Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Module II Lecture 4:F-Tests Graduate School 2004/2005 Quantitative Research Methods Gwilym Pryce

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Module II Lecture 4:F-Tests Graduate School 2004/2005 Quantitative Research Methods Gwilym Pryce"— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Module II Lecture 4:F-Tests Graduate School 2004/2005 Quantitative Research Methods Gwilym Pryce g.pryce@socsci.gla.ac.uk

2 2 Plan: (1) Testing a set of linear restrictions – the general case (2) Testing homogenous Restrictions (3) Testing for a relationship – Special Case of Homogenous Restrictions (4) Testing for Structural Breaks

3 3 (1) Testing a set of linear Restrictions - The General Procedure Suppose we want to test whether there are any country specific effects in the relationship between inflation and the money supply: INFL = a + b MS + g 1 COUNTRY 1 + …. + g 42 COUNTRY 2 –I.e. we want to test the following null hypothesis: H 0 : g 1 = g 2 = g 3 =…. = g 42 = 0 Then we can think of this as being equivalent to comparing two regressions, one restricted and one unrestricted:

4 4 The Unrestricted regression is: INFL = a + b MS + g 1 COUNTRY 1 + …. + g 42 COUNTRY 2 The Restricted regression is: INFL = a + b MS We can test whether all the g coefficients equal zero using the F-test:

5 5 The General formula for F: Where: RSS U = restricted residual sum of squares = RSS under H 1 RSS R = unrestricted residual sum of squares = RSS under H 0 r = number of restrictions = diff. in no. parameters between restricted and unrestricted equations df u =df from unrestricted regression = n - k where k is all coefficients including the intercept. NB RSS R is always greater than RSS U since imposing a restriction on an equation can never reduce the RSS

6 6 Using the F-test: If the null hypothesis is true (i.e. restrictions are satisfied) then we would expect the restricted and unrestricted regressions to give similar results –I.e. RSS R and RSS U will be similar –so we accept H 0 when the test statistic gives a small value for F. But if one of the restrictions does not hold, then the restricted regression will have had an invalid restriction imposed upon it and will be mispecified. –  higher residual variation  higher RSS R –so we reject H 0 when the test stat. gives a large value

7 7 Test Procedure: (i) Compute RSS U –Run the unrestricted form of the regression in SPSS and take a note of the residual sum of squares = RSS U (ii) Compute RSS R –Run the restricted form of the regression in SPSS and take a note of the residual sum of squares = RSS R (iii) Calculate r and df U (iv) Substitute RSS U, RSS R, r and df U in the equation for F and find the significance level associated with the value of F you have calculated.

8 8 Example 1: H o : no country effects (R and U regressions have the same dependent variable) Step (i) RSS U = 1835.811

9 9 Step (ii) RSS R = 2097.722

10 10 Step (iii) r and df u r = number of restrictions = difference in no. of parameters between the restricted and unrestricted equations = 3 df u =df from unrestricted regression = n U - k U where k is total number of all coefficients including the intercept = 516 - 5 = 511

11 11 (iv) Substitute RSS U, RSS R, r and df U in the formula for F F = (RSS R - RSS U ) / r = (2097.722 - 1835.811)/3 RSS U /df U 1835.811 / 511 = 87.304 3.593 = 24.298 df numerator = r = 3 df denominator = df U = 511 From Tables, we know that at P = 0.01, the value for F[3,511] would be 3.88 (I.e. Prob(F > 3.88) = 0.01) F we have calculated is > 3.88, so we know that P < 0.01 (I.e. Prob(F > 24.298) <0.01)  Reject Ho

12 12

13 13

14 14 Alternatively use Excel calculator: F-Tests.xls First Paste ANOVA tables of U and R models:

15 15 Second, check cell formulas, & let Excel do the rest:

16 16 Example 2: H o : b 2 + b 3 = 1 (R and U regressions have different dependent variables) (i) Compute RSS U –Run the unrestricted form of the regression in SPSS and take a note of the residual sum of squares = RSS U (ii) Compute RSS R –Run the restricted form of the regression in SPSS by: substituting the restrictions into the equation rearrange the equation so that each parameter appears only once create new variables where necessary and estimate by OLS –and take a note of the residual sum of squares = RSS R (iii) Calculate r and df U (iv) Calculate F and find the significance level

17 17 Unrestricted regression: y = b 1 + b 2 x 2 + b 3 x 3 + u H 0 : b 2 + b 3 = 1; If H 0 is true, then: b 3 = 1 - b 2 and: y = b 1 + b 2 x 2 + (1-b 2 )x 3 + u = b 1 + b 2 x 2 + x 3 - b 2 x 3 + u = b 1 + b 2 (x 2 - x 3 )+ x 3 + u y - x 3 = b 1 + b 2 (x 2 - x 3 )+ u Restricted regression: z = b 1 + b 2 (v)+ u where z = y - x 3 ; v = x 2 - x 3

18 18 Example 3: H o : b 2 = b 3 (R and U regressions have the same dependent variable) Unrestricted regression: y = b 1 + b 2 x 2 + b 3 x 3 + u H 0 : b 2 = b 3 ; H 1 : b 2  b 3 If H 0 is true, then: y = b 1 + b 2 x 2 + b 2 x 3 + u = b 1 + b 2 (x 2 + x 3 ) + u Restricted regression: y = b 1 + b 2 (w)+ u where w = x 2 + x 3 ;

19 19 Example 4: H o : b 3 = b 2 + 1 (R and U regressions have the different dependent variables) Unrestricted regression: Infl = b 1 + b 2 MS_GDP + b 3 MP_GDP + u H o : b 3 = b 2 + 1 If H 0 is true, then: Infl = b 1 + b 2 MS_GDP + (b 2 +1)MP_GDP + u = b 1 + b 2 MS_GDP + b 2 MP_GDP + 1  MP_GDP + u = b 1 + b 2 (MS_GDP + MP_GDP) + MP_GDP + u Infl - MP_GDP = b 1 + b 2 (MS_GDP + MP_GDP) + u Restricted regression: z = b 1 + b 2 (v)+ u where z = Infl - MP_GDP ; v = MS_GDP + MP_GDP

20 20 Step (i) RSS U = 2069.060

21 21 Step (ii) RSS R = 2070.305 SPSS syntax for creating Z and V COMPUTE Z = Infl - MP_GDP. EXECUTE. COMPUTE V = MS_GDP + MP_GDP. EXECUTE. SPSS syntax for Restricted Regression: REGRESSION /MISSING LISTWISE /STATISTICS COEFF OUTS R ANOVA /NOORIGIN /DEPENDENT Z /METHOD=ENTER V. SPSS ANOVA Output:

22 22 Step (iii) r and df u r = number of restrictions = difference in no. of parameters between the restricted and unrestricted equations = 1 df u =df from unrestricted regression = n U - k U where k is total number of all coefficients including the intercept = 516 - 3 = 513

23 23 (iv) Substitute RSS U, RSS R, r and df U in the formula for F F = (RSS R - RSS U ) / r = (2070.305 - 2069.060)/1 RSS U /df U 2069.060 / 513 = 1.245 / 4.033 = 0.309 df numerator = r = 1 df denominator = df U = 513 From Excel = FDIST(0.309,1,513), we know that Prob(F > 0.309) = 0.58 (I.e. 58% chance of Type I Error) –I.e. if we reject H 0 then there is more than a one in two chance that we have rejected H0 incorrectly –  Accept H 0 that b 3 = b 2 + 1

24 24 Using F-Tests.xls:

25 25

26 26 (2) Testing a set of linear Restrictions - When the Restrictions are Homogenous When linear restrictions are homogenous: –e.g. H 0 : b 2 = b 3 = 0 –e.g. H 0 : b 2 = b 3 we do not need to transform the dependent variable of the restricted equation. For restrictions of this type –I.e. where the dependent variable is the same in the restricted and unrestricted regressions we can re-write our F-ratio test statistic in terms of R 2 s:

27 27 F-ratio test statistic for homogenous restrictions: Where: RSS U = unrestricted residual sum of squares = RSS under H 1 RSS R = unrestricted residual sum of squares = RSS under H 0 r = number of restrictions = diff. in no. parameters between restricted and unrestricted equations df u =df from unrestricted regression = n - k where k is all coefficients including the intercept.

28 28 Proof of simpler formula for homogenous restrictions: If the dependent variable is the same in both the restricted and unrestricted equations, then the TSS will be the same We can then make use of the fact that RSS = (1 - R 2 ) TSS, which implies that: RSS R = (1- R R 2 ) TSS RSS U = (1- R U 2 ) TSS

29 29 Proof continued... Substituting RSS R = (1- R R 2 ) TSS and RSS U = (1- R U 2 ) TSS into our original formula for the F-ratio, we find that:

30 30 Example 1: H o : no country effects (R and U regressions have the same dependent variable) Our approach to this restriction when we tested it above was to use the RSSs as follows: Since it is a homogenous restriction (I.e. dep var is same in restricted and unrestricted models), we shall now attempt the same test but using the R 2 formulation of the F-ratio formula: F = (RSS R - RSS U ) / r = (2097.722 - 1835.811)/3 RSS U /df U 1835.811 / 511 = 24.301 Prob(F > F[3,511] 24.298) = 1.028E-14  Reject H 0

31 31 Unrestricted model: R U 2 = 0.139 Restricted model: R R 2 = 0.016

32 32 F = ( R U 2 - R R 2 ) / r = (0.139 - 0.016)/3 = 0.041 = 24.301 (1- R U 2) /df U (1- 0.139) / 511 0.0017

33 33

34 34

35 35 (3) Testing a set of linear Restrictions - When the Restrictions say that b i = 0  i A special case of homogenous restrictions is where we test for the existence of a relationship –I.e. H 0 : all slope coefficients are zero: Unrestricted regression: y = b 1 + b 2 x 2 + b 3 x 3 + u H 0 : b 2 = b 3 = 0; If H 0 is true, then y = b 1 In this case, Restricted regression does no explaining at all and so R R 2 = 0

36 36 And the homogenous restriction F-ratio test statistic reduces to: This is the F-test we came across in MII Lecture 2, and is the one automatically calculated in the SPSS ANOVA table where, r = k -1 df U = n - k

37 37 (4) Testing for Structural Breaks The F-test also comes into play when we want to test whether the estimated coefficients change significantly if we split the sample in two at a given point These tests are sometimes called “Chow Tests” after one of its proponents. There are actually two versions of the test: –Chow’s first test –Chow’s second test

38 38 (a) Chow’s First Test Use where n 2 > k (1) Run the regression on the first set of data (i = 1, 2, 3, … n 1 ) & let its RSS be RSS n1 (2) Run the regression on the second set of data (i = n 1 +1, n 1 +2, …, end of data) & let its RSS be RSS n2 (3) Run the regression on the two sets of data combined (i = 1, …, end of data) & let its RSS be RSS n1 + n2

39 39 (4) Compute RSS U, RSS R, r and df U : –RSS U = RSS n1 + RSS n2 –RSS R = RSS n1 + n2 –r = k = total no. of coeffts including the constant –df U = n 1 + n 2 -2k (5) Use RSS U, RSS R, r and df U to calculate F using the general formula for F and find the sig. Level:

40 40 (b) Chow’s Second Test Use where n 2 < k (I.e. when you have insufficient observations on 2 nd subsample to do Chow’s 1 st test) (1) Run the regression on the first set of data (i = 1, 2, 3, … n 1 ) & let its RSS be RSS n1 (2) Run the regression on the two sets of data combined (i = 1, …, end of data) & let its RSS be RSS n1 + n2

41 41 (3) Compute RSS U, RSS R, r and df U : –RSS U = RSS n1 –RSS R = RSS n1 + n2 –r = n 2 –df U = n 1 - k (4) Use RSS U, RSS R, r and df U to calculate F using the general formula for F and find the sig.:

42 42 Example of Chow’s 1 st Test: n 1 : before 1986: n 2 : 1986 and after

43 43

44 44

45 45 Summary: (1) Testing a set of linear restrictions – the general case (2) Testing homogenous Restrictions (3) Testing for a relationship – Special Case of Homogenous Restrictions (4) Testing for Structural Breaks

46 46 Reading Kennedy (1998) “A Guide to Econometrics”, Chapters 4 and 6 Maddala, G.S. (1992) “Introduction to Econometrics” p. 170-177


Download ppt "1 Module II Lecture 4:F-Tests Graduate School 2004/2005 Quantitative Research Methods Gwilym Pryce"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google