1. Piketty-Capital in the Twenty- First Century Quote 1: “The distribution of wealth is one of today’s most widely discussed and controversial issues. But what do we really know about it’s evolution over the long term?” Wealth≠income Part 1: Theoretical concepts Part 2-3: Empirical findings&historical interpretation Part 4: Predicion and policy advise

2. Quote 2 ”Capitalism automatically generates arbitrary and unsustainable inequalities that radically undermine the meritocratic values on which democratic societies are based” (p. 1)

3. How much of total wealth owned by top-10%? A) 20% B) 30% C) 40% D) 50% E) 60% F) 70% G) 80% H) 90%

7. Causes/background Economic R>g Political (1975-heden) Globalisation  Bargaining power capital (‘race to the bottom’) Weaker unions End of Cold War Saturized product markets Trans-national governance Deregulation (or: reregulation)

9. The power of discounting YearLabor income (g=2%) Income from wealth(5%) 1975100 1976102105 1977104.04110.25 1980110.4127.6 1990134.6207.9 2015220.8704

10. Quote 3 ”A gap r-g of fairly modest size is all that it takes to arrive at an extremely inegalitarian distribution of wealth” (p. 451)

11. Quote 4 ”the average income of the parents of Harvard students is currently about 450.000 (..) Such a finding does not seem entirely compatible with the idea of selection based solely on merit” (p. 485)

12. Quote 5 ”The rich world is rich, but the governments of the rich world are poor. Europe is the most extreme case: it has both the highest level of private wealth in the world and the greatest difficulty in resolving its public debt crisis” (p. 485)

14. Quote 6&7 ”in a democracy, the professed equality of rights of all citizens contrasts sharply with the very real inequality of living conditions” (p. 423) “The top thousandth would then own 60% of global wealth, which is hard to imagine in the framework of existing political institutions unless there is a particulary effective system of repression or an extremely powerful apparatus of persuasion, or perhaps both” (p. 439)

15. On the road to patrimonial capitalism Vautrin’s lesson in Balzac’s Pere Goriot (1835) to Rastignac

17. Final sentence Piketty “Refusing to deal with numbers rarely serves the interests of the least well-off” (p. 577).