1. 1 Outline r Principles of network applications m App architectures m App requirements r Web and HTTP m Objects vs. root files m Persistent, pipelining, parallel m Cookies m Caching r FTP

2. 2 FTP: the file transfer protocol r transfer file to/from remote host r client/server model m client: side that initiates transfer (either to/from remote) m server: remote host r ftp: RFC 959 r ftp server: port 21 file transfer FTP server FTP user interface FTP client local file system remote file system user at host

3. 3 FTP: separate control, data connections r FTP client contacts FTP server at port 21, specifying TCP as transport protocol r Client obtains authorization over control connection r Client browses remote directory by sending commands over control connection. r When server receives a command for a file transfer, the server opens a TCP data connection to client r After transferring one file, server closes connection. FTP client FTP server TCP control connection port 21 TCP data connection port 20 r Server opens a second TCP data connection to transfer another file. r Control connection: “out of band” r FTP server maintains “state”: current directory, earlier authentication

4. 4 Application layer r Electronic Mail m SMTP, POP3, IMAP r DNS r P2P file sharing

5. 5 Electronic Mail Three major components: r user agents r mail servers r simple mail transfer protocol: SMTP User Agent r a.k.a. “mail reader” r composing, editing, reading mail messages r e.g., Eudora, Outlook, elm, Netscape Messenger r outgoing, incoming messages stored on server user mailbox outgoing message queue mail server user agent user agent user agent mail server user agent user agent mail server user agent SMTP

6. 6 Electronic Mail: mail servers Mail Servers r mailbox contains incoming messages for user r message queue of outgoing (to be sent) mail messages r SMTP protocol between mail servers to send email messages m client: sending mail server m “server”: receiving mail server mail server user agent user agent user agent mail server user agent user agent mail server user agent SMTP

7. 7 Scenario: Alice sends message to Bob 1) Alice uses UA to compose message and “to” bob@someschool.edu 2) Alice’s UA sends message to her mail server; message placed in message queue 3) Client side of SMTP opens TCP connection with Bob’s mail server 4) SMTP client sends Alice’s message over the TCP connection 5) Bob’s mail server places the message in Bob’s mailbox 6) Bob invokes his user agent to read message user agent mail server mail server user agent 1 2 3 4 5 6

8. 8 SMTP: final words r SMTP uses persistent connections r SMTP requires message (header & body) to be in 7- bit ASCII Comparison with HTTP: r HTTP: pull r SMTP: push r both have ASCII command/response interaction, status codes r HTTP: each object encapsulated in its own response msg r SMTP: multiple objects sent in multipart msg

9. 9 Mail message format SMTP: protocol for exchanging email msgs RFC 822: standard for text message format: r header lines, e.g., m To: m From: m Subject: different from SMTP commands! r body m the “message”, ASCII characters only header body blank line

10. 10 Message format: multimedia extensions r MIME: multimedia mail extension, RFC 2045, 2056 r additional lines in msg header declare MIME content type From: alice@crepes.fr To: bob@hamburger.edu Subject: Picture of yummy crepe. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: image/jpeg base64 encoded data....................................base64 encoded data multimedia data type, subtype, parameter declaration method used to encode data MIME version encoded data

11. 11 Mail access protocols r SMTP: delivery/storage to receiver’s server r Mail access protocol: retrieval from server m POP: Post Office Protocol [RFC 1939] authorization (agent server) and download m IMAP: Internet Mail Access Protocol [RFC 1730] more features (more complex) manipulation of stored msgs on server m HTTP: Hotmail, Yahoo! Mail, etc. user agent sender’s mail server user agent SMTP access protocol receiver’s mail server

12. 12 POP3 protocol authorization phase r client commands:  user: declare username  pass: password r server responses m +OK  -ERR transaction phase, client:  list: list message numbers  retr: retrieve message by number  dele: delete r quit C: list S: 1 498 S: 2 912 S:. C: retr 1 S: S:. C: dele 1 C: retr 2 S: S:. C: dele 2 C: quit S: +OK POP3 server signing off S: +OK POP3 server ready C: user bob S: +OK C: pass hungry S: +OK user successfully logged on

13. 13 Outline r Electronic Mail m SMTP, POP3, IMAP r DNS r P2P file sharing

14. 14 DNS: Domain Name System People: many identifiers: m SSN, name, passport # Internet hosts, routers: m IP address (32 bit) - used for addressing datagrams m “name”, e.g., www.yahoo.com - used by humans Q: map between IP addresses and name ? Domain Name System: r distributed database implemented in hierarchy of many name servers r application-layer protocol host, routers, name servers to communicate to resolve names (address/name translation) m note: core Internet function, implemented as application-layer protocol m complexity at network’s “edge”

15. 15 DNS Why not centralize DNS? r single point of failure r traffic volume r distant centralized database r maintenance doesn’t scale! DNS services r Hostname to IP address translation r Host aliasing m Canonical and alias names r Mail server aliasing r Load distribution m Replicated Web servers: set of IP addresses for one canonical name

16. 16 Root DNS Servers com DNS servers org DNS serversedu DNS servers poly.edu DNS servers umass.edu DNS servers yahoo.com DNS servers amazon.com DNS servers pbs.org DNS servers Distributed, Hierarchical Database Client wants IP for www.amazon.com; 1 st approx: r Client queries a root server to find com DNS server r Client queries com DNS server to get amazon.com DNS server r Client queries amazon.com DNS server to get IP address for www.amazon.com

17. 17 DNS: Root name servers r contacted by local name server that can not resolve name r root name server: m contacts authoritative name server if name mapping not known m gets mapping m returns mapping to local name server 13 root name servers worldwide b USC-ISI Marina del Rey, CA l ICANN Los Angeles, CA e NASA Mt View, CA f Internet Software C. Palo Alto, CA (and 17 other locations) i Autonomica, Stockholm (plus 3 other locations) k RIPE London (also Amsterdam, Frankfurt) m WIDE Tokyo a Verisign, Dulles, VA c Cogent, Herndon, VA (also Los Angeles) d U Maryland College Park, MD g US DoD Vienna, VA h ARL Aberdeen, MD j Verisign, ( 11 locations)

18. 18 TLD and Authoritative Servers r Top-level domain (TLD) servers: responsible for com, org, net, edu, etc, and all top-level country domains uk, fr, ca, jp. m Network solutions maintains servers for com TLD m Educause for edu TLD r Authoritative DNS servers: organization’s DNS servers, providing authoritative hostname to IP mappings for organization’s servers (e.g., Web and mail). m Can be maintained by organization or service provider

19. 19 Local Name Server r Does not strictly belong to hierarchy r Each ISP (residential ISP, company, university) has one. m Also called “default name server” r When a host makes a DNS query, query is sent to its local DNS server m Acts as a proxy, forwards query into hierarchy.

20. 20 requesting host cis.poly.edu gaia.cs.umass.edu root DNS server local DNS server dns.poly.edu 1 2 3 4 5 6 authoritative DNS server dns.cs.umass.edu 7 8 TLD DNS server Example r Host at cis.poly.edu wants IP address for gaia.cs.umass.edu

21. 21 requesting host cis.poly.edu gaia.cs.umass.edu root DNS server local DNS server dns.poly.edu 1 2 4 5 6 authoritative DNS server dns.cs.umass.edu 7 8 TLD DNS server 3 Recursive queries recursive query: r puts burden of name resolution on contacted name server iterated query: r contacted server replies with name of server to contact r “I don’t know this name, but ask this server”

22. 22 DNS: caching and updating records r once (any) name server learns mapping, it caches mapping m cache entries timeout (disappear) after some time m TLD servers typically cached in local name servers Thus root name servers not often visited r update/notify mechanisms under design by IETF m RFC 2136 m http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/dnsind-charter.html

23. 23 DNS records DNS: distributed db storing resource records (RR) r Type=NS  name is domain (e.g. foo.com)  value is IP address of authoritative name server for this domain RR format: (name, value, type, ttl) r Type=A  name is hostname  value is IP address r Type=CNAME  name is alias name for some “cannonical” (the real) name www.ibm.com is really servereast.backup2.ibm.com  value is cannonical name r Type=MX  value is name of mailserver associated with name

24. 24 DNS protocol, messages DNS protocol : query and reply messages, both with same message format msg header r identification: 16 bit # for query, reply to query uses same # r flags: m query or reply m recursion desired m recursion available m reply is authoritative

25. 25 DNS protocol, messages Name, type fields for a query RRs in reponse to query records for authoritative servers additional “helpful” info that may be used

26. 26 Outline r Electronic Mail m SMTP, POP3, IMAP r DNS r P2P file sharing

27. 27 P2P file sharing Example r Alice runs P2P client application on her notebook computer r Intermittently connects to Internet; gets new IP address for each connection r Asks for “Hey Jude” r Application displays other peers that have copy of Hey Jude. r Alice chooses one of the peers, Bob. r File is copied from Bob’s PC to Alice’s notebook: HTTP r While Alice downloads, other users uploading from Alice. r Alice’s peer is both a Web client and a transient Web server. All peers are servers = highly scalable!

28. 28 P2P: centralized directory original “Napster” design 1) when peer connects, it informs central server: m IP address m content 2) Alice queries for “Hey Jude” 3) Alice requests file from Bob centralized directory server peers Alice Bob 1 1 1 1 2 3

29. 29 P2P: problems with centralized directory r Single point of failure r Performance bottleneck r Copyright infringement file transfer is decentralized, but locating content is highly centralized

30. 30 Query flooding: Gnutella r fully distributed m no central server r public domain protocol r many Gnutella clients implementing protocol overlay network: graph r edge between peer X and Y if there’s a TCP connection r all active peers and edges is overlay net r Edge is not a physical link r Given peer will typically be connected with < 10 overlay neighbors

31. 31 Gnutella: protocol Query QueryHit Query QueryHit Query QueryHit File transfer: HTTP r Query message sent over existing TCP connections r peers forward Query message r QueryHit sent over reverse path Scalability: limited scope flooding

32. 32 Gnutella: Peer joining 1. Joining peer X must find some other peer in Gnutella network: use list of candidate peers 2. X sequentially attempts to make TCP with peers on list until connection setup with Y 3. X sends Ping message to Y; Y forwards Ping message. 4. All peers receiving Ping message respond with Pong message 5. X receives many Pong messages. It can then setup additional TCP connections

33. 33 Exploiting heterogeneity: KaZaA r Each peer is either a group leader or assigned to a group leader. m TCP connection between peer and its group leader. m TCP connections between some pairs of group leaders. r Group leader tracks the content in all its children.

34. 34 KaZaA: Querying r Each file has a hash and a descriptor r Client sends keyword query to its group leader r Group leader responds with matches: m For each match: metadata, hash, IP address r If group leader forwards query to other group leaders, they respond with matches r Client then selects files for downloading m HTTP requests using hash as identifier sent to peers holding desired file

35. 35 Application Later: Summary r Application architectures m client-server m P2P m hybrid r application service requirements: m reliability, bandwidth, delay r Internet transport service model m connection-oriented, reliable: TCP m unreliable, datagrams: UDP Our study of network apps now complete! r specific protocols: m HTTP m FTP m SMTP, POP, IMAP m DNS

36. 36 Application Layer: Summary r typical request/reply message exchange: m client requests info or service m server responds with data, status code r message formats: m headers: fields giving info about data m data: info being communicated Most importantly: learned about protocols r control vs. data msgs m in-band, out-of-band r centralized vs. decentralized r stateless vs. stateful r reliable vs. unreliable msg transfer r “complexity at network edge”