Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Organizational Notes no study guide no review session not sufficient to just read book and glance at lecture material midterm/final is considered hard.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Organizational Notes no study guide no review session not sufficient to just read book and glance at lecture material midterm/final is considered hard."— Presentation transcript:

1 Organizational Notes no study guide no review session not sufficient to just read book and glance at lecture material midterm/final is considered hard by some students questions will relate to both book and lecture material

2 What is Cognitive Science? … is the interdisciplinary study of mind and intelligence, embracing philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence, neuroscience, linguistics, and anthropology (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cognitive-science/

3 Practical Value Education: –Intelligent tutoring systems –Automatically grading exams Legal: –Distinguishing between true and false memories –Evaluating line-ups Sales –Understanding beliefs and desires Information technology: –Search engines –Building intelligent systems Cognitive scientists might have some things to say about these issues.

4 Most cognitive scientists are cognitive psychologists, computer scientists, or cognitive neuroscientists (from: Schunn et al. 2005)

5 Cognitive Science Computer Science/ ArtificialIntelligence Neuroscience Philosophy Cognitive Psychology Linguistics Understanding Computation Building computer models that learn from the environment To understand limits of theories To understand structure of language To understand how the brain works For behavioral data in various tasks; mental representations and processes We will focus mostly on insights from Cognitive Psychology Interdisciplinary study of intelligent behavior

6 Areas of Study Cognitive psychology/science is about studying internal processes that are often unobservable, e.g.: Perception, Attention, Memory, Visual Imagery, Language, Concept Learning, Reasoning Need converging evidence from different perspectives to really understand cognitive processes ?

7 Levels of Analysis Implementational: –Where does mental activity take place in the brain? –How is processing actually done with neural activity? Algorithmic: –What is the abstract representation for input and output? –What stages are used to process information? –(also known as information processing level) Computational: –Why does the algorithm work well? –What is the goal or purpose of the computation? (Marr, 1982)

8 Levels of Analysis Example

9 Cognitive Neuroscience the study of the relation between cognitive processes and brain activities Potential to measure some “hidden” processes that are part of cognitive theories (e.g. memory activation, attention, “insight”) Measuring when and where activity is happening. Different techniques have different strengths: tradeoff between spatial and temporal resolution

10 Information Processing Information processing models resemble processing in computers – made cognitive psychology popular Idea is that information is processed in a number of stages The major goal of information processing research is to –identify those processes –identify how information is represented

11 Types of Processing Bottom-up processing Top-down processing Parallel processing Serial processing

12 An early version of the information-processing approach  purely bottom up or stimulus-driven

13 A Demonstration of Top-Down Processing

14 (Kleffner & Ramachandran, ’92) Why do we seem to have a fairly robust interpretation of which shapes are concave and convex when the perceptual information is perfectly ambiguous? -> perception affected by knowledge Top-down processing: perception affected by knowledge of world

15 Top down processing: perception affected by memory First time, sine wave speech sounds incomprehensible (to most) After hearing the natural utterance, perception of sine- wave speech seems to be quite different "The steady drip is worse than a drenching rain." (for more info: http://www.haskins.yale.edu/haskins/MISC/SWS/SWS.html) http://psiexp.ss.uci.edu/research/teachingP140C/demos/sinewavespeech.aif http://psiexp.ss.uci.edu/research/teachingP140C/demos/naturalutterance.aif

16 Sound Induced Illusory Flashes Example of parallel and interactive processing: –processing of perceptual information in one modality is often affected by processing in another modality Demo of sound induced illusory flashes: –http://shamslab.psych.ucla.edu/demos/http://shamslab.psych.ucla.edu/demos/ –http://www.cns.atr.jp/~kmtn/soundInducedIllusoryFlash/index.htmlhttp://www.cns.atr.jp/~kmtn/soundInducedIllusoryFlash/index.html –http://www.cns.atr.jp/~kmtn/soundInducedIllusoryFlash2/http://www.cns.atr.jp/~kmtn/soundInducedIllusoryFlash2/ –For more information on this effect see: http://shamslab.psych.ucla.edu/publications/SCR-reprint.pdf http://shamslab.psych.ucla.edu/publications/SCR-reprint.pdf –note: demo might not work on your particular computer Demo shows that visual perception affected by auditory perception

17 Top-down processing Later stages of processing affect earlier stages  can explain effects of Knowledge, memory, expectations and context

18 Parallel vs. Serial Processing To illustrate the difficulty of distinguishing between serial and parallel processing, consider the Sternberg task Goal: what steps are involved in comparing information to memory? How long do these steps take? Task: –give subjects memory sets. E.g. 3 9 7 –Probe memory with targets and foil digits: 9 = “yes”, 6=“no”. Measure reaction time. –Vary the size of these memory sets

19 Typical Sternberg Results Plot reaction time as function of memory set size and type of trial (targets/foils) What are the implications of seeing a linear increase in reaction time as a function of memory set?

20 A serial information processing model for Sternberg task Perceive Stimulus Is it a 3? Is it a 9? 9 Is it a 7? Make Decision yes This serial information processing model predicts a linear increase

21 A parallel information processing model for Sternberg task Perceive Stimulus Is it a 3? Is it a 9? 9 Is it a 7? Make Decision yes This parallel information processing model also predicts a linear increase

22 Identifiability Sometimes, behavioral results do not allow processes and representations to be uniquely identified (e.g. Sternberg task) Identifiability refers to the ability to specify the correct combination of representations and processes used to accomplish a task

23 How can we tell models/theories apart? Need converging evidence to tell theories apart –More behavioral data –Data from cognitive neuroscience –Data from neuropsychology

24 Note Please read book –to review major brain structures and their functions –to review brain imaging techniques See also additional PowerPoint slides available on class website –cogneuro review slides


Download ppt "Organizational Notes no study guide no review session not sufficient to just read book and glance at lecture material midterm/final is considered hard."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google