We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
supports HTML5 video
Modified over 4 years ago
Confidence Intervals © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
Statistical InferenceInferences regarding a population are made based on a sample Inferences about population parameters (e.g., μ) are made by examining sample statistics (e.g., sample mean) © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
Statistical Inference2 primary approaches Hypothesis Testing (of a population parameter) Estimation (of a population parameter) Point Estimation Sample mean is an estimate of the population mean Interval Estimation Confidence Intervals Hypothesis Testing vs. Estimation Closely related © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
Confidence Interval A range of values associated with a parameter of interest (such as a population mean or a treatment effect) that is calculated using the data, and will cover the TRUE parameter with a specified probability (if the study was repeated a large number of times) © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
Confidence Interval (CI)Based on sample statistics (estimates of population parameters) The width of the CI provides some information regarding the precision of the estimate Provides both a range of plausible values and a test for the parameter of interest © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
Confidence Interval Roughly speaking: an interval within which we expect the true parameter to be contained. Based on the notion of repeated sampling (similar to hypothesis testing) © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
Confidence Interval The “percent” indicates the probability (based on repeated sampling) that the CI covers the TRUE parameter Not the probability that the parameter falls in the interval The CI is the random entity (that depends on the random sample) The parameter is fixed A different sample would produce a different interval, however the parameter of interest remains unchanged. © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
Illustration We are analyzing a study to determine if a new drug decreases LDL cholesterol. We measure the LDL of 100 people before administering the drug and then again after 12 weeks of treatment. We then calculate the mean change (post-pre) and examine it to see if improvement is observed. © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
Illustration Assume now that the drug has no effect (i.e., the true mean change is 0). Note that in reality, we never know what the true mean is. We perform the study and note the mean change and calculate a 95% CI Hypothetically, we repeat the study an infinite number of times (each time re-sampling 100 new people) © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
Illustration Study 1, Mean=–7, 95% CI (-12, 2). © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
Illustration Remember the true change is zero (i.e., the drug is worthless) 95% of these intervals will cover the true change (0). 5% of the intervals will not cover 0 In practice, we only perform the study once. We have no way of knowing if the interval that we calculated is one of the 95% (that covers the true parameter) or one of the 5% that does not. © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
Example Two treatments are being compared with respect to “clinical response” for the treatment of nosocomial (hospital-acquired) pneumonia The 95% CI for the difference in response rates for the two treatment groups is (-0.116, 0.151) What does this mean? © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
Example (continued) Based upon the notion of repeated sampling, 95% of the CIs calculated in this manner would cover the true difference in response rates. We do not know if we have one of the 95% that covers the true difference or one of the 5% that does not. Thus we are 95% confident that the true between-group difference in the proportion of subjects with clinical response is between and 0.151 © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
Caution Thus, every time that we calculate a 95% CI, then there is a 5% chance that the CI does not cover the quantity that you are estimating. If you perform a large analyses, calculating many CIs for many parameters, then you can expect that 5% of the will not cover the the parameters of interest. © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
CIs and Hypothesis TestingTo use CIs for hypothesis testing: values between the limits are values for which the null hypothesis would not be rejected At the α=0.05 level: We would fail to reject H0: treatment change=0 since 0 is contained in (-0.116, 0.151) We would reject H0: treatment change=-20 since -20 is not contained in (-0.116, 0.151) © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
CIs and Hypothesis TestingWhat would be the conclusion of these hypothesis tests if we wanted to test at α=0.01 or α=0.10? © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
Confidence Interval WidthIt is desirable to have narrow CIs Implies more precision in your estimate Wide CIs have little meaning In general, with all other things being equal: Smaller sample size wider CIs Higher confidence wider CIs Larger variability wider CIs © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
In Practice It is a good idea to provide confidence intervals in an analyses They provide both a test and an estimate of the magnitude of the effect (which p-values do not provide) © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
For Illustration Consider the neuropathy example (insert neuropathy_example.pdf) Sensitivity 48.5 w/ 95% CI (36.9, 60.3) © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
CIs Similar to hypothesis testing:We may choose the confidence level (e.g., 95% α=0.05) CIs may be: 1-sided: (-∞, value) or (value, ∞), or 2-sided (value, value) © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
CIs Some things to think aboutScale of the variable(s): continuous vs. binary (next class) 1-sample vs. 2-sample CI for a population mean CI for the difference between 2 population means σ known or unknown © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
CIs Insert CI1.pdf © Scott Evans, Ph.D.
Hypothesis Testing Goal: Make statement(s) regarding unknown population parameter values based on sample data Elements of a hypothesis test: Null hypothesis.
Sampling: Final and Initial Sample Size Determination
Business Statistics - QBM117 Selecting the sample size.
Nemours Biomedical Research Statistics March 19, 2009 Tim Bunnell, Ph.D. & Jobayer Hossain, Ph.D. Nemours Bioinformatics Core Facility.
Introduction to Biostatistics, Harvard Extension School © Scott Evans, Ph.D.1 Confidence Intervals.
Normality,Sampling & Hypothesis Testing and sample size estimation Jobayer Hossain, PhD Larry Holmes, Jr, PhD October 23, 2008 RESEARCH STATISTICS.
Statistical Inference: Hypothesis Testing
PSY 1950 Confidence and Power December, Requisite Quote “The picturing of data allows us to be sensitive not only to the multiple hypotheses that.
Introduction to Biostatistics, Harvard Extension School © Scott Evans, Ph.D.1 Sample Size and Power.
Copyright © 2005 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc Chapter 10 Introduction to Estimation.
Sample Size Determination
Review for Exam 2 Some important themes from Chapters 6-9 Chap. 6. Significance Tests Chap. 7: Comparing Two Groups Chap. 8: Contingency Tables (Categorical.
Fall 2012Biostat 5110 (Biostatistics 511) Discussion Section Week 8 C. Jason Liang Medical Biometry I.
Thomas Songer, PhD with acknowledgment to several slides provided by M Rahbar and Moataza Mahmoud Abdel Wahab Introduction to Research Methods In the Internet.
INFERENTIAL STATISTICS – Samples are only estimates of the population – Sample statistics will be slightly off from the true values of its population’s.
Objectives (BPS chapter 14)
1 Economics 173 Business Statistics Lectures 3 & 4 Summer, 2001 Professor J. Petry.
1/2555 สมศักดิ์ ศิวดำรงพงศ์
+ Chapter 9 Summary. + Section 9.1 Significance Tests: The Basics After this section, you should be able to… STATE correct hypotheses for a significance.
Chapter 6 Introduction to Statistical Inference. Introduction Goal: Make statements regarding a population (or state of nature) based on a sample of measurements.
© 2019 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.