1. Chapel: Status/Community Brad Chamberlain Cray Inc. CSEP 524 May 20, 2010

2. Outline Chapel Context Global-view Programming Models Language Overview  Status, Collaborations, Future Work

3. The Chapel Team  Interns Hannah Hemmaplardh (`10–UW) Jonathan Turner (`10 – Boulder) Jacob Nelson (`09 – UW) Albert Sidelnik (`09 – UIUC) Andy Stone (`08 – Colorado St) James Dinan (`07 – Ohio State) Robert Bocchino (`06 – UIUC) Mackale Joyner (`05 – Rice)  Alumni David Callahan Roxana Diaconescu Samuel Figueroa Shannon Hoffswell Mary Beth Hribar Mark James John Plevyak Wayne Wong Hans Zima Sung-Eun Choi, David Iten, Lee Prokowich, Steve Deitz, Brad Chamberlain, and half of Greg Titus

4. Chapel Work  Chapel Team’s Focus: specify Chapel syntax and semantics implement open-source prototype compiler for Chapel perform code studies of benchmarks, apps, and libraries in Chapel do community outreach to inform and learn from users/researchers support users of code releases refine language based on all these activities implement outreach support release code studies specify Chapel

5. Compiling Chapel Chapel Source Code Chapel Executable Chapel Standard Modules Chapel Compiler

6. Chapel Compiler Architecture Generated C Code Chapel Source Code Standard C Compiler & Linker Chapel Executable Chapel Compiler 1-sided Messaging, Threading Libraries Runtime Support Libraries (in C) Chapel Standard Modules Internal Modules (written in Chapel) Chapel-to-C Compiler

7. Chapel and the Community  Our philosophy: help the parallel community understand what we are doing develop Chapel as an open-source project encourage external collaborations over time, turn language over to the community  Goals: to get feedback that will help make the language more useful to support collaborative research efforts to accelerate the implementation to aid with adoption

8. Chapel Release  Current release: version 1.1 (April 15 th, 2010)  Supported environments: UNIX/Linux, Mac OS X, Cygwin  How to get started: 1. Download from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/chapel 2. Unpack tar.gz file 3. See top-level README  for quick-start instructions  for pointers to next steps with the release  Your feedback desired!  Remember: a work-in-progress  it’s likely that you will find problems with the implementation  this is still a good time to influence the language’s design

9. Implementation Status (v1.1)  Base language: stable (some gaps and bugs remain)  Task parallel: stable multi-threaded implementation of tasks, sync variables atomic sections are an area of ongoing research with U. Notre Dame  Data parallel: stable multi-threaded data parallelism for dense domains/arrays other domain types have a single-threaded reference implementation  Locality: stable locale types and arrays stable task parallelism across multiple locales initial support for some distributions: Block, Cyclic, Block-Cyclic  Performance: has received much attention in designing the language yet minimal implementation effort to date

10. Selected Collaborations (see chapel.cray.com for complete list) Notre Dame/ORNL (Peter Kogge, Srinivas Sridharan, Jeff Vetter): Asynchronous Software Transactional Memory over distributed memory UIUC (David Padua, Albert Sidelnik): Chapel for hybrid CPU-GPU computing BSC/UPC (Alex Duran): Chapel over Nanos++ user-level tasking U/Malaga (Rafa Asenjo, Maria Gonzales, Rafael Larossa): Parallel file I/O for whole-array reads/writes University of Colorado, Boulder (Jeremy Siek, Jonathan Turner): Concepts/interfaces for improved support for generic programming PNNL/CASS-MT (John Feo, Daniel Chavarria): Hybrid computing in Chapel; performance tuning for the Cray XMT; ARMCI port ORNL (David Bernholdt et al.; Steve Poole et al.): Chapel code studies – Fock matrices, MADNESS, Sweep3D, coupled models, … U Oregon, Paratools Inc.: Chapel performance analysis using Tau (Your name here?)

11. Collaboration Opportunities (see chapel.cray.com for more details)  memory management policies/mechanisms  dynamic load balancing: task throttling and stealing  parallel I/O and checkpointing  exceptions; resiliency  language interoperability  application studies and performance optimizations  index/subdomain semantics and optimizations  targeting different back-ends (LLVM, MS CLR, …)  runtime compilation  library support  tools debuggers, performance analysis, IDEs, interpreters, visualizers  database-style programming  (your ideas here…)

12. Chapel and Education  If I were to offer a parallel programming class, I’d want to teach about: data parallelism task parallelism concurrency synchronization locality/affinity deadlock, livelock, and other pitfalls performance tuning …  I don’t think there’s a good language out there… …for teaching all of these things …for teaching some of these things at all …until now: I think Chapel has the potential to play a crucial role here

13. Our Next Steps  Expand our set of supported distributions  Continue to improve performance  Continue to add missing features  Expand the set of codes that we are studying  Expand the set of architectures that we are targeting  Support the public release  Continue to support collaborations and seek out new ones  Continue to expand our team

14. Summary Chapel strives to greatly improve Parallel Productivity via its support for… …general parallel programming …global-view abstractions …control over locality …multiresolution features …modern language concepts and themes