1. Nutrient cycling & Ecosystem Health READINGS for this lecture series: KREBS chap 27. Ecosystem Metabolism III: Nutrient Cycles KREBS chap 28. Ecosystem Health: Human Impacts; Pp 590 – 600 WEB Downloads

2. NUTRIENT CYCLING Energy – 1-way flow - eventually gets “lost” Nutrients – cycle Organic (living organisms) Inorganic (rocks, air, water) assimilation mineralization

4. Two main types of cycles: 1. Biochemical cycles: Redistribution within an individual organism This relates to r- and K-selection (Biol 303) 2. Biogeochemical cycles: “Local” - exchange occurs within and between terrestrial/aquatic ecosystems “Global” – exchange occurs between atmosphere and terrestrial/aquatic ecosystems

5. Two main types of cycles: 1. Biochemical cycles: Redistribution within an individual organism This relates to r- and K-selection (Biol 303) 2. Biogeochemical cycles: “Local” - exchange occurs within and between terrestrial/aquatic ecosystems “Global” – exchange occurs between atmosphere and terrestrial/aquatic ecosystems e.g. CO 2, SO 2, NOx

6. Krebs Fig. 27.12; p573 SULPHUR CYCLE

7. Krebs Fig. 28.8; p591 CARBON CYCLE respiration photosynthesis

8. Krebs Fig. 27.17; p579 NITROGEN CYCLE

9. 78% of air

10. These figures have: All sorts of rates of transfer We can compare between systems More interesting: What influences the rates? What are the impacts of altering the rates?

11. These figures have: All sorts of rates of transfer We can compare between systems More interesting: What influences the rates? e.g. forms of nutrients, types of organisms What are the impacts of altering the rates? e.g. disturbance, pollution, etc.

12. Compartment Models Quantitative descriptions of storage and movement of nutrients among different compartments of an ecosystem “Coarse” – few broad compartments e.g. plants, herbivores “Fine” – many detailed compartments e.g. separate species

13. Compartment Models POOL – “the quantity of a particular nutrient in a compartment” FLUX – “the quantity moving from one pool to another per unit time” TURNOVER TIME – “the time required for movement of an amount of nutrient equal to the quantity in the pool” (POOL/FLUX)

14. Krebs Fig. 27.2 p562 Phosphorus cycle in a lake (simplified) Turnover time (water): 9.5 (pool) /152 (flux) = 0.06 day

15. NUTRIENT PUMP Any biotic or abiotic mechanism responsible for continuous flux of nutrients through an ecosystem Biotic – tree roots, sea birds, Pacific salmon Abiotic – lake overturn, ocean upwelling

16. Nutrient pump (Terrestrial) Mycorrhizae

19. Soil micelles “CEC” Cation Exchange Capacity

20. Nutrient pumps (Marine) Microbial loop Upwelling

21. Nutrient pump (temperate lake turnover)

22. BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES: A few major points (general principles): 1.Nutrient cycling is never perfect i.e. always losses from system input and output (terrestrial systems) Precipitation Runoff & stream flow Particle fallout from atmosphere Wind loss Weathering of substrate Leaching Fertilizer & pollution Harvesting

23. 3. Relatively 'tight' cycling is the norm 2.Inputs and outputs are small in comparison to amounts held in biomass and recycled 4.Disturbances (e.g. deforestation) often uncouple cycling 5. Gradient from poles to tropics terrestrial systems cont’d…

24. HUBBARD BROOK FOREST Experiments done to: 1.Describe nutrient budget of intact forest 2.Assess effects of logging on nutrient cycles catchments

25. Annual Nitrogen budget for the undisturbed Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest. Values are Kg, or Kg/ha/yr

26. Disturbances (e.g. deforestation) often uncouples cycling, and a consequent:  loss of nutrients (Krebs Fig 27.7 p567)  x13 normal loss of NO 3 in Hubbard Brook  reduction in leaf area  40% more runoff (would have transpired)  more leaching  more erosion, and soil loss  decouples within-system cycling of decomposition and plant uptake processes  all the activities (and products) of spring decomposition get washed away

27. Logging causes decoupling of nutrient cycles and losses of nitrogen as nitrates and nitrites Nitrate losses after logging

28. Concentrations of ions in streamwater from experimentally deforested, and control, catchments at Hubbard Brook. logging Calcium Potassium Nitrate-N

29. H + >Ca ++ >Mg ++ >K + >Na + NH 3, NH 4 NO 2 - NO 3 - 1) Logging causes increased nitrification: 2) H + displace nutrient cations from soil micelles Uncoupling of N-cycle H+H+ H+H+

30. POLARTROPICS DecompositionSlowRapid Proportion nutrients in living biomass Low (mostly in dead organic matter) High CyclingSlowRapid 5. Gradient from poles to tropics

31. “laterites”

32. Relative proportion of Nitrogen in organic matter components ROOTS Polar Tropics Non-forestForest

33. Relative proportion of Nitrogen in organic matter components SHOOTS

34. DECOMPOSITION IF TOO SLOW: Nutrients removed from circulation for long periods Productivity reduced Excessive accumulations of organic matter (e.g. bogs) IF TOO FAST: Nutrient depletion Poor chemistry and physics of soil (e.g. decreased soil fertility, soil moisture and resistance to erosion) (e.g. tropical laterites)

35. WHAT DETERMINES DECOMPOSITION RATES IN FORESTS?  moisture and temperature  pH of litter and the forest floor  more acid promotes fungi, less bacteria  species of plant producing the litter  chemical composition of the litter  C/N ratio - high gives poor decomposition  microbes need N to use C  N often complexed with nasties (e.g. tannin)  o ptimum is 25:1  Douglas fir wood548:1  Douglas fir needles58:1  alfalfa hay18:1  activities of soil fauna e.g. earthworms

36. Decomposition Rates influenced by: temperature moisture pH, O 2 quality of litter soil type (influences bugs) soil animals type of fauna / flora rapid if bacterial slow if fungal

37. RATE OF DECOMPOSITION humid tropical forests about 2 - 3 weeks temperate hardwood forests 1 - 3 years temperate / boreal forests 4 - 30 yr arctic/alpine / dryland forests >40 years generally, rate of decomposition increases with increased amount of litterfall Residence time … the time required for the complete breakdown of one year’s litter fall

38. Residence times (years)

40. Decomposition Rates influenced by: temperature moisture pH, O 2 quality of litter soil type (influences bugs) soil animals type of fauna / flora rapid if bacterial slow if fungal (mineral content, C/N ratio)

42. Plant species % weight loss in 1 year C/N ratio # bacterial colonies # fungal colonies Bact / Fungi ratio Mulberry9025 Redbud7026 White Oak5534 Loblolly pine 4043 Relationship between rate of litter decomposition and litter quality (C/N ratio) Faster decomposition at lower C/N ratios

43. Decomposition Rates influenced by: temperature moisture pH, O 2 quality of litter soil type (influences bugs) soil animals type of fauna / flora rapid if bacterial slow if fungal

44. (J) J A S O N D J F M A 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 % leaf litter remaining 0.5 mm mesh bags 7.0 mm mesh bags

45. Litter decomposers

46. Decomposition Rates influenced by: temperature moisture pH, O 2 quality of litter soil type (influences bugs) soil animals type of fauna / flora rapid if bacterial slow if fungal

47. Plant species % weight loss in 1 year C/N ratio # bacterial colonies # fungal colonies Bact / Fungi ratio Mulberry90256982650264 Redbud70262861870148 White Oak553432188017 Loblolly pine 40431536042 Relationship between rate of litter decomposition and the balance between bacteria and fungi Faster decomposition at higher bact/fungi ratios x10 2