Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

MesoscaleM. D. Eastin Deep Convection: Classification.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "MesoscaleM. D. Eastin Deep Convection: Classification."— Presentation transcript:

1 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin Deep Convection: Classification

2 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin Deep Convection: Classification Types of Convective Storms: Single Cell Storms Multicell Storms Supercell Storms

3 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin The Convective Cell: Ordinary deep convective cumulonimbus (Cb) clouds Have been studied and documented since the late 1800s Single Cell Storms

4 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin The Convective Cell: First detailed documentation of “thunderstorms” was by Horace Byers and Roscoe Braham in the late 1940s Documented all convection that occurred during a 3-month period in a ~100 square mile area near Orlando, FL Data collection included 50 surface stations, 6 balloon launch sites, radar, and aircraft simultaneously flying at 5 altitudes Results described the evolution of an ordinary convective cell in three stages Single Cell Storms

5 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin The Convective Cell: Cumulus Stage:Developing cumulus cloud dominated by an updraft > 10 m/s Minimal updraft tilt No downdrafts Precipitation develops aloft and is suspended by updraft From Byers and Braham (1949) Single Cell Storms

6 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin The Convective Cell: Mature Stage: Cloud extends through depth of the atmosphere Anvil cloud begins to spread out near tropopause Downdraft develops due to precipitation loading and evaporational cooling Precipitation reaches the ground Leading edge of downdraft produces a gust front Single Cell Storms From Byers and Braham (1949)

7 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin The Convective Cell: Dissipating Stage: Precipitation core and downdraft wipe out the updraft Cell becomes dominated by a weak downdraft Light precipitation at the ground Single Cell Storms From Byers and Braham (1949)

8 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin The Convective Cell: Basic building block of all convective systems Lifespan is 30-60 minutes  Occur in environments with: weak vertical shear (< 10 m/s), variable CAPE (500-2000 J/kg), and small CIN ( > -50 J/kg) Motion is roughly the speed and direction of the mean flow in the 0-6 km AGL layer Gust front spreads out equally in all directions and rarely initiates new convective cells Can produce rain, hail, strong winds, but rarely tornadoes Single Cell Storms

9 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin Single Cell Storms The Convective Cell: Basic building block of all convective systems Lifespan is 30-60 minutes  Occur in environments with: weak vertical shear (< 10 m/s), variable CAPE (500-2000 J/kg), and small CIN ( > -50 J/kg) Motion is roughly the speed and direction of the mean flow in the 0-6 km AGL layer Gust front spreads out equally in all directions and rarely initiates new convective cells Can produce rain, hail, strong winds, but rarely tornadoes

10 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin The Multicell Storm: A collection of single-cell storms at various stages in their lifecycle New cell development regularly occurs on gust front flanks Multicell Storms Note: These images are qualitatively consistent with one another Cell 5 Cell 4 Cell 3 Cell 2 Cell 1

11 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin The Multicell Storm: New cell development occurs on the flanks of the gust front where convergence with the ambient storm-relative low-level flow is maximized Individual cell motion (V c ) may be different than the overall storm motion (V s ) Individual cells continue to move at the speed and direction of the mean flow in the 0-6 km AGL layer The storm may move at a speed slower or faster than the mean wind (and in a different direction) depending on which flank has the maximum convergence Multicell Storms

12 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin The Multicell Storm: Main inflow approaches the storm and is lifted by the spreading gust front By the time the updraft has reached the tropopause (anvil cloud), it is often well behind the leading edge of the gust front Downdraft air originates at mid-levels from precipitation loading and evaporational cooling  Updraft and downdraft are well separated, allows the system to live for a much long time than a single cell Multicell Storms

13 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin The Multicell Storm: Common features include a shelf cloud, overshooting tops, and an anvil cloud Lifespan 2-12 hours  Occur in environments with: moderate vertical shear (10-20 m/s) variable CAPE (500-3000 J/kg) small CIN (> -50 J/kg) Can produce copious rainfall, hail, high winds and some tornadoes along the gust front Shelf Cloud Example Multicell Storms

14 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin The Multicell Storm: Often observed in a wide variety of overall system structures Examples include: Squall Lines (all varieties) Bow Echoes Mesoscale Convective Complexes Examples of Multicell Storms on Radar From Houze (1993) Multicell Storms

15 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin The Supercell Storm: Single-cell storm that develops in isolation or splits from a multicell storm  Defining characteristic is a single, quasi-steady, rotating updraft – often observed by radar as a strong “mesocyclone” and with a “hook” echo Most rare, but most dangerous, storm type - can produce large hail and strong, long-lived tornadoes Supercell Storms From Houze (1993)

16 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin The Supercell Storm: Life span up to 8 hours  Motion is often slower than and to the right of the mean flow in the 0-6 km layer  Occur in environments with: strong vertical shear (> 20 m/s) large CAPE (1000-4000 J/kg) small CIN ( > -50 J/kg) Supercell Storms

17 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin The Supercell Storm:  Early radar observations help identify many common structural characteristics during the mature stage of a supercell Forward Flank Downdraft (FFD) Strongest and largest of the downdrafts Located below the primary anvil cloud and separated from primary updraft Associated with the most intense precipitation and gust front Rear Flank Downdraft (RFD) Located adjacent to the primary updraft Associated with mid-level mesocyclone Collocated with the “hook” appendage  Both downdrafts are driven by water loading and evaporational cooling  Note how their two gust fronts create “meso-fronts” similar to an occluded low From Lemon and Doswell (1979) Storm Motion Supercell Storms

18 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin The Supercell Storm:  Early radar observations help identify many common structural characteristics during the mature stage of a supercell Primary Updraft (UD) Helical in structure Updraft speeds can reach 40-50 m/s Located at the occlusion point of the two intersecting gust fronts Located within the “hook” structure Hook Echo (see thick black contour) Distinct notch in the radar reflectivity Location of maximum inflow Location of primary updraft Location of any tornado Caused by the mid-level mesocyclone advecting precipitation around itself Good evidence of a mesocyclone Also called an “inflow notch” Storm Motion Tornado (T) From Lemon and Doswell (1979) Supercell Storms

19 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin The Supercell Storm:  Modern Doppler radar observations continue to show these common features as well as the strong rotation associated with the mid-level mesocyclone Doppler Velocity Outbound Flow Inbound Flow Mesocyclone Supercell Storms

20 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin The Supercell Storm: Bounded Weak Echo Region (BWER) Distinct “gap” of low reflectivity in radar cross-sections Location of the primary updraft Caused by a very strong ascent lofting all precipitation and hail (that normally fall through the updraft) to the upper levels Updraft speeds must be greater than 10 m/s Located within the hook echo Also called an “echo free vault”  Presence of a BWER and a hook echo is good evidence of a very strong and rotating updraft (i.e. a supercell) Supercell Storms

21 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin From Chisholm and Renick (1972) The Supercell Storm: Strong updrafts can produce very large hailstones if the updraft velocity is greater than the fall velocity of the hailstone (up to 20-30 m/s) The “overhang” of a BWER, observed in radar reflectivity, is often composed of small hailstones that are initially ejected from the updraft at upper levels, but fall back into the strong updraft at lower levels This cycle can repeat itself several times, allowing the hailstone to grow larger  A hail trajectory example might follow 1 → 2 → 3 Supercell Storms

22 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin From Burgess (1974) The Supercell Storm: Often “split” into two separate storms After the split, the motion of the storm on the right (left) is to the right (left) of the mean 0-6 km environmental flow Called “right-movers” and “left-movers”  The right-mover usually continues as a long-lived supercell (thanks in part to continued access to the warm, moist low-level inflow from the southeast), and often experiences a slower forward speed  The left-mover usually begins to dissipate (in part due to the right-mover blocking access to the inflow), and often experiences a faster forward speed We will discuss the dynamical processes involved with such events later…… Left Mover (LM) Storm Split Right Mover (RM) Supercell Storms RM LM Mean Wind

23 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin Supercell Varieties A Spectrum of Supercell Types: 1.Classic supercells 2.High-precipitation (HP) supercells 3.Low-precipitation (LP) supercells 4.Shallow (miniature) supercells Classic Supercells: Structure described on previous slides Tend to occur in the Central Great Plains and Midwest (west of Mississippi River) Are capable of producing large hail, violent tornadoes, and strong winds. Classic Supercell

24 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin High-Precipitation (HP) Supercells: Produce more rain than classic supercells Strongest RFDs and FFDs Tend to be less isolated – located at the southern end of squall lines Often occur east of the Mississippi River Are capable of producing large hail, weak tornadoes (rain-wrapped), downbursts, and flash floods Note the Elevation Angles Supercell Varieties

25 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin Low-Precipitation (LP) Supercells: Produce less rain than classic supercells Weakest RFDs and FFDs Tend to be smaller in diameter Most often occur in the High Plains along the dryline Still capable of producing large hail, but tornadoes are less common Note the Elevation Angles Supercell Varieties

26 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin Shallow (or Miniature) Supercells: Small diameter (<6 km) and shallow (<6 km) compared to classic supercells Most often occur in tropical cyclones Small CAPE (<1000 J/kg) confined to lower and middle levels Strong shear (up to 30 m/s) in lower 3 km Capable of producing weak tornadoes Miniature Supercells in Hurriance Ivan Supercell Varieties From Eastin and Link (2009)

27 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin The following questions naturally arise….  Given observations of the environment, which convective storm structure should you anticipate? Single cells Multicells Supercells  What environmental parameters should you look at? Vertical Instability (CAPE and CIN…more in next lecture) Vertical Shear (hodographs…more in next lecture)  What physical processes are responsible for the aforementioned storm structure and evolution? (more to come…) Deep Convection: Classification

28 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin Summary Single Cell Storms History Three Stages (basic characteristics and structure) Significance Multicell Storms Basic Characteristics and Structure Motion and Propagation Varieties Supercell Storms Basic characteristics Defining structures Motion and storm-splitting Varieties (differences in structure and environment) Deep Convection: Classification

29 MesoscaleM. D. Eastin References Atkins, N.T., J.M. Arnott, R.W. Przybylinski, R.A. Wolf, and B.D. Ketcham, 2004: Vortex structure and evolution within bow echoes. Part I: Single-Doppler and damage analysis of the 29 June 1998 derecho. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 2224-2242. Byers, H. R., and R. R. Braham, Jr., 1949: The Thunderstorm. Supt. Of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 287 pp. Burgess, D. W., 1974: Study of a right-moving thunderstorm utilizing new single Doppler radar evidence. Masters Thesis, Dept. Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 77 pp. Chisholm, A. J. and J. H. Renick, 1972: The kinematics of multicell and supercell Alberta hailstorms. Alberta Hail Study, Research Council of Alberta hail Studies, Rep. 72-2, Edmonton, Canada, 24-31. Houze, R. A. Jr., 1993: Cloud Dynamics, Academic Press, New York, 573 pp. Klemp, J. B., and R. Rotunno, 1983: A study of the tornadic region within a supercell thunderstorm. J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 359-377. Lemon, L. R., and C. A. Doswell, 1979: Severe thunderstorm evolution and mesocyclone structure as related to tornadogenesis., Mon. Wea. Rev., 107, 1184–1197. Weisman, M. L., and J. B. Klemp, 1986: Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms. Mesoscale Meteorology and Forecasting, Ed: Peter S. Ray, American Meteorological Society, Boston, 331-358. Wilhelmson, R. B., and J. B. Klemp, 1981: A three-dimensional numerical simulation of splitting severe storms on 3 April 1964. J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 1581-1600.


Download ppt "MesoscaleM. D. Eastin Deep Convection: Classification."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google