Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Nitrogen Losses at a Drainage Systems Scale Bruce Montgomery MN Department of Agriculture.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Nitrogen Losses at a Drainage Systems Scale Bruce Montgomery MN Department of Agriculture."— Presentation transcript:

1 Nitrogen Losses at a Drainage Systems Scale Bruce Montgomery MN Department of Agriculture

2 Red Top Cooperators UM Dept. of Soil, Water & Climate Blue Earth Agronomics Rob & Janice Meyer-Red Top Farms University of Minnesota Extension UM Dept of Biosystems and Ag Eng. Brown Nicollet Environmental Health And the BNC Water Quality Board

3 Why do producers error on the high side? “Research is only tested on garden size plots!” Because most research is developed on small plots under ideal conditions, many farmers believe that University recommendations will not work on production scale operations

4 St. Peter Wellhead Protection Area

5 Community Water Supplies Impacted by Ag

6 Key Project Goals: Red Top Farm Demonstration Bridge the gap between UM water quality plot work and farm fields in terms of evaluating nitrogen and pesticide Best Management Practices (BMPs). Characterize long-term water quantity and quality trends on a field scale using subsurface tile drainage systems. Develop a demonstration site that is meaningful on a local and a regional scale.

7 Red Top is Located in Nicollet County, MN

8

9 Red Top Field Layout West Field East Field

10 Monitoring Equipment at Red Top

11

12 Annual Drainage Losses Red Top Farm 1997-2002 Annual Drainage Loss (Inches) On average, 7” of drainage or 25% of the annual water budget is transported.

13 “Storm Events” account for the majority of the annual drainage losses 58% 74% 76% Annual Drainage Loss (Inches)

14 Monthly Distribution of Sub-surface Drainage 2000 Growing Season-Red Top Typically, April-May- Early June account for approximately 75% of the annual drainage

15 Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Rates to Corn

16 1997 and 1999 N Rate Design

17 St. Peter Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate Validation Project 2000 and 2001 N Fertilizer Rate (Lb/A) on Corn Following Soybeans Bu/Acre

18 New UM Pub

19 Midwestern Water Quality Project Symposium March 11, 2003 Country Inn and Suites Mankato 9:00-3:00 Improve water quality in the Minnesota River Basin Midwestern Water Quality Project Minnesota 2000-2002 CAP’s Partners MN Corn Growers St. Peter Wellhead Partnership University of Minnesota NAICC

20 Nitrate-N Changes After Implementation of UM BMPs: 1995-2001 Nitrate-N Concentrations (mg/L)

21 Nitrate-N Changes After Implementation of UM BMPs: 1995-2001 Nitrate-N Concentrations (mg/L)

22 Corn-95 Beans-96 Corn-97 Beans-98 Corn-99 Beans-00 Corn-01 Nitrate-N Concentration Conclusions NO 3 -N mg/Liter Approaching “background levels” (Corn-Sb rotation with no nitrogen fertilizer)

23 Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Rates to Corn

24 Nitrate-N Changes –Aggressive N Inputs/Management Changes Nitrate-N Concentrations (mg/L)

25 2001 and 2002 Nitrate-N Concentrations in Tile Water

26 Nitrate Concentrations by Growing Seasons and Crop

27 Nitrate-N Concentrations-Entire Monitoring Cycle at Red Top Farms Nitrate-N Concentrations (mg/L)

28 Nitrate-N Losses from Corn and Soybeans 1997-2002 Average N Losses: 22 lb/A/year

29 Ortho-Phosphorus Concentrations Flow-Weighted by Growing Seasons

30 Total Phosphorus Concentrations Flow-Weighted by Growing Seasons

31 Phosphorus (Total) Losses via Sub-Surface Drainage

32 Red Top Benefits: Model Calibration

33 Sands et al, 2003

34

35 Pesticides at a Glance at the Red Top Site APPLIED to FIELD Metolachlor (Dual) Acetochlor (Surpass) Nicosulfuron (Accent) Imazethapyr (Pursuit) Dicamba (Banvel) Atrazine Glyphosate (Roundup) Trifluralin (Treflan) DETECTED in TILE WATER Metolachlor (Dual) Acetochlor (Surpass) Nicosulfuron (Accent) Imazathypyr (Pursuit) Dicamba (Banvel) Atrazine

36

37

38 Seven Mile Creek Watershed Characteristics 85% of the watershed is cropland-mostly prime; Very high % tile drained; Documented water quality challenges

39 Seven Mile Creek High Nitrogen Loading Minor Watershed

40 Seven Mile Creek Significant Phosphorus Loading Minor Watershed

41 Red Top and Seven Mile Creek Nitrate-N “Runoff”: 2000-2001

42 Red Top and Seven Mile Creek Nitrate-N Concentrations: 2000-2001

43 Field (Red Top) vs Watershed Scale (Seven Mile Creek) Nitrate-N Losses

44

45 n Due to the flashy drainage characteristics of these systems, continuous automated monitoring is absolutely critical! n The majority of the drainage and chemical movement occurs in very narrow timeframes. Red Top Farm Demonstration Drainage and Response Times

46 n Implementation of existing Nitrogen BMPs and University of Minnesota Fertilizer Recommendations resulted in a significant reduction in fertilizer inputs (25-30%), maintained yields and appears to have decreased N losses at this site by 40-50%. n Field scale Nitrogen strip validation work both at Red Top and within the St. Peter Source Water Protection Area continued to demonstrate that the UM Fertilizer Recommendations will optimize yields. Red Top Farm Demonstration Nitrogen Management Conclusions

47 General Observations based on the First 5 Years at Red Top Expect to see annual N LOSSES between 15- 25 Lb/A under well managed corn-soybean production; Unlikely that the 10 mg/L drinking water standard can be attained under corn-soybean rotations.

48 Red Top Farm Demonstration Nitrogen Losses in a Nutshell Assuming that nitrate-N levels of 13-15 mg/L under a corn-soybean rotation are “background levels”, this means the following: 1)For every inch of drainage water, there is 3.2 pounds of N loss; (simply calculated by dividing the concentration by the magic number Of 4.4. In this case 14 mg/L divided by 4.4=3.2) 2) Furthermore, since the average annual drainage is 7”, this means that 22 lb/A is lost each year.

49 Red Top Farm Demonstration Nitrogen Management Conclusions n The biggest water quality improvements will be realized through the implementation of basic nitrogen management such as correct rate selection and timing of application.

50 n Monitoring tile drainage systems is a practical methodology for verifying effectiveness of Best Management Practices on a field-scale. n This system is an excellent educational tool for developing the linkage between ag practices and water quality issues. Red Top Farm Demonstration General Conclusions

51 For more information from MDA Staff…….. Bill VanRyswyk-Surface Water Hydrologist, Mankato 507-389-5772 Brian Williams-Advisor, Le Sueur 507-665- 6806 Paul Wotzka-Surface Water Hydrologist, Elba (Whitewater State Park) 507-932-5424 Bruce Montgomery-Unit Supervisor, St. Paul 651-297-7178


Download ppt "Nitrogen Losses at a Drainage Systems Scale Bruce Montgomery MN Department of Agriculture."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google