Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

GEOCHEMICAL MOBILIZATION OF ARSENIC TO GROUND WATER Sara Baldvins CHEM 4101 December 9, 2011.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "GEOCHEMICAL MOBILIZATION OF ARSENIC TO GROUND WATER Sara Baldvins CHEM 4101 December 9, 2011."— Presentation transcript:

1 GEOCHEMICAL MOBILIZATION OF ARSENIC TO GROUND WATER Sara Baldvins CHEM 4101 December 9, 2011

2 Greatest Mass Poisoning in History  Naturally occurring arsenic (As) contamination in ground water is causing widespread health problems.  35 million in Bangladesh and 6 million in Bengal are at risk.  As poisoning has also been reported in China, Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Thailand, and Taiwan.

3 Analytical Problem Hypothesis  The speciation of arsenic in soils impacts how mobile the arsenic is which contributes to the high concentrations found in the ground water of some regions. Problem Summary  Certain soils easily mobilize As to the ground water.  In these soils certain hydrological, geological, and chemical conditions make arsenic more mobile.

4 Species Separation Methods TechniqueAdvantagesDisadvantages Sequential Extraction Low matrix interference, high yields, can be automated, inexpensive Time consuming, potentially large user error CEHigh resolution, great separations, quick run- times Significant matrix interference, low reproducibility without considerable efforts, small sample size Ion Chrom.Recovery better than 92% for most species, good resolution Loses resolution in presence of other anions, multiple interferences between the As compounds.

5 Sample Prep: Sequential Extraction Once the soil is ground to the appropriate particle size the reagents will be applied stepwise as follows: StepTarget Geologic Phase MgIonically bond As PO 4 Strongly adsorbed As HCl As co-precipitated w/AVS, oxides, and very amorphous Fe oxyhydroxides Ox As co-precipitated w/amorphous Fe oxyhydroxides HNO 3 As co-precipitated w/pyrite and amorphous As 2 S 3 Hot HNO 3 Orpiment and remaining recalcitrant As minerals

6 Analytical Techniques TechniqueAdvantagesDisadvantages HG-AASLeast expensive, LODs good with HG, most commonly used for As detection One species at a time, slow run time, large amount of sample preparation HG-AFSGreat LOD with HG, inexpensive Some species hard to detect, large matrix interferences ICP-MSGood LOD, multiple species at one time, short running time, less sample preparation required Requires standards, expensive, hard to run large amount of extraction sample through

7 Hydride Generator The are large interferences when using AAS to detect As so a Hydride Generator must be used.

8 Atomic Absorption Spectrometer For the PerkinElmer PinAAcle 900T:  With HG precision ≤ 4.5% for As  LOD ≤ 5 ppb  LOQ approx. 1 ppb

9 XANES  X-ray Absorption Near-Edge Structure  The absorption edge corresponding to the liberation of a core electron from an element will exhibit several identifiable features which change depending on the chemical environment of the element being probed.  Answers questions about the oxidation state, coordination, and spin state of the probed element.

10 XANES

11 Conclusions  Multiple methods are generally required for speciation analysis.  Method choice is highly dependant on operating budget since so many samples are needed.  HG-AAS is cheap and effective and a good method for bulk analysis.  XANES adds validity to the HG-AAS findings by providing an exact picture of the structures in the sample.

12 References 1.Berg, J. A., 2008. Hydrogeology of the Surficial and Buried AquifersRegional Hydrogeological Assessment, RHA-6, part B, Plates 1-6. State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Waters. 2.Erickson, Melinda L., and Randal J. Barnes. "Glacial Sediment Causing Regional-Scale Elevated Arsenic in Drinking Water." Ground Water 43(2005a): 796-805. 3.Keon, N.E., C.H. Swartz, D.J. Brabander, C. Harvey, and H.F. Hemond. "Validation of an Arsenic Sequential Extraction Method for Evaluating Mobility in Sediments." Environmental Science and Technology. 35(2001): 2778-2784. 4.Smedley, P. L. and Kinniburgh, D. G., 2002. A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Applied Geochemistry 17, 517-568.


Download ppt "GEOCHEMICAL MOBILIZATION OF ARSENIC TO GROUND WATER Sara Baldvins CHEM 4101 December 9, 2011."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google