Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Mobile IPv6 & Cellular Telephony Charles E. Perkins Nokia Research Center Mountain View, CA USA

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Mobile IPv6 & Cellular Telephony Charles E. Perkins Nokia Research Center Mountain View, CA USA"— Presentation transcript:

1 1 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Mobile IPv6 & Cellular Telephony Charles E. Perkins Nokia Research Center Mountain View, CA USA http://www.iprg.nokia.com/~charliep charliep@iprg.nokia.com

2 2 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Why Mobile IP? Both ends of a TCP session (connection) need to keep the same IP address for the life of the session. This is the home address, used for end-to-end communication IP needs to change the IP address when a network node moves to a new place in the network. This is the care-of address, used for routing Mobile IP changes the mobility problem into a routing problem managing a dynamic association between a care-of address to a home address, called a binding

3 3 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Mobile IPv6 protocol overview Advertisement from local router contains routing prefix Seamless Roaming: mobile node always uses home address Address autoconfiguration for care-of address Binding Updates sent to home agent & correspondent nodes (home address, care-of address, binding lifetime) Mobile Node “always on” by way of home agent Local Router charliep@nokia.com Home Agent correspondent node with binding correspondent node

4 4 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Mobile IPv6 Design Points Enough Addresses Enough Security Address Autoconfiguration Route Optimization Destination Options Reduced Soft-State

5 5 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Enough Addresses 340 undecillion addresses ( 340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 ) total! Billions of IP-addressable wireless handsets IPv4 address space crunch is already evident recent unfulfilled request to RIPE Pressure driving current deployment of NAT But, multi-level NAT unknown/unavailable Besides, NAT not useful for always on operation Even more IP addresses needed for embedded wireless! Especially interesting for China now 8 million IPv4 addresses and 50+ million handsets

6 6 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Enough Security (almost) Authentication Header mandatory to implement Needed for Binding Update Remote Redirect problem Encapsulating Security Payload mandatory to implement Key distribution still poorly understood PKI? AAAv6 w/ symmetric key?

7 7 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Address Autoconfiguration A new care-of address on every link Stateless Address Autoconfiguration Link-Local Address  Global Address by changing link-local prefix to advertised routing prefix Stateful Autoconfiguration (DHCPv6) Movement Detection by monitoring advertisement of new prefix by hints from physical layer and/or lower-level protocol by monitoring TCP acknowledgements, etc. Routing PrefixMAC address

8 8 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Destination Options used by Mobile IPv6 Destination Options much better than IPv4 options Binding Updates sent in data packets to Correspondent Nodes allows optimal routing with minimal packet overhead SHOULD be supported by all IPv6 network nodes Binding Update also sent (typically with no data) to Home Agent replaces IPv4 Registration Request messages Home Address option better interaction with ingress filtering MUST be supported by all IPv6 network nodes Binding Acknowledgement now sent via ICMP replaces Registration Reply

9 9 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Route Optimization Most Internet devices will be mobile, so we should design for that case for the health of the future Internet Binding Update SHOULD be part of every IPv6 node implementation, according to IETF specification Reduces network load by ~50% (depending on your favorite traffic model) Route Optimization could double Internet-wide performance! reduced latency better bandwidth utilization reduced vulnerability to network partition eliminate any Home Agent bottleneck

10 10 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Improved ICMP messages IPv4 ICMP returns only 8 payload bytes IPv4 home agents could not relay errors insufficient inner header information some data sources might never find out about broken links IPv6 ICMP messages return enough data Also used for anycast home agent discovery

11 11 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Mobile IPv6 status Interactions with IPsec fully worked out Mobile IPv6 testing event Sept 15-17, 1999 Bull, Ericsson, NEC, INRIA Connectathon March 2000 – success! Internet Draft in Last Call ETSI bake-off October 2-6, 2000

12 12 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Hierarchical Mobility Agents Home Agent GMA Often, only one level of hierarchy is being considered LMA Problem: how to reduce latency due to signaling to Home Agent Solution: Localize signaling to Visited Domain Method: Regional Registration

13 13 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Regional registrations Protocol uses Binding Update between the MN and the Visited Domain IPv6 regional registration (Malinen/Perkins) specification uses: signaling between visited domain routers authentication between MN, visited network routers and home agent Destination option (as opposed to the IPv4 solution) Home Agent stores GMA address as the Care-of Address Mobile Node registers only once with Home Agent Mobile node registers locally with GMA

14 14 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Regional Registrations for IPv6 two new functional elements: Gateway Mobility Agent, Regional Mobility Agent participate in registration key distribution to be used for subsequent authentication GMA has a globally routable address that is used as Mobile Node’s Care Of Address (CoA) in binding updates to Home Agent and Correspondent Nodes extension to Mobile IP signaling Regional Binding Update Automatic determination for crossover router Novel packet forwarding mechanism

15 15 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Smooth/Fast/Seamless Handover Smooth handover == low loss Fast handover == low delay 30 ms? Seamless handover == smooth and fast

16 16 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Mobile-controlled seamless handover Mobile sends SHIN (Seamless Handover (SH) Initiate message) New Access Router sends SHREP (SH Request) Previous Access Router sends SHREP (SH Reply) Regional Registration Destination Option SHIN SHREQ SHREP

17 17 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Context Feature Handover Seamless Handover has suboptions to control feature handovers: Header Compression suboption Managed Buffering suboption in future … QoS transfer suboption(?) SHIN contains 32-bit authentication extension SHREQ relays authentication to Previous Access Router New Access Route r Previous Access Router

18 18 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Network Controlled Handover Previous Access Router sends Unsolicited SHREP to new access router Mobile node allows transferred context to be finalized by sending an (authenticated) SHIN SHREPSHIN

19 19 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Buffer management Why do we need buffer management? Avoid loss of packets during handover Needed for VoIP application When to start buffering? When a MN moves to a new access router and there are time critical sessions ongoing IF MN could request buffering just before moving Less buffering space required, but… More prone to sudden failures in communication

20 20 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Header compression IP/UDP/RTP(TCP) header compression is compelling in cellular environments 60/40 byte headers for 20 byte payload for voice Existing standard, mainly RFC 2508, suffers from differential encoding of RTP fields from packet to packet: “error propagation” relying on feedback from the receiver when context is damaged: “delay sensitivity” When the MN changes its IP point of attachment (aka router), header compression state is needed at the new point of attachment to seamlessly continue header compression operation

21 21 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Problem Illustration Compressed packet stream Uncompressed packet stream discard New Router Previous Router

22 22 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Basic framework for header compression in handoff Rule definition: send a Full Header when an otherwise static field changes (default standard behavior) The MN sends a full header when CoA changes The New Router sends full header to the MN Packets sent to previous CoA are forwarded to the MN with compression

23 23 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Cellular architectures Involve SS7 over "control plane" to set up virtual circuits for "user plane" traffic Are highly optimized for voice traffic (low delay, guaranteed bandwidth), not data Tend toward "intelligent network" philosophy which for IP is a misplaced locus of control. Operators want to migrate towards "All-IP" solutions (whatever that means…). We have a tremendous legacy that needs a lot of attention

24 24 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl AAA and Cellular Telephony Terminology Protocol overview Key Distribution Scalability and Performance IETF Status

25 25 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Terminology Authentication – verifying a node’s identity Authorization – for access to resources according to authentication and policy Accounting – measuring utilization Network Access Identifier (NAI) – user@realmuser@realm Challenge – replay protection from local attendant AAAF for foreign domain AAAH for home domain

26 26 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl AAA & Mobile IP protocol overview Advertisement from local attendant (e.g., router) Connectivity request w/ MN-NAI from Mobile Node AAAFAAAH Local Attendant Home Agent charliep@nokia.com AAAH contacts & initializes Home Agent AAAH authenticates & authorizes, starts accounting AAAH, optionally, allocates a home address AAAF looks at realm within MN-NAI to contact AAAH Local Attendant asks AAAF for help

27 27 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Key Distribution New security model just one security association (SA): mobile node  AAAH Mobile IP needs an association between HA  mobile node 3GPP2, others, want also: local attendant  mobile node visited mobility agent  home agent AAAH can dynamically allocate all three of these keys passed back along with authorization and Binding Acknowledgement

28 28 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Brokers Needed when there are 1000’s of domains NAI is perfect to enable this AAAF decides whether to use per realm may prefer bilateral arrangement iPASS, GRIC redirect mode also allowable AAAH AAAF Local Attendant Home Agent

29 29 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Scalability and Performance Single Internet Traversal Brokers Eliminate all unnecessary AAA interaction Handoff between local attendants (routers) can use existing keys from previous router Regional Registration HA can use single regional care-of address per domain

30 30 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Mobile IP/AAA Status AAA working group has been formed Working from experience with RADIUS Mobile IP (v4) AAA requirements draft Last Call “over”, informational RFC due soon Several 3G requirements documents online Mobile IP/AAA extensions draft AAAv6 Internet Draft(s) submitted stateless and stateful variations DIAMETER has been selected for IPv4

31 31 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Other features (needed for IPv6)b Mobility-aware Routers used as mobility agents access control needed at neighbor cache Regional registration eliminates most location update traffic across Internet GGSNs/border routers are candidates for GMA UDP Lite Robust Header Compression AAA  HLR adaptation layer Challenge generation (not from HLR?) Privacy considerations

32 32 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl 3GPP with GPRS Internet PSTN HSS Subscription and Location Directory Call Processing Server/Gatekeeper CPS/GK SGSN Evolution from cellular packet/GPRS BSC/RNC BSS GGSN GPRS GW Traditional BSS with packet data QoS enhancements Mobility agent At GGSN

33 33 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl One (of many) “ALL-IP” visions PSTN HA (mobility within serving ntw) HA FW AAA Server Internet, Intranets Subscriber database FW CPS GW "Slim RNC/BSC" Evolution from general IP networks

34 34 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl CDMA2000 3G micromobility AAA Server HA AAA Server Subscriber database PDSN RNN

35 35 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl CDMA2000 3G micromobility Terminate physical layer distant from “FA” Protected, private n/w between FA and MN PDSN (Packet Data Serving Node) ~ GFA RNN (Radio Network Node) ~ LFA RNN manages the physical layer connection to the mobile node

36 36 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl CDMA2000 3G Requirements GRE encapsulation Reverse Tunneling (RFC 2344) Registration Update Registration Acknowledge Session-specific registration extension contains MN-ID, type, MN Connection-ID contains Key field for GRE

37 37 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl CDMA2000 Registration Update Used for handovers to new RNN Acknowledgement required allows PDSN/old RNN to reclaim resources New authentication extension required Home address  0 Home agent  PDSN Care-of address  RNN

38 38 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl IMT-2000/UMTS/EDGE reqt’s Independent of access technology so should work for non-GSM also Interoperation with existing cellular Privacy/encryption (using IPsec) QoS for Voice/IP and videoconferencing particular concern during handover Fixed/mobile convergence desired

39 39 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl IMT-2000 reqt’s, continued Charge according to QoS attribute request Roaming to diverse access technologies e.g., Vertical IP Route optimization Identification/authorization based on NAI Proxy registration for legacy mobile nodes Signaling for firewall traversal

40 40 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl IMT-2000 reqt’s, continued Reverse tunneling Private networks but, still allow access to networks other than the mobile node’s home network Dynamic home address assignment Dynamic home agent assignment even in visited network even when roaming from one visited network to another

41 41 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl IPv6 status for cellular telephony Has been mandated for 3GPP MWIF recommendation for IPv6 3GPP2 study group favorable towards IPv6 Seems difficult to make a phone call to a handset behind a NAT (not impossible, just expensive and cumbersome and protocol-rich) IETF design team designated for fast/smooth/seamless handover AAA adaptation layer for HLR(HSS) under consideration Smooth evolution from GPRS envisioned

42 42 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Summary and Conclusions Future Internet is largely wireless/mobile IPv6 addressability needed for billions of wireless devices Mobile IPv6 is far better and more efficient than Mobile IPv4 Autoconfiguration is suitable for the mobile Internet Security is a key component for success Seamless handover needed for VoIPv6 AAA has a big role to play for cellular rollout We expect Mobile IPv6 (with AAA & Seamless handover) to be the future 3G++ converged wired/wireless, voice/data network

43 43 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Mobile IPv6 & Cellular Telephony Charles E. Perkins Nokia Research Center Mountain View, CA USA http://www.iprg.nokia.com/~charliep charliep@iprg.nokia.com

44 44 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Two-Level Visited-Domain Hierarchy Internet Home Link GMA Mobile Node Visited Domain Gateway Mobile Agent Correspondent Node Home Agent New Access Router Previous Access Router Binding Update Binding Acknowledgement

45 45 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Two-Level Visited-Domain Hierarchy Internet Home Network WLAN GMA Mobile Node GMA Correspondent Node New Access Router Previous Access Router Home Agent Visited Domain

46 46 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Deep Visited-Domain Hierarchy Internet Router LMA2 GMA AR1 Router AR1 LMA1 Visited Domain AR4 Router Correspondent Node Home Agent

47 47 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Buffer Management Process IP Network Corresponden t Node Start buffering Hand off Previous Access Router New Access Router

48 48 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Buffer Management Process IP Network Correspondent Node Send buffered packets Rtr.Adv

49 49 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Packet Forwarding from previous router Uncompressed header Compressed header Payload IP Network NewCo A Previous Access Router New Access Router Correspondent Node

50 50 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Packet Forwarding to new CoA R2 R1 IP Network CN Partially compressed header Compressed header Payload CN: Correspondent Node

51 51 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl


Download ppt "1 © NOKIA ICCT2000.PPT/ 08/23/00 / HFl Mobile IPv6 & Cellular Telephony Charles E. Perkins Nokia Research Center Mountain View, CA USA"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google