Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Atomic Mass Evaluation: Present and Future WANG Meng Institute of Modern Physics, CAS ARIS2014, Tokyo, June 2.

Published byCorey Dina Stevenson Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "The Atomic Mass Evaluation: Present and Future WANG Meng Institute of Modern Physics, CAS ARIS2014, Tokyo, June 2."— Presentation transcript:

1 The Atomic Mass Evaluation: Present and Future WANG Meng Institute of Modern Physics, CAS ARIS2014, Tokyo, June 2

2 Outline Introduction atomic mass, measurement, evaluation … Present status publication of AME2012, comparison with AME03… Some considerations about future correlation, workload… …

3 Atomic mass Nuclear physics Nuclear astrophysics Atomic physics Atomic energy Fundamental symmetries Metrology … mass→ binding energy → interaction

4 Mass spectroscopy 19 th century, weights of elements 1913, discovery of isotopism Magic number deformation island of inversion … “100 years of Mass Spectrometry” International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, Volumes 349–350 (2013) Edited by Dr. Yuri Litvinov and Dr. Klaus Blaum

5 5 Mass ratio M[ 33 S + ]/M[ 32 SH + ] Mass measurement: inertial mass energy Relative Measurements Mass measurements Energy released from neutron capture of 32 S 32 S + n - 33 S = 8641.6398(33) keV 33 S- ( 32 S + H) = -8437.29682(30) μu

6 Atomic mass evaluation M.S. Livingston, H.A. Bethe, “Nuclear Physics, C. Nuclear dynamics, experimental”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 9 (1937) 245, XVIII. Nuclear masses, combining data from mass spectroscopy and nuclear reaction/decay In 1950s, A. H. Wapstra created AME, to solve the problem of overdetermination

7 Konig et al., Nucl. Phys. A 28 (1961) 1 Ame1961, Ame1964, Ame1971, Ame1977 Ame1983, Ame1993, Ame2003, Ame2012 Series of the AME

8

9 102 Pd 102 Rh 102 Ru 1961Hi06 1150 （ 6 ） 1986Be53 543.0(0.8) 103 Pd 103 Rh 103 Ru 1970Bo29 7624.6(1.5) 2006Fi.A 7625.6(0.9) 1958Ro09 764(4) 1965Mu09 760(6) 1970Pe04 762(5) 1982Oh04 769(4) 1982Ba69 6232.2(0.3) 2006Fi.A 6232.00(0.17) 1961Hi06 2317(10) 1963Bo17 2325(10) 1983Do11 (p,n) 2332(15) 2011Go23 1203.27(0.36) An example Q ββ : 1172.7(2.4) keV

10 Outline Introduction atomic mass, measurement, evaluation … Present status publication of AME2012, comparison with AME03… Some considerations about future correlation, workload… …

11 December 2012 issue of Chinese Physics C (IOP Science) 3711 Masses 2416 known ground state 232 known isomers 1063 extrapolated 13809 input equations in AME12 5275 mass spectrometry 8534 reactions & decays AME2012 Volume 36 Number 12 December 2012 1157 The NUBASE2012 evaluation of nuclear properties G. Audi, F.G. Kondev, M. Wang, B. Pfeiffer, X. Sun, J. Blachot, M. MacCormick 1287 The AME2012 atomic mass evaluation (I). Evaluation of input data, adjustment procedures G. Audi, M. Wang, A.H. Wapstra, F.G. Kondev, M. MacCormick, X. Xu, B. Pfeiffer 1603 The AME2012 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references M. Wang, G. Audi, A.H. Wapstra, F.G. Kondev, M. MacCormick, X. Xu, B. Pfeiffer a.CSNSM-Orsay b.IMP-Lanzhou c.GSI-Darmstadt d.ANL-Argonne e.MPIK-Heildelberg f.IPN-Orsay For reprints, write to me: wangm@impcas.ac.cnwangm@impcas.ac.cn

12  Ex, J , T 1/2 & decay modes  both ground state & Isomers (T 1/2 >100ns)  Independently evaluated data complete up-to-date credible & reliable properly referenced NUBASE2012 Poster session1- A055

13 Accuracy of masses

14 Comparison of uncertainties σ03/σ12

15 225 new masses Comparison of uncertainties σ03/σ12

16 1000 100 10 -10 -100 -1000 Comparison of values ME03 – ME12 52 Ca: 1754 keV 99Y: 18 σ

17 shell subshell deformation Information from mass

18 H3H3He4He36Ar38Ar40Ar87Rb107Ag109Ag133Cs 8.71E-03 1.11E-075.63285 1.06E-076.2714672 -1.40E-103.59E-093.61E-094.01E-03 4.06E-062.01E-092.04E-091.58E-13840.6494 3.98E-023.13E-063.12E-06-5.04E-104.93E-0343815.16 2.65E-021.96E-062.01E-062.22E-102.25E-033.11899325.7662911 3.85E-02-2.72E-06-3.20E-061.69E-081.58E-040.44435390.5215105442.66677 2.49E-020.160636320.162765045.85E-061.86E-040.407123020.54031179.8692356540624.4 2.18E-02-4.10E-03-3.06E-033.35E-061.00E-040.23287280.2516555.64802122.3052921974735.2 4.66E-02-1.27E-05-1.25E-052.88E-089.03E-050.41321730.36650985.7231064.74542339.44400873.71616 Correlations Covariance matrix provided to CODATA group as request. 5.553018

19 Outline Introduction atomic mass, measurement, evaluation … Present status publication of AME2012, comparison with AME03… Some considerations about future correlation, workload… …

20 Injection ToF Correlation: mass measurement with a storage ring Plenary talk: ZHANG Yuhu, June 5

21

22 Amount of work: reference per year

23 Amount of work: reference + equation kondev@anl.gov Evaluators: M. Wang, G. Audi, F.G. Kondev, M. MacCormick, X. Xu

24  The AME12 & NuBase12 evaluations have been published– significant improvement compared to AME03 & NuBase03 evaluations – more nuclei & better precision.  Individual files are available for download (ascii): http://amdc.impcas.ac.cn  If you need a hard copy – please contact me: wangm@impcas.ac.cnwangm@impcas.ac.cn  The AMDC coordination at IMP-Lanzhou  Next Tables are foreseen in 2016 (electronic publication only) mass.mass12 nubase.mas12 Conclusion Thank you for your attention!

25

26

27 Accepted by ADNDT arXiv:1401.2021v4

28

Download ppt "The Atomic Mass Evaluation: Present and Future WANG Meng Institute of Modern Physics, CAS ARIS2014, Tokyo, June 2."

Similar presentations

Search for key nuclear structure states below 132 Sn M. Górska, M. Pfützner, H. Grawe et al.

Search for key nuclear structure states below 132 Sn M. Górska, M. Pfützner, H. Grawe et al.
Structure of the ECEC candidate daughter 112 Cd P.E. Garrett University of Guelph TRIUMF Excellence Cluster “Universe”, Technische Universität München.

Structure of the ECEC candidate daughter 112 Cd P.E. Garrett University of Guelph TRIUMF Excellence Cluster “Universe”, Technische Universität München.
Penning-Trap Mass Spectrometry for Neutrino Physics

Penning-Trap Mass Spectrometry for Neutrino Physics
2/June/2014 Advances in Radioactive Isotope Science (ARIS2014) the University of Tokyo S. Watanabe A K. Minomo, M. Shimada, S. Tagami, B M. Kimura, C M.

2/June/2014 Advances in Radioactive Isotope Science (ARIS2014) the University of Tokyo S. Watanabe A K. Minomo, M. Shimada, S. Tagami, B M. Kimura, C M.
FRS-ESR Experiments Collaboration. Measured Mass Surface Masses of more than 1100 Nuclides were measured Mass accuracy: SMS 1.5 ∙10 -7 up to 4 ∙10 -8.

FRS-ESR Experiments Collaboration. Measured Mass Surface Masses of more than 1100 Nuclides were measured Mass accuracy: SMS 1.5 ∙10 -7 up to 4 ∙10 -8.
Log ft values in Beta Decay

Log ft values in Beta Decay
“Statistical Approach Using Neural Nets” Nuclear Masses and Half-lives E. Mavrommatis S. Athanassopoulos A. Dakos University of Athens K. A. Gernoth J.

“Statistical Approach Using Neural Nets” Nuclear Masses and Half-lives E. Mavrommatis S. Athanassopoulos A. Dakos University of Athens K. A. Gernoth J.
Proton and Two-Proton Decay of a High-Spin Isomer in 94 Ag Ernst ROECKL GSI Darmstadt and Warsaw University.

Proton and Two-Proton Decay of a High-Spin Isomer in 94 Ag Ernst ROECKL GSI Darmstadt and Warsaw University.
Nuclear Power Plants. What do nuclear power plants release? Energy! How do these power plants provide us with energy? Energy is collected from the nucleus.

Nuclear Power Plants. What do nuclear power plants release? Energy! How do these power plants provide us with energy? Energy is collected from the nucleus.
Boris Pritychenko Nuclear Physics Data Compilation for Nucleosynthesis Modeling, Trento, May 29 – June 1, 2007 MACS and Astrophysical Reaction Rates from.

Boris Pritychenko Nuclear Physics Data Compilation for Nucleosynthesis Modeling, Trento, May 29 – June 1, 2007 MACS and Astrophysical Reaction Rates from.
B. Sun, Minischool on the Physics of NUSTAR, June 8-11, 2009 Mass Measurement Collaboration G. Audi, K. Beckert, P. Beller, F. Bosch, D. Boutin, T. Buervenich,

B. Sun, Minischool on the Physics of NUSTAR, June 8-11, 2009 Mass Measurement Collaboration G. Audi, K. Beckert, P. Beller, F. Bosch, D. Boutin, T. Buervenich,
Nuclear physics input to astrophysics: e.g.  Nuclear structure: Masses, decay half lives, level properties, GT strengths, shell closures etc.  Reaction.

Nuclear physics input to astrophysics: e.g.  Nuclear structure: Masses, decay half lives, level properties, GT strengths, shell closures etc.  Reaction.
Futoshi Minato JAEA Nuclear Data Center, Tokai Theoretical calculations of beta-delayed neutrons and sensitivity analyses 1.

Futoshi Minato JAEA Nuclear Data Center, Tokai Theoretical calculations of beta-delayed neutrons and sensitivity analyses 1.
Oslo, May 21-24, 2007 1 Systematics of Level Density Parameters Till von Egidy, Hans-Friedrich Wirth Physik Department, Technische Universität München,

Oslo, May 21-24, Systematics of Level Density Parameters Till von Egidy, Hans-Friedrich Wirth Physik Department, Technische Universität München,
Mass Measurements at CSRe and Related Physics Yuhu Zhang (Y. H. Zhang) Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Lanzhou 730000, China （

Mass Measurements at CSRe and Related Physics Yuhu Zhang (Y. H. Zhang) Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Lanzhou , China （
The 11 th Inter. Conf. on nucleus-Nucleus Collision, San Antonio Texas, May 27- June 1 Yu-Hu Zhang Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

The 11 th Inter. Conf. on nucleus-Nucleus Collision, San Antonio Texas, May 27- June 1 Yu-Hu Zhang Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Ning Wang 1, Min Liu 1, Xi-Zhen Wu 2, Jie Meng 3 Isospin effects in nuclear mass models Nuclear Structure and Related Topics (NSRT15), 2015.7.14-18, DUBNA.

Ning Wang 1, Min Liu 1, Xi-Zhen Wu 2, Jie Meng 3 Isospin effects in nuclear mass models Nuclear Structure and Related Topics (NSRT15), , DUBNA.
The structure of giant resonances in calcium and titanium isotopes. N.G.Goncharova, Iu.A.Skorodumina Skobelzyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State.

The structure of giant resonances in calcium and titanium isotopes. N.G.Goncharova, Iu.A.Skorodumina Skobelzyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State.
A new approach to estimating the probability for  delayed neutron emission E. A. McCutchan A.A. Sonzogni T.D. Johnson National Nuclear Data Center Brookhaven.

A new approach to estimating the probability for  delayed neutron emission E. A. McCutchan A.A. Sonzogni T.D. Johnson National Nuclear Data Center Brookhaven.
Mass measurements using low energy ion beams -1- C. Thibault 31 mars 2004 Motivations to measure masses Present status Experimental methods for direct.

Mass measurements using low energy ion beams -1- C. Thibault 31 mars 2004 Motivations to measure masses Present status Experimental methods for direct.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google