  Such as the Domestic Economy, Fiscal Policy, Productivity & Efficiency. Some factors also affect the quality of labor indirectly  Such as Basic Technological, Health & Environment and Education.

45 WCI has a negative relationship with UNEMPLOYMENT RATE We can conclude that WCI can explain the unemployment rate. But the relation is not too close.


Download ppt "IMD World Competitiveness Index VS Unemployment Lam Ka Man 06015360 Sung Yuk Ling 06007260 Chow Cheuk Yin 06007201 Wan Tai Ho 06009077 Au Chun Lung 06015840."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google