1. How to Get NSF to Fund Your Social Science Research Robert E. O’Connor, Director Program in Decision, Risk and Management Sciences Division of Social and Economic Sciences Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences National Science Foundation Penn State 2015

2. Workshop Outline Background on the National Science Foundation Social Science Research Opportunities Submission Procedures Separating Awards from Declinations

3. NSF in a Nutshell Independent Agency Supports basic research Uses grant mechanism Low overhead; highly automated Discipline-based structure Cross-disciplinary mechanisms Use of Rotators/IPAs 2014 budget: $7.172 billion

4. National Science Foundation Inspector General National Science Board Director Deputy Director Staff Offices Computer & Information Science & Engineering Engineering Geosciences Mathematics & Physical Sciences Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences Education & Human Resources Budget, Finance & Award Management Information Resource Management Biological Sciences

5. Social and Economic Sciences Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences Office of the Director Science Resources Statistics Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences

6. Why Do You Want NSF Funding? Funds curiosity-driven research Pays full overhead (no match) Provides summer salary support Uses the grant mechanism

7. Opportunities Unsolicited competitions Special solicitations (e.g., IBIS) Rapid response research (RAPID) Early-concept grants for exploratory research (EAGER) CAREER grants Dear Colleague Letter Doctoral dissertation improvement grants Research Coordination Networks

8. Where to Start? www.nsf.gov Check awards by program, keyword, etc. (www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/)www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/ Read solicitation carefully (if not unsolicited competition) Download Grant Proposal Guide (http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_sum m.jsp?ods_key=gpg)http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_sum m.jsp?ods_key=gpg

9. (SES) Social and Economic Sciences (SES) FY 2015 budget: approximately $100 million Decision, Risk, & Management Sciences Economics (Big Dog) Science of Organizations Law and Social Science Methodology, Measurement & Statistics Political Science Science, Technology and Society Sociology Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences

10. SES Target Dates January 15 & August 15 Law and Social Science Political Science Sociology January 16 & August 16 Methods, Measures, and Statistics January 18 & August 18 Decision, Risk, & Management Sciences Economics February 1 & August 1 Science and Society February 2 & September 3 Science of Organizations

11. Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences (BCS) FY 2015 budget: $100 million Archaeology & Archaeometry Cultural Anthropology Cognitive Neuroscience Developmental & Learning Sciences Geography & Regional Science Linguistics Perception, Action, & Cognition Biological Anthropology Social Psychology

12. January 14 & July 14 Cognitive Neuroscience January 15 & July 15 Developmental & Learning Sciences Linguistics Social Psychology January 15 & August 15 Cultural Anthropology Geography & Regional Science January 20 & August 20 Biologica l Anthropology February 1 & August 1 Perception, Cognition and Action July 1 & December 1 Archaeology BCS Target Dates

13. Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Awards Archaeology Cultural Anthropology Decision, Risk, & Management Science Economics Geography & Regional Science Law and Social Science Linguistics Biological Anthropology Political Science Science and Society Sociology Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences

14. Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program Untenured faculty (or comparable) Single scholar award $400,000, 5-years minimum award Three proposals lifetime limit July 1 deadline “Walk on Water” expectation

15. Rapid Response Research (RAPID) Research when data are ephemeral $200,000 maximum; 1 year 5-page project description Internal review only Contact program officer first

16. Early-concept grants for exploratory research (EAGER) Exploratory work on untested, potentially transformative ideas High-risk, high-potential payoff $300,000 maximum; 2 years 8-page descriptive Internal review only Contact program officer first

17. Dear Colleague Letter Example: Stimulating Research Related to the Science of Broadening Participation http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2014/nsf14038/nsf 14038.jsphttp://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2014/nsf14038/nsf 14038.jsp Submit to relevant SBE program Front office to pay half of award

18. Interdisciplinary Behavioral and Social Science Research http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2012/nsf1261 4/nsf12614.htm December 2, 2014 Deadline $1M awards for interdisciplinary SBE science Future uncertain

19. Research Coordination Networks http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_sum m.jsp?pims_id=11691http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_sum m.jsp?pims_id=11691 Support groups of scholars focused on a theme Submit to a program Limited to 5-years, $500,000

20. Special Program: Dynamics of Coupled Natural and Human Systems (CNH) Funds quantitative, interdisciplinary analyses of relevant human and natural system processes and complex interactions at diverse scales First permanent inter-directorate program Now part of the SEES Investment Program Officer: Tom Baerwald

21. Innovations at the Nexus of Food, Energy, and Water New program to replace Water Sustainability and Climate FY2016 budget request is $74,960,000 FY2015 DCL for supplements and workshops March 30, 2015 deadline http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2015/nsf15040/nsf15040.jsp

22. Critical Resilient Interdependent Infrastructure Systems and Processes Integration of engineering, computer science, and social science Three PIs March 20, 2015 deadline http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2015/nsf1553 1/nsf15531.htm Big Future

23. NRT National Science Foundation Research Traineeship Program The new IGERT http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_ key=nsf15542http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_ key=nsf15542 December 22, 2015 letters of intent $3M for 5 years in for interdisciplinary graduate education

24. STEM* Initiatives NSF Graduate STEM Fellows in K-12 Education (GK-12) National STEM Education Distributed Learning (NSDL) Alliances for Broadening Participation in STEM (ABP) As three examples.... * Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics

25. NSF’s Future? FY2016 budget request is a significant increase over 2015 budget The eternal conflict: disciplinary v. inter-disciplinary priorities Threats to social science

26. Proposal Structure 1 Summary (1 page; overview, intellectual merit, broader impacts) Description (15 pages) References (no limit, but….) Biographical sketches (2 pages each) Budget Budget justification (3 pages)

27. Proposal Structure 2 Current and pending support Data Management Plan Post-Doc Mentoring Plan Reviewing Suggestions (optional)

28. Research & Education Communities NSF Proposal Generating Document Program Officer Analysis & Recom- mendation Proposal Process Division Director Concur Organization submits via FastLane Minimum of 3 Reviews Required Ad hoc Panel Both Proposal Processing Unit NSF Program Officer Returned as Inappropriate/Withdrawn Organization Award via DGA Decline 4 months30 days Proposal Preparation Time Proposal received by NSFDiv. Dir. ConcurAward Review of Proposal P.O. Recommend DGA Review & Processing of Award

29. NSF Sources of Reviewers Program Officer’s knowledge References listed in the proposal Google Community of Science and other databases Reviewer’s recommendations Investigator’s suggestions

30. Human Subjects No award for a project involving human subjects can be made without prior Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval of the research activity. IRB approval is not needed at the time of proposal submission.

31. Funding Decisions Program Officer decision Feedback to PI Informal and formal notification Scope of work and budget discussions

32. Two Funding Criteria Intellectual merit Broader impacts

33. Intellectual Merit? NSF funds basic research Intellectual merit means increasing knowledge through developing and examining basic theories or methods

34. Broader Impacts The Project Description must contain, as a separate section within the narrative, a discussion of the broader impacts of the proposed activities. Broader impacts may be accomplished through the research itself, through the activities that are directly related to specific research projects, or through activities that are supported by, but are complementary to the project. NSF values the advancement of scientific knowledge and activities that contribute to the achievement of societally relevant outcomes. Such outcomes include, but are not limited to: full participation of women, persons with disabilities, and underrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM); improved STEM education and educator development at any level; increased public scientific literacy and public engagement with science and technology; improved well-being of individuals in society; development of a diverse, globally competitive STEM workforce; increased partnerships between academia, industry, and others; improved national security; increased economic competitiveness of the United States; and enhanced infrastructure for research and education.

35. Budget Tips Amounts –Reasonable for work -- Realistic –Well justified -- Need established –In-line with program guidelines Eligible costs –Personnel –Equipment –Travel –Other Direct Costs, Subawards –Facilities & Administrative Costs

36. Myths about NSF Only funds scholars at elite graduate institutions Only funds “famous” academics Once declined, you are likely always to be declined Only funds “normal science” Advisory committees make funding decisions

37. Reasons for Declinations “Trust-me” proposal Not feasible –Expertise gaps –Insufficient funding –Too ambitious Incremental contribution Bad luck

38. How to Put Together an Interdisciplinary Team Commit for the long haul –Be wary if untenured –Expect a long development period Find a wise and strong leader –Proposals need coherence –Leaders need to listen and then decide Meet for intellectual as well as task- related purposes

39. NSF vs. NIH NSF tends to be smaller NSF is more open to risky, exploratory, paradigm-challenging work NSF stresses basic research NSF has no scoring system, percentile system NSF program officers make funding decisions NSF uses “revision encouragement” loosely

40. Advice Learn to love rejection Team up E-mail or call Program Officer with specific questions Encourage dissertation improvement grant proposals (check program first)

41. Useful to submit even if declined Revise and resubmit Discover other funding sources Forces thinking Build relationships Receive reviews from experts

42. QUESTIONS?? Contact Bob O’Connor (703) 292-7263 roconnor@nsf.gov